Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

29-05-2018 | Original Article

Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory

Auteurs: Ayala S. Allon, Gili Vixman, Roy Luria

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 8/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

As part of filtering irrelevant information from entering visual working memory (VWM) and selecting only the relevant information for further processing the system should first tag the pieces of information as relevant or irrelevant. We manipulated difficulty of tagging items as relevant or irrelevant by applying perceptual grouping cues to investigate if it can improve filtering performance in VWM. Participants performed a change-detection task with three targets, six targets, or three targets and three distractors (filtering condition) in the memory display, and were asked to remember the colors (Experiments 1–2) or the orientations (Experiments 3–5) of the targets and ignore the distractors. In the filtering conditions, either the targets (Experiments 1, 3, and 4) or the distractors (Experiments 2 and 5) formed an illusory object (a Kanizsa triangle), appeared in a triangle-like configuration (grouping by proximity), or appeared at random positions (non-grouping). Grouping the targets improved filtering performance relative to non-grouping. Moreover, the illusory object cue further improved filtering performance beyond a proximity cue, but only when the cue was compatible with the task. When the distractors were grouped, the proximity cue improved filtering performance, and the illusory object cue, despite being a potent grouping cue, failed to improve filtering performance when it was compatible with the task. We suggest that the grouping cues advanced tagging of the grouped items. Yet, when the grouping cue strongly enhanced processing of the distractors, the tagging failed, such that the preliminary process of estimating incoming items led to full processing of the grouped items.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(25), 10367–10371.CrossRef Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(25), 10367–10371.CrossRef
go back to reference Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factor. Perception and Psychophysics, 51(2), 145–162.CrossRefPubMed Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factor. Perception and Psychophysics, 51(2), 145–162.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.CrossRef Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.CrossRef
go back to reference Cowan, N. (2001). Metatheory of storage capacity limits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(01), 154–176.CrossRef Cowan, N. (2001). Metatheory of storage capacity limits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(01), 154–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(4), 501–517.CrossRef Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(4), 501–517.CrossRef
go back to reference Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149.CrossRef Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(5), 741–753.CrossRefPubMed Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(5), 741–753.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2008). Top-down control settings and the attentional blink: Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture. Visual Cognition, 16(5), 616–642.CrossRef Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2008). Top-down control settings and the attentional blink: Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture. Visual Cognition, 16(5), 616–642.CrossRef
go back to reference Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030.PubMed Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030.PubMed
go back to reference Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(2), 317.PubMed Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(2), 317.PubMed
go back to reference MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163.CrossRefPubMed MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
go back to reference Schwarzkopf, S. D., & Rees, G. (2015). Perceptual organization and consciousness. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schwarzkopf, S. D., & Rees, G. (2015). Perceptual organization and consciousness. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643.CrossRef Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643.CrossRef
go back to reference Theeuwes, J., & Godijn, R. (2002). Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(5), 764–770.CrossRefPubMed Theeuwes, J., & Godijn, R. (2002). Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(5), 764–770.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428(6984), 748–751.CrossRefPubMed Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428(6984), 748–751.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Woodman, G. F., Vecera, S. P., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Perceptual organization influences visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(1), 80–87.CrossRefPubMed Woodman, G. F., Vecera, S. P., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Perceptual organization influences visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(1), 80–87.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10187-002.CrossRef Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​10187-002.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory
Auteurs
Ayala S. Allon
Gili Vixman
Roy Luria
Publicatiedatum
29-05-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1032-5