Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2020

23-02-2018 | Original Article

Finger-counting habits, not finger movements, predict simple arithmetic problem solving

Auteurs: Kyle Morrissey, Darcy Hallett, Rutanya Wynes, Jingmei Kang, Ming Han

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Previous research in embodied mathematical cognition has found differences between those who start counting on their left hand and those who start counting on the right hand. However, if starting hand is a finger-embodied effect, then finger-specific interference may affect these differences between left and right starters. Furthermore, cultures that demonstrate different finger-counting habits may also be differently affected by this interference. In the current study, a total of 66 Canadians and 60 Chinese participants completed a single/dual-task paradigm and were also assessed on their starting hand for counting. The primary task was to verbally answer simple arithmetic problems, while the dual task was to either sequentially tap their fingers or their foot. Contrary to predictions, a specific finger-movement interference pattern that had previously been reported was not evident in this study, despite a much larger sample. Nevertheless, Canadians left starters outperformed right starters for every operation type, which may be further evidence of individual differences in the lateralization of arithmetic processes. Derived from a combination of a replication, a conceptual replication, and a cross-cultural comparison, this investigation suggests that embodied effects in the published literature are in need of both independent replication as well as investigation of individual differences. This study also further validates the differences between left and right starters, and suggests that more research is needed to understand the influence of embodied cognition on mathematical understanding.
Literatuur
go back to reference Barnes, M. A., Smith-Chant, B. L., & Landry, S. (2005). Number processing in neurodevelopmental disorders: Spina bifida myelomenigocele. In J. I. D. Campbell Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 299–314). New York: Psychology Press. Barnes, M. A., Smith-Chant, B. L., & Landry, S. (2005). Number processing in neurodevelopmental disorders: Spina bifida myelomenigocele. In J. I. D. Campbell Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 299–314). New York: Psychology Press.
go back to reference Baroody, A. J. (1984). Children’s difficulties in subtraction: Some causes and questions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 203–213.CrossRef Baroody, A. J. (1984). Children’s difficulties in subtraction: Some causes and questions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 203–213.CrossRef
go back to reference Butterworth, B. (1999). What counts—how every brain is hardwired for math. New York: The Free Press. Butterworth, B. (1999). What counts—how every brain is hardwired for math. New York: The Free Press.
go back to reference Marinthe, C., Fayol, M., & Barouillet, P. (2001). Gnosies digitales et development des performances arithetiques. In van Hout A., C. Meljac & J. P. Fischer (Eds.), Troubles du Calcul et Dyscalculies chez l’Enfant (pp. 239–254). Paris: Masson. Marinthe, C., Fayol, M., & Barouillet, P. (2001). Gnosies digitales et development des performances arithetiques. In van Hout A., C. Meljac & J. P. Fischer (Eds.), Troubles du Calcul et Dyscalculies chez l’Enfant (pp. 239–254). Paris: Masson.
go back to reference Morrissey, K. R., Liu, M., Kang, J., Hallett, D., & Wang, Q. (2016). Cross-cultural and intra-cultural differences in finger-counting habits and number magnitude processing: Embodied numerosity in Canadian and Chinese University Students. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 2, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v2i1.14.CrossRef Morrissey, K. R., Liu, M., Kang, J., Hallett, D., & Wang, Q. (2016). Cross-cultural and intra-cultural differences in finger-counting habits and number magnitude processing: Embodied numerosity in Canadian and Chinese University Students. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 2, 1–19. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5964/​jnc.​v2i1.​14.CrossRef
go back to reference Penner-Wilger, M., Waring, R. J., & Newton, A. T. (2014). Subitizing and finger gnosis predict calculation fluency in adults. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1150–1155). Austin: Cognitive Science Society. Penner-Wilger, M., Waring, R. J., & Newton, A. T. (2014). Subitizing and finger gnosis predict calculation fluency in adults. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1150–1155). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
go back to reference Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Metagegevens
Titel
Finger-counting habits, not finger movements, predict simple arithmetic problem solving
Auteurs
Kyle Morrissey
Darcy Hallett
Rutanya Wynes
Jingmei Kang
Ming Han
Publicatiedatum
23-02-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0990-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2020

Psychological Research 1/2020 Naar de uitgave