Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1174-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
This study attempted to compare changes in the Quality-of-Life (QoL) scores after three different first-line anti-cancer treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a real-world clinical setting.
From May 2011 to December 2013, we prospectively measured the QoL scores of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC using the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life—Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire. Each QoL measurement was matched by age and sex with one healthy referent from the National Health Interview Survey. Dynamic changes in patients’ QoL scores and major determinants were repeatedly assessed by construction of a mixed-effects model to adjust for possible confounders.
A total of 336 patients with 577 QoL measurements related to first-line anti-cancer treatments were enrolled. Performance status was the most important predictor of QoL scores in all domains after controlling for potential confounders. With age- and sex-matched healthy subjects as the reference, patients treated with gemcitabine + platinum showed significantly lower scores in multiple physical and psychological domain items in the WHOQOL-BREF. However, pemetrexed + platinum and gefitinib/erlotinib affected patients’ QoL scores in ‘energy/fatigue’ and ‘daily activities’ with smaller magnitudes, and the scores appeared to improve after 3–4 months of treatment.
Patients receiving gemcitabine + platinum as first-line anti-cancer treatment for advanced NSCLC experienced relatively poor QoL scores throughout treatment course. Studies to develop a real-time computerized system automatically updating the mixed-effects model for QoL to facilitate participatory clinical decision making by physicians, patients, and their families merit further research.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
American Cancer Society. (2010). Cancer Facts and Figures 2010. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.
Claassens, L., van Meerbeeck, J., Coens, C., Quinten, C., Ghislain, I., Sloan, E. K., et al. (2011). Health-related quality of life in non-small-cell lung cancer: An update of a systemic review on methodological issues in randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29, 2104–2120. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Lin, C. Y., Yang, S. C., Lai, W. W., Su, W. C., & Wang, J. D. (2015). Rasch models suggested the satisfactory psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life—Brief among lung cancer patients. Journal of Health Psychology,. doi: 10.1177/1359105315603474.
Chen, G., Feng, J., Zhou, C., Wu, Y. L., Liu, X. Q., Wang, C., et al. (2013). Quality of life (QoL) analyses from OPTIMAL (CTONG-0802), a phase III, randomized, open-label study of first-line erlotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Annals of Oncology, 24, 1615–1622. CrossRefPubMed
Grønberg, B. H., Bremnes, R. M., Fløtten, Ø., Amundsen, T., Brunsvig, P. F., Hjelde, H. H., et al. (2009). Phase III study by the Norwegian lung cancer study group: Pemetrexed plus carboplatin compared with gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 3217–3224. CrossRefPubMed
Yao, G., Chung, C. W., Yu, C. F., & Wang, J. D. (2002). Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 101, 342–351. PubMed
The WHOQOL Group, Programme on Mental Health, WHO. (1996). WHOQOL-BREF introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Rosell, R., Carcereny, E., Gervais, R., Vergnenegre, A., Massuti, B., Felip, E., et al. (2012). Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): A multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncology, 13, 239–246. CrossRefPubMed
Phungrassami, T., Katikarn, R., Watanaarepornchai, S., & Sangtawan, D. (2004). Quality of life assessment in radiotherapy patients by WHOQOL-BREF-THAI: A feasibility study. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 87, 1459–1465. PubMed
Scagliotti, G. V., Parikh, P., von Pawel, J., Biesma, B., Vansteenkiste, J., Manegold, C., et al. (2008). Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 3543–3551. CrossRefPubMed
Scagliotti, G. V., Park, K., Patil, S., Rolski, J., Goksel, T., Martins, R., et al. (2009). Survival without toxicity for cisplatin plus pemetrexed versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a risk-benefit analysis of a large phase III study. European Journal of Cancer, 45, 2298–2303. CrossRefPubMed
Zhou, C., Wu, Y. L., Chen, G., Feng, J., Liu, X. Q., Wang, C., et al. (2011). Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncology, 12, 735–742. CrossRefPubMed
- Health-related quality of life after first-line anti-cancer treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in clinical practice
- Springer International Publishing