Top

Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy

Gepubliceerd in:

04-03-2020

Factorial Structure and Invariance Analysis of the BIS–BAS Scale, IPIP-R Version

Auteurs: Ronald Toro, Juan García-García, Flor Zaldívar-Basurto

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy | Uitgave 4/2020

Abstract

Gray’s Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory is a neurobiological model developed to explain the regulation of behavior and emotions, using the BIS and BAS systems as motivational constructs based on variables of sensitivity to reinforcement, associated with the emergence of internalizing and externalizing psychopathologies. The objective was to analyze the factor structure, and invariance of the BIS–BAS IPIP-R translated into the Spanish language. A non-probabilistic sampling of 288 people between the ages of 18 and 45 from the city of Bogotá, Colombia (167 women and 121 men, average age of 28.92 (SD = 7.53) was carried out. Among the results, a two-dimensional structure was verified with correlated factors and residual covariances, once included when reviewing the modification rates and the favorable adjustment of the model. In the invariance analysis of the correlated two-dimensional model, when imposing progressive and sequential restrictions, differential values are presented, indicating that the factor loads are invariant in nested groups. In conclusion, evidence of the two correlated dimensions that support Gray’s theory of activation and inhibition systems independent of sex and age was obtained.

volgende artikel Moderating the Role of Self-Compassion in the Relationship Between Perfectionism and Depression

Asociación Médica Mundial (WMA). (2017). Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM—Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. Brasil: Autor. Retrieved from https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/.

Barranco-Jiménez, L., Rodarte-Acosta, B., Medina-Cuevas, Y., & Solís-Cámara, P. (2009). Evaluación psicométrica de los sistemas de activación e inhibición del comportamiento en adultos mexicanos. Anales de Psicología, 25(2), 358–367.

Brooker, B. A., Ostojic, D., & Miller, C. J. (2017). Symptom covariance accounts for behavioral approach associations across impulse control disorders. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 10(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-017-0245-6.CrossRefPubMed

Byrne, B. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20(4), 872–882.PubMed

Campbell-Sills, L., Liverant, G. I., & Brown, T. (2004). Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation scales in a large sample of outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders. Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.244.CrossRefPubMed

Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319.CrossRef

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRef

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.CrossRef

Cooper, A., Gomez, R., & Aucote, H. (2007). The behavioural inhibition system and behavioural approach system (BIS/BAS) scales: Measurement and structural invariance across adults and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.023.CrossRef

Corr, P. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST): Introduction. In P. Corr (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 1–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511819384.002.CrossRef

Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. (1975). Manual for the Eysenck personality questionnaire (junior and adult). London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Falkenbach, D. M., Reinhard, E. E., & Roelofs, F. R. (2017). Theory based gender differences in psychopathy subtypes. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.023.CrossRef

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., et al. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007.CrossRef

Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behavior Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266.CrossRef

Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck´s theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model of Personality (pp. 246–276). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gray, J. A. (1994). Three fundamental emotion systems. In P. Ekman & R. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion (pp. 243–247). New York: Oxford University Press.

Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety. London: Oxford University Press.

Gray, N. S., & Snowden, R. J. (2016). Psychopathy in women: Prediction of criminality and violence in UK and USA psychiatric patients resident in the community. Psychiatry Research, 237, 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.014.CrossRefPubMed

Harnett, P. H., Reid, N., Loxton, N. J., & Lee, N. (2016). The relationship between trait mindfulness, personality and psychological distress: A revised reinforcement sensitivity theory perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.085.CrossRef

Hickendorff, M., Edelsbrunner, P. A., McMullen, J., Schneider, M., & Trezise, K. (2018). Informative tools for characterizing individual differences in learning: Latent class, latent profile, and latent transition analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 66, 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.001.CrossRef

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.CrossRef

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

Johnson, A. K., Sellbom, M., & Phillips, T. R. (2014). Elucidating the associations between psychopathy, Gray’s Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory constructs, and externalizing behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.026.CrossRef

Kingsbury, A., Coplan, R. J., Weeks, M., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (2013). Covering all the BAS’s: A closer look at the links between BIS, BAS, and socio-emotional functioning in childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.021.CrossRef

Kubak, F. A., & Salekin, R. T. (2009). Psychopathy and anxiety in children and adolescents: New insights on developmental pathways to offending. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavior Assessment, 31, 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9144-2.CrossRef

Li, W., Zhang, W., Xiao, L., & Nie, J. (2016). The association of Internet addiction symptoms with impulsiveness, loneliness, novelty seeking and behavioral inhibition system among adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Psychiatry Research, 243, 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.020.CrossRefPubMed

Li-Chung, L., Po-Hsien, H., & Li-Jen, W. (2017). Selecting path models in SEM: A comparison of model selection criteria. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(6), 855–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1363652.CrossRef

Maack, D. J., & Ebesutani, C. (2018). A re-examination of the BIS/BAS scales: Evidence for BIS and BAS as unidimensional scales. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 27(2), e1612. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1612.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Martínez, M. V., Zalazar-Jaime, M. F., Pilatti, A., & Cupani, M. (2012). Adaptación del Cuestionario de Personalidad BIS–BAS IPIP a una muestra de estudiantes argentinos y su relación con patrones de consumo de alcohol. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 30(2), 304–316.

Mautz, C. P., Hill, R. W., Hueslman, T. J., & Bazzini, D. G. (2017). Behavioral activation and behavioral inhibition predict perfectionism. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 6(4), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170604.13.CrossRef

Mowlaie, M., Abolghasemi, A., & Aghababaei, N. (2016). Pathological narcissism, brain behavioral systems and tendency to substance abuse: The mediating role of self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.019.CrossRef

Muris, P., Meesters, C., de Kanter, E., & Timmerman, P. E. (2005). Behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation system scales for children: Relationships with Eysenck’s personality traits and psychopathological symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.06.007.CrossRef

Omiya, S., Kobori, O., Tomoto, A., Igarashi, Y., & Iyo, M. (2015). Personality and substance use in Japanese adolescents: The Japanese version of Substance Use Risk Profile Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.034.CrossRef

Pagliaccio, D., Luking, K. R., Anokhin, A. P., Gotlib, I. H., Hayden, E. P., Olino, T. M., et al. (2016). Revising the BIS/BAS Scale to study development: Measurement invariance and normative effects of age and sex from childhood through adulthood. Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000186.CrossRefPubMed

Pettersson, E., Turkheimer, E., Horn, E. E., & Menatti, A. R. (2011). The general factor of personality and evaluation. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.839.CrossRef

Pulido, M. A., Rivera, L., Fondón, A., & Vázquez, P. (2016). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala BIS/BAS en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios mexicanos. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 21(3), 300–310.

Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315.CrossRefPubMed

Ross, S. R., Keiser, H. N., Strong, J. V., & Webb, C. M. (2013). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and symptoms of personality disorder: Specificity of the BIS in Cluster C and BAS in Cluster B. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.020.CrossRef

Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.CrossRef

Spencer, C. C., Foster, J. D., & Bedwell, J. S. (2017). Structural relationships among the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory and grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 32(5), 654–667. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2017_31_318.CrossRefPubMed

Spielberger, C. D., & Sydeman, S. J. (1994). State-trait anxiety inventory and state-trait anger expression inventory. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 292–321). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Torrubia, R., Ávila, C., & Caseras, X. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity scales. In P. Corr (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 188–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511819384.007.CrossRef

Torrubia, R., Ávila, C., Moltó, J., & Caseras, X. (2001). The sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsive dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00183-5.CrossRef

Van Meter, A. R., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2015). A tale of two diatheses: Temperament, BIS, and BAS as risk factors for mood disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 180, 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.053.CrossRefPubMed

Wallace, J., & Newman, J. (2008). RST and psychopathy: Associations between psychopathy and the behavioral activation and inhibition systems. In P. Corr (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 398–414). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511819384.014.CrossRef

Yang, Y. (2003). Can the strengths of AIC and BIC be shared? Biometrika, 92, 937–950.CrossRef

Yuan, K. H., Marshall, L. L., & Bentler, P. M. (2002). A unified approach to exploratory factor analysis with missing data, nonnormal data, and in the presence of outliers. Psychometrika, 67(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294711.CrossRef

Zinbarg, R., & Yoon, K. (2008). RST and clinical disorders: Anxiety and depression. In P. Corr (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 360–397). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511819384.013.CrossRef

Titel: Factorial Structure and Invariance Analysis of the BIS–BAS Scale, IPIP-R Version
Auteurs: Ronald Toro
Juan García-García
Flor Zaldívar-Basurto
Publicatiedatum: 04-03-2020
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy / Uitgave 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0894-9085
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6563
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00345-4

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2020

Predictive Influence of Irrational Beliefs on Self-esteem of University Students with Late Blindness

Efficacy of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy on Academic Procrastination Behaviours Among Students Enrolled in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics Education (PCME)

Developing Self-determined Motivation and Performance with an Elite Athlete: Integrating Motivational Interviewing with Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

Effect of an Emotional Intelligence Training Program Developed for Prospective Psychological Counselors on Psychological Counseling Skill Levels

Suicide Attempts in Turkish University Students: The Role of Cognitive Style, Hopelessness, Cognitive Reactivity, Rumination, Self-esteem, and Personality Traits

Moderating the Role of Self-Compassion in the Relationship Between Perfectionism and Depression