Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Perspectives on Medical Education 4/2017

Open Access 01-08-2017 | Commentary

Focus on what works and why it works: bridging the gap between research knowledge and practical knowledge

Auteurs: Jan van Tartwijk, Manon Kluijtmans

Gepubliceerd in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Uitgave 4/2017

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
insite
ZOEKEN
In their contribution to Perspectives on Medical Education, Ng, Baker, and Leslie provide a novel and clear perspective on faculty development in health profession education (HPE) by conceptualizing it as a space for sharing research and practical knowledge [1]. The process of sharing these two types of knowledge implies that both are mobilized during faculty development and, in the end, become related. Successful faculty development then empowers faculty by enriching their contextualized experiential knowledge with research-based knowledge. According to Ng and colleagues, this enables them to become agents of positive change in their own system.
The key role that teacher involvement plays in the success of educational change has been widely recognized in the literature [2, 3]. The impact that research knowledge, i. e. evidence generated by systematic empirical research, can have as fuel for innovation of education has also been emphasized [4]. The million-dollar question that still needs to be answered concerns how to close the proverbial gap between research knowledge and practical knowledge [5] within the space professional development provides. Clues for its answer can be found in the literature on teacher professional development.
In an extensive review of the literature on the effectiveness of professional development in HPE, Steinert and her colleagues [6] identify a number of ‘key features’ that make professional development effective, including the role of experiential learning and feedback. They also emphasize the importance of working with peers. Similar reviews in the field of research on teachers and teaching [7, 8] found similar features, also emphasizing the importance of a focus on concrete issues related to instruction. Furthermore, models for teacher learning are available that provide suggestions for the utilization of research knowledge in teacher professional development [9, 10]. In all these models, reflection on application in practice is regarded as a key characteristic of effective professional development. Such reflection should not only focus on what works, but also on why it works, using the knowledge provided by previous research as a starting point.
Here, we want to advocate an approach for faculty development that aims to stimulate faculty to enrich their contextualized experiential knowledge with research-based knowledge, by stimulating them to not only focus on what works, but also on why it works.
Most faculty involved in medical education have been trained as clinicians and many of them also as researchers. Clinicians routinely exert evidence-based practice: integrating scientific evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. As researchers they are familiar with the routine of formulating research questions that are grounded in theory, systematically gathering data for analysis to answer these questions, and reflecting on their findings by considering how these findings match with existing knowledge based on research of others. All of these routines can be used in faculty development. When faculty design education they can use knowledge that is available in the research literature on (medical) education, they can systematically gather data on its success, and they can reflect on their evaluations together with their peers. Many of the key features of effective professional development are included in such approaches, and they could contribute to the development of what is referred to in the literature as scholarship of teaching and learning among faculty [11, 12]. In such a professional development space, research knowledge and practical knowledge would not only be mobilized, but would merge, laying the foundation for education in which research evidence is taken seriously [5].
Of additional importance, faculty might experience a coalescence of clinical, research and teaching roles by taking a scholarly approach to teaching, rather than experiencing teaching as an isolated (or conflicting) task. This could foster a positive narrative on teaching, which might strengthen teacher identity and motivation [13].

Conflict of interest

J. van Tartwijk and M. Kluijtmans declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
Literatuur
1.
2.
go back to reference Kelly B. Key themes and future directions for implementation science and psychology in education. In: Kelly B, Perkins DF, editors. Handbook of implementation sciencefor psychology in education. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2012. pp. 461–4.CrossRef Kelly B. Key themes and future directions for implementation science and psychology in education. In: Kelly B, Perkins DF, editors. Handbook of implementation sciencefor psychology in education. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2012. pp. 461–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change, 4th ed. New York: Teachers College; 2007. Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change, 4th ed. New York: Teachers College; 2007.
4.
go back to reference Slavin RE. Evidence-based education policies: transforming educational practice and research. Educ Res. 2002;31:15–21.CrossRef Slavin RE. Evidence-based education policies: transforming educational practice and research. Educ Res. 2002;31:15–21.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference van der Vleuten CPM, Driessen EW. What would happen to education if we take education evidence seriously? Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3:222–32.CrossRef van der Vleuten CPM, Driessen EW. What would happen to education if we take education evidence seriously? Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3:222–32.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006;28:497–526.CrossRef Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006;28:497–526.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference van Driel J, Meirink J, Van Veen K, Zwart R. Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: a review of design features and quality of research. Stud Sci Educ. 2012;48:129–60.CrossRef van Driel J, Meirink J, Van Veen K, Zwart R. Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: a review of design features and quality of research. Stud Sci Educ. 2012;48:129–60.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Desimone LM, Porter AC, Garet MS, Yoon KS, Birman BF. Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 2002;24:81–112.CrossRef Desimone LM, Porter AC, Garet MS, Yoon KS, Birman BF. Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 2002;24:81–112.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Clarke D, Hollingsworth H. Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teach Teach Educ. 2002;18:947–67.CrossRef Clarke D, Hollingsworth H. Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teach Teach Educ. 2002;18:947–67.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Korthagen FAJ, Kessels J, Koster B, Lagerwerf B, Wubbels T. Linking practice and theory: the pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001. Korthagen FAJ, Kessels J, Koster B, Lagerwerf B, Wubbels T. Linking practice and theory: the pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001.
11.
go back to reference Mårtensson K, Roxå T, Olsson T. Developing a quality culture through the scholarship of teaching and learning. High Educ Res Dev. 2011;30:51–62.CrossRef Mårtensson K, Roxå T, Olsson T. Developing a quality culture through the scholarship of teaching and learning. High Educ Res Dev. 2011;30:51–62.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Trigwell K, Shale S. Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Stud High Educ. 2004;29:523–36.CrossRef Trigwell K, Shale S. Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Stud High Educ. 2004;29:523–36.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference van Lankveld T, Schoonenboom J, Kusurkar RA, Volman M, Beishuizen J, Croiset G. Integrating the teaching role into one’s identity: a qualitative study of beginning undergraduate medical teachers. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2016; doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9694-5. van Lankveld T, Schoonenboom J, Kusurkar RA, Volman M, Beishuizen J, Croiset G. Integrating the teaching role into one’s identity: a qualitative study of beginning undergraduate medical teachers. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2016; doi:10.​1007/​s10459-016-9694-5.
Metagegevens
Titel
Focus on what works and why it works: bridging the gap between research knowledge and practical knowledge
Auteurs
Jan van Tartwijk
Manon Kluijtmans
Publicatiedatum
01-08-2017
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Uitgave 4/2017
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Elektronisch ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0363-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2017

Perspectives on Medical Education 4/2017 Naar de uitgave