Top

Gepubliceerd in:

21-04-2020 | Original Article

Functions of spontaneous and voluntary future thinking: evidence from subjective ratings

Auteurs: J. Duffy, S. N. Cole

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2021

Abstract

Future thinking is defined as the ability to withdraw from reality and mentally project oneself into the future. The primary aim of the present study was to examine whether functions of future thoughts differed depending on their mode of elicitation (spontaneous or voluntary) and an attribute of goal-relatedness (selected-goal-related or selected-goal-unrelated). After producing spontaneous and voluntary future thoughts in a laboratory paradigm, participants provided ratings on four proposed functions of future thinking (self, directive, social, and emotional regulation). Findings showed that spontaneous and voluntary future thoughts were rated similarly on all functions except the directive function, which was particularly relevant to spontaneous future thoughts. Future thoughts classed as goal-related (selected-goal-related) were rated higher across all functions, and there was largely no interaction between mode of elicitation and goal-relatedness. A higher proportion of spontaneous future thoughts were selected-goal-related compared with voluntary future thoughts. In general, these results indicate that future thinking has significant roles across affective, behavioural, self and social functions, and supports theoretical views that implicate spontaneous future thought in goal-directed cognition and behaviour.

vorige artikel Can you voluntarily forget what you are planning to forget? Behavioral evidence for the underlying truth of the cost–benefit principle

volgende artikel I could do it now, but I’d rather (forget to) do it later: examining links between procrastination and prospective memory failures

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

For an in-depth discussion of conceptual differences between spontaneous and voluntary future thought, see Cole & Kvavilashvili, (2019b).

There are several phenomena that are related to spontaneous future thinking. For example, mind wandering is described as a shift in one’s attention away from events in the environment and towards mental content generated by the individual, and is often, but not necessarily, about the future (Smallwood & Schooler, 2015). Daydreaming is related to both mind wandering and spontaneous future thinking but generally involves withdrawing from the surrounding environment and moving one’s thoughts onto absent or imaginary events/objects. Importantly, daydreaming and mind wandering can involve volitional processes (Dorsch, 2015; Seli et al., 2016), whereas a cardinal property of spontaneous future thought is its unbidden nature (see Cole & Kvavilashvili, 2019a).

The principle underlying our decision to match the N size to a previous study was based on the fact that this study (Cole & Berntsen, 2016) which had effect sizes (η_p²) of 0.10—0.26 comparing selected-goal-related and non selected-goal-related future thoughts. This previous study had large enough effect sizes to find significant differences at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels. But because Cole & Berntsen (2016) included 32 participants in past and future groups, and we had only one future group, an N size of 32 was deemed adequate to find differences in a within-groups design.

We thank an anonymous reviewer for raising this point.

Considering that one participant was male, it would be useful to ascertain the effect of mode of elicitation and goal-salience when this male is excluded; thus making our results generalisable to the female population. When this male was excluded, analyses of function ratings with the remaining 30 participants, with the same ANOVAs presented in “Functions” showed consistent main effects and interactions as with the male included. Thus, we conclude that the addition of this male did not affect our main analyses.

Although somewhat related, as both refer to goals, we believe that current concerns and the directive function are conceptually different. Current concerns refer to higher order goals whereas the directive function is centred around the pursuit of these goals (so the thoughts/actions required to achieve goals, see Klinger, 1975; Pillemer, 2003). Also, data from the study indicated that some of the current-concern related thoughts were not rated as 10 (highly) for the directive function. This indicates that these could be related but separable constructs. In fact, 16.18% of current concern related thoughts were rated low (< 3) on the planning function, 33.82% for the goal setting function, and 32.35% for the decision-making function.

Addis, D. R., Wong, A. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). Age-related changes in the episodic simulation of future events. Psychological science, 19(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02043.x.CrossRefPubMed

Anderson, R. J., Dewhurst, S. A., & Nash, R. A. (2012). Shared cognitive processes underlying past and future thinking: The impact of imagery and concurrent task demands on event specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025451.CrossRefPubMed

Armitage, C. J., & Reidy, J. G. (2012). Evidence that process simulations reduce anxiety in patients receiving dental treatment: randomized exploratory trial. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 25(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2011.604727.CrossRef

Atance, C. M., & O'Neill, D. K. (2001). Episodic future thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(12), 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01804-0.CrossRefPubMed

Barsics, C., Van der Linden, M., & D'Argembeau, A. (2016). Frequency, characteristics, and perceived functions of emotional future thinking in daily life. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1051560.CrossRefPubMed

Barzykowski, K., Radel, R., Niedźwieńska, A., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2019). Why are we not flooded by spontaneous thoughts about past and future? Testing the cognitive inhibition dependency hypothesis. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 83(4), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1120-6.CrossRefPubMed

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Oettingen, G. (2016). Pragmatic Prospection: How and why people think about the future. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000060.CrossRef

Benoit, R. G., Gilbert, S. J., & Burgess, P. W. (2011). A neural mechanism mediating the impact of episodic prospection on farsighted decisions. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(18), 6771–6779. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6559-10.2011.CrossRefPubMed

Berntsen, D. (1996). Spontaneous autobiographical memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(5), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199610)10:5%3c435:AID-ACP408%3e3.0.CO;2-L.CrossRef

Berntsen, D. (1998). Voluntary and spontaneous access to autobiographical memory. Memory, 6(2), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/741942071.CrossRefPubMed

Berntsen, D. (2009). Spontaneous autobiographical memories. An introduction to the unbidden past. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575921CrossRef

Berntsen, D., & Bohn, A. (2010). Remembering and forecasting: The relation. Memory & Cognition, 38(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.3.265.CrossRef

Berntsen, D., & Hall, N. M. (2004). The episodic nature of spontaneous autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 789–803.CrossRef

Berntsen, D., & Jacobsen, A. S. (2008). Spontaneous (spontaneous) mental time travel into the past and future. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.001.CrossRefPubMed

Berntsen, D., Staugaard, S. R., & Sørensen, L. M. T. (2013). Why am I remembering this now? Predicting the occurrence of spontaneous (spontaneous) episodic memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 426–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029128.CrossRef

Bluck, S., Alea, N., Habermas, T., & Rubin, D. C. (2005). A TALE of three functions: The self-reported uses of autobiographical memory. Social Cognition, 23(1), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.23.1.91.59198.CrossRef

Boyer, P. (2008). Evolutionary economics of mental time travel? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.003.CrossRefPubMed

Bulley, A., Henry, J., & Suddendorf, T. (2016). Prospection and the present moment: The role of episodic foresight in intertemporal choices between immediate and delayed rewards. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000061.CrossRef

Cole, S. N., & Berntsen, D. (2016). Do future thoughts reflect personal goals? Current concerns and mental time travel into the past and future. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1044542.CrossRefPubMed

Cole, S. N., Barnes, M., Jones, T., & Elwell, C. (2019). What are the cognitive mechanisms underlying spontaneous future thinking? Manuscript in Preparation

Cole, S. N., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2019a). Spontaneous future cognition: The past, present and future of an emerging topic. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 83, 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01193-3.CrossRefPubMed

Cole, S. N., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2019b). Spontaneous and deliberate future thinking: A dual process account. Psychological Research. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01262-7.CrossRef

Cole, S. N., Staugaard, S. R., & Berntsen, D. (2016). Inducing spontaneous and voluntary mental time travel using a laboratory paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 44(3), 376–389. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0564-9.CrossRef

Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(4), 594–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005.CrossRef

Conway, M. A., Justice, L., & D’Argembeau, A. (2019). The self-memory system revisited: Past, present, and future. In J. H. Mace (Ed.), The organization and structure of autobiographical memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Conway, M. A., Loveday, C., & Cole, S. N. (2016). The remembering–imagining system. Memory Studies, 9(3), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698016645231.CrossRef

Daniel, T. O., Stanton, C. M., & Epstein, L. H. (2013). The future is now: reducing impulsivity and energy intake using episodic future thinking. Psychological Science, 24, 2339–2342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613488780.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

D'Argembeau, A., Lardi, C., & Van der Linden, M. (2012). Self-defining future projections: Exploring the identity function of thinking about the future. Memory, 20(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.647697.CrossRefPubMed

D'Argembeau, A., & Mathy, A. (2011). Tracking the construction of episodic future thoughts. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 140(2), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022581.CrossRef

D'Argembeau, A., Renaud, O., & Van der Linden, M. (2011). Frequency, characteristics and functions of future-oriented thoughts in daily life. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1647.CrossRef

D'Argembeau, A., Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Collette, F., Van der Linden, M., Feyers, D., et al. (2010). The neural basis of personal goal processing when envisioning future events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1701–1713. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21314.CrossRefPubMed

Dorsch, F. (2015). Focused daydreaming and mind-wandering. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(4), 791–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-014-0221-4.CrossRef

Dunkel, C. S., & Anthis, K. S. (2001). The role of possible selves in identity formation: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 24(6), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2001.0433.CrossRefPubMed

Finnbogadóttir, H., & Berntsen, D. (2011). Spontaneous and voluntary mental time travel in high and low worriers. Memory, 19(6), 625–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.595722.CrossRefPubMed

Finnbogadóttir, H., & Berntsen, D. (2013). Spontaneous future projections are as frequent as spontaneous memories, but more positive. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.014.CrossRefPubMed

Fleury, J., Sedikides, C., & Donovan, K. D. (2002). Possible health selves of older African Americans: Toward increasing the effectiveness of health promotion efforts. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 18(1), 52–58.CrossRef

Gaesser, B., Keeler, K., & Young, L. (2018). Moral imagination: Facilitating prosocial decision-making through scene imagery and theory of mind. Cognition, 171, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.004.CrossRefPubMed

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. American psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493

Hall, S. A., Rubin, D. C., Miles, A., Davis, S. W., Wing, E. A., Cabeza, R., et al. (2014). The neural basis of spontaneous episodic memories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(10), 2385–2399. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00633.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Harris, C. B., Rasmussen, A. S., & Berntsen, D. (2014). The functions of autobiographical memory: An integrative approach. Memory, 22(5), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.806555.CrossRefPubMed

Hoyle, R. H., & Sherrill, M. R. (2006). Future orientation in the self-system: Possible selves, self-regulation, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1673–1696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00424.x.CrossRefPubMed

Irish, M., & Piguet, O. (2013). The pivotal role of semantic memory in remembering the past and imagining the future. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00027.CrossRefPubMed

Jeunehomme, O., & D'Argembeau, A. (2016). Prevalence and determinants of direct and generative modes of production of episodic future thoughts in the word cueing paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.993663.CrossRefPubMed

Johannessen, K. B., & Berntsen, D. (2010). Current concerns in spontaneous and voluntary autobiographical memories. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 847–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.01.009.CrossRefPubMed

Klinger, E. (1975). Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives. Psychological Review, 82(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076171.CrossRef

Klinger, E. (2009). Daydreaming and fantasizing: Thought flow and motivation. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 225–239). New York: Psychology Press.

Klinger, E., Barta, S. G., & Maxeiner, M. E. (1980). Motivational correlates of thought content frequency and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1222–1237. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077724.CrossRef

Kvavilashvili, L., & Mandler, G. (2004). Out of one’s mind: A study of spontaneous semantic memories. Cognitive Psychology, 48(1), 47–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00115-4.CrossRefPubMed

Kvavilashvili, L., & Rummel, J. (2020). On the nature of everyday prospection: A review and theoretical integration of research on mind-wandering, future thinking and prospective memory. Review of General Psychology (Article accepted for publication)

Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.CrossRef

McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 14(7), S127–S144. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.775.CrossRef

Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie du Sert, N., et al. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nikles, I. I., Charles, D., Brecht, D. L., Klinger, E., & Bursell, A. L. (1998). The effects of current concern-and nonconcern-related waking suggestions on nocturnal dream content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 242–255. https://doi.org.yorksj.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.242

O'Donnell, S., Daniel, T. O., & Epstein, L. H. (2017). Does goal relevant episodic future thinking amplify the effect on delay discounting? Consciousness and Cognition, 51, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2010). Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of prefrontal-mediotemporal interactions. Neuron, 66(1), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.026.CrossRefPubMed

Pham, L. B., & Taylor, S. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcomebased mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002010.CrossRef

Plimpton, B., Patel, P., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2015). Role of triggers and dysphoria in mind-wandering about past, present and future: A laboratory study. Consciousness & Cognition, 33, 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.014.CrossRef

Pillemer, D. (2003). Directive functions of autobiographical memory: The guiding power of the specific episode. Memory, 11(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/741938208.CrossRefPubMed

Prebble, S. C., Addis, D. R., & Tippett, L. J. (2013). Autobiographical memory and sense of self. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 815–840. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030146.CrossRefPubMed

Rasmussen, A. S., & Berntsen, D. (2009). Emotional valence and the functions. Memory & Cognition, 37(4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.4.477.CrossRef

Rasmussen, A. S., & Berntsen, D. (2013). The reality of the past versus the ideality of the future: Emotional valence and functional differences between past and future mental time travel. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0260-y.CrossRef

Rathbone, C. J., Conway, M. A., & Moulin, C. J. A. (2011). Remembering and Imagining: The role of the self. Consciousness & Cognition, 20, 1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.013.CrossRef

Ruvolo, A. P., & Markus, H. R. (1992). Possible selves and performance: The power of self-relevant imagery. Social Cognition, 10(1), 95–124.CrossRef

Schacter, D. L. (2012). Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. American Psychologist, 67(8), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029869.CrossRef

Schacter, D. L., Benoit, R. G., & Szpunar, K. K. (2017). Episodic future thinking: Mechanisms and functions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.06.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schlagman, S., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2008). Spontaneous autobiographical memories in and outside the laboratory: How different are they from voluntary autobiographical memories? Memory & Cognition, 36(5), 920–932. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.5.920.CrossRef

Seli, P., Risko, E. F., Smilek, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Mind-wandering with and without intention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331.CrossRefPubMed

Smallwood, J., Schooler, J. W., Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., Burns, P., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Self-reflection and the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Consciousness & Cognition, 20, 1120–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.12.017.CrossRef

Spreng, R. N., Stevens, W. D., Chamberlain, J. P., Gilmore, A. W., & Schacter, D. L. (2010). Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition. Neuroimage, 53(1), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.016.CrossRefPubMed

Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(3), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001975.CrossRef

Szpunar, K. K. (2010). Episodic future thought: An emerging concept. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610362350.CrossRefPubMed

Szpunar, K. K., Spreng, R. N., & Schacter, D. L. (2014). A taxonomy of prospection: Introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(52), 18414–18421. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417144111.CrossRef

Szpunar, P. M., & Szpunar, K. K. (2016). Collective future thought: Concept, function, and implications for collective memory studies. Memory Studies, 9(4), 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698015615660.CrossRef

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 5, 7–24.

Thomsen, D. K. (2015). Autobiographical periods: a review and central components of a theory. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000043.CrossRef

Warden, E. A., Plimpton, B., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2019). Absence of age effects on spontaneous past and future thinking in daily life. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 83(4), 727–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1103-7.CrossRefPubMed

Waters, T. E., Bauer, P. J., & Fivush, R. (2014). Autobiographical memory functions served by multiple event types. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2976.CrossRef

Wheeler, M. A., Stuss, D. T., & Tulving, E. (1997). Toward a theory of episodic memory: The frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 331–354.CrossRef

Titel: Functions of spontaneous and voluntary future thinking: evidence from subjective ratings
Auteurs: J. Duffy
S. N. Cole
Publicatiedatum: 21-04-2020
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01338-9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2021

Exploring to learn and learning to explore

Asymmetric coupling of action and outcome valence in active and observational feedback learning

Sweet taste experience improves prosocial intentions and attractiveness ratings

Task-related thought and metacognitive ability in mind wandering reports: an exploratory study

Effort avoidance is not simply error avoidance

Correction to: Self-bias effect: movement initiation to self-owned property is speeded for both approach and avoidance actions