Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 3/2005

01-01-2005 | Original Article

Foreground–background segmentation and attention: A change blindness study

Auteurs: Veronica Mazza, Massimo Turatto, Carlo Umiltà

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2005

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

One of the most debated questions in visual attention research is what factors affect the deployment of attention in the visual scene? Segmentation processes are influential factors, providing candidate objects for further attentional selection, and the relevant literature has concentrated on how figure–ground segmentation mechanisms influence visual attention. However, another crucial process, namely foreground–background segmentation, seems to have been neglected. By using a change blindness paradigm, we explored whether attention is preferentially allocated to the foreground elements or to the background ones. The results indicated that unless attention was voluntarily deployed to the background, large changes in the color of its elements remained unnoticed. In contrast, minor changes in the foreground elements were promptly reported. Differences in change blindness between the two regions of the display indicate that attention is, by default, biased toward the foreground elements. This also supports the phenomenal observations made by Gestaltists, who demonstrated the greater salience of the foreground than the background.
Literatuur
go back to reference Baylis, G. C., & Baylis, L. L. (1997). Deficit in figure-ground segmentation following closed head injury. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1133–1138.CrossRefPubMed Baylis, G. C., & Baylis, L. L. (1997). Deficit in figure-ground segmentation following closed head injury. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1133–1138.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 145–162PubMed Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 145–162PubMed
go back to reference Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 451–470.CrossRefPubMed Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 451–470.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Beck, D. M., & Palmer, S. E. (2002). Top-down influences on perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1071–1084.CrossRefPubMed Beck, D. M., & Palmer, S. E. (2002). Top-down influences on perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1071–1084.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bian, Z., Braunstein, M. L., & Andersen, G. J. (2003). The ground surface dominance effect. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, Canada. Bian, Z., Braunstein, M. L., & Andersen, G. J. (2003). The ground surface dominance effect. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, Canada.
go back to reference Chun, M. M., & Marois, R. (2002). The dark side of visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 184–189.CrossRefPubMed Chun, M. M., & Marois, R. (2002). The dark side of visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 184–189.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Coren, S. (1969). Brightness contrast as a function of figure-ground relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 517–524.PubMed Coren, S. (1969). Brightness contrast as a function of figure-ground relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 517–524.PubMed
go back to reference Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 448–456.PubMed Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 448–456.PubMed
go back to reference Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1996). Edge-assignment and figure-ground segmentation in short-term visual matching. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 248–306.CrossRefPubMed Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1996). Edge-assignment and figure-ground segmentation in short-term visual matching. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 248–306.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Driver, J., & Mattingley, J. B. (1998). Parietal neglect and visual awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 17–22.CrossRefPubMed Driver, J., & Mattingley, J. B. (1998). Parietal neglect and visual awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 17–22.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Driver, J., Baylis, G. C., & Rafal, R. D. (1992). Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect. Nature, 360, 73–75.CrossRefPubMed Driver, J., Baylis, G. C., & Rafal, R. D. (1992). Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect. Nature, 360, 73–75.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M., & Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention, and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80, 61–95.CrossRefPubMed Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M., & Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention, and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80, 61–95.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501–507. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501–507.
go back to reference He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1995). Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, 92, 11155–11159. He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1995). Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, 92, 11155–11159.
go back to reference Kanwisher, N., & Driver, J. (1992). Objects, attributes and visual attention: Which, what and where. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 26–31.CrossRef Kanwisher, N., & Driver, J. (1992). Objects, attributes and visual attention: Which, what and where. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 26–31.CrossRef
go back to reference Lamme, V. A. F. (1995). The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1605–1615.PubMed Lamme, V. A. F. (1995). The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1605–1615.PubMed
go back to reference Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., & Rock, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475–501.PubMed Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., & Rock, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475–501.PubMed
go back to reference Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Nakayama, K. & Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunction. Nature, 320, 264–265.PubMed Nakayama, K. & Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunction. Nature, 320, 264–265.PubMed
go back to reference Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
go back to reference O’Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J. J. (1999). Change blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’. Nature, 398, 34.PubMed O’Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J. J. (1999). Change blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’. Nature, 398, 34.PubMed
go back to reference Peterson, M. A., & Hochberg, J. (1983). Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 183–193.CrossRef Peterson, M. A., & Hochberg, J. (1983). Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 183–193.CrossRef
go back to reference Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849–860.PubMed Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849–860.PubMed
go back to reference Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17–42.CrossRef Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17–42.CrossRef
go back to reference Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research, 38, 2489–2505.CrossRefPubMed Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research, 38, 2489–2505.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373. Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373.
go back to reference Rock, I., Linnett, C., Grant, P., & Mack, A. (1992). Perception without attention: Results of a new method. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 502–534.PubMed Rock, I., Linnett, C., Grant, P., & Mack, A. (1992). Perception without attention: Results of a new method. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 502–534.PubMed
go back to reference Rubin, E. (1915). Visuell warhgenommene figuren. Copenhagen: Glydendalske. Rubin, E. (1915). Visuell warhgenommene figuren. Copenhagen: Glydendalske.
go back to reference Rubin, E. (translated, 1958). Figure and ground. In D. C. Beardslee and M. Wertheimer (Eds. and Trans.) Readings in perception (pp. 194–203). New York: Van Nostrand. Rubin, E. (translated, 1958). Figure and ground. In D. C. Beardslee and M. Wertheimer (Eds. and Trans.) Readings in perception (pp. 194–203). New York: Van Nostrand.
go back to reference Scholl, B. J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm. Visual Cognition, 7, 377–396.CrossRef Scholl, B. J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm. Visual Cognition, 7, 377–396.CrossRef
go back to reference Scholl, B. J. (2001) Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1–46. Scholl, B. J. (2001) Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1–46.
go back to reference Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261–267. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261–267.
go back to reference Skiera, G., Petersen, D., Skalej, M., & Fahle, M. (2000). Correlates of figure-ground segregation in fMRI. Vision Research, 40, 2047–2056.CrossRefPubMed Skiera, G., Petersen, D., Skalej, M., & Fahle, M. (2000). Correlates of figure-ground segregation in fMRI. Vision Research, 40, 2047–2056.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Turatto, M., & Galfano, G. (2000). Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1639–1643.CrossRefPubMed Turatto, M., & Galfano, G. (2000). Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1639–1643.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Turatto, M., Angrilli, A., Mazza, V., Umiltà, C., & Driver, J. (2002). Looking without seeing the background change: Electrophysiological correlates of change detection versus change blindness. Cognition, 84, B1–B10.CrossRefPubMed Turatto, M., Angrilli, A., Mazza, V., Umiltà, C., & Driver, J. (2002). Looking without seeing the background change: Electrophysiological correlates of change detection versus change blindness. Cognition, 84, B1–B10.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Turatto, M., Bettella, S., Umiltà, C., & Bridgeman, B. (2003). Perceptual conditions necessary to induce change blindness. Visual Cognition, 10, 233–255. Turatto, M., Bettella, S., Umiltà, C., & Bridgeman, B. (2003). Perceptual conditions necessary to induce change blindness. Visual Cognition, 10, 233–255.
go back to reference Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von Gestalt. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301–350. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von Gestalt. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301–350.
go back to reference Wong, E., & Weisstein, N. (1982). A new perceptual context-superiority effect: Line segments are more visible against a figure than against a ground. Science, 218, 587–589.PubMed Wong, E., & Weisstein, N. (1982). A new perceptual context-superiority effect: Line segments are more visible against a figure than against a ground. Science, 218, 587–589.PubMed
go back to reference Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII (pp. 73–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII (pp. 73–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Metagegevens
Titel
Foreground–background segmentation and attention: A change blindness study
Auteurs
Veronica Mazza
Massimo Turatto
Carlo Umiltà
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2005
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0174-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2005

Psychological Research 3/2005 Naar de uitgave