Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the routine clinical care of chronically ill patients has the potential to add valuable information about the impact of the disease and its treatment and promotes effective patient self-management in which patients become more active participants in their own care. PROMs provide clinicians with timely information on patients’ symptoms as well as functional and emotional status. PROMs are a useful tool for enhancing patient–clinician communication.
We develop a conceptual framework describing the potential effects of the use of PROMs in chronic care management. The framework summarizes insights from the methods for evaluating the clinical effectiveness and methods for the health technology assessment of diagnostic technologies and results from the relevant studies.
The framework describes potential effects, from proximal to distal, including communication (patient–clinician, patient–relative, clinician–clinician, and clinician–relative), engaging patients in shared clinical decision making, patient management (clinician management and patient self-management), and patient outcomes. Important potential effects also include enhancement in patient activation as well as improvements in clinician and patient satisfaction, and patient adherence to recommended treatment. Previous frameworks have described patient–physician communication, patient satisfaction, and health outcomes. Our framework adds unique domains, including patient engagement, patient activation, shared clinical decision making, and patient self-management.
The framework can be used as a tool to guide the development of interventions to improve chronic care management through the use of PROMs.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Global status report on noncommunicable diseases (2010). www.who.int/nmh/publications_ncd_report_full_en.pdf (last visited November 18, 2013).
Yach, D., Hawkes, C., & Hofman, K. J. (2004). The global burden of chronic diseases: Overcoming impediments to prevention and control. Journal American medical Association,21(291), 2616–2622. CrossRef
Barr, V. J., Robinson, S., Marin-link, B., Underhill, L., Dotts, A., Ravensdale, D., et al. (2003). The expanded chronic care model: An integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the chronic care model. Hospital Quarterly,7(1), 73–82. PubMed
Tinetti, M. E., Fried, T. R., & Boyd, C. M. (2012). Designing health care for the most common chronic condition—Multimorbidity. Journal of the American Medical Association,307(23), 2493–2494. PubMed
Fayers, P. M., & Machain, D. (2000). Quality of life: Assessment, analysis and Interpretation. Chapter 10. New York: Wiley. CrossRef
Wu, A. (1996) The role of quality assessments in medical practice. Bert Spilker, (Ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A., Brown, P., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal Clinical Oncology,22(4), 714–724. CrossRef
Santana, M. J., Feeny, D., Johnson, J. A., McAlister, F. A., Kim, D., Weinkauf, J., et al. (2010). An assessment of the effects of the use of measures of health-related quality of life in routine clinical care: An application to lung transplantation. Quality of Life Research,19(3), 371–379. PubMedCrossRef
Lyndon, G. M., Dowrick, C. F., McBride, A., Burgess, H. J., Howe, A. C., Clarke, P. D., et al. (2011). Questionnaire severity measure of depression: A threat to the doctor-patient relationship? British Journal of General Practice,61(583), 117–123. CrossRef
Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient–physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. Journal American Medical Association,288(23), 3027–3034. CrossRef
Haywood, K., Marshall, S., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Patient participation in the consultation process: A structured review of intervention strategies. Patient Education Counselling,63(1–2), 12–23. CrossRef
Rosenbloom, S. K., Victorson, D. E., Hanh, E. A., Peterman, A. H., & Cella, D. (2007). Assessment is not enough: A randomized controlled trial of the effects of health-related quality of life assessment on quality of life and satisfaction in oncology clinical practice. Psychooncology,16, 1069–1079. PubMedCrossRef
Gutteling, J. J., Darlington, A. S., Janssen, H. L., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Busschbach, J. J., & de Man, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of health-related quality of life measurement in clinical practice: A prospective, randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic liver disease and their physicians. Quality of Life Research,17, 195–205. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Boyce, M.B., Browne, J.P. (2013). Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Quality of Life Research. [ePub ahead of print].
Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2011). Implementing patient-reported outcome assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research,. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0054.
Aaronson, N.K., Choucair, A.K., Elliott, T.E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M.Y., Hess, R., Miller, D.M., Reeve, B.B., Santana, M.J., Snyder, C.F. (2011). User’s guide to implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. http://www.isoqol.org (last access March 2, 2013).
Roter, D. L., & Hall, J. A. (2006). Doctors talking with patients/patients talking to doctors. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Roter, D. L. The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship. Patient Education Counselling, 39, 5–15.
Street, R. L, Jr, Makoul, G., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009). How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counselling,74, 295–301. CrossRef
Gerrity, P. (2010). And to think that it happened on 11th street: A nursing approach to community-based holistic care and health care reform. Alternative Therapies,6(5), 62–67.
Takeuchi, E. E., Keding, A., Awad, N., Hofmann, U., Campbell, L. J., Selby, P. J., et al. (2011). Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: A longitudinal analysis of patient–physician communication. Journal Clinical Oncology,29(21), 2910–2917. CrossRef
Epstein, R. M., & Street, R. L, Jr. (2007). Patient-centered communication in cancer care: Promoting healing and reducing suffering. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. (NIH Publication No 07-6225).
Bodenheimer, T., Loring, K., Holman, H., & Grumbach, K. (2002). Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. The Journal of the American Medical Association,288(19), 2469–2475. CrossRef
McGreevey, M. (2006). Patient as partners: How to involve patient and families in Their Own Care. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
Hibbard, H. J., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R., & Tusler, M. (2004). Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Research,39, 4, Part I. CrossRef
Chow, A., Mayer, E. K., Darzi, A. W., & Athanasiou, T. (2009). Patient-reported outcome measures: The importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Journal of Surgery,146(3), 435–443.
Hibbard, J. H., Mahoney, E. R., Stock, R., & Tusler, M. (2007). Self-management and health care utilization. Do increases in patient-activation result in improved self-management behaviours. Health Research Services,42(4), 1443–1462. CrossRef
Remmers, C., Hibbard, J., Mosen, D. M., Wagenfield, M., Hoye, R. E., & Jones, C. (2009). Is patient activation associated with future health outcomes and healthcare utilization among patients with diabetes? Journal Ambulatory care management,32(4), 320–327. CrossRef
Korda, H. Patient Satisfaction: The new rules of engagement. The Health Care Blog. http://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2012/10/26/patient-satisfaction-the-new-rules-of-engagement/ (last access August 26, 2013).
Loring, K. R., Sobel, D. S., Ritter, P. L., Laurent, D., & Hobbs, M. (2001). Effects of the self-management program on patient with chronic disease. Effective Clinical Practice,4(6), 256–262.
Clark, N. M., Becker, M. H., Janz, N. K., Loring, K., Rakowski, W., & Anderson, L. (1991). Self-management of chronic disease by older adults: A review and questions for research. Journal of Aging Health,3, 3–27. CrossRef
Marshall, S. S., Haywood, K. L., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2005). Patient involvement and collaboration in shared decision- making: A structure review to inform chronic disease management. Report from the patient-reported health instruments group to the Department of Health.
Roter, D., & Frankel, R. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the evaluation of the medical dialogue. Social Sciences and Medicine,34(10), 1097–1103. CrossRef
Rivkin, M. O., & Bush, P. J. (1974). The satisfaction continuum in health care: Consumer and provider preferences. In S. J. Mushkin (Ed.), Consumer incentives for health care. New York: Prodist.
Banta, H. D., & Behney, C. J. (1981). Policy formulation and technology assessment. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly,59, 445–479. CrossRef
Olsen, L. A., Aisner, D., & McGinnis, J. The learning healthcare system: Workshop summary (IOM Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine). Roundtable on Evidence- Based Medicine. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53494/pdf/TOC.pdf (last access December 3, 2013).
- Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management
- Springer International Publishing