Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
When military service members deploy, they move outside the immediate boundary of their families. However, because boundaries are permeable, service members remain a psychological part of their families in spite of their physical absence. The extent of service members’ continued involvement in daily family life is likely tied to their non-deployed family members’ actions to manage this boundary. In the current study, we were interested in identifying non-deployed family members’ actions to either promote, or limit, service members’ involvement in daily family life during deployment. These actions by family members constitute boundary management behaviors. We collected qualitative data from a sample of Army reservists (N = 13) and their household family members (N = 15). Findings indicated that family members used a variety of boundary management behaviors during deployment, some of which promoted reservists’ involvement, and others which limited it. In addition, boundary management behaviors varied by who they targeted, their intentionality, and their implications for reservists’ well-being. Findings illustrate the value in equipping military families with language that enables them to communicate openly about the significance of their boundary management behavior over the course of deployment so that they may arrive at a balance between stretching and restricting boundaries that best suits their unique needs.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Baptist, J. A., Amanor-Boadu, Y., Garrett, K., Goff, B. S. N., Collum, J., Gamble, P., et al. (2011). Military marriages: The aftermath of operation Iraqi freedom (OIF) and operation enduring freedom (OEF) deployments. Contemporary Family Therapy,33, 199–214. doi: 10.1007/s10591-011-9162-6. CrossRef
Boss, P. (2002). Family stress management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Luccie, M. F. (1995). Mothers as gatekeepers: A model of maternal mediators of father involvement. The Journal of Genetic Psychology,156, 115–131. CrossRef
Everson, R. B., & Camp, T. G. (2011). Seeing systems: An introduction to systemic approaches with military families. In R. B. Everson & C. R. Figley (Eds.), Families under fire: Systemic therapy with military families (pp. 3–30). New York: Routledge.
Frank, M., Shanfield, S., & Evans, H. (1981). The in-and-out parent: Strategies for managing re-entry stress. Military Medicine,146, 846–849. PubMed
Hill, R. (1949). Families under stress: Adjustment to the crises of war separation and reunion. New York: Harper.
Institute of Medicine. (2013). Returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan: Assessment of readjustment needs of veterans, service members, and their families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Rodriguez, A. J., & Margolin, G. (2015). Parental incarceration, transnational migration, and military deployment: Family process mechanisms of youth adjustment to temporary parent absence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review,18, 24–49. doi: 10.1007/s10567-014-0176-0. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Stafford, L. (2005). Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Watson Wiens, T., & Boss, P. (2006). Maintaining family resiliency before, during, and after military separation. In C. A. Castro, A. B. Adler, & T. W. Britt (Eds.), Military life: The psychology of serving in peace and combat (pp. 13–38). Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.
- Family Members as Boundary Managers: Behaviors that Promote and Limit Service Members’ Involvement in Daily Family Life
Christina M. Marini
Shelley MacDermid Wadsworth
Young In Kwon
Colleen E. Pagnan
- Springer US