Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

15-03-2021

Factor Structure of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV): A Systematic Review Using Narrative Synthesis

Auteurs: Ryan Veal, Christine Critchley, Stefan Luebbers, Reece Cossar, James R. P. Ogloff

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 3/2021

Abstract

The Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV) is often utilized in both community and forensic psychiatric settings for formulation, treatment assessments and risk assessment. Accordingly, it is essential to assess the psychometric properties of the PCL:SV. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize research examining the PCL:SV to determine the most appropriate factor structure, independent of other PCL measures. Using a PRISMA protocol, 2893 articles were screened, with 19 included for analysis. Consistent with research on other PCL measures, the results supported the use of three- and four-factor models of PCL:SV psychopathy in community and psychiatric populations, with more tentative support for the original two-factor structure. Findings associated with the PCL:SV latent factor structure were less clear for the studies sampling forensic, nonpsychiatric populations. The choice of which PCL:SV factor structure to adopt for clinical purposes remains dependent on the clinician’s theoretical perspectives of the psychopathy construct.

vorige artikel Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Symptoms, Impulsivity, and Cyberdeviance in an Adult Population

volgende artikel Comorbidity Between Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents: Bridge Symptoms and Relevance of Risk and Protective Factors

Skeem and Cooke (2010) clarify the distinction of antisocial behavior (i.e., that which defeats the interests of the social order) from criminal behavior by the intervention of criminal justice system in the latter.

Testlets are used in measurement models to reflect item dependencies (Steinberg & Thissen, 1996). Cooke and Michie (2001) propose that the item descriptions for those items falling on a testlet have overlap so are more accurately reflected in this manner.

Not reported in Table 4, Forth et al. (1996) reported that a single factor solution appeared to account for the most variance in both their male and female samples, yet Kaiser’s criterion and the respective factor loadings were inconsistent with a single-factor solution. Further, Rogers et al. (2000) reported that use of Scree plot test supported a three-factor model; however, this model, unlike their identified two-factor model, was not identified because of excessive cross loadings using the PCL:SV sub criteria. Clear factor solutions were not identified in the EFA models of Forth et al. (1996) and Rogers et al. (2000).

Covariation among items in CBFA is presumed to be explained by both general factors and separate uncorrelated grouping factors, which has been proposed to provide a more accurate reflection of the unique coherency among particular subgroups of items than in standard CFA (Reise et al., 2010).

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 74, 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.CrossRef

*Andershed, H., Köhler, D., Eno Louden, J., & Hinrichs, G. (2008). Does the three-factor model of psychopathy identify a problematic subgroup of young offenders? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.04.003.

Bishopp, D., & Hare, R. D. (2008). A multidimensional scaling analysis of the Hare PCL-R: Unfolding the structure of psychopathy. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160701483484.CrossRef

*Bo, S., Pedersen, L., Christensen, K. B., & Rasmussen, K. (2019). Psychopathy in a forensic sample: The factor structure of the PCL:SV in a Danish forensic sample. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60, 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12566

*Boduszek, D., Dhingra, K., Hyland, P., & Debowska, A. (2016). A bifactorial solution to the psychopathy checklist: Screening version in a sample of civil psychiatric patients. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 26, 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1956

Bolt, D. M., Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2007). Score metric equivalence of the psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R) across criminal offenders in North America and the United Kingdom: A critique of Cooke, Michie, Hart, and Clark (2005) and new analyses. Assessment, 14, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106293505.CrossRefPubMed

Burnham, K. P. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644.

Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.

Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., Altmejd, A., Buttrick, N., Chan, T., Chen, Y., Forsell, E., Gampa, A., Heikensten, E., Hummer, L., Imai, T., Isaksson, S., Manfredi, D., Rose, J., Wagenmakers, E., & Wu, H. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in nature and science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z.CrossRefPubMed

Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRef

Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity. St Louis, MO: Mosby.

Coid, J., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Roberts, A., & Hare, R. D. (2009). Prevalence and correlates of psychopathic traits in the household population of Great Britain. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.01.002.CrossRefPubMed

Cooke, D. J., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., & Michie, C. (2012). Explicating the construct of psychopathy: Development and validation of a conceptual model, the comprehensive assessment of psychopathic personality (CAPP). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.746759.CrossRef

*Cooke, D, J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171.

Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Clark, D. A. (2004). Reconstructing psychopathy: Clarifying the significance of antisocial and socially deviant behavior in the diagnosis of psychopathic personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.18.4.337.40347.CrossRefPubMed

Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1999) Evaluating the Screening Version of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL:SV): An item response theory analysis. Psychological Assessment, 11, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.11.1.3.

Cooke, D. J., & Sellbom, M. (2019). An examination of psychopathy checklist-revised latent factor structure via exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 31, 581–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000676.CrossRefPubMed

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, 10, 1–9.

Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne (n.d.), Australia. Available at www.covidence.org

Crighton, D. (2009). Uses and abuses of the Hare psychopathy checklist. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 12, 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmh.12.2.33.CrossRefPubMed

*Dolan, M. C., & Anderson, I. M. (2003). The relationship between serotonergic function and the psychopathy checklist: Screening version. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 17, 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881103017002011.

Douglas, K. S., Vincent, G. M., & Edens, J. F. (2018). Risk for criminal recidivism: The role of psychopathy. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy, 2nd Ed. (pp. 682–709). New York, NY: Guilford.

Edens, J., Campbell, J., & Weir, J. (2007). Youth psychopathy and criminal recidivism: A meta-analysis of the psychopathy checklist measures. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9019-y.CrossRefPubMed

Flores-Mendoza, C. E., Alvarenga, M. A. S., Herrero, Ó., & Abad, F. J. (2008). Factor structure and behavioural correlates of the psychopathy checklist-revised [PCL-R] in a Brazilian prisoner sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 584–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.016.CrossRef

Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286.CrossRef

Ford, J. K., Maccallum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x.CrossRef

*Forth, A, E., Brown, S, L., Hart, S, D., & Hare, R, D. (1996). The assessment of psychopathy in male and female noncriminals: Reliability and validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00221-9.

Hare, R. D. (1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(80)90028-8.CrossRef

Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare psychopathy checklist–revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.

Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare psychopathy checklist-revised (2nd Ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.

Hare, R. D. (2016). Psychopathy, the PCL-R, and criminal justice: Some new findings and current issues. Canadian Psychology, 57, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000041.CrossRef

Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2005). Structural models of psychopathy. Current Psychiatry Reports, 7, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/10.1007/s11920-005-0026-3.CrossRefPubMed

Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2006). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, structural properties, and new directions. In Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 58–88). New York, NY: Guilford.

Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452.CrossRefPubMed

Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2010). The role of antisociality in the psychopathy construct: Comment on Skeem and Cooke (2010). Psychological Assessment, 22, 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013635.CrossRefPubMed

Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., & Mokros, A. (2018). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, properties, debates, and new directions. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy 2nd Ed. (pp. 39–79). New York, NY: Guilford.

Harpur, T. J., Hakstian, A. R., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Factor structure of the psychopathy checklist. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 741–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.5.741.CrossRefPubMed

*Hart, S, D., Cox, D., & Hare, R, D. (1995). Manual for the psychopathy checklist: Screening version. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.

Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1994). Psychopathy and the big 5: Correlations between observers' ratings of normal and pathological personality. Journal of Personality Disorders, 8, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1994.8.1.32.CrossRef

Hart, S. D., Hare, R. D., & Forth, A. E. (1994). Psychopathy as a risk marker for violence: Development and validation of a screening version of the revised psychopathy checklist. In J. Monahan & H. J. Steadman (Eds.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on mental health and development. Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment (pp. 81–98). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

*Hill, C, D., Neumann, C, S., & Rogers, R. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the psychopathy checklist: Screening version in offenders with Axis I disorders. Psychological Assessment, 16, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.16.1.90.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

*Jackson, R, L., Neumann, C, S., & Vitacco, M, J. (2007). Impulsivity, anger, and psychopathy: The moderating effect of ethnicity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.3.289.

The Joanna Briggs Institute. (2015). Joanna Briggs institute reviewers’ manual: 2015 edition/supplement. Author: The University of Adelaide, Australia.

Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1981). LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relations by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago, IL: International Educational Services.

Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relations by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.

Kenny, D, A. (2015). Measuring model fit. Retrieved 30 June, 2018, from: http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th Ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.

Leistico, A.-M. R., Salekin, R. T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9096-6.CrossRefPubMed

Lynam, D. R., Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., Miller, J. D., Mullins-Sweatt, S., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the elemental psychopathy assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23, 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021146.CrossRefPubMed

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Monahan, J., & Steadman, H. (1994). Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., Roth, L., Grisso, T., & Banks, S. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Muthén, B, O. (2019). Personal correspondence. Retrieved from: http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/11/2156.html?1560759684

Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2017-2019). Mplus user’s guide (8th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.

Muthén, B, O., Muthén, L. & Asparouhov, T. (2015, March 24). Estimator choices with categorical outcomes. Retrieved from: http://www.statmodel.com/download/EstimatorChoices.pdf

*Neumann, C, S., & Hare, R, D. (2008). Psychopathic traits in a large community sample: Links to violence, alcohol use, and intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.76.5.893

Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., & Newman, J. P. (2007). The super-ordinate nature of the psychopathy checklist-revised. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., & Pardini, D. A. (2015). Antisociality and the construct of psychopathy: Data from across the globe. Journal of Personality, 83, 678–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12127.CrossRefPubMed

Neumann, C. S., Vitacco, M. J., Hare, R. D., & Wupperman, P. (2005). Reconstruing the “reconstruction” of psychopathy: A comment on Cooke, Michie, Hart, and Clark. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2005.19.6.624.CrossRefPubMed

Ogloff, J. R. P. (2006) Psychopathy/antisocial personality disorder conundrum. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1614.2006.01834.x.

Ogloff, J. R. P., & Wood, M. (2010). The treatment of psychopathy: Clinical nihilism or steps in the right direction? In L. Malatesti & J. McMillan (Eds.), Responsibility and psychopathy: Interfacing law, psychiatry, and philosophy (pp. 155–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199551637.003.0009.CrossRef

Patrick, C. J. (2006). Back to the future: Cleckley as a guide to the next generation of psychopathy research. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 605–617). New York, NY: Guilford.

Patrick, C. J., Hicks, B. M., Nichol, P. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2007). A bifactor approach to modeling the structure of the psychopathy checklist-revised. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Popay, J., Roberts, H. M., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., & Britten, N. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. London: Institute for Health Research.

Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Richards, H. J., Gacono, C. B., Cunliffe, T. B., Kivisto, A. J., Smith, J. M., & Bodholdt, R. (2016). Assessing psychopathy in adults: The Hare psychopathy checklist—Revised and psychopathy checklist: Screening version. In C. B. Gacono (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner's guide, 2nd ed. (pp. 137–166). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

*Rogers, R., Salekin, R, T., Hill, C., Sewell, K, W., Murdock, M, E., & Neumann, C, S. (2000). The psychopathy checklist: Screening version: An examination of criteria and subcriteria in three forensic samples. Assessment, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319110000700101

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. (1988). Scaling corrections for statistics in covariance structure analysis. UCLA: Department of Statistics, UCLA. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3141h70c

*Shariat, S, V., Assadi, S, M., Noroozian, M., Pakravannejad, M., Yahyazadeh, O., Aghayan, S., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. (2010). Psychopathy in Iran: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 676–691. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2010.24.5.676.

Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58, 935–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007.CrossRef

Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22, 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0008512.CrossRefPubMed

*Skeem, J, L., & Mulvey, E, P. (2001). Psychopathy and community violence among civil psychiatric patients: Results from the MacArthur violence risk assessment study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.3.358.

*Skeem, J, L., Mulvey, E, P., & Grisso, T. (2003). Applicability of traditional and revised models of psychopathy to the psychopathy checklist: Screening version. Psychological Assessment, 15, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.1.41.

Skeem, J. L., Polaschek, D. L. L., Patrick, C. J., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality: Bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 95–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611426706.CrossRefPubMed

Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.CrossRefPubMed

Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (1996). Uses of item response theory and the testlet concept in the measurement of psychopathology. Psychological Methods, 1, 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.81.CrossRef

*Strand, S., & Belfrage, H. (2005). Gender differences in psychopathy in a Swedish offender sample. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.674

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th edition - International edition). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291170.CrossRef

Veal, R., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2021). The concept of psychopathy and risk assessment: Historical developments, contemporary considerations, and future directions. In P. B. Marques, M. F. Paulino, & L. Alho (Eds.), Psychopathy and criminal behavior: Current trends and challenges. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.

*Vitacco, M, J., Neumann, C. S., & Jackson, R, L. (2005). Testing a four-factor model of psychopathy and its association with ethnicity, gender, intelligence, and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.466.

*Walters, G, D., Wilson, N, J., & Glover, A, J, J. (2011). Predicting recidivism with the psychopathy checklist: Are factor score composites really necessary? Psychological Assessment, 23, 552–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022483.

Wilson, N. J. (2000). The utility of the psychopathy checklist – Screening version for predicting serious violent recidivism in a New Zealand offender sample. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Hamilton: University of Waikato.

*Wilson, M, J., Abramowitz, C., Vasilev, G., Bozgunov, K., & Vassileva, J. (2014). Psychopathy in Bulgaria: The cross-cultural generalizability of the Hare psychopathy checklist. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9405-6.

World Health Organization. (1990). International classification of diseases and related health problems (10th ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.

Yang, M., Wong, S., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020473.CrossRefPubMed

*Žukauskienė, R., Laurinavičius, A., & Čėsnienė, I. (2010). Testing factorial structure and validity of the PCL:SV in Lithuanian prison population. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9176.

Titel: Factor Structure of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV): A Systematic Review Using Narrative Synthesis
Auteurs: Ryan Veal
Christine Critchley
Stefan Luebbers
Reece Cossar
James R. P. Ogloff
Publicatiedatum: 15-03-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-021-09877-0

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2021

Childhood Conduct Problems Trajectories Are Associated with Distinct Antisocial Process Screening Device Dimensions

Parental Marital Conflict and Growth in Adolescents’ Externalizing Problems: the Role of Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia

Profiles of Rater Dis/Agreement within Universal Screening in Predicting Distal Outcomes

Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS)

Comorbidity Between Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents: Bridge Symptoms and Relevance of Risk and Protective Factors

Multidisciplinary Early Intervention for Preschoolers with Externalizing Behavior Problems and Language Impairment: Results from an Open Trial