Skip to main content
Top

05-11-2024 | Research

Exploring the Utility of the Limited Prosocial Emotions Specifier for Subtyping Conduct Problems and Oppositional Defiant Problems: A Multi-informant Study

Auteur: Mojtaba Elhami Athar

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the clinical utility of the “Limited Prosocial Emotions” (LPE) specifier in subtyping conduct problems (CP) and oppositional defiant problems (ODP) among two samples including 1203 parent–child dyads and 1,937 school-attending youths in Iran. The prevalence of LPE across the entire sample, as well as subsamples of youths with clinically elevated levels of CP and ODP, were examined. CP + LPE individuals scored significantly higher than CP-Only youths on several measures of externalizing psychopathology and depression, although these findings were not fully consistent across informants. Several anticipated differences in measures of aggression and antisocial behavior were not found. Also, no significant group differences were observed between the ODP + LPE and ODP-Only groups concerning externalizing and internalizing psychopathology. In the total sample, youths with LPE scored significantly higher in measures of externalizing and internalizing psychopathology than those without LPE, though the magnitude of these differences was in small ranges. Overall, the findings provide only limited support for the clinical utility of the LPE specifier for CP and none whatsoever for ODP.
Voetnoten
1
Because the CD and ODD constructs in the study rely on CBCL/YSR-based proxies, the terms CP and ODP will be used to refer to conduct problems and oppositional defiant problems, respectively.
 
2
The PSCD Self-report Version was completed by youths in both samples, while the remaining measures in this section were exclusively completed by youths in the second sample.
 
3
(60.60%) 40 youths with clinically elevated CP scores also had ODD scores in the clinical range. Similarly, 40 (63.49%) individuals with clinically elevated ODD scores also scored within the clinical range for CP.
 
4
31 (34.44%) youths with clinically elevated CP scores also had ODP scores in the clinical range. Similarly, 40 (63.49%) individuals with clinically elevated ODP scores also scored within the clinical range for CP.
 
Literatuur
2.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Publication, Washington D.C.CrossRef American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Publication, Washington D.C.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Manti E, Scholte EM, Van Berckelaer-Onnes IA, Van Der Ploeg JD (2009) Social and emotional detachment: a cross-cultural comparison of the non-disruptive behavioural psychopathic traits in children. Crim Behav Mental Health 19(3):178–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.732CrossRef Manti E, Scholte EM, Van Berckelaer-Onnes IA, Van Der Ploeg JD (2009) Social and emotional detachment: a cross-cultural comparison of the non-disruptive behavioural psychopathic traits in children. Crim Behav Mental Health 19(3):178–192. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cbm.​732CrossRef
13.
go back to reference World Health Organization (2019) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th Revision), vol 1. World Health Organization, Geneva World Health Organization (2019) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th Revision), vol 1. World Health Organization, Geneva
26.
go back to reference Cooke DJ (1998) Cross-cultural aspects of psychopathy. Psychopathy: antisocial, criminal, and violent behavior. pp. 260–276. Cooke DJ (1998) Cross-cultural aspects of psychopathy. Psychopathy: antisocial, criminal, and violent behavior. pp. 260–276.
31.
go back to reference Shwalb DW, Shwalb BJ, Nakazawa J (2014) East and Southeast Asia: Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, and Indonesia. In: Van Le H, Satiadarma MP (eds) Handbook of cultural developmental science. Psychology Press, London, pp 457–476 Shwalb DW, Shwalb BJ, Nakazawa J (2014) East and Southeast Asia: Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, and Indonesia. In: Van Le H, Satiadarma MP (eds) Handbook of cultural developmental science. Psychology Press, London, pp 457–476
35.
go back to reference Salekin R, Hare R (2016) Proposed Specifiers for Conduct Disorder (PSCD) scale. Unpublished test. Salekin R, Hare R (2016) Proposed Specifiers for Conduct Disorder (PSCD) scale. Unpublished test.
37.
go back to reference Frick PJ, Hare RD (2001) Antisocial process screening device (APSD): Technical manual Frick PJ, Hare RD (2001) Antisocial process screening device (APSD): Technical manual
39.
go back to reference Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles: child behavior checklist for ages 6–18, teacher’s report form, youth self-report: an integrated system of multi-informant assessment. University of Vermont, research center for children youth & families. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles: child behavior checklist for ages 6–18, teacher’s report form, youth self-report: an integrated system of multi-informant assessment. University of Vermont, research center for children youth & families.
40.
go back to reference Raine A, Dodge K, Loeber R, Gatzke-Kopp L, Lynam D, Reynolds C, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Liu J (2006) The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggress Behav: Off J Int Soc Res Aggress 32(2):159–171CrossRef Raine A, Dodge K, Loeber R, Gatzke-Kopp L, Lynam D, Reynolds C, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Liu J (2006) The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggress Behav: Off J Int Soc Res Aggress 32(2):159–171CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Cohen J (2013) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. RoutledgeCrossRef Cohen J (2013) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. RoutledgeCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Exploring the Utility of the Limited Prosocial Emotions Specifier for Subtyping Conduct Problems and Oppositional Defiant Problems: A Multi-informant Study
Auteur
Mojtaba Elhami Athar
Publicatiedatum
05-11-2024
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-024-01776-1