Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
In this study, using a national recruitment strategy, we tested the different factors that influence retention in four different types of relationship education (RE), a self-directed book, assessment and feedback, and a six session Couple CARE program delivered by email or by phone. Of all the factors considered, required program effort, highly valuing marriage, religiosity, education, and step-family status were able to predict with seventy percent accuracy which couples would complete or not complete their RE experience. Program effort was substantially better at predicting retention than all other variables. Retention was high in the book and assessment conditions but was much lower in the two Couple CARE conditions where more effort and time was required. Initial engagement was higher in the email based Couple CARE condition but overall retention was higher in the phone based condition. Important implications for current and future RE efforts are proposed.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Bennet-Levy, J., Richards, D. A., Farrand, P., Christensen, H., Griffiths, K. M., Kavanagh, D. J., et al. (Eds.). (2010). Oxford guide to low intensity CBT interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blair, J. M., & Cordova, J. V. (2009). Commitment as a predictor of participation in premarital education. The Family Journal, 17, 118–125. CrossRef
Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Edwards, J. N. (1983). Measuring marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 387–394. CrossRef
Busby, D. M., Holman, T. B., & Niehuis, S. (2009). The association between partner- and self enhancement and relationship quality outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 449–464. CrossRef
Busby, D. M., Holman, T. B., & Taniguchi, N. (2001). RELATE: Relationship evaluation of the individual, family, cultural, and couple contexts. Family Relations, 50, 308–316. CrossRef
Busby, D. M., Holman, T. B., & Walker, E. (2008). Pathways to relationship aggression between adult partners. Family Relations, 57, 72–83. CrossRef
Busby, D. M., Ivey, D. C., Harris, S. M., & Ates, C. (2007). Self-directed, therapist-directed, and assessment-based interventions for premarital couples. Family Relations, 56, 279–290. CrossRef
Busby, D. M., Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2013). Sowing wild oats: Valuable experience or a field full of weeds? Personal Relationships. doi: 10.1111/pere.12009.
Casey, L., & Halford, W. K. (2010). Couples and the silicon chip: Applying technology to couple services. In K. Hahlweg, M. Grawe, & D. Baucom (Eds.), Enhancing couples: The shape of couple therapy to come (pp. 216–230). Gottingen: Hogrefe.
Chapman, G. D. (1995). The five love languages: How to express heartfelt commitment to your mate. Chicago: Northfield Publishing.
De Maria, R. M. (2005). Distressed couples and marriage education. Family Relations, 54, 242–253. CrossRef
Duncan, S. F., Holman, T. B., & Yang, C. (2007). Factors associated with involvement in marriage preparation programs. Family Relations, 56, 270–278. CrossRef
Duncan, S. F., Steed, A., & Needham, C. M. (2009). A comparison evaluation study of web-based and traditional marriage and relationship education. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 8, 162–180.
Eurostat (2011). Marriage and divorce statistics. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Marriage_and_divorce_statistics. Retrieved November 12, 2012.
Halford, W. K. (2011). Marriage and relationship education: What works and how to provide it. New York: Guilford Press.
Huberty, C. J. (1984). Issues in the use and interpretation of discriminant analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95(1), 156–171. CrossRef
Hunt, R., Hof, L., & DeMaria, R. (1998). Marriage enrichment: Preparation, mentoring, and outreach. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.
Kavanagh, D. J., & Bennet-Levy, J. (2010). Facilitating the widespread adoption of low intensity CBT interventions: Adapting interventions to different community contexts. In: J. Bennet-Levy, D. A. Richards, P., Farrand, H. Christensen, K. M. Griffiths, & D. J. Kavanagh et al. (Eds.) Oxford guide to low intensity CBT interventions (pp. 537). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larson, J. H., & Halford, W. K. (2011). One size does not fit all: Customizing couple education. In J. Wetchler (Ed.), Handbook of clinical issues in couple therapy (pp. 293–309). Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
McAllister, S., Duncan, S. F., & Busby, D. M. (2013). Exploratory analysis of factors associated with participation in self-directed and traditional marriage and relationship education. Marriage and Family Review, 49, 563–584. CrossRef
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational Interviewing (3rd ed.). NY: Guilford Press.
National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) (2009). Tools for ethical thinking and practice in FLE. Minneapolis.
Roberts, L. C., Morris, M. L. (1998). An evaluation of marketing factors in marriage enrichment program promotion. Family Relations, 47, 37–44.
Silliman, B., & Schumm, W. R. (2004). Adolescents’ perceptions of marriage and premarital education. Family Relations, 53(5), 513–520. CrossRef
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88. CrossRef
Sullivan, K. T., Pasch, L. A., Cornelius, T., & Cirigliano, E. (2004). Predicting participation in premarital prevention programs: The health belief model and social norms. Family Process, 43, 175–193.
Taylor, C., Jobson, K. O., Winzelberg, A., & Abascal, L. (2002). The use of the internet to provide evidence-based integrated treatment programs for mental health. Psychiatric Annals, 32, 671–677. CrossRef
Weston, R., Qu, L., & Hayes, A. (2012). From form to function: Contemporary choices, changes, and challenges. In P. Noller & G. C. Karantzas (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of couples and family relationships (pp. 11–24). West Sussex: Willey-Blackwell Publishing.
Wood, R. G., McConnell, S. D., Moore, Q., Clarkwest, A., & Hsueh, J. (2012). The effects of building strong families: A healthy marriage and relationship skills education program for unmarried parents. Journal of Policy Analysis and management, 31(2), 228–252. CrossRef
- Flexible Delivery Approaches to Couple Relationship Education: Predictors of Initial Engagement and Retention of Couples
Dean M. Busby
Jeffry H. Larson
Thomas B. Holman
W. Kim Halford
- Springer US