Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Effector identity and orthogonal stimulus–respo...

volgende artikel Length perception of horizontal and vertical bi...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-03-2010 | Original Article | Uitgave 2/2010

Factors influencing online control of video-aiming movements performed without vision of the cursor

Tijdschrift:: Psychological Research > Uitgave 2/2010

Auteurs:: Louis-Nicolas Veilleux, Luc Proteau

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Abstract

A modulation of the primary impulse of manual/video-aiming movements performed without visual feedback has been reported. In the present study, we show that this modulation is modified (a) with increased practice, (b) the use of an aligned visual display, and (c) the availability of visual feedback on alternated trials. However, this modulation was not as efficient as that observed in a normal vision condition, which underlines the primary role of vision to ensure endpoint accuracy. Moreover, this modulation was observed only on the extent component of the task. This last observation indicates that proprioception can be used to modulate the extent component of goal-directed movements but that vision is necessary to modulate their direction.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Abahnini, K., & Proteau, L. (1999). The role of peripheral and central visual information for the directional control of manual aiming movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 160–175. PubMed

Bagesteiro, L. B., Sarlegna, F. R., & Sainburg, R. L. (2006). Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance. Experimental Brain Research, 171(3), 358–370. CrossRef

Bédard, P., & Proteau, L. (2003). On the role of peripheral visual afferent information for the control of rapid video-aiming movements. Acta Psychologica, 113(1), 99–117. CrossRefPubMed

Bédard, P., & Proteau, L. (2004). On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements. Experimental Brain Research, 158(1), 75–85. CrossRef

Bédard, P., & Proteau, L. (2005). Movement planning of video and of manual aiming movements. Spatial Vision, 18(3), 275–296. CrossRefPubMed

Carlton, L. G. (1981). Processing visual feedback information for movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(5), 1019–1030. CrossRefPubMed

Cheng, D. T., Luis, M., & Tremblay, L. (2008). Randomizing visual feedback in manual aiming: reminiscence of the previous trial condition and prior knowledge of feedback availability. Experimental Brain Research, 189(4), 403–410. CrossRef

Darling, W. G., & Cooke, J. D. (1987). Changes in the variability of movement trajectories with practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(3), 291–309. PubMed

Desmurget, M., Epstein, C. M., Turner, R. S., Prablanc, C., Alexander, G. E., & Grafton, S. T. (1999). Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nature Neuroscience, 2(6), 563–567. CrossRefPubMed

Desmurget, M., Rossetti, Y., Prablanc, C., Stelmach, G. E., & Jeannerod, M. (1995). Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 73(2), 262–272. PubMed

Elliott, D., & Allard, F. (1985). The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 37(3), 407–425.

Elliott, D., & Calvert, R. (1990). The influence of uncertainty and premovement visual information on manual aiming. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44(4), 501–511. PubMed

Elliott, D., Carson, R. G., Goodman, D., & Chua, R. (1991). Discrete vs. continuous visual control of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 10(4), 393–418. CrossRef

Elliott, D., & Madalena, J. (1987). The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 39(3), 541–559.

Goodale, M. A., Pelisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320(6064), 748–750. CrossRefPubMed

Gordon, J., Ghilardi, M. F., Cooper, S. E., & Ghez, C. (1994). Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Experimental Brain Research, 99(1), 112–130. CrossRef

Guigon, E., Baraduc, P., & Desmurget, M. (2008). Computational motor control: feedback and accuracy. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27(4), 1003–1016. CrossRefPubMed

Hansen, S., Glazebrook, C. M., Anson, J. G., Weeks, D. J., & Elliott, D. (2006). The influence of advance information about target location and visual feedback on movement planning and execution. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(3), 200–208. PubMed

Harris, C. M., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature, 394(6695), 780–784. CrossRefPubMed

Heath, M. (2005). Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. Motor Control, 9(3), 281–311. PubMed

Khan, M. A., Elliott, D., Coull, J., Chua, R., & Lyons, J. (2002). Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules: kinematic evidence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34(1), 45–57. CrossRefPubMed

Khan, M. A., Franks, I. M., & Goodman, D. (1998). The effect of practice on the control of rapid aiming movements: Evidence for an interdependency between programming and feedback processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 425–443.

Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G., Fourkas, A., Franks, I. M., Elliott, D., & Pembroke, S. (2003). Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude. Acta Psychologica, 113(1), 83–97. CrossRefPubMed

Lateiner, J. E., & Sainburg, R. L. (2003). Differential contributions of vision and proprioception to movement accuracy. Experimental Brain Research, 151(4), 446–454. CrossRef

Lemay, M., Gagnon, S., & Proteau, L. (2004). Manual pointing to remembered targets.but also in a remembered visual context. Acta Psychologica, 117(2), 139–153. CrossRefPubMed

Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (2002). Developmental aspects of the control of manual aiming movements in aligned and non-aligned visual displays. Experimental Brain Research, 146(3), 293–306. CrossRef

Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (2004). Planning and control of straight-ahead and angled planar movements in adults and young children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(4), 245–258. PubMed

Lyons, J., Hansen, S., Hurding, S., & Elliott, D. (2006). Optimizing rapid aiming behaviour: Movement kinematics depend on the cost of corrective modifications. Experimental Brain Research, 174(1), 95–100. CrossRef

Mackrous, I., & Proteau, L. (2007). Specificity of practice results from differences in movement planning strategies. Experimental Brain Research, 183(2), 181–193. CrossRef

Messier, J., & Kalaska, J. F. (1997). Differential effect of task conditions on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 115(3), 469–478. CrossRef

Messier, J., & Kalaska, J. F. (1999). Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 125(2), 139–152. CrossRef

Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Smith, J. E. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95(3), 340–370. CrossRefPubMed

Neely, K. A., Tessmer, A., Binsted, G., & Heath, M. (2008). Goal-directed reaching: Movement strategies influence the weighting of allocentric and egocentric visual cues. Experimental Brain Research, 186(3), 375–384. CrossRef

Novak, K. E., Miller, L. E., & Houk, J. C. (2002). The use of overlapping submovements in the control of rapid hand movements. Experimental Brain Research, 144(3), 351–364. CrossRef

Novak, K. E., Miller, L. E., & Houk, J. C. (2003). Features of motor performance that drive adaptation in rapid hand movements. Experimental Brain Research, 148(3), 388–400.

Papaxanthis, C., Pozzo, T., & McIntyre, J. (2005). Kinematic and dynamic processes for the control of pointing movements in humans revealed by short-term exposure to microgravity. Neuroscience, 135(2), 371–383. CrossRefPubMed

Prablanc, C., & Martin, O. (1992). Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67(2), 455–469. PubMed

Proteau, L. (2005). Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task. Experimental Brain Research, 161(4), 441–456. CrossRef

Proteau, L., & Isabelle, G. (2002). On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements toward targets of different sizes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34(4), 367–384. CrossRefPubMed

Proteau, L., & Masson, G. (1997). Visual perception modifies goal-directed movement control: Supporting evidence from a visual perturbation paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 50(4), 726–741.

Proteau, L., Roujoula, A., & Messier, J. (2009). Online control of video aiming movements: fast and efficient corrections of undetected experimentally-induced errors. Journal of Motor Behavior, in press.

Robin, C., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2005). Specificity of learning in a video-aiming task: modifying the salience of dynamic visual cues. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(5), 367–376. CrossRefPubMed

Sarlegna, F., Blouin, J., Bresciani, J. P., Bourdin, C., Vercher, J. L., & Gauthier, G. M. (2003). Target and hand position information in the online control of goal-directed arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 151(4), 524–535. CrossRef

Sarlegna, F., Blouin, J., Vercher, J. L., Bresciani, J. P., Bourdin, C., & Gauthier, G. M. (2004). Online control of the direction of rapid reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 157(4), 468–471. CrossRef

Saunders, J. A., & Knill, D. C. (2003). Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 152(3), 341–352. CrossRef

Saunders, J. A., & Knill, D. C. (2004). Visual feedback control of hand movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(13), 3223–3234. CrossRefPubMed

Saunders, J. A., & Knill, D. C. (2005). Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research, 162(4), 458–473. CrossRef

Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T, Jr. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 47(5), 415–451. CrossRefPubMed

Selen, L. P., Beek, P. J., & van Dieen, J. H. (2006). Impedance is modulated to meet accuracy demands during goal-directed arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 172(1), 129–138. CrossRef

van Beers, R. J., Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). The role of execution noise in movement variability. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(2), 1050–1063. CrossRefPubMed

van Beers, R. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2002). When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Current Biology, 12(10), 834–837. CrossRefPubMed

Whitney, D., Westwood, D. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object. Nature, 423(6942), 869–873. CrossRefPubMed

Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review Monographs, 3(Whole No. 13), 1–119.

Titel: Factors influencing online control of video-aiming movements performed without vision of the cursor
Auteurs:: Louis-Nicolas Veilleux
Luc Proteau
Publicatiedatum: 01-03-2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0229-z
Uitgeverij: Springer-Verlag
Tijdschrift: Psychological Research An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action
Uitgave 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2010

On interference effects in concurrent perception and action

Defining consciousness in the context of incidental sequence learning: theoretical considerations and empirical implications

Effector identity and orthogonal stimulus–response compatibility in blindness to response-compatible stimuli

Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task

Relational framework improves transitive inference across age groups

Structural selection in implicit learning of artificial grammars