Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies 3/2020

10-01-2020 | Original Paper

Fathers in Jail and their Minor Children: Paternal Characteristics and Associations with Father-Child Contact

Auteurs: Rebecca J. Shlafer, Laurel Davis, Lauren Hindt, Lindsay Weymouth, Hilary Cuthrell, Cynthia Burnson, Julie Poehlmann-Tynan

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 3/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Objectives

More than five million children have experienced a co-resident parent leaving to spend time behind bars. Most incarceration occurs in jails, yet little is known about contact between parents in jail and their minor children. Such information is essential to inform programming and policy to support families in the context of incarceration.

Methods

In the present study, 315 fathers in jail with minor children (3–17 years old) were recruited from four jails in the Midwest region of the United States. Fathers in jail reported their demographic information, incarceration-related characteristics (e.g., number of prior arrests), children’s exposure to incarceration-related events, and frequency of contact with their children.

Results

Four main findings emerged: (1) telephone contact was the most common modality for engaging with children during a paternal jail stay, with 22% of fathers reporting daily phone contact with children, (2) types of contact were correlated, so that more phone contact and letter writing were associated with more frequent visits, (3) White, non-Hispanic fathers and those who did not plan to live with their children upon release were less likely to report telephone contact with their children, and (4) children who witnessed their fathers’ arrest were less likely to write and children who witnessed their fathers’ criminal activity were less likely to visit.

Conclusions

Contact between fathers in jail and children has implications for the parent-child relationship. Future research should explore quality of and barriers to contact, including incarceration-related events.
Voetnoten
1
Jailed fathers were not compensated; however, caregivers who participated in other parts of the larger study were compensated and some fathers may have been motivated to participate for this reason.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Arditti, J. A., Lambert-Shute, J., & Joest, K. (2003). Saturday morning at the jail: Implications of incarceration for families and children. Family Relations, 52(3), 195–204.CrossRef Arditti, J. A., Lambert-Shute, J., & Joest, K. (2003). Saturday morning at the jail: Implications of incarceration for families and children. Family Relations, 52(3), 195–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Boswell, G. (2002). Imprisoned fathers: the children’s view. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(1), 14–26.CrossRef Boswell, G. (2002). Imprisoned fathers: the children’s view. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(1), 14–26.CrossRef
go back to reference Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Bronson, J., & Carson, E. A. (2019). Prisoners in 2017. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Bronson, J., & Carson, E. A. (2019). Prisoners in 2017. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
go back to reference Christian, J., Martinez, D. J., & Martinez, D. (2015). Beyond the shadows of the prison: Agency and resilience among prisoners’ family members. In And justice for all, (pp. 1–42). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library. Christian, J., Martinez, D. J., & Martinez, D. (2015). Beyond the shadows of the prison: Agency and resilience among prisoners’ family members. In And justice for all, (pp. 1–42). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library.
go back to reference Cramer, L., Goff, M., Peterson, B., & Sandstrom, H. (2017). Parent-child visiting practices prisons and jails: a synthesis of research and practice. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Cramer, L., Goff, M., Peterson, B., & Sandstrom, H. (2017). Parent-child visiting practices prisons and jails: a synthesis of research and practice. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
go back to reference Dallaire, D., Zeman, J. L., & Thrash, T. M. (2015). Differential effects of type of children’s contact with their jailed mothers and children’s behavior problems. In J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Ed.), Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: implications for policy and intervention (pp. 23–38). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef Dallaire, D., Zeman, J. L., & Thrash, T. M. (2015). Differential effects of type of children’s contact with their jailed mothers and children’s behavior problems. In J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Ed.), Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: implications for policy and intervention (pp. 23–38). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference De Claire, K., & Dixon, L. (2017). The effects of prison visits from family members on prisoners’ well-being, prison rule breaking, and recidivism: a review of research since 1991. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 185–199.CrossRef De Claire, K., & Dixon, L. (2017). The effects of prison visits from family members on prisoners’ well-being, prison rule breaking, and recidivism: a review of research since 1991. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 185–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Eddy, J. M., Martinez, Jr., C. R., & Burraston, B. (2013). VI. A randomized controlled trial of a parent management training program for incarcerated parents: proximal impacts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(3), 75–93.CrossRef Eddy, J. M., Martinez, Jr., C. R., & Burraston, B. (2013). VI. A randomized controlled trial of a parent management training program for incarcerated parents: proximal impacts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(3), 75–93.CrossRef
go back to reference Eddy, J. M., & Burraston, B. O. (2018). Programs promoting the successful reentry of fathers from jail or prison to home in their communities. In C. Wildeman, A. R. Haskins & J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Eds), When parents are incarcerated: interdisciplinary research and interventions to support children. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Eddy, J. M., & Burraston, B. O. (2018). Programs promoting the successful reentry of fathers from jail or prison to home in their communities. In C. Wildeman, A. R. Haskins & J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Eds), When parents are incarcerated: interdisciplinary research and interventions to support children. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
go back to reference Eddy, J. M., & Poehlmann-Tynan, J. (2019). Handbook on children with incarcerated parents. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRef Eddy, J. M., & Poehlmann-Tynan, J. (2019). Handbook on children with incarcerated parents. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. 1st ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. 1st ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Galardi, T. R., Settersten, Jr, R. A., Vuchinich, S., & Richards, L. (2017). Associations between incarcerated fathers’ cumulative childhood risk and contact with their children. Journal of Family Issues, 38(5), 654–676.CrossRef Galardi, T. R., Settersten, Jr, R. A., Vuchinich, S., & Richards, L. (2017). Associations between incarcerated fathers’ cumulative childhood risk and contact with their children. Journal of Family Issues, 38(5), 654–676.CrossRef
go back to reference Glaze, L. E., & Maruschak, L. M. (2008). Parents in prison and their minor children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.CrossRef Glaze, L. E., & Maruschak, L. M. (2008). Parents in prison and their minor children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.CrossRef
go back to reference Hairston, C. F. (1998). The forgotten parent: understanding the forces that influence incarcerated fathers’ relationships with their children. Child Welfare, 77(5), 617–639.PubMed Hairston, C. F. (1998). The forgotten parent: understanding the forces that influence incarcerated fathers’ relationships with their children. Child Welfare, 77(5), 617–639.PubMed
go back to reference Lamberti, J. S. (2016). Preventing criminal recidivism through mental health and criminal justice collaboration. Psychiatric Services, 67(11), 1206–1212.CrossRef Lamberti, J. S. (2016). Preventing criminal recidivism through mental health and criminal justice collaboration. Psychiatric Services, 67(11), 1206–1212.CrossRef
go back to reference Maldonado, S. (2006). Recidivism and paternal engagement. Family Law Quarterly, 40, 191–211. Maldonado, S. (2006). Recidivism and paternal engagement. Family Law Quarterly, 40, 191–211.
go back to reference McClure, H. H., Shortt, J. W., Eddy, J. M., Holmes, A., Van Uum, S., Russell, E., & Martinez, C. R. (2015). Associations among mother-child contact, parenting stress, hair cortisol, and mother and child adjustment related to incarceration. In J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Ed.), Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: implications for policy and intervention (advances in child and family policy and practice). New York, NY: Springer. McClure, H. H., Shortt, J. W., Eddy, J. M., Holmes, A., Van Uum, S., Russell, E., & Martinez, C. R. (2015). Associations among mother-child contact, parenting stress, hair cortisol, and mother and child adjustment related to incarceration. In J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Ed.), Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: implications for policy and intervention (advances in child and family policy and practice). New York, NY: Springer.
go back to reference Minton, T. D., & Zeng, Z. (2016). Jail inmates in 2015. Washington, D.C.: BJS. Minton, T. D., & Zeng, Z. (2016). Jail inmates in 2015. Washington, D.C.: BJS.
go back to reference Murphey, D., & Cooper, P. M. (2015). Parents behind bars: what happens to their children? Bethesda, MD: Child Trends. Murphey, D., & Cooper, P. M. (2015). Parents behind bars: what happens to their children? Bethesda, MD: Child Trends.
go back to reference Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., & Sekol, I. (2012). Children’s antisocial behavior, mental health, drug use, and educational performance after parental incarceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 175.CrossRef Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., & Sekol, I. (2012). Children’s antisocial behavior, mental health, drug use, and educational performance after parental incarceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 175.CrossRef
go back to reference Peterson, B., Fontaine, J., Cramer, L., Reisman, A., Cuthrell, H., Goff, M., McCoy, E., & Reginal, T. (2019). Model practices for parents in prisons and jails. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Peterson, B., Fontaine, J., Cramer, L., Reisman, A., Cuthrell, H., Goff, M., McCoy, E., & Reginal, T. (2019). Model practices for parents in prisons and jails. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
go back to reference Poehlmann-Tynan, J. (Ed.). (2015). Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: Implications for policy and intervention. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Poehlmann-Tynan, J. (Ed.). (2015). Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: Implications for policy and intervention. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
go back to reference Poehlmann-Tynan, J., & Arditti, J. A. (2018). Developmental and family perspectives on parental incarceration. In: C Wildeman, A. R Haskins, J Poehlmann-Tynan, (Eds), APA Bronfenbrenner series on the ecology of human development. When parents are incarcerated: interdisciplinary research and interventions to support children. (pp. 53–81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000062-004.CrossRef Poehlmann-Tynan, J., & Arditti, J. A. (2018). Developmental and family perspectives on parental incarceration. In: C Wildeman, A. R Haskins, J Poehlmann-Tynan, (Eds), APA Bronfenbrenner series on the ecology of human development. When parents are incarcerated: interdisciplinary research and interventions to support children. (pp. 53–81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0000062-004.CrossRef
go back to reference Poehlmann-Tynan, J., Burnson, C., Runion, H., & Weymouth, L. A. (2017). Attachment in young children with incarcerated fathers. Development & Psychopathology, 29, 389–404.CrossRef Poehlmann-Tynan, J., Burnson, C., Runion, H., & Weymouth, L. A. (2017). Attachment in young children with incarcerated fathers. Development & Psychopathology, 29, 389–404.CrossRef
go back to reference Poehlmann-Tynan, J., & Pritzl, K. In: In J. M. Eddy, J. Poehlmann-Tynan Eds 2019). Parent-child visits when parents are incarcerated in prison or jail. Handbook on children with incarcerated parents. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer International Press. Poehlmann-Tynan, J., & Pritzl, K. In: In J. M. Eddy, J. Poehlmann-Tynan Eds 2019). Parent-child visits when parents are incarcerated in prison or jail. Handbook on children with incarcerated parents. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer International Press.
go back to reference Poehlmann-Tynan, J., Runion, H., Burnson, C., Maleck, S., Weymouth, L., Pettit, K., & Huser, M. (2015). Young children’s behavioral and emotional reactions to plexiglass and video visits with jailed parents. In J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Ed.), Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: implications for policy and intervention (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef Poehlmann-Tynan, J., Runion, H., Burnson, C., Maleck, S., Weymouth, L., Pettit, K., & Huser, M. (2015). Young children’s behavioral and emotional reactions to plexiglass and video visits with jailed parents. In J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Ed.), Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: implications for policy and intervention (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Poehlmann-Tynan J., Cuthrell H., Weymouth L., Burnson C., Frerks, L., Muentner, L., Holder, N., Milavetz, Z., Lauter, L., Hindt, L., Davis, L., Schubert, E., & Shlafer, R. (2020). Multisite randomized efficacy trial of educational intervention for young children with jailed fathers. In press, Development and Psychopathology. Poehlmann-Tynan J., Cuthrell H., Weymouth L., Burnson C., Frerks, L., Muentner, L., Holder, N., Milavetz, Z., Lauter, L., Hindt, L., Davis, L., Schubert, E., & Shlafer, R. (2020). Multisite randomized efficacy trial of educational intervention for young children with jailed fathers. In press, Development and Psychopathology.
go back to reference Roy, K. M., & Dyson, O. L. (2005). Gatekeeping in context: babymama drama and the involvement of incarcerated fathers. Fathering, 3(3), 289.CrossRef Roy, K. M., & Dyson, O. L. (2005). Gatekeeping in context: babymama drama and the involvement of incarcerated fathers. Fathering, 3(3), 289.CrossRef
go back to reference Sakala, L. (2014). Breaking down mass incarceration in the 2010 census: state-by-state incarceration rates by race/ethnicity. Prison Policy Initiative. Sakala, L. (2014). Breaking down mass incarceration in the 2010 census: state-by-state incarceration rates by race/ethnicity. Prison Policy Initiative.
go back to reference Sarkadi, A., Kristiansson, R., Oberklaid, F., & Bremberg, S. (2008). Fathers’ involvement and children’s developmental outcomes: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Acta Paediatrica, 97(2), 153–158.CrossRef Sarkadi, A., Kristiansson, R., Oberklaid, F., & Bremberg, S. (2008). Fathers’ involvement and children’s developmental outcomes: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Acta Paediatrica, 97(2), 153–158.CrossRef
go back to reference Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177.CrossRef Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177.CrossRef
go back to reference Sesame Street Workshop (2013). Tips for incarcerated parents. New York, NY: Sesame Street. Sesame Street Workshop (2013). Tips for incarcerated parents. New York, NY: Sesame Street.
go back to reference Shlafer, R. J., Loper, A. B., & Schillmoeller, L. (2015). Introduction and literature review: is parent-child contact during parental incarceration beneficial? In J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Ed.), Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: implications for policy and intervention. New York, NY: Springer. Shlafer, R. J., Loper, A. B., & Schillmoeller, L. (2015). Introduction and literature review: is parent-child contact during parental incarceration beneficial? In J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Ed.), Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: implications for policy and intervention. New York, NY: Springer.
go back to reference Spaulding, A. C., Perez, S. D., Seals, R. M., Hallman, M. A., Kavasery, R., & Weiss, P. S. (2011). Diversity of release patterns for jail detainees: implications for public health interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 101(S1), S347–S352.CrossRef Spaulding, A. C., Perez, S. D., Seals, R. M., Hallman, M. A., Kavasery, R., & Weiss, P. S. (2011). Diversity of release patterns for jail detainees: implications for public health interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 101(S1), S347–S352.CrossRef
go back to reference Solomon, A., Osborne, J. W. L., LoBuglio, S. F., Mellow, J., & Mukamal, D. A. (2008). Life after lockup: improving reentry from jail to the community. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Solomon, A., Osborne, J. W. L., LoBuglio, S. F., Mellow, J., & Mukamal, D. A. (2008). Life after lockup: improving reentry from jail to the community. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
go back to reference Tasca, M. (2016). The gatekeepers of contact: child-caregiver dyads and parental prison visitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(6), 739–758.CrossRef Tasca, M. (2016). The gatekeepers of contact: child-caregiver dyads and parental prison visitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(6), 739–758.CrossRef
go back to reference Turney, K., & Conner, E. (2019). Jail incarceration: a common and consequential form of criminal justice contact. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 265–290.CrossRef Turney, K., & Conner, E. (2019). Jail incarceration: a common and consequential form of criminal justice contact. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 265–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Yi, Y., Turney, K., & Wildeman, C. (2017). Mental health among jail and prison inmates. American Journal of Men’s Health, 11(4), 900–909.CrossRef Yi, Y., Turney, K., & Wildeman, C. (2017). Mental health among jail and prison inmates. American Journal of Men’s Health, 11(4), 900–909.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Fathers in Jail and their Minor Children: Paternal Characteristics and Associations with Father-Child Contact
Auteurs
Rebecca J. Shlafer
Laurel Davis
Lauren Hindt
Lindsay Weymouth
Hilary Cuthrell
Cynthia Burnson
Julie Poehlmann-Tynan
Publicatiedatum
10-01-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01696-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2020

Journal of Child and Family Studies 3/2020 Naar de uitgave