Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 2/2019

20-11-2017 | Original Article

Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task

Auteurs: Angus Chapman, Christel Devue, Gina M. Grimshaw

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

In a dot-probe task, two cues—one emotional and one neutral—are followed by a probe in one of their locations. Faster responses to probes co-located with the emotional stimulus are taken as evidence of attentional bias. Several studies indicate that such attentional bias measures have poor reliability, even though ERP studies show that people reliably attend to the emotional stimulus. This inconsistency might arise because the emotional stimulus captures attention briefly (as indicated by ERP), but cues appear for long enough that attention can be redistributed before the probe onset, causing RT measures of bias to vary across trials. We tested this hypothesis by manipulating SOA (stimulus onset asynchrony between onset of the cues and onset of the probe) in a dot-probe task using angry and neutral faces. Across three experiments, the internal reliability of behavioural biases was significantly greater than zero when probes followed faces by 100 ms, but not when the SOA was 300, 500, or 900 ms. Thus, the initial capture of attention shows some level of consistency, but this diminishes quickly. Even at the shortest SOA internal reliability estimates were poor, and not sufficient to justify the use of the task as an index of individual differences in attentional bias.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Power was calculated assuming a one-tailed test, as negative reliabilities are meaningless. This method underestimates the true power of our Experiments, as it is based on a single correlation coefficient and not the distribution of reliabilities that our computational method produces.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Cisler, J. M., Bacon, A. K., & Williams, N. L. (2009). Phenomenological characteristics of attentional biases towards threat: A critical review. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 221–234. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cisler, J. M., Bacon, A. K., & Williams, N. L. (2009). Phenomenological characteristics of attentional biases towards threat: A critical review. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 221–234. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage.
go back to reference Ross, D. A., Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2015). Reliability of composite-task measurements of holistic face processing. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 736–743. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ross, D. A., Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2015). Reliability of composite-task measurements of holistic face processing. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 736–743. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Spielberger, C. D., & Sydeman, S. J. (1994). State-trait anxiety inventory and state-trait anger expression inventory. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 292–321). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Spielberger, C. D., & Sydeman, S. J. (1994). State-trait anxiety inventory and state-trait anger expression inventory. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 292–321). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Staugaard, S. R. (2009). Reliability of two versions of the dot-probe task using photographic faces. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51(3), 339–350. Staugaard, S. R. (2009). Reliability of two versions of the dot-probe task using photographic faces. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51(3), 339–350.
Metagegevens
Titel
Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task
Auteurs
Angus Chapman
Christel Devue
Gina M. Grimshaw
Publicatiedatum
20-11-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0947-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2019

Psychological Research 2/2019 Naar de uitgave