Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 5/2014

01-06-2014

Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management

Auteurs: Maria-Jose Santana, David Feeny

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

The inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the routine clinical care of chronically ill patients has the potential to add valuable information about the impact of the disease and its treatment and promotes effective patient self-management in which patients become more active participants in their own care. PROMs provide clinicians with timely information on patients’ symptoms as well as functional and emotional status. PROMs are a useful tool for enhancing patient–clinician communication.

Methods

We develop a conceptual framework describing the potential effects of the use of PROMs in chronic care management. The framework summarizes insights from the methods for evaluating the clinical effectiveness and methods for the health technology assessment of diagnostic technologies and results from the relevant studies.

Results

The framework describes potential effects, from proximal to distal, including communication (patient–clinician, patient–relative, clinician–clinician, and clinician–relative), engaging patients in shared clinical decision making, patient management (clinician management and patient self-management), and patient outcomes. Important potential effects also include enhancement in patient activation as well as improvements in clinician and patient satisfaction, and patient adherence to recommended treatment. Previous frameworks have described patient–physician communication, patient satisfaction, and health outcomes. Our framework adds unique domains, including patient engagement, patient activation, shared clinical decision making, and patient self-management.

Conclusions

The framework can be used as a tool to guide the development of interventions to improve chronic care management through the use of PROMs.
Literatuur
2.
go back to reference Schneider, K. M., O’Donnell, B. E., & Dean, D. (2009). Prevalence of chronic conditions in the United States Medicare population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 82. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schneider, K. M., O’Donnell, B. E., & Dean, D. (2009). Prevalence of chronic conditions in the United States Medicare population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 82. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yach, D., Hawkes, C., & Hofman, K. J. (2004). The global burden of chronic diseases: Overcoming impediments to prevention and control. Journal American medical Association, 21(291), 2616–2622. CrossRef Yach, D., Hawkes, C., & Hofman, K. J. (2004). The global burden of chronic diseases: Overcoming impediments to prevention and control. Journal American medical Association, 21(291), 2616–2622. CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Parekh, A. K., Goodman, R. A., Gordon, K., Koh, H. K., & the HHS interagency workgroup on multiple chronic conditions. (2011). Managing multiple chronic conditions: A strategic framework for improving health outcomes and quality of life. Public Health Reports, 126, 460–470. PubMedCentralPubMed Parekh, A. K., Goodman, R. A., Gordon, K., Koh, H. K., & the HHS interagency workgroup on multiple chronic conditions. (2011). Managing multiple chronic conditions: A strategic framework for improving health outcomes and quality of life. Public Health Reports, 126, 460–470. PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., & von Korff, M. (1996). Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. The Milbank Quarterly, 74(4), 511–544. PubMedCrossRef Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., & von Korff, M. (1996). Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. The Milbank Quarterly, 74(4), 511–544. PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Barr, V. J., Robinson, S., Marin-link, B., Underhill, L., Dotts, A., Ravensdale, D., et al. (2003). The expanded chronic care model: An integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the chronic care model. Hospital Quarterly, 7(1), 73–82. PubMed Barr, V. J., Robinson, S., Marin-link, B., Underhill, L., Dotts, A., Ravensdale, D., et al. (2003). The expanded chronic care model: An integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the chronic care model. Hospital Quarterly, 7(1), 73–82. PubMed
7.
go back to reference Tinetti, M. E., Fried, T. R., & Boyd, C. M. (2012). Designing health care for the most common chronic condition—Multimorbidity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307(23), 2493–2494. PubMed Tinetti, M. E., Fried, T. R., & Boyd, C. M. (2012). Designing health care for the most common chronic condition—Multimorbidity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307(23), 2493–2494. PubMed
8.
go back to reference Wolff, J. L., Starfield, B., & Anderson, G. (2002). Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162(20), 2269–2276. PubMedCrossRef Wolff, J. L., Starfield, B., & Anderson, G. (2002). Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162(20), 2269–2276. PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Deyo, R. A., & Patrick, D. L. (1989). Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research. Medical Care, 27(3), S254–S268. PubMedCrossRef Deyo, R. A., & Patrick, D. L. (1989). Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research. Medical Care, 27(3), S254–S268. PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fayers, P. M., & Machain, D. (2000). Quality of life: Assessment, analysis and Interpretation. Chapter 10. New York: Wiley. CrossRef Fayers, P. M., & Machain, D. (2000). Quality of life: Assessment, analysis and Interpretation. Chapter 10. New York: Wiley. CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wu, A. (1996) The role of quality assessments in medical practice. Bert Spilker, (Ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven. Wu, A. (1996) The role of quality assessments in medical practice. Bert Spilker, (Ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
12.
go back to reference Morris, J., Perez, D., & McNoe, B. (1998). The use of quality of life data in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 7(1), 85–91. PubMedCrossRef Morris, J., Perez, D., & McNoe, B. (1998). The use of quality of life data in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 7(1), 85–91. PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Osoba, D. (1999). What has been learned from measuring health-related quality of life in clinical oncology. European Journal of Cancer, 35(11), 1565–1570. PubMedCrossRef Osoba, D. (1999). What has been learned from measuring health-related quality of life in clinical oncology. European Journal of Cancer, 35(11), 1565–1570. PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Taenzer, P., Buktz, B. D., Carkson, L. E., Speca, M., DeGagne, T., et al. (2000). Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behavior and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psycho-Oncology, 9(3), 203–213. PubMedCrossRef Taenzer, P., Buktz, B. D., Carkson, L. E., Speca, M., DeGagne, T., et al. (2000). Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behavior and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psycho-Oncology, 9(3), 203–213. PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A., Brown, P., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724. CrossRef Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A., Brown, P., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724. CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Santana, M. J., Feeny, D., Johnson, J. A., McAlister, F. A., Kim, D., Weinkauf, J., et al. (2010). An assessment of the effects of the use of measures of health-related quality of life in routine clinical care: An application to lung transplantation. Quality of Life Research, 19(3), 371–379. PubMedCrossRef Santana, M. J., Feeny, D., Johnson, J. A., McAlister, F. A., Kim, D., Weinkauf, J., et al. (2010). An assessment of the effects of the use of measures of health-related quality of life in routine clinical care: An application to lung transplantation. Quality of Life Research, 19(3), 371–379. PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lyndon, G. M., Dowrick, C. F., McBride, A., Burgess, H. J., Howe, A. C., Clarke, P. D., et al. (2011). Questionnaire severity measure of depression: A threat to the doctor-patient relationship? British Journal of General Practice, 61(583), 117–123. CrossRef Lyndon, G. M., Dowrick, C. F., McBride, A., Burgess, H. J., Howe, A. C., Clarke, P. D., et al. (2011). Questionnaire severity measure of depression: A threat to the doctor-patient relationship? British Journal of General Practice, 61(583), 117–123. CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dowrick, C., Leydon, G. M., McBride, A., Howe, A., Burgess, H., Clarke, P., et al. (2009). Patients’ and doctors’ views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: Qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 338, b663. PubMedCrossRef Dowrick, C., Leydon, G. M., McBride, A., Howe, A., Burgess, H., Clarke, P., et al. (2009). Patients’ and doctors’ views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: Qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 338, b663. PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J., & Meadows, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5, 401–416. PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh, J., & Meadows, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5, 401–416. PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Espallargues, M., Valderas, J. M., & Alonso, J. (2000). Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: A systematic review of its impact. Medical Care, 38, 175–186. PubMedCrossRef Espallargues, M., Valderas, J. M., & Alonso, J. (2000). Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: A systematic review of its impact. Medical Care, 38, 175–186. PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient–physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. Journal American Medical Association, 288(23), 3027–3034. CrossRef Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient–physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. Journal American Medical Association, 288(23), 3027–3034. CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J., Long, A. F., & Flynn, R. (2005). The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical care: Lack of impact or lack of theory? Social Science and Medicine, 60, 833–843. PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh, J., Long, A. F., & Flynn, R. (2005). The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical care: Lack of impact or lack of theory? Social Science and Medicine, 60, 833–843. PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Haywood, K., Marshall, S., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Patient participation in the consultation process: A structured review of intervention strategies. Patient Education Counselling, 63(1–2), 12–23. CrossRef Haywood, K., Marshall, S., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Patient participation in the consultation process: A structured review of intervention strategies. Patient Education Counselling, 63(1–2), 12–23. CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Marshall, S., Haywood, K., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: A structured review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12, 559–568. PubMedCrossRef Marshall, S., Haywood, K., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: A structured review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12, 559–568. PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Valderas, J. M., Kotzeva, A., Espallargues, M., et al. (2008). The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: A systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 17, 179–193. PubMedCrossRef Valderas, J. M., Kotzeva, A., Espallargues, M., et al. (2008). The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: A systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 17, 179–193. PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work and why? Quality of Life Research, 18, 115–123. PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work and why? Quality of Life Research, 18, 115–123. PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rosenbloom, S. K., Victorson, D. E., Hanh, E. A., Peterman, A. H., & Cella, D. (2007). Assessment is not enough: A randomized controlled trial of the effects of health-related quality of life assessment on quality of life and satisfaction in oncology clinical practice. Psychooncology, 16, 1069–1079. PubMedCrossRef Rosenbloom, S. K., Victorson, D. E., Hanh, E. A., Peterman, A. H., & Cella, D. (2007). Assessment is not enough: A randomized controlled trial of the effects of health-related quality of life assessment on quality of life and satisfaction in oncology clinical practice. Psychooncology, 16, 1069–1079. PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gutteling, J. J., Darlington, A. S., Janssen, H. L., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Busschbach, J. J., & de Man, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of health-related quality of life measurement in clinical practice: A prospective, randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic liver disease and their physicians. Quality of Life Research, 17, 195–205. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Gutteling, J. J., Darlington, A. S., Janssen, H. L., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Busschbach, J. J., & de Man, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of health-related quality of life measurement in clinical practice: A prospective, randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic liver disease and their physicians. Quality of Life Research, 17, 195–205. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference de Wit, M., Delemarre-van de Waal, H. A., Bokma, J. A., Haasnoot, K., Houdijk, M., Gemke, R. J., et al. (2008). Monitoring and discussing health related quality of life in adolescent with type 1 diabetes improve psychosocial well-being. Diabetes Care, 31(8), 1521–1526. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef de Wit, M., Delemarre-van de Waal, H. A., Bokma, J. A., Haasnoot, K., Houdijk, M., Gemke, R. J., et al. (2008). Monitoring and discussing health related quality of life in adolescent with type 1 diabetes improve psychosocial well-being. Diabetes Care, 31(8), 1521–1526. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hilarius, D. L., Kloeg, P. H., Gundy, C. M., & Aaroson, N. K. (2008). Use of health-related quality of life assessments in daily clinical oncology nursing practice: A community hospital-based intervention study. Cancer, 113(3), 628–637. PubMedCrossRef Hilarius, D. L., Kloeg, P. H., Gundy, C. M., & Aaroson, N. K. (2008). Use of health-related quality of life assessments in daily clinical oncology nursing practice: A community hospital-based intervention study. Cancer, 113(3), 628–637. PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Boyce, M.B., Browne, J.P. (2013). Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Quality of Life Research. [ePub ahead of print]. Boyce, M.B., Browne, J.P. (2013). Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Quality of Life Research. [ePub ahead of print].
32.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2011). Implementing patient-reported outcome assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research,. doi: 10.​1007/​s11136-011-0054. Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2011). Implementing patient-reported outcome assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research,. doi: 10.​1007/​s11136-011-0054.
33.
go back to reference Aaronson, N.K., Choucair, A.K., Elliott, T.E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M.Y., Hess, R., Miller, D.M., Reeve, B.B., Santana, M.J., Snyder, C.F. (2011). User’s guide to implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. http://​www.​isoqol.​org (last access March 2, 2013). Aaronson, N.K., Choucair, A.K., Elliott, T.E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M.Y., Hess, R., Miller, D.M., Reeve, B.B., Santana, M.J., Snyder, C.F. (2011). User’s guide to implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. http://​www.​isoqol.​org (last access March 2, 2013).
34.
go back to reference Roter, D. L., & Hall, J. A. (2006). Doctors talking with patients/patients talking to doctors. Westport, CT: Praeger. Roter, D. L., & Hall, J. A. (2006). Doctors talking with patients/patients talking to doctors. Westport, CT: Praeger.
35.
go back to reference Roter, D. L. The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship. Patient Education Counselling, 39, 5–15. Roter, D. L. The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship. Patient Education Counselling, 39, 5–15.
36.
go back to reference Street, R. L, Jr, Makoul, G., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009). How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counselling, 74, 295–301. CrossRef Street, R. L, Jr, Makoul, G., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009). How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counselling, 74, 295–301. CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Levinson, W., Lesser, C. S., & Epstein, R. M. (2010). Developing physician communication skills for patient-centered care. Health Affairs, 29(7), 1310–1318. PubMedCrossRef Levinson, W., Lesser, C. S., & Epstein, R. M. (2010). Developing physician communication skills for patient-centered care. Health Affairs, 29(7), 1310–1318. PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Feldman-Stewart, D., Brundage, M. D., & Tishelman, C. (2005). A conceptual framework for patient-professional communication: An application to the cancer context. Psycho-oncology, 14, 801–809. PubMedCrossRef Feldman-Stewart, D., Brundage, M. D., & Tishelman, C. (2005). A conceptual framework for patient-professional communication: An application to the cancer context. Psycho-oncology, 14, 801–809. PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Feldman-Stewart, D., & Brundage, M. D. (2009). A conceptual framework for patient-provider communication: A tool in the PRO research tool box. Quality of Life Research, 18, 109–114. PubMedCrossRef Feldman-Stewart, D., & Brundage, M. D. (2009). A conceptual framework for patient-provider communication: A tool in the PRO research tool box. Quality of Life Research, 18, 109–114. PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Gerrity, P. (2010). And to think that it happened on 11th street: A nursing approach to community-based holistic care and health care reform. Alternative Therapies, 6(5), 62–67. Gerrity, P. (2010). And to think that it happened on 11th street: A nursing approach to community-based holistic care and health care reform. Alternative Therapies, 6(5), 62–67.
41.
go back to reference Takeuchi, E. E., Keding, A., Awad, N., Hofmann, U., Campbell, L. J., Selby, P. J., et al. (2011). Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: A longitudinal analysis of patient–physician communication. Journal Clinical Oncology, 29(21), 2910–2917. CrossRef Takeuchi, E. E., Keding, A., Awad, N., Hofmann, U., Campbell, L. J., Selby, P. J., et al. (2011). Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: A longitudinal analysis of patient–physician communication. Journal Clinical Oncology, 29(21), 2910–2917. CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Epstein, R. M., & Street, R. L, Jr. (2007). Patient-centered communication in cancer care: Promoting healing and reducing suffering. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. (NIH Publication No 07-6225). Epstein, R. M., & Street, R. L, Jr. (2007). Patient-centered communication in cancer care: Promoting healing and reducing suffering. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. (NIH Publication No 07-6225).
43.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J., Abhyankar, P., McCluskey, S., Takeuchi, E., & Velikova, G. (2013). How do doctors refer to patient-reported outcome measures in oncology consultations? Quality of Life Research, 22, 939–950. PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh, J., Abhyankar, P., McCluskey, S., Takeuchi, E., & Velikova, G. (2013). How do doctors refer to patient-reported outcome measures in oncology consultations? Quality of Life Research, 22, 939–950. PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Bodenheimer, T., Loring, K., Holman, H., & Grumbach, K. (2002). Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(19), 2469–2475. CrossRef Bodenheimer, T., Loring, K., Holman, H., & Grumbach, K. (2002). Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(19), 2469–2475. CrossRef
45.
go back to reference McGreevey, M. (2006). Patient as partners: How to involve patient and families in Their Own Care. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. McGreevey, M. (2006). Patient as partners: How to involve patient and families in Their Own Care. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
46.
go back to reference Hibbard, H. J., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R., & Tusler, M. (2004). Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Research, 39, 4, Part I. CrossRef Hibbard, H. J., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R., & Tusler, M. (2004). Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Research, 39, 4, Part I. CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Chow, A., Mayer, E. K., Darzi, A. W., & Athanasiou, T. (2009). Patient-reported outcome measures: The importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Journal of Surgery, 146(3), 435–443. Chow, A., Mayer, E. K., Darzi, A. W., & Athanasiou, T. (2009). Patient-reported outcome measures: The importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Journal of Surgery, 146(3), 435–443.
48.
go back to reference Hibbard, J. H., Mahoney, E. R., Stock, R., & Tusler, M. (2007). Self-management and health care utilization. Do increases in patient-activation result in improved self-management behaviours. Health Research Services, 42(4), 1443–1462. CrossRef Hibbard, J. H., Mahoney, E. R., Stock, R., & Tusler, M. (2007). Self-management and health care utilization. Do increases in patient-activation result in improved self-management behaviours. Health Research Services, 42(4), 1443–1462. CrossRef
49.
50.
go back to reference Remmers, C., Hibbard, J., Mosen, D. M., Wagenfield, M., Hoye, R. E., & Jones, C. (2009). Is patient activation associated with future health outcomes and healthcare utilization among patients with diabetes? Journal Ambulatory care management, 32(4), 320–327. CrossRef Remmers, C., Hibbard, J., Mosen, D. M., Wagenfield, M., Hoye, R. E., & Jones, C. (2009). Is patient activation associated with future health outcomes and healthcare utilization among patients with diabetes? Journal Ambulatory care management, 32(4), 320–327. CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Loring, K. R., Sobel, D. S., Ritter, P. L., Laurent, D., & Hobbs, M. (2001). Effects of the self-management program on patient with chronic disease. Effective Clinical Practice, 4(6), 256–262. Loring, K. R., Sobel, D. S., Ritter, P. L., Laurent, D., & Hobbs, M. (2001). Effects of the self-management program on patient with chronic disease. Effective Clinical Practice, 4(6), 256–262.
53.
go back to reference Clark, N. M., Becker, M. H., Janz, N. K., Loring, K., Rakowski, W., & Anderson, L. (1991). Self-management of chronic disease by older adults: A review and questions for research. Journal of Aging Health, 3, 3–27. CrossRef Clark, N. M., Becker, M. H., Janz, N. K., Loring, K., Rakowski, W., & Anderson, L. (1991). Self-management of chronic disease by older adults: A review and questions for research. Journal of Aging Health, 3, 3–27. CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Marshall, S. S., Haywood, K. L., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2005). Patient involvement and collaboration in shared decision- making: A structure review to inform chronic disease management. Report from the patient-reported health instruments group to the Department of Health. Marshall, S. S., Haywood, K. L., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2005). Patient involvement and collaboration in shared decision- making: A structure review to inform chronic disease management. Report from the patient-reported health instruments group to the Department of Health.
55.
go back to reference Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making—The pinnacle of patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780–781. PubMedCrossRef Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making—The pinnacle of patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780–781. PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Frosch, D. L., & Kaplan, R. M. (1999). Shared decision making in clinical medicine: Past research and future directions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 17(4), 285–294. PubMedCrossRef Frosch, D. L., & Kaplan, R. M. (1999). Shared decision making in clinical medicine: Past research and future directions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 17(4), 285–294. PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Santana, M. J., Feeny, D., Weinkauf, J., Nador, R., Jackson, K., et al. (2010). The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients. Patient Related Outcome Measures, 1, 93–105. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Santana, M. J., Feeny, D., Weinkauf, J., Nador, R., Jackson, K., et al. (2010). The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients. Patient Related Outcome Measures, 1, 93–105. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Santana, M. J., Feeny, D., Ghosh, S., & Lien, D. C. (2012). Patient-reported outcome 2 years after lung transplantation: Does the underlying diagnosis matter? Patient Related Outcome Measures, 3, 79–84. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Santana, M. J., Feeny, D., Ghosh, S., & Lien, D. C. (2012). Patient-reported outcome 2 years after lung transplantation: Does the underlying diagnosis matter? Patient Related Outcome Measures, 3, 79–84. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Hudak, P. L., & Wright, J. G. (2000). The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine, 25(24), 3167–3177. PubMedCrossRef Hudak, P. L., & Wright, J. G. (2000). The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine, 25(24), 3167–3177. PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Roter, D., & Frankel, R. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the evaluation of the medical dialogue. Social Sciences and Medicine, 34(10), 1097–1103. CrossRef Roter, D., & Frankel, R. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the evaluation of the medical dialogue. Social Sciences and Medicine, 34(10), 1097–1103. CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Rivkin, M. O., & Bush, P. J. (1974). The satisfaction continuum in health care: Consumer and provider preferences. In S. J. Mushkin (Ed.), Consumer incentives for health care. New York: Prodist. Rivkin, M. O., & Bush, P. J. (1974). The satisfaction continuum in health care: Consumer and provider preferences. In S. J. Mushkin (Ed.), Consumer incentives for health care. New York: Prodist.
62.
go back to reference Guyatt, G. H., Tugwell, P. X., Feeny, D. H., Haynes, R. B., & Drummond, M. (1986). A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 134, 587–594. PubMedCentralPubMed Guyatt, G. H., Tugwell, P. X., Feeny, D. H., Haynes, R. B., & Drummond, M. (1986). A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 134, 587–594. PubMedCentralPubMed
63.
go back to reference Banta, H. D., & Behney, C. J. (1981). Policy formulation and technology assessment. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 59, 445–479. CrossRef Banta, H. D., & Behney, C. J. (1981). Policy formulation and technology assessment. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 59, 445–479. CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Abernethy, A. P., Ahmad, A., Zafar, S. Y., Wheeler, J. L., Reese, J. B., & Lyerly, H. K. (2010). Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care. Medical Care, 48(6), S32–S38. PubMedCrossRef Abernethy, A. P., Ahmad, A., Zafar, S. Y., Wheeler, J. L., Reese, J. B., & Lyerly, H. K. (2010). Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care. Medical Care, 48(6), S32–S38. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management
Auteurs
Maria-Jose Santana
David Feeny
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0596-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2014

Quality of Life Research 5/2014 Naar de uitgave