Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The purpose of this research was to measure changes in HRQoL during the diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with non-specific symptoms possibly attributable to cancer, to describe their experiences of HRQoL and to merge these findings with intent to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of their HRQoL experience during this stressful life event.
A convergent mixed methods (MM) design was used and involved quantitative data about HRQoL measured by the EORTC-QLQ-C30 instrument and qualitative interview data about patients’ HRQoL experiences. Participants completed the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire prior to and after evaluation. The baseline questionnaire informed the purposive sampling for the qualitative interview study, and open-end questions matched to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 constructs were used in the semi-structured interviews.
A total of 838 patients were enrolled in the quantitative study; 680 (81 %) also completed follow-up. Twenty-one patients participated in interviews. The MM findings are the meta-inferences drawn by looking across the matched quantitative and qualitative findings: physical function, social function, role function, emotional function, cognitive function, social function, symptoms and quality of life.
The survey results illustrate that HRQoL improved over time and the qualitative findings confirmed and further expanded the survey results. The MM analysis underlines that the HRQoL experience cannot be observed independently from context. Participants adapted to their situation over time, and this may change their perceptions of HRQoL. These findings can be used to enhance evidence-based care as clinicians need to be aware of how the context influences the HRQoL experience.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Harcourt, D., Ambler, N., Rumsey, N., & Cawthom, S. J. (1998). Evaluation of a one-stop breast lump clinic: A randomized controlled trial. The Breast, 7, 314–319. CrossRef
Al-Shakhli, H., Harcourt, D., & Kenealy, J. (2006). Psychological distress surrounding diagnosis of malignant and nonmalignant skin lesions at a pigmented lesion clinic. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (JPRAS), 59(5), 479–486. CrossRef
Rohani, C., Abedi, H. A., Omranipour, R., & Langius-Eklof, A. (2015). Health-related quality of life and the predictive role of sense of coherence, spirituality and religious coping in a sample of Iranian women with breast cancer: A prospective study with comparative design. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 40. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Koch, T. (2000). Life quality vs the ‘quality of life’: Assumptions underlying prospective quality of life instruments in health care planning. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 51(3), 419–427. CrossRef
Cox, K. (2003). Assessing the quality of life of patients in phase I and II anti-cancer drug trials: Interviews versus questionnaires. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 56(5), 921–934. CrossRef
Nielsen, T. N., Hansen, R. P., & Vedsted, P. (2010). Symptom presentation in cancer patients in general practice. Ugeskrift for Laeger, 172(41), 2827–2831. PubMed
Jensen, H., Torring, M. L., Olesen, F., Overgaard, J., Fenger-Gron, M., & Vedsted, P. (2015). Diagnostic intervals before and after implementation of cancer patient pathways—A GP survey and registry based comparison of three cohorts of cancer patients. BMC Cancer, 15(1), 308. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Probst, H. B., Hussain, Z. B., & Andersen, O. (2012). Cancer patient pathways in Denmark as a joint effort between bureaucrats, health professionals and politicians—A national Danish project. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 105(1), 65–70. CrossRef
Sundhedsstyrelsen [Ministry of Health]. (2012). Diagnostisk pakkeforløb for patienter med uspecifikke symptomer på alvorlig sygdom, der kunne være kræft [Cancer Patient Pathway (CPP) for patients with serious Non-Specific Symptoms and Signs of Cancer (NSSC-CPP)]. Copenhagen.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Taminiau-Bloem, E. F., van Zuuren, F. J., Koeneman, M. A., Rapkin, B. D., Visser, M. R., Koning, C. C., et al. (2010). A ‘short walk’ is longer before radiotherapy than afterwards: A qualitative study questioning the baseline and follow-up design. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 69-7525-8-69.
Wang, J. H., Adams, I. F., Tucker-Seeley, R., Gomez, S. L., Allen, L., Huang, E., et al. (2013). A mixed method exploration of survivorship among Chinese American and non-Hispanic White breast cancer survivors: The role of socioeconomic well-being. Quality of Life Research, 22(10), 2709–2720. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Masika, G. M., Wettergren, L., Kohi, T. W., & von Essen, L. (2012). Health-related quality of life and needs of care and support of adult Tanzanians with cancer: A mixed-methods study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10, 133-7525-10-133.
Bath-Hextall, F., Jenkinson, C., Kumar, A., Leonardi-Bee, J., Perkins, W., Cox, K., et al. (2013). Longitudinal, mixed method study to look at the experiences and knowledge of non melanoma skin cancer from diagnosis to one year. BMC Dermatology, 13, 13-5945-13-13.
Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045–1053. CrossRef
Moseholm, E., Rydahl-Hansen, S., Overgaard, D., Wengel, H. S., Frederiksen, R., Brandt, M., et al. (2016). Health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression in the diagnostic phase of suspected cancer, and the influence of diagnosis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14(1), 80-016-0484-9.
Moseholm, E., Lindhardt, B. Ø., & Rydahl-Hansen, S. (2016). The experiences of health-related quality of life in patients with non-specific symptoms who undergo a diagnostic evaluation for cancer: A qualitative interview study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. doi: 10.1111/scs.12359. PubMed
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376. CrossRefPubMed
Fayers, P., Aaronson, N., Bjordal, K., Groenvold, M., Curran, D., & Bottomley, A. (2001). The EORTC QLQ- C30 scoring manual (3rd ed.). Brussels: EORTC.
Curry, L., & Nunez-Smith, M. (2015). Mixed methods in health sciences research: A practical primer. United States of America: SAGE Publications Inc.
Polit, D. F. (2008). Nursing research, generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advanced scientific practices. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 57–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 48(11), 1507–1515. CrossRef
Wilson, I. B. (1999). Clinical understanding and clinical implications of response shift. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 48(11), 1577–1588. CrossRef
Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015). The 1 + 1=3 intergration challange. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117. CrossRef
- Health-related quality of life in patients with serious non-specific symptoms undergoing evaluation for possible cancer and their experience during the process: a mixed methods study
B. Ø. Lindhardt
M. D. Fetters
- Springer International Publishing