Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 1/2010

01-02-2010

Health and role functioning: the use of focus groups in the development of an item bank

Auteurs: Milena D. Anatchkova, Jakob B. Bjorner

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 1/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Background

Role functioning is an important part of health-related quality of life. However, assessment of role functioning is complicated by the wide definition of roles and by fluctuations in role participation across the life-span. The aim of this study is to explore variations in role functioning across the lifespan using qualitative approaches, to inform the development of a role functioning item bank and to pilot test sample items from the bank.

Methods

Eight focus groups were conducted with a convenience sample of 38 English-speaking adults recruited in Rhode Island. Participants were stratified by gender and four age groups. Focus groups were taped, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content.

Results

Participants of all ages identified family roles as the most important. There was age variation in the importance of social life roles, with younger and older adults rating them as more important.
Occupational roles were identified as important by younger and middle-aged participants. The potential of health problems to affect role participation was recognized. Participants found the sample items easy to understand, response options identical in meaning and preferred five response choices.

Conclusions

Participants identified key aspects of role functioning and provided insights on their perception of the impact of health on their role participation. These results will inform item bank generation.
vorige artikel The Functional Living Index-Cancer: estimating its reliability based on clinical trial data
volgende artikel Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms
Literatuur
1.
Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent development in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67–92.CrossRef
2.
Conway, M. E. (1988). Theoretical approaches to the study of roles. In M. E. Hardy & K. Cook (Eds.), Role theory perspectives for health professionals (pp. 63–73). Norwalk: Appleton & Lange.
3.
Hardy, M. E., & Hardy, W. (1988). Development of scientific knowledge. In M. E. Hardy & M. E. Conway (Eds.), Role theory: Perspectives for health professionals. Norwalk: Appleton&Lange.
4.
Wiersma, D. (1988). Role functioning as a component of quality of life in mental disorders. In M. E. Hardy & M. E. Conway (Eds.), Role theory: Perspectives for health professionals (pp. 45–56). Norwalk: Appleton&Lange.
5.
Sherbourne, D. C., Stewart, A. L., & Wells, K. B. (1992). Role functioning measures. In A. Stewart & J. E. Ware Jr (Eds.), Measuring functioning and well-being (pp. 205–219). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
6.
World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF—The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO).
7.
Ustun, T. B., Chatterji, S., Bickenbach, J., Kostanjsek, N., & Schneider, M. (2003). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A new tool for understanding disability and health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 565–571.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Badley, E. M. (2008). Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 2335–2345.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Perenboom, R. J., & Chorus, A. M. (2003). Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 577–587.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Schuntermann, M. F. (2005). The implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in Germany: Experiences and problems. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 28, 93–102.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Jette, A. M. (2006). Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Physical Therapy, 86, 726–734.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Mangen, D. J., & Peterson, W. A. (1982). Social roles and social participation. In D. J. Mangen & W. A. Peterson (Eds.), Research instruments in social gerontology Vol. 2. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
Testa, M. A., & Simonson, D. C. (1996). Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine, 334, 835–840.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Graney, M. J. (1982). Social participation roles. In D. J. Mangen & W. A. Peterson (Eds.), Social roles and social participation (pp. 9–42). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
Cardol, M., Brandsma, J. W., de Groot, I. J., van den Bos, G. A., de Haan, R. J., & de Jong, B. A. (1999). Handicap questionnaires: What do they assess? Disability and Rehabilitation, 21, 97–105.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Dijkers, M. P., Whiteneck, G., & El Jaroudi, R. (2000). Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, S63–S80.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Hardy, M. E., & Conway, M. E. (1988). Role theory: Perspectives for health professionals (2nd ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
18.
McDowell, I. (1996). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
Loeppke, R., Hymel, P. A., Lofland, J. H., Pizzi, L. T., Konicki, D. L., Anstadt, G. W., et al. (2003). Health-related workplace productivity measurement: General and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM Expert Panel. Journal of Occupation and Environmental Medicine, 45, 349–359.CrossRef
20.
Lofland, J. H., Pizzi, L., & Frick, K. D. (2004). A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments. Pharmacoeconomics, 22, 165–184.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Mattke, S., Balakrishnan, A., Bergamo, G., & Newberry, S. J. (2007). A review of methods to measure health-related productivity loss. The American Journal of Managed Care, 13, 211–217.PubMed
22.
Ware, J. E., Jr., & Dewey, J. (2000). How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
23.
Goodman, S. H., Sewell, D. R., Cooley, E. L., & Leavitt, N. (1993). Assessing levels of adaptive functioning: The role functioning scale. Community Mental Health Journal, 29, 119–131.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Gandek, B., Sinclair, S. J., Jette, A. M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2007). Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC). American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 57–71.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Haley, S. M., Gandek, B., Siebens, H., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Sinclair, S. J., Tao, W., et al. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 275–283.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Mulcahey, M. J., Haley, S. M., Duffy, T., Pengsheng, N., & Betz, R. R. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 28, 330–335.PubMed
27.
Wilkie, D. J., Judge, M. K., Berry, D. L., Dell, J., Zong, S., & Gilespie, R. (2003). Usability of a computerized PAINReportIt in the general public with pain and people with cancer pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 25, 213–224.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Castel, L. D., Williams, K. A., Bosworth, H. B., Eisen, S. V., Hahn, E. A., Irwin, D. E., et al. (2008). Content validity in the PROMIS social-health domain: A qualitative analysis of focus-group data. Quality of Life Research, 17, 737–749.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Wainer, H., & Mislevy, R. J. (2000). Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. In H. Wainer, N. J. Dorans, R. Flaugher, B. F. Green, L. Mislevy, L. Steinberg, & D. Thissen (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 61–101). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30.
O’Brien, K. (1993). Using focus groups to develop health surveys: An example from research on social relationships and AIDS-preventive behavior. Health Education & Behavior, 20, 361–372.CrossRef
31.
Koopman, W. (2003). Needs assessment of persons with multiple sclerosis and significant others: Using the literature review and focus groups for preliminary survey questionnaire development. Axone, 24, 10–15.PubMed
32.
McLeod, P. J., Meagher, T. W., Steinert, Y., & Boudreau, D. (2000). Using focus groups to design a valid questionnaire. Academic Medicine, 75, 671.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Detmar, S. B., Bruil, J., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., & Bisegger, C. (2006). The use of focus groups in the development of the KIDSCREEN HRQL questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1345–1353.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Barr, J., & Schumacher, G. (2003). Using focus groups to determine what constitutes quality of life in clients receiving medical nutrition therapy: First steps in the development of a nutrition quality-of-life survey. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103, 844–851.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Mangione, C. M., Berry, S., Spritzer, K., Janz, N. K., Klein, R., Owsley, C., et al. (1998). Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: Results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Archives of Ophthalmology, 116, 227–233.PubMed
36.
US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration (2006). Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims.
37.
DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45, S12–S21.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M. H., Noblit, G., & Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1342–1365.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Lawton, J. (2003). Lay experiences of health and illness: Past research and future agendas. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25, 23–40.
40.
Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4, 167–182.CrossRef
41.
Charmaz, K. (1983). Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociology of Health & Illness, 5, 168–195.CrossRef
42.
Hainsworth, M. A. (1994). Living with multiple sclerosis: The experience of chronic sorrow. The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 26, 237–240.PubMed
43.
Anatchkova, M. D. & Bjorner, J. B. (2007). Conceptual Review of Role Functioing Measures Internal report.
44.
Turner-Bowker, D. M., Saris-Baglama, R. N., DeRosa, M, Paulsen, C. A., & Bransfield, C. (2008). Participants’ experience of asthma: Results from a Focus Group Study. Poster presented at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 13th Annual International Meeting, Toronto, Canada. In.
45.
Turner-Bowker, D. M., Saris-Baglama, R. N., DeRosa, M. A., Paulsen, C. A., & Bransfield, C. P. (2009). Using qualitative research to inform the development of a comprehensive outcomes assessment for asthma. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, (in press).
46.
Richardson, M. M., Saris-Baglama, R. N., Anatchkova, M. D., Stevens, L. A., Miskulin, D. C., Turner-Bowker, D. M. et al. (2007). Patient experience of chronic kidney disease (CKD): Results of a Focus Group Study. In.
47.
Billson, J., Steinmeyer, M., Reis, K., & Downes, B. (2007). The impacts of chronic kidney disease on quality of life: Focus group exploration of domains/items for computerized adaptive testing. Technical report prepared for QualityMetric Incorporated: Group Dimensions International.
48.
Conrad, P. (1990). Qualitative research on chronic illness: A commentary on method and conceptual development. Social Science and Medicine, 30, 1257–1263.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Health and role functioning: the use of focus groups in the development of an item bank
Auteurs
Milena D. Anatchkova
Jakob B. Bjorner
Publicatiedatum
01-02-2010
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9570-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2010

Quality of Life Research 1/2010 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Change in health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality in the older adults

OriginalPaper

Women’s perceptions of their husband’s drinking behavior as a risk factor of their health-related quality of life in the postpartum period

OriginalPaper

Impact of road traffic noise annoyance on health-related quality of life: results from a population-based study

Brief Communication

The challenge of validating SF-12 for its use with community-dwelling elderly in Israel

Brief Communication

Utility of the twelve-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) for discriminating depression “caseness” and severity in Spanish primary care patients

OriginalPaper

Mapping analyses to estimate health utilities based on responses to the OM8-30 otitis media questionnaire