Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 2/2022

20-07-2021

Feasibility and performance of smartphone-based daily micro-surveys among patients recovering from cancer surgery

Auteurs: Lisa van den Berg, Philip Brouwer, Nikhil Panda, Maarten M. Hoogbergen, Ian Solsky, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, Alex B. Haynes, Christopher J. Sidey-Gibbons

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 2/2022

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Aims

Daily micro-surveys, or the high-frequency administration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), may provide real-time, unbiased assessments of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of daily micro-surveys using a smartphone platform among patients recovering from cancer surgery.

Methods

In a prospective study (2017–2019), patients undergoing cancer surgery downloaded a smartphone application that administered daily micro-surveys comprising five randomly selected items from the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Micro-surveys were administered without replacement until the entire SF-36 was administered weekly. The full-length SF-36 was also administered preoperatively and 4, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. We assessed response and completion rates between the micro-surveys and full-length SF-36, as well as agreement of responses using Bland–Altman (B&A) analyses.

Results

Ninety-five patients downloaded the application and were followed for a mean of 131 days [SD ± 85]. Response rates for the full-length SF-36 and micro-surveys was 76% [95%CI 69, 83], and 34% [95%CI 26, 39]. Despite lower response rates, more SF-36 surveys were collected using the daily micro-surveys compared to the intermittent full-length SF-36 (9.9 [95%CI 8.4, 12.6] vs. 3.0 [95%CI 2.8, 3.3], respectively). B&A analyses demonstrated lack of agreement between micro-surveys and SF-36. However, agreement improved with higher micro-survey completion rate. Eighty-five percent of participants reported that daily micro-surveys were not burdensome.

Conclusion

This study suggests that collection of daily micro-surveys among patients recovering from cancer surgery is feasible using smartphones in the early postoperative period. Future implementation of daily micro-surveys may more granularly describe momentary HRQoL changes through a greater volume of self-reported survey data.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
2.
go back to reference Black, N. (2013). Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ, 346, e7896. Black, N. (2013). Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ, 346, e7896.
3.
go back to reference Panda, N., & Haynes, A. B. (2020). Prioritizing the Patient Perspective in Oncologic Surgery. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 27(1), 43–44.CrossRef Panda, N., & Haynes, A. B. (2020). Prioritizing the Patient Perspective in Oncologic Surgery. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 27(1), 43–44.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bradburn, N. M., Rips, L. J., & Shevell, S. K. (1987). Answering autobiographical questions : The impact of memory and inference on surveys Author(s): Norman M. Bradburn, Lance J. Rips and Steven K. Shevell Reviewed work(s): Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 4798 Science (80-. )., vol. 236, no. 4798, pp. 157–161. Bradburn, N. M., Rips, L. J., & Shevell, S. K. (1987). Answering autobiographical questions : The impact of memory and inference on surveys Author(s): Norman M. Bradburn, Lance J. Rips and Steven K. Shevell Reviewed work(s): Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 4798 Science (80-. )., vol. 236, no. 4798, pp. 157–161.
5.
go back to reference Erskine, A., Morley, S., & Pearce, S. (1990). Memory for pain: A review. Pain, 41(3), 255–265.CrossRef Erskine, A., Morley, S., & Pearce, S. (1990). Memory for pain: A review. Pain, 41(3), 255–265.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4(1), 1–32.CrossRef Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4(1), 1–32.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(3), 236–243.CrossRef Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(3), 236–243.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Timmer, B. H. B., Hickson, L., & Launer, S. (2017). Ecological momentary assessment: Feasibility, construct validity, and future applications. American Journal of Audiology, 26(3S), 436–442.CrossRef Timmer, B. H. B., Hickson, L., & Launer, S. (2017). Ecological momentary assessment: Feasibility, construct validity, and future applications. American Journal of Audiology, 26(3S), 436–442.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Junghaenel, D. U., Schneider, S., & Schwartz, J. E. (2016). PROMIS fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, physical function, depression, anxiety, and anger scales demonstrate ecological validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 74, 194–206.CrossRef Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Junghaenel, D. U., Schneider, S., & Schwartz, J. E. (2016). PROMIS fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, physical function, depression, anxiety, and anger scales demonstrate ecological validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 74, 194–206.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Torous, J., Kiang, M. V., Lorme, J., & Onnela, J. P. (2016). New tools for new research in psychiatry: A scalable and customizable platform to empower data driven smartphone research. JMIR Ment Heal, 3(2), e16.CrossRef Torous, J., Kiang, M. V., Lorme, J., & Onnela, J. P. (2016). New tools for new research in psychiatry: A scalable and customizable platform to empower data driven smartphone research. JMIR Ment Heal, 3(2), e16.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Onnela, J. P., & Rauch, S. L. (2016). Harnessing smartphone-based digital phenotyping to enhance behavioral and mental health. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41(7), 1691–1696.CrossRef Onnela, J. P., & Rauch, S. L. (2016). Harnessing smartphone-based digital phenotyping to enhance behavioral and mental health. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41(7), 1691–1696.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Panda, N., et al. (2020). Using smartphones to capture novel recovery metrics after cancer surgery. JAMA Surgery, 155(2), 123–129.CrossRef Panda, N., et al. (2020). Using smartphones to capture novel recovery metrics after cancer surgery. JAMA Surgery, 155(2), 123–129.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Condon, D. M., et al. (2020). Does recall period matter? Comparing PROMIS® physical function with no recall, 24-hr recall, and 7-day recall. Quality of Life Research, 29(3), 745–753.CrossRef Condon, D. M., et al. (2020). Does recall period matter? Comparing PROMIS® physical function with no recall, 24-hr recall, and 7-day recall. Quality of Life Research, 29(3), 745–753.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference L. Busija, E. Pausenberger, T. P. Haines, S. Haymes, R. Buchbinder, and R. H. Osborne, 2011 “Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQ O L)”. Arthritis Care Res vol. 63(11): 383-412 L. Busija, E. Pausenberger, T. P. Haines, S. Haymes, R. Buchbinder, and R. H. Osborne, 2011 “Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQ O L)”. Arthritis Care Res vol. 63(11): 383-412
15.
go back to reference N. Panda, D. W. Rattner, and C. R. Morse, 2019 “Third-time (‘redo–redo’) anti-reflux surgery: patient-reported outcomes after a thoracoabdominal approach,” Surg. Endosc., no. 0123456789 N. Panda, D. W. Rattner, and C. R. Morse, 2019 “Third-time (‘redo–redo’) anti-reflux surgery: patient-reported outcomes after a thoracoabdominal approach,” Surg. Endosc., no. 0123456789
16.
go back to reference S. S. Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA 2020“Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis”. Gastroenterol. Nurs vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 200–202 S. S. Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA 2020“Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis”. Gastroenterol. Nurs vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 200–202
17.
go back to reference Giavarina, D. (2015). Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem. Medica, 25(2), 141–151.CrossRef Giavarina, D. (2015). Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem. Medica, 25(2), 141–151.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Antonescu, I., Scott, S., Tran, T. T., Mayo, N. E., & Feldman, L. S. (2014). Measuring postoperative recovery: What are clinically meaningful differences? Surgical (United States), 156(2), 319–327. Antonescu, I., Scott, S., Tran, T. T., Mayo, N. E., & Feldman, L. S. (2014). Measuring postoperative recovery: What are clinically meaningful differences? Surgical (United States), 156(2), 319–327.
19.
go back to reference Panda, N., Solsky, I., & Haynes, A. B. (2019). Redefining shared decision-making in the digital era. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 45(12), 2287–2288.CrossRef Panda, N., Solsky, I., & Haynes, A. B. (2019). Redefining shared decision-making in the digital era. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 45(12), 2287–2288.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ono, M., Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., & Stone, A. A. (2019). What affects the completion of ecological momentary assessments in chronic pain research? An individual patient data meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), e11398.CrossRef Ono, M., Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., & Stone, A. A. (2019). What affects the completion of ecological momentary assessments in chronic pain research? An individual patient data meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), e11398.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Becker, J., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E. (2008). Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(1), 17–33.CrossRef Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Becker, J., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E. (2008). Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(1), 17–33.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Harrison, C., Loe, B. S., Lis, P., & Sidey-Gibbons, C. (2020). Maximizing the potential of patient-reported assessments by using the open-source concerto platform with computerized adaptive testing and machine learning. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), 1–8.CrossRef Harrison, C., Loe, B. S., Lis, P., & Sidey-Gibbons, C. (2020). Maximizing the potential of patient-reported assessments by using the open-source concerto platform with computerized adaptive testing and machine learning. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), 1–8.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Feasibility and performance of smartphone-based daily micro-surveys among patients recovering from cancer surgery
Auteurs
Lisa van den Berg
Philip Brouwer
Nikhil Panda
Maarten M. Hoogbergen
Ian Solsky
Jukka-Pekka Onnela
Alex B. Haynes
Christopher J. Sidey-Gibbons
Publicatiedatum
20-07-2021
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02934-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2022

Quality of Life Research 2/2022 Naar de uitgave