Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Doctors frequently see patients who have difficulties coping with their disease and rate their disease activity high, despite the fact that according to the doctors, the disease activity is low. This study explored the patients’ perspectives on this discordance that may help to understand why for some patients, usual care seems to be insufficient.
In our qualitative study we conducted focus group interviews where questions were used as a guideline. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Twenty-nine patients participated in four focus groups. Participants could not put their finger exactly on why doctors estimated that their disease activity was low, while they experienced high levels of disease activity. During the in-depth focus interviews, seven themes emerged that appeared related to high experienced disease activity: (1) perceived stress, (2) balancing activities and rest, (3) medication intake, (4) social stress, (5) relationship with professionals, (6) comorbidity, and (7) physical fitness.
When patients were asked why their view of their disease activity was different from that of their physician, seven themes emerged. The way participants coped with these themes seemed to be the predominant concept. Specific interventions that focus on one or more of the reported themes and on coping may improve not only the quality of life of these patients but also the satisfaction with the patient–doctor relationship for both parties.
Lee, Y. C., Cui, J., Lu, B., Frits, M. L., Iannaccone, C. K., Shadick, N. A., et al. (2011). Pain persists in DAS28 rheumatoid arthritis remission but not in ACR/EULAR remission: A longitudinal observational study. Arthritis Research and Therapy, 13, 83. CrossRef
Nicolau, G., Yogui, M. M., Vallochi, T. L., Gianini, R. J., Laurindo, I. M., & Novaes, G. S. (2004). Sources of discrepancy in patient and physician global assessments of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Journal of Rheumatology, 31, 1293–1296. PubMed
Yen, J. C., Abrahamowicz, M., Dobkin, P. L., Clarke, A. E., Battista, R. N., & Fortin, P. R. (2003). Determinants of discordance between patients and physicians in their assessment of lupus disease activity. Journal of Rheumatology, 30, 1967–1976. PubMed
Alarcon, G. S., McGwin, G, Jr., Brooks, K., Roseman, J. M., Fessler, B. J., & Sanchez, M. L. (2002). Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups. XI. Sources of discrepancy in perception of disease activity: A comparison of physician and patient visual analog scale scores. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 47, 408–413. CrossRefPubMed
Carr, A., Hewlett, S., Hughes, R., Mitchell, H., Ryan, S., Carr, M., et al. (2003). Rheumatology outcomes: The patient’s perspective. Journal of Rheumatology, 30(4), 880–883. PubMed
Krueger, R. A. C., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus group: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. CrossRef
Aletaha, D., Machold, K. P., Nell, V. P., & Smolen, J. S. (2006). The perception of rheumatoid arthritis core set measures by rheumatologists. Results of a Survey. Rheumatology (Oxford), 45(9), 1133–1139. CrossRef
Fransen, J., & van Riel, P. L. (2006). DAS remission cut points. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 24(6 Suppl 43), S29–S32.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
Bowen, G. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–142. CrossRef
Folkman, S. (2011). The oxford handbook of stress, health and coping (pp. 1716–1723). New York: Oxford University Press.
Groarke, A., et al. (2004). The role of perceived and actual disease status in adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford), 43(9), 1142–1149. CrossRef
Wolfe, F., O’Dell, J., Kavanaugh, A., Wilske, K., & Pincus, T. (2001). Evaluating severity and status in rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 28(6), 1453–1462. PubMed
Egholm, L., Krogh, C., Pincus, T., Dreyer, L., & Ellingsen, T. (2015). Discordance of global assessments by patient and physician is higher in female than in male patients regardless of the physician’s sex: Data on patients with rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis from the DANBIO registry. Journal of Rheumatology, 42(10), 1781–1785. CrossRef
- Focus group interviews reveal reasons for differences in the perception of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis
Margot J. M. Walter
Adriaan van’t Spijker
Johanna M. W. Hazes
Jolanda J. Luime
- Springer International Publishing