Top

Gepubliceerd in:

19-09-2018 | Original Article

Exploring the temporal boundary conditions of the articulatory in–out preference effect

Auteurs: Judith Gerten, Sascha Topolinski

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2020

Abstract

Earlier research has documented a preference for words with consonantal articulation patterns that move from the front to the back of the mouth (e.g., MENIKA) over words with reversely wandering consonantal articulation spots (e.g., KENIMA). The present experiments explored the temporal dynamics of the reading process in this in–out preference effect. In three experiments (total N = 344), we gradually reduced the presentation durations of inward and outward wandering words from 1000 ms down to 25 ms to approximate the minimum length of visual stimulus presentation required to trigger the effect. The in–out effect was reliably observed for exposure timings down to 50 ms, but vanished for 25 ms timings, which is line with previous evidence on phonological encoding. Thus, impressively, 50 ms of word presentation is sufficient to evoke the in–out effect. These findings suggest phonological activation to be a prerequisite and thus a driving mechanism of the in–out effect.

vorige artikel Sumacku or Smack? The value of analyzing acoustic signals when investigating the fundamental phonological unit of language production

volgende artikel Effects of pitch and tempo of auditory rhythms on spontaneous movement entrainment and stabilisation

We thank Dr. Patricia Rossi for these thoughts.

Adelman, J. S., Marquis, S. J., & Sabatos-DeVito, M. G. (2010). Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1799–1801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610387442.CrossRefPubMed

Bakhtiari, G., Körner, A., & Topolinski, S. (2016). The role of fluency in preferences for inward over outward words. Acta Psychologica, 171, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.10.006.CrossRefPubMed

Bolte, A., & Goschke, T. (2005). On the speed of intuition: Intuitive judgments of semantic coherence under different response deadlines. Memory and Cognition, 33(7), 1248–1255. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193226.CrossRefPubMed

Bremner, A. J., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K. J., & Spence, C. (2013). “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to Westerners. Cognition, 126(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.007.CrossRefPubMed

Coltheart, M. (2005). Modeling reading: The dual-route approach. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell handbooks of developmental psychology) (pp. 6–23). Malden: Blackwell Pub. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch1.CrossRef

Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.589.CrossRef

Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2010). Small sounds, big deals: Phonetic symbolism effects in pricing. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1086/651241.CrossRef

Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395(6702), 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1038/26967.CrossRefPubMed

Diependaele, K., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2010). Fast phonology and the bimodal interactive activation model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 764–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440902834782.CrossRef

Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.343.CrossRefPubMed

Erle, T. M., Reber, R., & Topolinski, S. (2017). Affect from mere perception: Illusory contour perception feels good. Emotion, 17(5), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000293.CrossRefPubMed

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRef

Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(2), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334157.CrossRef

Fort, M., Martin, A., & Peperkamp, S. (2015). Consonants are more important than vowels in the bouba-kiki effect. Language and Speech, 58(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830914534951.CrossRefPubMed

Godinho, S., & Garrido, M. V. (2016). Oral approach-avoidance: A replication and extension for European-Portuguese phonation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2172.CrossRef

Godinho, S., & Garrido, V., M (2017). Branding with the in–out effect: The impact of consonantal articulation on brand evaluation. Psychology and Marketing, 34(9), 904–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21031.CrossRef

Grainger, J., Granier, J.-P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 865–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.865.CrossRefPubMed

Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 128–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

JASP Team (2016). JASP (Version 0.7.5.5)[Computer software].

Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Intention memory and achievement motivation: Volitional facilitation and inhibition as a function of affective contents of need-related stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.426.CrossRefPubMed

Klink, R. R. (2000). Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters, 11, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008184423824.CrossRef

Körner, A., Bakhtiari, G., & Topolinski, S. (in press). Training articulation sequences: A first systematic modulation of the articulatory in–out effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.

Kramer, A. F., & Donchin, E. (1987). Brain potentials as indices of orthographic andphonological interaction during word matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.1.76.CrossRefPubMed

Kronrod, A., Ackerman, J., & Lowrey, T. (2014). The effect of phonetic embodiment on attitudes towards brand names. In J. Cotte & S. Wood (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 136–140). Duluth: Association for Consumer Research.

Lindau, B., & Topolinski, S. (2018a). The articulatory in–out effect resists oral motor interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000443.CrossRefPubMed

Lindau, B., & Topolinski, S. (2018b). The influence of articulation dynamics on recognition memory. Cognition, 179, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.021.CrossRefPubMed

Lowrey, T. M., & Shrum, L. J. (2007). Phonetic symbolism and brand name preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 406–414. https://doi.org/10.1086/518530.CrossRef

Maglio, S. J., Rabaglia, C. D., Feder, M. A., Krehm, M., & Trope, Y. (2014). Vowel sounds in words affect mental construal and shift preferences for targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1082–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035543.CrossRef

Maurer, D., Pathman, T., & Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9(3), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00495.x.CrossRefPubMed

Newman, R. L., & Connolly, J. F. (2004). Determining the role of phonology in silent reading using event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 21(1), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.05.006.CrossRefPubMed

Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008.CrossRef

Reber, R., Zimmermann, T. D., & Wurtz, P. (2004). Judgments of duration, figure-ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords. Perception and Psychophysics, 66(7), 1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196839.CrossRefPubMed

Rossi, P., Pantoja, F., Borges, A., & Werle, C. O. C. (2017). What a delicious name! Articulatory movement effects on food perception and consumption. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(4), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1086/693112.CrossRef

Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225.CrossRefPubMed

Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Schlegelmilch, R., & Grice, M. (2014). Mood is linked to vowel type: The role of articulatory movements. Emotion, 14(2), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035752.CrossRefPubMed

Silva, R. R., Chrobot, N., Newman, E., Schwarz, N., & Topolinski, S. (2017). Make it short and easy: Username complexity determines trustworthiness above and beyond objective reputation. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Silva, R. R., & Topolinski, S. (2018). My username is IN! The influence of inward vs. outward wandering usernames on judgments of online seller trustworthiness. Psychology and Marketing, 35(4), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21088.CrossRef

Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky. Psychological Science, 20(2), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02267.x.CrossRefPubMed

Topolinski, S. (2017). Articulation patterns in names: A hidden route to consumer preference. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(4), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1086/692820.CrossRef

Topolinski, S., Bakhtiari, G., & Erle, T. M. (2016). Can I cut the Gordian tnok? The impact of pronounceability, actual solvability, and length on intuitive problem assessments of anagrams. Cognition, 146, 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.019.CrossRefPubMed

Topolinski, S., & Boecker, L. (2016a). Minimal conditions of motor inductions of approach-avoidance states: The case of oral movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145(12), 1589–1603. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000217.CrossRef

Topolinski, S., & Boecker, L. (2016b). Mouth-watering words: Articulatory inductions of eating-like mouth movements increase perceived food palatability. Appetite, 99, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.018.CrossRefPubMed

Topolinski, S., Boecker, L., Erle, T. M., Bakhtiari, G., & Pecher, D. (2017). Matching between oral inward–outward movements of object names and oral movements associated with denoted objects. Cognition and Emotion, 31(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1073692.CrossRefPubMed

Topolinski, S., & Deutsch, R. (2012). Phasic affective modulation of creativity. Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000159.CrossRefPubMed

Topolinski, S., & Deutsch, R. (2013). Phasic affective modulation of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 414–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028879.CrossRefPubMed

Topolinski, S., Erle, T. M., & Reber, R. (2015). Necker’s smile: Immediate affective consequences of early perceptual processes. Cognition, 140, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.004.CrossRefPubMed

Topolinski, S., Maschmann, I. T., Pecher, D., & Winkielman, P. (2014). Oral approach-avoidance: Affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036477.CrossRefPubMed

Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). Motormouth: Mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014504.CrossRefPubMed

Topolinski, S., Zürn, M., & Schneider, I. K. (2015). What’s in and what’s out in branding? A novel articulation effect for brand names. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2009). Reward counteracts conflict adaptation. Evidence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1473–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02470.x.CrossRefPubMed

Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989.CrossRefPubMed

Xiao, K., & Yamauchi, T. (2014). Semantic priming revealed by mouse movement trajectories. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.004.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Exploring the temporal boundary conditions of the articulatory in–out preference effect
Auteurs: Judith Gerten
Sascha Topolinski
Publicatiedatum: 19-09-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1095-3

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2020

Attention for future reward

Correspondence effect driven by salient visual asymmetries in integral object stimuli

Comparison of two psychophysical methods across visual and haptic perception of stand-on-ability

Effects of pitch and tempo of auditory rhythms on spontaneous movement entrainment and stabilisation

Visuo-motor interference with a virtual partner is equally present in cooperative and competitive interactions

Visual attention, biological motion perception, and healthy ageing