Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The careers of male and female physicians indicate gender differences, whereas in medical education a feminization is occurring. Our review aims to specify gender-related speciality preferences during medical education. A literature search on gender differences in medical students’ speciality preferences was conducted in PubMed, Eric, Embase and Social Abstracts, and reference lists from January 2000 to June 2013. Study quality was assessed by critical appraisal. Our search yielded 741 hits and included 14, mostly cross-sectional, studies originating from various countries. No cohort studies were found. Throughout medical education, surgery is predominantly preferred by men and gynaecology, paediatrics and general practice by women. Internal medicine was pursued by both genders. The extent of gender-specific speciality preferences seemed related to the male-to-female ratio in the study population. When a population contained more male students gynaecology seemed even more preferred by women, while in a more feminine population, men more highly preferred surgery. Internationally, throughout medical education, gender-related speciality preferences are apparent. The extent might be influenced by the male-to-female ratio of a study population. Further research of the role of gender in career considerations of medical students on the future workforce is necessary.
Freeman B. Special considerations for woman. In: Compagnies MGH, editor. The ultimate guide to choosing medical speciality special 2004.
Riska E, editor. Gender in medical education. 2008; Finland.
Cancian FM, Oliker SJ. Caring and gender. In: Littlefield R, editor. 2000.
Tsouroufli M, Rees C, Monrouxe L, Sundaram V. Gender, identities and intersectionality in medical education research. Med Educ. 2011;45:213–6.
Ridell ST, Tett L. Gender balance in teaching debate: tensions between gender theory and equality policy. IJIE. 2009.
Laan R, Leunissen R, Van Herwaarden C. The 2009 framework for undergraduate medical education in the Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;29, nr. 1(-):10–5.
Weightman AL, Mann MK, Sander L, Turley RL. Questions to assist with the critical appraisal of an observational study eg cohort, case-control, crosssectional. A systematic approach to identifying the evidence, Project methodology 5. Cardiff: Information Services UWCM, January 2004 http://hebw.uwcm.ac.uk/projectmethod/Project%20Methodology%205.pdf.
Cochrane. Handbook Systematic Reviews of Health Promotion and Public Health intervention; Unit Eight: Principles of Critical Appraisal. Deakin University and the Australian Department of Health and Aging, 2005.
Al-Nuaimi Y, McGrouther G, Bayat A. Modernising medical careers and factors influencing career choices of medical students. Br J Hosp Med. 2008;69(3):163–6. CrossRef
Finucane P, O’Dowd T. The career plans of Irish interns: results of a national survey. Ir Med J. 2004;97(5):149. PubMed
Fysh TH, Thomas G, Ellis H. Who wants to be a surgeon? A study of 300 first year medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2007;19(7):2. CrossRef
Ku MC. When does gender matter? Gender differences in speciality choice among physicians. Work Occup. 2011;38(2):221–62. CrossRef
Mwachaka PMM, Mbugua ET. Speciality preferences among medical students in a Kenyan university. PAMJ. 2010;5:18.
Parsa S, Aghazadeh A, Nejatisafa AA, et al. Freshmen versus interns’ speciality interests. AIM. 2010;13:509–15.
van Tongeren-Alers M, van Esch M, Verdonk P, Johansson E, Hamberg K, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Are new medical students’ speciality preferences gendered? Related motivational factors at a Dutch medical school. TLM. 2011;23(3):263–8.
UNESCO. The section for women and gender equality: UNESCO’S Gender Mainstreaming Implementation Framework (GMIF) for 2002–2007. 2003.
- Gendered specialities during medical education: a literature review
Lotte van Leerdam
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum