Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2007

01-01-2007 | Original Article

Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice

Auteur: Bernhard Hommel

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Five experiments investigated the spontaneous integration of stimulus and response features. Participants performed simple, prepared responses (R1) to the mere presence of Go signals (S1) before carrying out another, freely chosen response (R2) to another stimulus (S2), the main question being whether the likelihood of repeating a response depends on whether or not the stimulus, or some of its features, are repeated. Indeed, participants were more likely to repeat the previous response if stimulus form or color was repeated than if it was alternated. The same was true for stimulus location, but only if location was made task-relevant, whether by defining the response set in terms of location, by requiring the report of S2 location, or by having S1 to be selected against a distractor. These findings suggest that task-relevant stimulus and response features are spontaneously integrated into independent, local event files, each linking one stimulus to one response feature. Upon reactivation of one member of the binary link activation is spread to the other, thereby increasing the likelihood to repeat a response if one or more stimulus features are repeated. These findings support the idea that both perceptual events and action plans are cognitively represented in terms of their features, and that feature-integration processes cross borders between perception and action.
Voetnoten
1
The basic idea underlying this (uncommon but not a priori unreasonable) consideration assumes that binding may not be obligatory or necessary for perception or identification to occur. Indeed, if only one event would be represented at a given time there would be no real binding problem: the different features of the event would be coded in different feature maps or systems, but they could still converge on a particular behavior, be that a conscious experience or an overt response, without being "tagged" or "bound". However, binding problems do come into play if more than one event is to be represented at a time, because this raises the question of which features belong to which event. Experiments 4 and 5 aimed at creating such problems.
 
2
In the present study, these binary linkages showed up as main effects of stimulus-feature repetitions on the dependent variable response repetition. These main effects of form, color, and location repetition explained substantial portions of the variance: η2=0.18–0.43, η2=0.14–0.24, η2=0.11–0.31, and η2=0.11–0.19 in Experiments 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The variance explained by two-way interactions between these three variables (which imply three-way interactions including response repetition) accounted for less variance without exception, η2=0.02–0.08, η2=0.001–0.04, η2=0.004–0.04, and η2=0.001–0.08, respectively, and the contribution from the three-way interaction (implying a four-way interaction involving all stimulus features and response repetition) was negligible, η2<0.02 in all cases.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Alexander, G. E. & Crutcher, M D. (1990). Preparation for movement: neural representations of intended direction in three motor areas of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 64, 133–150.PubMed Alexander, G. E. & Crutcher, M D. (1990). Preparation for movement: neural representations of intended direction in three motor areas of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 64, 133–150.PubMed
go back to reference Baddeley, A. D. (1966). The capacity for generating information by randomization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 119–129.PubMedCrossRef Baddeley, A. D. (1966). The capacity for generating information by randomization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 119–129.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Berlyne, D. E. (1957). Uncertainty and conflict: a point of contact between information-theory and behavior-theory concepts. Psychological Review, 64, 329–339.PubMedCrossRef Berlyne, D. E. (1957). Uncertainty and conflict: a point of contact between information-theory and behavior-theory concepts. Psychological Review, 64, 329–339.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bertelson, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 90–102. Bertelson, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 90–102.
go back to reference Bonnet, M. & MacKay, W. A. (1989). Changes in contingent-negative variation and reaction time related to precueing of direction and force of a forearm movement. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 33, 147–152.PubMed Bonnet, M. & MacKay, W. A. (1989). Changes in contingent-negative variation and reaction time related to precueing of direction and force of a forearm movement. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 33, 147–152.PubMed
go back to reference Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. M. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.CrossRefPubMed Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. M. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference DeYoe, E. A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 11, 219–226.CrossRefPubMed DeYoe, E. A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 11, 219–226.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Duncan, J. (1996). Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.). Attention and performance, vol XVI (pp. 549–578). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Duncan, J. (1996). Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.). Attention and performance, vol XVI (pp. 549–578). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Duncan, J. & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.CrossRefPubMed Duncan, J. & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.CrossRefPubMed Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2005). Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research, this issue. Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2005). Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research, this issue.
go back to reference Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent of attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044.CrossRefPubMed Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent of attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385–390.CrossRef Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385–390.CrossRef
go back to reference Georgopoulos, A. P. (1990). Neurophysiology of reaching. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII: motor representation and control (pp. 227–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Georgopoulos, A. P. (1990). Neurophysiology of reaching. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII: motor representation and control (pp. 227–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1996a). The cognitive representation of action: automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176–186.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1996a). The cognitive representation of action: automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176–186.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1996b). S–R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546–571.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1996b). S–R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546–571.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus–response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus–response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus–response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus–response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus–response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus–response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2002). Responding to object files: automatic integration of spatial information revealed by stimulus–response compatibility effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 567–580. Hommel, B. (2002). Responding to object files: automatic integration of spatial information revealed by stimulus–response compatibility effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 567–580.
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11, 483–521.CrossRef Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11, 483–521.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Pösse, B., & Waszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 227–245. Hommel, B., Pösse, B., & Waszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 227–245.
go back to reference Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P., (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.). Inhibitory mechanisms in attention memory an language. San Diego: Academic. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P., (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.). Inhibitory mechanisms in attention memory an language. San Diego: Academic.
go back to reference Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188–196.PubMedCrossRef Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188–196.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. (1992). The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175–219.CrossRefPubMed Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. (1992). The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175–219.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kalaska, J. F. & Hyde, M. L. (1985). Area 4 and area 5: differences between the load direction-dependent discharge variability of cells during active postural fixation. Experimental Brain Research, 59, 197–202.CrossRef Kalaska, J. F. & Hyde, M. L. (1985). Area 4 and area 5: differences between the load direction-dependent discharge variability of cells during active postural fixation. Experimental Brain Research, 59, 197–202.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirby, N. (1980). Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 129–172). London: Academic. Kirby, N. (1980). Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 129–172). London: Academic.
go back to reference Kornblum, S. (1973). Sequential effects in choice RT: a tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (Ed.). Attention & performance: vol IV (pp. 259–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Kornblum, S. (1973). Sequential effects in choice RT: a tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (Ed.). Attention & performance: vol IV (pp. 259–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Kornblum, S., & Stevens, G. (2002). Sequential effects of dimensional overlap: findings and issues. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.). Common mechanisms in perception and action: attention & performance: vol XIX (pp. 9–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kornblum, S., & Stevens, G. (2002). Sequential effects of dimensional overlap: findings and issues. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.). Common mechanisms in perception and action: attention & performance: vol XIX (pp. 9–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Kutas, M. & Donchin, E. (1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 202, 95–115.CrossRefPubMed Kutas, M. & Donchin, E. (1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 202, 95–115.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2005). Tailoring perception and action to the task at hand. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. in press. Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2005). Tailoring perception and action to the task at hand. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. in press.
go back to reference Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451–468.CrossRefPubMed Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451–468.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Leslie, A. M., Xu, F., Tremoulet, P. D., & Sholl, B. J. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: developing ’what’ and ’where’ systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 10–18.CrossRef Leslie, A. M., Xu, F., Tremoulet, P. D., & Sholl, B. J. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: developing ’what’ and ’where’ systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 10–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Mayr, U., & Bryck, R. L. (2005). Low-level constraints on high-level selection: switching tasks with and without switching stimulus/response objects. Psychological Research, this issue. Mayr, U., & Bryck, R. L. (2005). Low-level constraints on high-level selection: switching tasks with and without switching stimulus/response objects. Psychological Research, this issue.
go back to reference Milliken, B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2005). Repetition costs in word identification: evaluating a stimulus–response integration account. Psychological Research, this issue. Milliken, B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2005). Repetition costs in word identification: evaluating a stimulus–response integration account. Psychological Research, this issue.
go back to reference Odom, R. D. (1972). Effects of perceptual salience on the recall of relevant and incidental dimensional values: a developmental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 285–291.PubMedCrossRef Odom, R. D. (1972). Effects of perceptual salience on the recall of relevant and incidental dimensional values: a developmental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 285–291.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E. & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: inferences from movement-related brain research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217–232.CrossRefPubMed Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E. & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: inferences from movement-related brain research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217–232.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Phaf, R. H., Van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Hudson, P. T. W. (1990). SLAM: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273–341.CrossRefPubMed Phaf, R. H., Van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Hudson, P. T. W. (1990). SLAM: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273–341.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 2–25. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 2–25.
go back to reference Pratt, J., & Hommel, B. (2003). Symbolic control of visual attention: the role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 835–845.CrossRefPubMed Pratt, J., & Hommel, B. (2003). Symbolic control of visual attention: the role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 835–845.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Raffone, A., & Wolters, G. (2001). A cortical mechanism for binding in visual working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 766–785.CrossRefPubMed Raffone, A., & Wolters, G. (2001). A cortical mechanism for binding in visual working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 766–785.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Riehle, A. & Requin, J. (1989). Monkey primary motor and premotor cortex: single-cell activity related to prior information about direction and extent of an intended movement. Journal of Neurophysiology, 61, 534–549.PubMed Riehle, A. & Requin, J. (1989). Monkey primary motor and premotor cortex: single-cell activity related to prior information about direction and extent of an intended movement. Journal of Neurophysiology, 61, 534–549.PubMed
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D. A. (1987). Successive approximations to a model of human motor programming. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 21, 153–182.CrossRef Rosenbaum, D. A. (1987). Successive approximations to a model of human motor programming. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 21, 153–182.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D. A., Weber, R. J., Hazelett, W. M. & Hindorff, V. (1986). The parameter remapping effect in human performance: evidence from tongue twisters and finger fumblers. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 710–725.CrossRef Rosenbaum, D. A., Weber, R. J., Hazelett, W. M. & Hindorff, V. (1986). The parameter remapping effect in human performance: evidence from tongue twisters and finger fumblers. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 710–725.CrossRef
go back to reference Soetens, E., Boer, L. C., & Hueting, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 598–616.CrossRef Soetens, E., Boer, L. C., & Hueting, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 598–616.CrossRef
go back to reference Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.CrossRef Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.CrossRef
go back to reference Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.). Common mechanisms in perception and action: attention & performance: vol XIX (pp. 538–552). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.). Common mechanisms in perception and action: attention & performance: vol XIX (pp. 538–552). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Stoffer, T. H., & Yakin, A. R. (1994). The functional role of attention for spatial coding on the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 53, 127–135.CrossRef Stoffer, T. H., & Yakin, A. R. (1994). The functional role of attention for spatial coding on the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 53, 127–135.CrossRef
go back to reference Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects. In The 14th Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201–237. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects. In The 14th Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201–237.
go back to reference Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.CrossRefPubMed Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tune, G. S. (1964). A brief survey of variables that influence random generation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18, 705–710.PubMed Tune, G. S. (1964). A brief survey of variables that influence random generation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18, 705–710.PubMed
go back to reference Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994). ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 157–165.CrossRefPubMed Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994). ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 157–165.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1993). The role of position in object selection in vision. Psychological Research, 56, 44–58.CrossRefPubMed Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1993). The role of position in object selection in vision. Psychological Research, 56, 44–58.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vidal, F., Bonnet, M. & Macar, F. (1991). Programming response duration in a precueing reaction time paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 226–234.PubMedCrossRef Vidal, F., Bonnet, M. & Macar, F. (1991). Programming response duration in a precueing reaction time paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 226–234.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wenke, D., Gaschler, R., & Nattkemper, D. (2005). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research, this issue. Wenke, D., Gaschler, R., & Nattkemper, D. (2005). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research, this issue.
go back to reference Wickens, J., Hyland, B. & Anson, G. (1994). Cortical cell assemblies: a possible mechanism for motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 66–82.PubMedCrossRef Wickens, J., Hyland, B. & Anson, G. (1994). Cortical cell assemblies: a possible mechanism for motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 66–82.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202–238. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202–238.
go back to reference Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.). Attention (pp. 13–74). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.). Attention (pp. 13–74). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Metagegevens
Titel
Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice
Auteur
Bernhard Hommel
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0035-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2007

Psychological Research 1/2007 Naar de uitgave