Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2007

01-01-2007 | Original Article

Feature binding and episodic retrieval in blindness for congruent stimuli: evidence from analyses of sequential congruency

Auteurs: Chris Oriet, Biljana Stevanovski, Pierre Jolicœur

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Targets are identified more poorly when presented during a congruent cued response than during an incongruent cued response (blindness effect). The authors investigated sequential trial dependencies in the blindness effect. The results show that the size of the blindness effect depends both on the previous cued response-target congruency relationship and on repetition of events from the preceding trial. This finding suggests that cued responses and targets become linked together in a single episodic trace; repeating one of these events from the preceding trial activates the other. Depending on whether the activated representation matches or conflicts with events on the current trial, target identification performance is either facilitated or impaired. Implications for action planning and feature binding are discussed.
Voetnoten
1
Cued response repetition is confounded with target repetition, so it was not possible to analyze both these factors within a single analysis. We chose to include cued response repetition as a factor, rather than target repetition, because it is easier to understand how cued responses can reactivate previous targets and influence subsequent target representation than it is to understand how targets can reactivate previous cued responses and then influence identification of themselves. We do not, however, exclude this latter possibility, and we discuss two possible ways in which target repetition could influence identification performance.
 
2
We thank Jochen Müsseler for directing our attention to this possibility.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., & Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. S. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance II (pp. 107 – 132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., & Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. S. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance II (pp. 107 – 132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Caessens, B. & Vandierendonck, A. (2002). Inhibition and blindness to response-compatible stimuli: a reappraisal. Acta Psychologica, 111, 44 – 57.CrossRef Caessens, B. & Vandierendonck, A. (2002). Inhibition and blindness to response-compatible stimuli: a reappraisal. Acta Psychologica, 111, 44 – 57.CrossRef
go back to reference Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2005). Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69 (this issue). Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2005). Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69 (this issue).
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2005). Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69, XX–XX. Hommel, B. (2005). Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69, XX–XX.
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J, Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.CrossRef Hommel, B., Müsseler, J, Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Proctor, R. L., and Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 68, 1 – 17.CrossRef Hommel, B., Proctor, R. L., and Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 68, 1 – 17.CrossRef
go back to reference Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 110, 306 – 340. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 110, 306 – 340.
go back to reference Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. M. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman, R. Davies, & J. Beatty (Eds.), Varieties of Attention. (pp. 29 – 61). New York: Academic. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. M. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman, R. Davies, & J. Beatty (Eds.), Varieties of Attention. (pp. 29 – 61). New York: Academic.
go back to reference Milliken, B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2005). Repetition costs in word identification: Evaluating a stimulus–response integration account. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69 (this issue). Milliken, B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2005). Repetition costs in word identification: Evaluating a stimulus–response integration account. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69 (this issue).
go back to reference Milliken, B., Lupiañez, J., Debner, J., & Abello, B. (1999). Automatic and controlled processing in stroop negative priming: The role of attentional set . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1384–1402.CrossRef Milliken, B., Lupiañez, J., Debner, J., & Abello, B. (1999). Automatic and controlled processing in stroop negative priming: The role of attentional set . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1384–1402.CrossRef
go back to reference Mordkoff, T. (1998). The gating of irrelevant information in selective-attention tasks (Abstract). Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 193. Mordkoff, T. (1998). The gating of irrelevant information in selective-attention tasks (Abstract). Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 193.
go back to reference Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861 – 872.CrossRef Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861 – 872.CrossRef
go back to reference Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125 – 129. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125 – 129.
go back to reference Müsseler, J., Wühr, P, & Prinz, W. (2000). Varying the response-code in the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Visual Cognition, 7, 743 – 767.CrossRef Müsseler, J., Wühr, P, & Prinz, W. (2000). Varying the response-code in the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Visual Cognition, 7, 743 – 767.CrossRef
go back to reference Müsseler, J., Steininger, S., & Wühr, P. (2001). Can actions affect perceptual processing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54(A), 137–154.CrossRefPubMed Müsseler, J., Steininger, S., & Wühr, P. (2001). Can actions affect perceptual processing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54(A), 137–154.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Oriet, C., Stevanovski, B., Jolicœur, P., & Cowan, W. B. (2003). Lengthening the duration of response execution does not modulate blindness to action-compatible stimuli. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 11–22.PubMed Oriet, C., Stevanovski, B., Jolicœur, P., & Cowan, W. B. (2003). Lengthening the duration of response execution does not modulate blindness to action-compatible stimuli. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 11–22.PubMed
go back to reference Park, J. & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 613–623.CrossRef Park, J. & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 613–623.CrossRef
go back to reference Prinz, W. (1992). Why don’t we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1–20. Prinz, W. (1992). Why don’t we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1–20.
go back to reference Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 1–17.CrossRef Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Schneider, W. (1988). Micro experimental laboratory: an integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 20, 206–217. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro experimental laboratory: an integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 20, 206–217.
go back to reference Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S–R compatibility. Reaction time as a function of ear–hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97–102. Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S–R compatibility. Reaction time as a function of ear–hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97–102.
go back to reference Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (2002). Blinded by headlights. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 65–74.PubMed Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (2002). Blinded by headlights. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 65–74.PubMed
go back to reference Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 431–440.CrossRef Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 431–440.CrossRef
go back to reference Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (in press). Relative contributions of conceptual and response-related activation in blindness to congruent stimuli. Visual Cognition. Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (in press). Relative contributions of conceptual and response-related activation in blindness to congruent stimuli. Visual Cognition.
go back to reference Stoet, G. & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.CrossRef Stoet, G. & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.CrossRef
go back to reference Stoet, G. & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance, Vol. XIX (pp. 538–552). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stoet, G. & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance, Vol. XIX (pp. 538–552). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.CrossRefPubMed Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.CrossRefPubMed Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wenke, D., Gaschler, R., & Nattkemper, D. (2005). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69, XX–XX. Wenke, D., Gaschler, R., & Nattkemper, D. (2005). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69, XX–XX.
go back to reference Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1260–1270.CrossRef Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1260–1270.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Feature binding and episodic retrieval in blindness for congruent stimuli: evidence from analyses of sequential congruency
Auteurs
Chris Oriet
Biljana Stevanovski
Pierre Jolicœur
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0034-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2007

Psychological Research 1/2007 Naar de uitgave