Skip to main content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development 5/2021

01-10-2020 | Original Article

Greek Validation of the Factor Structure and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Self Report (SDQ-SR): Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling

Auteurs: Rapson Gomez, Frosso Motti-Stefanidi, Scott Jordan, Vasileios Stavropoulos

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development | Uitgave 5/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The study examined the factor structure and longitudinal measurement invariance over three time points (1-year apart) of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Self Report (SDQ-SR) for ratings provided by adolescents in Greece. It used exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) to achieve these two goals. At time point one, a total of 968 adolescents (males = 508, and females = 460) between 12 and 17.9 years completed the SDQ-SR. In relation to factor structure, ESEM tested the fit of one- to five-factor models. The findings were interpreted as indicating most support for the ESEM model with three factors (the factors being dysregulation, peer problems, and prosocial behaviour). This model showed support for configural invariance and full metric invariance across the three time points. Except for two thresholds, all other thresholds were also invariant across the three time points. Thus, there was good support for longitudinal measurement invariance. The implications of the findings for use of the SDQ-SR are discussed.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R, Ford T (2000). The mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain: HM Stationery Office London. Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R, Ford T (2000). The mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain: HM Stationery Office London.
2.
go back to reference Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V (2003) The Strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Int Rev Psychiatr 15(1–2):173–7 CrossRef Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V (2003) The Strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Int Rev Psychiatr 15(1–2):173–7 CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stone LL, Otten R, Engels RC, Vermulst AA, Janssens JM (2010) Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4-to 12-year-olds: a review. Clin Child Family Psychol Rev 13(3):254–274 CrossRef Stone LL, Otten R, Engels RC, Vermulst AA, Janssens JM (2010) Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4-to 12-year-olds: a review. Clin Child Family Psychol Rev 13(3):254–274 CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 40(11):1337–45 CrossRef Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 40(11):1337–45 CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V (1998) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Eur Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 7(3):125–30 CrossRef Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V (1998) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Eur Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 7(3):125–30 CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 38(5):581–6 CrossRef Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 38(5):581–6 CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Caci H, Morin AJ, Tran A (2015) Investigation of a bifactor model of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatr 24(10):1291–301 CrossRef Caci H, Morin AJ, Tran A (2015) Investigation of a bifactor model of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatr 24(10):1291–301 CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kersten P, Czuba K, McPherson K, Dudley M, Elder H, Tauroa R et al (2016) A systematic review of evidence for the psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Int J Behav Dev 40(1):64–75 CrossRef Kersten P, Czuba K, McPherson K, Dudley M, Elder H, Tauroa R et al (2016) A systematic review of evidence for the psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Int J Behav Dev 40(1):64–75 CrossRef
10.
go back to reference DeVries JM, Gebhardt M, Voß S (2017) An assessment of measurement invariance in the 3-and 5-factor models of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: new insights from a longitudinal study. Personal Individ Differ 119:1–6 CrossRef DeVries JM, Gebhardt M, Voß S (2017) An assessment of measurement invariance in the 3-and 5-factor models of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: new insights from a longitudinal study. Personal Individ Differ 119:1–6 CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Goodman A, Lamping DL, Ploubidis GB (2010) When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 38(8):1179–91 PubMedCrossRef Goodman A, Lamping DL, Ploubidis GB (2010) When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 38(8):1179–91 PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Van Roy B, Veenstra M, Clench-Aas J (2008) Construct validity of the five-factor strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiat 49(12):1304–12 PubMedCrossRef Van Roy B, Veenstra M, Clench-Aas J (2008) Construct validity of the five-factor strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiat 49(12):1304–12 PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Di Riso D, Salcuni S, Chessa D, Raudino A, Lis A, Altoè G (2010) The Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). Early evidence of its reliability and validity in a community sample of Italian children. Personal Individ Differ 49(6):570–575 CrossRef Di Riso D, Salcuni S, Chessa D, Raudino A, Lis A, Altoè G (2010) The Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). Early evidence of its reliability and validity in a community sample of Italian children. Personal Individ Differ 49(6):570–575 CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Richter J, Sagatun Å, Heyerdahl S, Oppedal B, Røysamb E (2011) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ)–self-report. An analysis of its structure in a multiethnic urban adolescent sample. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 52(9):1002–1011 CrossRef Richter J, Sagatun Å, Heyerdahl S, Oppedal B, Røysamb E (2011) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ)–self-report. An analysis of its structure in a multiethnic urban adolescent sample. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 52(9):1002–1011 CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Essau CA, Olaya B, Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous X, Pauli G, Gilvarry C, Bray D et al (2012) Psychometric properties of the strength and difficulties questionnaire from five European countries. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 21(3):232–45 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Essau CA, Olaya B, Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous X, Pauli G, Gilvarry C, Bray D et al (2012) Psychometric properties of the strength and difficulties questionnaire from five European countries. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 21(3):232–45 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rønning JA, Handegaard BH, Sourander A, Mørch W-T (2004) The Strengths and difficulties self-report questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples. Eur Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 13(2):73–82 CrossRef Rønning JA, Handegaard BH, Sourander A, Mørch W-T (2004) The Strengths and difficulties self-report questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples. Eur Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 13(2):73–82 CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mellor D, Stokes M (2007) The factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Eur J Psychol Assess 23(2):105–12 CrossRef Mellor D, Stokes M (2007) The factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Eur J Psychol Assess 23(2):105–12 CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Percy A, McCrystal P, Higgins K (2008) Confirmatory factor analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Eur J Psychol Assess 24(1):43–8 CrossRef Percy A, McCrystal P, Higgins K (2008) Confirmatory factor analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Eur J Psychol Assess 24(1):43–8 CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Goodman A, Goodman R (2011) Population mean scores predict child mental disorder rates: validating SDQ prevalence estimators in Britain. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 52(1):100–108 CrossRef Goodman A, Goodman R (2011) Population mean scores predict child mental disorder rates: validating SDQ prevalence estimators in Britain. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 52(1):100–108 CrossRef
20.
go back to reference van de Looij-Jansen PM, Goedhart AW, de Wilde EJ, Treffers PD (2011) Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire: how important are method effects and minor factors? Br J Clin Psychol 50(2):127–44 PubMedCrossRef van de Looij-Jansen PM, Goedhart AW, de Wilde EJ, Treffers PD (2011) Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire: how important are method effects and minor factors? Br J Clin Psychol 50(2):127–44 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Giannakopoulos G, Tzavara C, Dimitrakaki C, Kolaitis G, Rotsika V, Tountas Y (2009) The factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in Greek adolescents. Ann Gener Psychiatr 8(1):20 CrossRef Giannakopoulos G, Tzavara C, Dimitrakaki C, Kolaitis G, Rotsika V, Tountas Y (2009) The factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in Greek adolescents. Ann Gener Psychiatr 8(1):20 CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yao S, Zhang C, Zhu X, Jing X, McWhinnie CM, Abela JR (2009) Measuring adolescent psychopathology: psychometric properties of the self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a sample of Chinese adolescents. J Adolesc Health 45(1):55–62 PubMedCrossRef Yao S, Zhang C, Zhu X, Jing X, McWhinnie CM, Abela JR (2009) Measuring adolescent psychopathology: psychometric properties of the self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a sample of Chinese adolescents. J Adolesc Health 45(1):55–62 PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ruchkin V, Koposov R, Vermeiren R, Schwab-Stone M (2012) The strength and difficulties questionnaire: russian validation of the teacher version and comparison of teacher and student reports. J Adolesc 35(1):87–96 PubMedCrossRef Ruchkin V, Koposov R, Vermeiren R, Schwab-Stone M (2012) The strength and difficulties questionnaire: russian validation of the teacher version and comparison of teacher and student reports. J Adolesc 35(1):87–96 PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Poulou MS (2013) Emotionality and social behaviour. Hellenic J Psychol 10:47–60 Poulou MS (2013) Emotionality and social behaviour. Hellenic J Psychol 10:47–60
25.
go back to reference Bibou-Nakou I, Markos A, Padeliadu S, Chatzilampou P, Ververidou S (2019) Multi-informant evaluation of students' psychosocial status through SDQ in a national Greek sample. Child Youth Ser Rev 96:47–54 CrossRef Bibou-Nakou I, Markos A, Padeliadu S, Chatzilampou P, Ververidou S (2019) Multi-informant evaluation of students' psychosocial status through SDQ in a national Greek sample. Child Youth Ser Rev 96:47–54 CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Liang L, Yang J, Yao S (2019) Measurement equivalence of the SDQ in chinese adolescents: a horizontal and longitudinal perspective. J Affect Disord 257:439–44 PubMedCrossRef Liang L, Yang J, Yao S (2019) Measurement equivalence of the SDQ in chinese adolescents: a horizontal and longitudinal perspective. J Affect Disord 257:439–44 PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Twyford JM, Buckley L, Moffa K, Dowdy E (2019) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) self-report: factor structure of the self-report form in Latinx youth. Int J Sch Educat Psychol 7(3):187–200 CrossRef Twyford JM, Buckley L, Moffa K, Dowdy E (2019) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) self-report: factor structure of the self-report form in Latinx youth. Int J Sch Educat Psychol 7(3):187–200 CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Brown TA. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research: Guilford Publications. Brown TA. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research: Guilford Publications.
29.
go back to reference Morin AJ, Arens AK, Marsh HW (2016) A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Struct Equat model: Multidiscip J 23(1):116–39 CrossRef Morin AJ, Arens AK, Marsh HW (2016) A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Struct Equat model: Multidiscip J 23(1):116–39 CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Dickey WC, Blumberg SJ (2004) Revisiting the factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: United States, 2001. J Am Acad Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 43(9):1159–67 CrossRef Dickey WC, Blumberg SJ (2004) Revisiting the factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: United States, 2001. J Am Acad Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 43(9):1159–67 CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Stokes M, Mellor D, Yeow J, Hapidzal NF (2014) Do parents, teachers and children use the SDQ in a similar fashion? Qual Quant 48(2):983–1000 CrossRef Stokes M, Mellor D, Yeow J, Hapidzal NF (2014) Do parents, teachers and children use the SDQ in a similar fashion? Qual Quant 48(2):983–1000 CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Marsh HW, Wen Z, Hau K-T, Little TD, Bovaird JA, Widaman KF (2007) Unconstrained structural equation models of latent interactions: contrasting residual-and mean-centered approaches. Struct Equat Model: Multidiscip J 14(4):570–80 CrossRef Marsh HW, Wen Z, Hau K-T, Little TD, Bovaird JA, Widaman KF (2007) Unconstrained structural equation models of latent interactions: contrasting residual-and mean-centered approaches. Struct Equat Model: Multidiscip J 14(4):570–80 CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Marsh HW, Lüdtke O, Robitzsch A, Trautwein U, Asparouhov T, Muthén B et al (2009) Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivar Behav Res 44(6):764–802 CrossRef Marsh HW, Lüdtke O, Robitzsch A, Trautwein U, Asparouhov T, Muthén B et al (2009) Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivar Behav Res 44(6):764–802 CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Asparouhov T, Muthén B (2009) Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structur Equat Model: Multidiscip J 16(3):397–438 CrossRef Asparouhov T, Muthén B (2009) Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structur Equat Model: Multidiscip J 16(3):397–438 CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Marsh HW, Morin AJ, Parker PD, Kaur G (2014) Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 10:85–110 CrossRef Marsh HW, Morin AJ, Parker PD, Kaur G (2014) Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 10:85–110 CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hall CL, Guo B, Valentine AZ, Groom MJ, Daley D, Sayal K et al (2019) The validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms. PloS One 14(6):e0218518 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hall CL, Guo B, Valentine AZ, Groom MJ, Daley D, Sayal K et al (2019) The validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms. PloS One 14(6):e0218518 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Drasgow F, Kanfer R (1985) Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. J Appl Psychol 70(4):662 PubMedCrossRef Drasgow F, Kanfer R (1985) Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. J Appl Psychol 70(4):662 PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Leopold DR, Christopher ME, Burns GL, Becker SP, Olson RK, Willcutt EG (2016) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and sluggish cognitive tempo throughout childhood: temporal invariance and stability from preschool through ninth grade. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 57(9):1066–74 CrossRef Leopold DR, Christopher ME, Burns GL, Becker SP, Olson RK, Willcutt EG (2016) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and sluggish cognitive tempo throughout childhood: temporal invariance and stability from preschool through ninth grade. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 57(9):1066–74 CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Cole DA, Martin JM, Jacquez FM, Tram JM, Zelkowitz R, Nick EA et al (2017) Time-varying and time-invariant dimensions of depression in children and adolescents: implications for cross-informant agreement. J Abnor Psychol 126(5):635 CrossRef Cole DA, Martin JM, Jacquez FM, Tram JM, Zelkowitz R, Nick EA et al (2017) Time-varying and time-invariant dimensions of depression in children and adolescents: implications for cross-informant agreement. J Abnor Psychol 126(5):635 CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Motti-Stefanidi F, Pavlopoulos V, Tantaros S (2011) Parent-adolescent conflict and adolescents' adaptation: a longitudinal study of Albanian immigrant youth living in Greece. IOS Press 5(1–2):57–71 Motti-Stefanidi F, Pavlopoulos V, Tantaros S (2011) Parent-adolescent conflict and adolescents' adaptation: a longitudinal study of Albanian immigrant youth living in Greece. IOS Press 5(1–2):57–71
41.
go back to reference Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL (2005) Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Int J Test 5(2):159–68 CrossRef Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL (2005) Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Int J Test 5(2):159–68 CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Bullinger M, Anderson R, Cella D, Aaronson N (1993) Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Qual Res 2(6):451–9 Bullinger M, Anderson R, Cella D, Aaronson N (1993) Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Qual Res 2(6):451–9
43.
go back to reference Muthén L, Muthén B (2012) Mplus statistical modeling software: Release 7.0. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén Muthén L, Muthén B (2012) Mplus statistical modeling software: Release 7.0. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén
44.
go back to reference Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard PÉ, Savalei V (2012) When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods 17(3):354 PubMedCrossRef Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard PÉ, Savalei V (2012) When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods 17(3):354 PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Lubke GH, Muthén BO (2004) Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structr Equat Model 11(4):514–34 CrossRef Lubke GH, Muthén BO (2004) Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structr Equat Model 11(4):514–34 CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Beauducel A, Herzberg PY (2006) On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structur Equat Model 13(2):186–203 CrossRef Beauducel A, Herzberg PY (2006) On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structur Equat Model 13(2):186–203 CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics Boston. MA: Allyn and Bacon 5: 2007 Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics Boston. MA: Allyn and Bacon 5: 2007
48.
go back to reference Costello AB, Best Osborne J (2005) Practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Evaluat 10:1–9 Costello AB, Best Osborne J (2005) Practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Evaluat 10:1–9
49.
go back to reference Guo B, Kaylor-Hughes C, Garland A, Nixon N, Sweeney T, Simpson S et al (2017) Factor structure and longitudinal measurement invariance of PHQ-9 for specialist mental health care patients with persistent major depressive disorder: exploratory structural equation modelling. J Affect Disord 219:1–8 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Guo B, Kaylor-Hughes C, Garland A, Nixon N, Sweeney T, Simpson S et al (2017) Factor structure and longitudinal measurement invariance of PHQ-9 for specialist mental health care patients with persistent major depressive disorder: exploratory structural equation modelling. J Affect Disord 219:1–8 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Meredith W (1993) Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58(4):525–43 CrossRef Meredith W (1993) Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58(4):525–43 CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods 3(1):4–70 CrossRef Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods 3(1):4–70 CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Hu L-t, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3(4):424 CrossRef Hu L-t, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3(4):424 CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structur Equat Model 9(2):233–55 CrossRef Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structur Equat Model 9(2):233–55 CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Chen FF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structur Equat Model: Multidiscip J 14(3):464–504 CrossRef Chen FF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structur Equat Model: Multidiscip J 14(3):464–504 CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Deutz MH, Shi Q, Vossen HG, Huijding J, Prinzie P, Deković M et al (2018) Evaluation of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire-dysregulation profile (SDQ-DP). Psychol Assess 30(9):1174 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Deutz MH, Shi Q, Vossen HG, Huijding J, Prinzie P, Deković M et al (2018) Evaluation of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire-dysregulation profile (SDQ-DP). Psychol Assess 30(9):1174 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Holtmann M, Becker A, Banaschewski T, Rothenberger A, Roessner V (2011) Psychometric validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire-dysregulation profile. Psychopathology 44(1):53–9 PubMedCrossRef Holtmann M, Becker A, Banaschewski T, Rothenberger A, Roessner V (2011) Psychometric validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire-dysregulation profile. Psychopathology 44(1):53–9 PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Kunze B, Wang B, Isensee C, Schlack R, Ravens-Sieberer U, Klasen F et al (2018) Gender associated developmental trajectories of SDQ-dysregulation profile and its predictors in children. Psychol Med 48(3):404–15 PubMedCrossRef Kunze B, Wang B, Isensee C, Schlack R, Ravens-Sieberer U, Klasen F et al (2018) Gender associated developmental trajectories of SDQ-dysregulation profile and its predictors in children. Psychol Med 48(3):404–15 PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Cheung GW (2008) Testing equivalence in the structure, means, and variances of higher-order constructs with structural equation modeling. Organ Res Methods 11(3):593–613 CrossRef Cheung GW (2008) Testing equivalence in the structure, means, and variances of higher-order constructs with structural equation modeling. Organ Res Methods 11(3):593–613 CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Gomez R, Stavropoulos V (2019) Oppositional Defiant disorder dimensions: associations with traits of the multidimensional personality model among adults. Psychiatr Q Gomez R, Stavropoulos V (2019) Oppositional Defiant disorder dimensions: associations with traits of the multidimensional personality model among adults. Psychiatr Q
60.
go back to reference West SG, Taylor AB, Wu W (2012) Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. Handbook Structur Equat Model 1:209–31 West SG, Taylor AB, Wu W (2012) Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. Handbook Structur Equat Model 1:209–31
Metagegevens
Titel
Greek Validation of the Factor Structure and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Self Report (SDQ-SR): Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling
Auteurs
Rapson Gomez
Frosso Motti-Stefanidi
Scott Jordan
Vasileios Stavropoulos
Publicatiedatum
01-10-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development / Uitgave 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-01065-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2021

Child Psychiatry & Human Development 5/2021 Naar de uitgave