Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Gabriele Melli and Carlo Chiorri are contributed equally
The Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS) is a self-report instrument that assesses the severity of the four most empirically supported OC symptom dimensions (Contamination, Responsibility, Unacceptable Thoughts, and Symmetry). The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the DOCS and address associations with socio-demographical variables, psychometric properties in a community (i.e., non-student) sample, and congruence of factor solutions across non-clinical and patient samples. Factor structure, internal consistency, construct, and criterion validity were investigated in three samples of participants (315 from the general population, 106 OCD patients and 31 with other anxiety disorders [OADs]). Results supported the four-factor structure of the DOCS both in clinical and non-clinical sample, and adequate levels of factor congruence across the two samples were found. DOCS scores showed good internal consistency, temporal stability and construct validity, and could adequately discriminate between non-clinical participants, OCD and OADs patients. All the other variables kept constant, associations of DOCS total score with educational level, of Contamination with gender, and of Unacceptable Thoughts with age were also found. These findings suggest that the Italian version of the DOCS retains the adequate psychometric properties of the original, and can be confidently used as an assessment tool of OC symptoms in clinical and research settings.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Abramowitz, J. S., Deacon, B. J., Olatunji, B. O., Wheaton, M. G., Berman, N. C., Losardo, D., Timpano, K. R., McGrath, P. B., Riemann, B. C., Adams, T., Björgvinsson, T., Storch, E. A., & Hale, L. R. (2010). Assessment of obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions: development and evaluation of the dimensional obsessive-compulsive scale. Psychological Assessment, 22, 180–198. CrossRefPubMed
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing. CrossRef
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073. CrossRef
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington: American Psychiatric Association.
Behling, O., & Law, K. S. (2000). Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: problems and solutions (sage university papers series on quantitative applications in the social Sciences, series no. 07–131). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A. M., & Yekutieli, D. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93, 491–507.
Brown, T. A., Di Nardo, P. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1994). Anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV (ADIS-IV). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation/Graywind Publications Incorporated.
Buja, A., & Eyuboglu, N. (1992). Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 509–540. CrossRef
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: basic issues in scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. CrossRef
de Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D., & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 147–181. CrossRef
Enander, J., Andersson, E., Kaldo, V., Lindefors, N., Andersson, G., & Rück, C. (2012). Internet administration of the dimensional obsessive-compulsive scale: a psychometric evaluation. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 1, 325–330. CrossRef
ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 Investigators. (2004). Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: Results from the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109(Suppl. 420), 21–27. CrossRef
Foa, E. B., Kozak, M. J., Salkovskis, P. M., Coles, M. E., & Amir, N. (1998). The validation of a new obsessive-compulsive disorder scale: the obsessive-compulsive inventory. Psychological Assessment, 10, 206–214. CrossRef
Hénin, M. (2012). Yale-brown obsessive-compulsive scale. In C. Sica (Ed.), Disturbo ossessivo-compulsivo. questionari e interviste per la valutazione clinica. Trento: Erickson.
López-Solà, C., Gutiérrez, F., Alonso, P., Rosado, S., Taberner, J., Segalàs, C., Real, E., Menchón, J. M., & Fullana, M. A. (2013). Spanish version of the dimensional obsessive–compulsive scale (docs): psychometric properties and relation to obsessive beliefs. Comprehensive Psychiatry. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.08.015. PubMed
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: a computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavioral Research Methods, 38, 88–91. CrossRef
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57–64.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis: the role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 611–637. CrossRef
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30–46. CrossRef
Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189. CrossRef
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 599–620. CrossRef
Muthen, B., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modelling with categorical and continuous outcomes (Technical Report). Los Angeles: University of California.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ólafsson, R. P., Arngrímsson, J. B., Árnason, P., Kolbeinsson, Þ., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Kristjánsson, Á., & Olason, D. Þ. (2013). The Icelandic version of the dimensional obsessive compulsive Scale (DOCS) and its relationship with obsessive beliefs. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.02.001.
Olatunji, B. O., Sawchuck, C. N., Arrindell, W. A., & Lohr, J. M. (2005). Disgust sensitivity as a mediator of the sex differences in contamination fears. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 713–722. CrossRef
Profet, M. (1992). Pregnancy sickness as adaptation: a deterrent to maternal ingestion of teratogens. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 327–365). New York: Oxford University Press.
Rasmussen, S. A., & Eisen, J. L. (1992). The epidemiology and clinical features of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15, 743–759. PubMed
Rosario-Campos, M. C., Miguel, E. C., Quatrano, S., Chacon, P., Ferrao, Y., Findley, D., Katsovich, L., Scahill, L., King, R. A., Woody, S. R., Tolin, D., Hollander, E., Kano, Y., & Leckman, J. F. (2006). The dimensional Yale–Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (DY-BOCS): an instrument for assessing obsessive–compulsive symptom dimensions. Molecular Psychiatry, 11, 495–504. CrossRefPubMed
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. CrossRef
Sanavio, E. (1988). Obsessions and compulsions: the Padua inventory. Behavior Research and Therapy, 26, 169–177. CrossRef
Sica, C., Novara, C., & Sanavio, E. (2002). Culture and psychopathology: superstition and obsessive-compulsive cognitions and symptoms in a non-clinical Italian sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1001–1012. CrossRef
Sica, C., Taylor, S., Arrindell, W. A., & Sanavio, E. (2006). A cross-cultural test of the cognitive theory of obsessions and compulsions: a comparison of Greek, Italian, and American individuals. A preliminary study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30, 585–597. CrossRef
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 89–92. CrossRef
Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984). Washington: Department of the Army.
Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of factors from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. CrossRef
Wang, C., Wang, J., Tang, T., Zhang, S., & Bjorgvinsson, T. (2012). Psychometric validation of dimensional obsessive-compulsive scale (DOCS) in Chinese college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 315–319.
Weissman, M. M., Bland, R. C., Canino, G. J., Greenwald, S., Hwu, H. G., Lee, C. K., et al. (1994). The cross national epidemiology of obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 55, 5–10. PubMed
- Factor Congruence and Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS) Across Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples
- Springer US
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505