Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

07-01-2019 | The Writer’s Craft | Uitgave 1/2019 Open Access

Giving feedback on others’ writing

Tijdschrift:: Perspectives on Medical Education > Uitgave 1/2019

Auteurs:: Chris Watling, Lorelei Lingard

» Naar de volledige tekst

Without Abstract

Watling C. The three ‘S’s of editing: story, structure, and style. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:300–2. CrossRef

Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996;119:254–84. CrossRef

Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13:275–88. CrossRef

Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P. Guidelines on feedback for clinical education: The dos, don’ts, and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:284–99. CrossRef

Titel: Giving feedback on others’ writing
Auteurs:: Chris Watling
Lorelei Lingard
Publicatiedatum: 07-01-2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0492-z
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Tijdschrift: Perspectives on Medical Education
Uitgave 1/2019
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Elektronisch ISSN: 2212-277X

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Without Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2019

Why institutional ethnography? Why now? Institutional ethnography in health professions education

Progressive research collaborations and the limits of soft power

Implementing an interprofessional narrative medicine program in academic clinics: Feasibility and program evaluation

The Clinical Reasoning Mapping Exercise (CResME): a new tool for exploring clinical reasoning

Development and validation of a health profession education-focused scholarly mentorship assessment tool

Putting post-decision wagering to the test: a measure of self-perceived knowledge in basic sciences?