Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-09-2011 | Brief Communication | Uitgave 7/2011 Open Access

Quality of Life Research 7/2011

Fatigue in children: reliability and validity of the Dutch PedsQLTM Multidimensional Fatigue Scale

Tijdschrift:
Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 7/2011
Auteurs:
M. Suzanne Gordijn, Eline M. P. Cremers, Gertjan J. L. Kaspers, Reinoud J. B. J. Gemke
Belangrijke opmerkingen
An erratum to this article can be found at http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-011-9869-8
Abbreviations
HRQOL
Health-related quality of life
PedsQLTM
Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM
ICC
Intraclass correlation coefficient
SPSS
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
SES
Socioeconomic status

Introduction

Fatigue is a common symptom in pediatric health conditions and is associated with poorer HRQOL [ 18]. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL TM) Multidimensional Fatigue Scale was designed by Varni and colleagues to measure fatigue in children. The original American version demonstrated adequate reliability and validity [ 14, 9]. Recently, this questionnaire has been translated into Dutch in accordance with internationally accepted methods [ 10].
Substantial cultural differences regarding sleep and fatigue in children have been reported, precluding generalization of instruments before assessment in other sociocultural contexts has been performed [ 1116]. Accordingly, our objectives were to obtain a norm-reference and to test the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the PedsQL TM Multidimensional Fatigue Scale.
We hypothesized that the reliability and validity of the Dutch version is comparable to the original version. In addition, we expected adolescents to be more fatigued than younger children [ 17].

Methods

The PedsQL TM Multidimensional Fatigue Scale was distributed at day care facilities and schools in urban and suburban areas in the Netherlands, between October 2009 and May 2010. The questionnaire was self-administered, but children aged 5–7 years have been assisted by the researcher. One half of the participants were given the option to receive the questionnaire again after 2 weeks to assess test–retest reliability. The other half received two copies of the questionnaire to be completed independently by both parents to test inter-observer reliability.
The 18-item PedsQL TM Multidimensional Fatigue Scale reflects three subscales: general fatigue (GF), sleep/rest fatigue (SRF), and cognitive fatigue (CF). The questionnaire comprises parallel child self-reports for the ages 5–7 years (young child), 8–12 years (child), and 13–18 years (adolescent) and parent proxy-reports, the latter also including 2–4 years of age (toddler). The participants rated how often a particular problem occurred in the past month, using a 5-point Likert scale and for the young child self-report a 3-point scale. Each item is reverse-scored and rescaled to 0–100 scale, so that higher scores indicate fewer symptoms of fatigue.
Feasibility was evaluated from the percentage of missing answers [ 18]. Range of measurement was based on the percentage of scores at extremes of the scaling range. Scale internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach’s coefficient alpha [ 19]. Test–retest and inter-observer reliability and the parent/child concordance were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) [ 20]. ICCs were designated as ≤0.40 poor to fair agreement, 0.41–0.60 moderate agreement, 0.61–0.80 good agreement, and 0.81–0.100 excellent agreement [ 21, 22]. The ability of the questionnaire to distinguish between groups differing in health condition was computed using unpaired t-tests. Calculated effect sizes up to 0.20 were considered to be small, about 0.50 moderate and about 0.80 large [ 23].
The effect of sociodemographic variables was assessed using linear regression analysis. Within-group differences were assessed by analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni correction for age and education and t-tests for gender, country of birth, and family structure. Data were analyzed using SPSS 15.0.1. A P value of <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Results

In total, 1,257 parent reports and 1,000 child reports were distributed, of which 497 and 366 reports were returned, respectively (response rates 40 and 37%). Sociodemographic characteristics of the initial test are presented in Table  1. Most reported chronic health conditions were asthma, allergies, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Table 1
Sociodemographic characteristics of sample
 
Total sample
Child report
 Age, years: mean (95% CI)
11.4 (11.0–11.8)
 Gender, boys (%)
166 (45%)
 Impaired health condition (%)
40 (11%)
 Medication use (%)
29 (8%)
 Ethnicity, Dutch (%)
359 (98%)
Parent report
 Age child, years: mean (95% CI)
9.5 (9.0–9.9)
 Gender, male (%)
64 (13%)
 Ethnicity, Dutch (%)
466 (94%)
 Education, high (%)
203 (42%)
 Employment
419 (86%)
 Single-parent family (%)
38 (8%)
95% CI 95% confidence interval
PedsQL TM Multidimensional Fatigue Scale scores are summarized in Table  2. Adolescents had more symptoms of GF than the other age ranges (mean difference = 6.20, P < 0.001 for child reports and 5.27, P < 0.001 for parent reports). Boys had more symptoms of CF than girls (mean difference = 3.42, P = 0.0034 for parent reports). Children of immigrants had more problems with SRF compared to children of parents born in the Netherlands (mean difference = 6.12, P = 0.017 for parent reports). Children in a single-parent family had more symptoms of CF (mean difference = 8.29, P = 0.037 for parent reports) and lower total fatigue scores (mean difference = 5.93, P = 0.039 for parent reports) than children living in a two-parent household. Children of low educated parents had more problems with CF (mean difference = 9.35, P = 0.03 for child reports) and lower total fatigue scores (mean difference = 7.17, P = 0.014 for child reports) than children of high educated parents.
Table 2
Scale descriptives for PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
Scale
Age group (years)
Toddler (2–4)
Young child (5–7)
Child (8–12)
Adolescent (13–18)
Total sample
N
Mean
CI
N
Mean
CI
N
Mean
CI
N
Mean
CI
N
Mean
CI
Child report
 Total fatigue
NA
68
76.59
73.16–80.03
143
78.70
76.63–80.76
155
75.24
73.34–77.14
366
76.84
75.54–78.14
 General fatigue
NA
68
83.46
79.61–87.30
143
82.66
80.53–84.80
155
76.72
74.44–78.99
366
80.29
78.81–81.77
 Sleep/rest fatigue
NA
68
74.00
69.47–78.52
143
77.55
75.06–80.03
155
71.88
69.63–74.12
366
74.49
72.88–76.09
 Cognitive fatigue
NA
68
72.24
66.99–77.49
143
75.76
72.60–78.92
155
77.15
74.72–79.58
366
75.69
73.83–77.56
Parent report
 Total fatigue
104
82.87
80.77–84.96
83
83.01
80.43–85.49
149
81.25
79.18–83.31
161
79.17
76.99–81.35
497
81.21
80.10–82.32
 General fatigue
104
82.80
80.49–85.10
83
84.46
81.76–87.15
149
82.27
80.01–84.53
161
77.71
75.23–80.19
497
81.27
80.01–82.52
 Sleep/rest fatigue
104
82.92
80.36–85.49
83
87.77
85.11–90.43
149
85.49
83.35–87.62
161
80.87
78.53–83.22
497
83.84
82.62–85.06
 Cognitive fatigue
104
82.77
79.84–85.70
83
76.71
72.96–80.46
149
75.98
72.80–79.15
161
78.93
76.13–81.73
497
78.48
76.90–80.06
CI 95% confidence interval
Missing responses for all items were rare: 0.2% in parent reports and 0.3% in child reports. No floor effects were detected. Ceiling effects ranged from 1.4% in child reports to 5.1% in parent reports. All child report and parent report scales approached or exceeded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.70 (range 0.64–0.93) (Table  3). Forty-three children (12%) and 75 parents (15%) performed the retest. The retest response for the young child was too low for evaluation. Child report and parent report test–retest ICCs had moderate to excellent agreement (range 0.50 to 0.85) (Table  4). At group level, no significant differences emerged between the test- and retest, except for GF which was reported to be better after 2 weeks by the parents. Fifty-five participants (11%) returned two questionnaires, completed by both parents. Inter-observer reliability ICCs had poor to excellent agreement (range 0.27–0.93) (Table  5). At group level, there were no significant differences between fathers ( n = 169) and mothers ( n = 440), except for lower SRF scores reported by the mothers. Parent/child concordance ICCs had poor to good agreement (range 0.10–0.68) (Table  6). At group level, means of SRF, CF, and total fatigue of the parent report were significantly higher compared to the child report.
Table 3
Internal consistency reliability for PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
Scale
Age group (years)
Toddler (2–4)
Young child (5–7)
Child (8–12)
Adolescent (13–18)
Total sample
α
α
α
α
α
Child report
 Total fatigue
NA
0.79
0.85
0.86
0.83
 General fatigue
NA
0.67
0.71
0.80
0.73
 Sleep/rest fatigue
NA
0.66
0.67
0.64
0.64
 Cognitive fatigue
NA
0.74
0.86
0.81
0.81
Parent report
 Total fatigue
0.88
0.89
0.91
0.93
0.91
 General fatigue
0.78
0.80
0.83
0.86
0.83
 Sleep/rest fatigue
0.72
0.70
0.79
0.81
0.77
 Cognitive fatigue
0.90
0.90
0.92
0.93
0.92
α Cronbach’s coefficient alpha
Table 4
Test–retest reliability for PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
Scale
Age group (years)
Toddler (2–4)
Young child (5–7)
Child (8–12)
Adolescent (13–18)
Total sample
N
ICC
N
ICC
N
ICC
N
ICC
N
ICC
Child report
 Total fatigue
NA
 
NA a
19
0.84
23
0.71
43
0.78
 General fatigue
NA
 
NA a
19
0.74
23
0.75
43
0.77
 Sleep/rest fatigue
NA
 
NA a
19
0.85
23
0.50
43
0.69
 Cognitive fatigue
NA
 
NA a
18
0.75
23
0.78
43
0.75
Parent report
 Total fatigue
24
0.68
NA a
24
0.82
25
0.81
75
0.78
 General fatigue
24
0.57
NA a
24
0.69
25
0.82
75
0.71
 Sleep/rest fatigue
24
0.59
NA a
24
0.83
25
0.64
75
0.69
 Cognitive fatigue
24
0.69
NA a
24
0.73
25
0.74
75
0.73
ICC internal consistency reliability
aOnly 1 child and 2 parents filled in the retest
Table 5
Inter-observer reliability for PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
Scale
Age group (years)
Toddler (2–4)
Young child (5–7)
Child (8–12)
Adolescent (13–18)
Total sample
N
ICC
N
ICC
N
ICC
N
ICC
N
ICC
Total fatigue
40
0.62
7
0.93
12
0.81
71
0.56
130
0.64
General fatigue
40
0.43
7
0.71
12
0.54
71
0.45
130
0.52
Sleep/rest fatigue
40
0.87
7
0.84
12
0.67
71
0.66
130
0.76
Cognitive fatigue
40
0.27
7
0.90
12
0.87
71
0.47
130
0.52
ICC internal consistency reliability
Table 6
Parent child concordance for PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
Scale
Age group (years)
Toddler (2–4)
Young child (5–7)
Child (8–12)
Adolescent (13–18)
Total sample
N
ICC
N
ICC
N
ICC
N
ICC
N
ICC
Total fatigue
NA
 
68
0.25
140
0.68
153
0.52
361
0.53
General fatigue
NA
 
68
0.22
140
0.48
153
0.50
361
0.44
Sleep/rest fatigue
NA
 
68
0.10
140
0.46
153
0.41
361
0.36
Cognitive fatigue
NA
 
68
0.22
140
0.66
153
0.45
361
0.49
ICC internal consistency reliability
Child report and the parent report total scores and most subscale scores demonstrated a significant difference between the healthy participants (89%) and the participants with an impaired health condition (11%) (Table  7). Effect sizes varied from small to medium, with children with an impaired health condition showing lower scores and thus more fatigue.
Table 7
Construct validity for PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
Scale
Healthy sample
Impaired health condition sample
N
Mean
CI
N
Mean
CI
Difference
Effect size
P value
Child report
 Total fatigue
326
77.40
76.06–78.73
40
72.31
67.46–77.15
5.09
0.42
0.047
 General fatigue
326
80.48
78.92–82.04
40
78.75
73.97–83.53
1.73
0.12
0.47
 Sleep/rest fatigue
326
75.00
73.37–76.64
40
70.25
64.04–76.46
4.75
0.32
0.07
 Cognitive fatigue
326
76.65
74.77–78.52
40
67.92
60.39–75.44
8.73
0.51
0.03
Parent report
 Total fatigue
442
81.90
80.75–83.06
55
75.61
72.04–78.18
6.29
0.51
<0.001
 General fatigue
442
82.00
80.69–83.30
55
75.41
71.49–79.33
6.59
0.47
0.001
 Sleep/rest fatigue
442
84.76
83.49–86.03
55
76.41
72.58–80.23
8.35
0.62
<0.001
 Cognitive fatigue
442
78.91
77.27–80.56
55
75.00
69.55–80.45
3.91
0.22
0.13
CI 95% confidence interval

Discussion

Our cohort showed that adolescence was associated with more fatigue, which might reflect the decrease in sleep duration at that age [ 16, 17, 24]. Boys reported more fatigue than girls, indicating socially related gender differences [ 25]. Fatigue was more common in children living in a single-parent family, which might be explained by the higher prevalence of sleep problems in these children [ 16]. Being a child of an immigrant was associated with more fatigue, stressing the influence of the sociocultural background on fatigue. Children of low educated parents reported more fatigue, corresponding with lower reported HRQOL in populations with low socioeconomic status [ 26].
The questionnaire was found to be feasible because of the minimal missing item responses. All scales approached or exceeded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.70, recommended for comparing groups. Parent report total scores approached or exceeded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.90, recommended for analyzing individual patient scales [ 27, 28]. Test–retest reliability was low in the toddler version, suggesting that this version should be applied with caution. The low test–retest accordance in adolescents might be a real variation due to the fluctuations in nocturnal sleep duration. Inter-observer agreement was low in toddlers and adolescents. This observation is difficult to explain and requires further exploration. The father/child agreement and the mother/child agreement were low in the young child, the adolescent and the total sample. This may be due to differences in reasoning and response reactions between parent and child [ 29]. Children scored lower than their parents. The low parent/child concordance (including the weakest agreement for the young child and lower scores reported by the children) has consistently been observed in HRQOL measurement, particularly for internalizing problems [ 3033]. These findings support the need to measure the perspectives of the child and the parent, since both may influence healthcare utilization. The assumption was confirmed that the questionnaire was able to distinguish between healthy children and children with an impaired health condition. It is expected that a clinical sample with more severely ill children will demonstrate worse fatigue scores and higher effect sizes.
Regarding the current study several limitations need to be mentioned. First, we had low response rates, which might lead to non-response bias. Second, the ethnicity of the participants was rather homogenous; only 2% of the children and 6% of the parents were born outside the Netherlands, compared to 10 and 10%, respectively in the Dutch population [ 34]. A possible explanation is the language problems that immigrants experienced and therefore decided not to participate in this study. Third, the educational background of our parent respondents showed that 42% were highly educated, compared to 18% of the Dutch population [ 35]. Highly educated parents might have been more aware of the necessity of this study wherefore more willing to participate. Children from immigrants as well as from low educated parents may experience more fatigue; hence, the obtained norm-reference may underestimate fatigue in the general population. Information on nonparticipants was not available, thus generalization of the norm-results should be made with caution.
In conclusion, the Dutch version of the PedsQL TM Multidimensional Fatigue Scale demonstrates overall adequate psychometric properties in another sociocultural context. With the obtained norm-references, it can be utilized as a tool to evaluate fatigue in children.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the children and parents who participated in this study. We are also grateful to the day care facilities and schools for making this project possible.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​2.​0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2011

Quality of Life Research 7/2011 Naar de uitgave