Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

29-02-2016 | Editorial

Exploring the numerical mind by eye-tracking: a special issue

Auteurs: Matthias Hartmann, Martin H. Fischer

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Excerpt

Psychological research has a long track record of developing tools for our understanding of mental processes. Prominent among these tools are the measurement of the duration of cognitive processes (mental chronometry) and the localization of these processes in the brain (cognitive neuroscience). Somewhat less prominent, but undeservedly so, is eye movement recording or eye-tracking. Eye-tracking has a century-old history (Wade & Tatler, 2005) that has recently culminated in the widespread availability of relatively affordable and low-effort tools for the unobtrusive study of visual exploratory behaviour (e.g., Holmqvist et al., 2011). …
volgende artikel Insights into numerical cognition: considering eye-fixations in number processing and arithmetic
Voetnoten
1
These numbers are based on an online search of the Web of Knowledge database on Dec 20 2015, using the search term “eye movements” in conjunction with either “number” or “language”. Research results that did not investigate aspects of numerical cognition or language processing were then manually removed to obtain the correct number of relevant studies between the years 2006 and 2015.
 
Literatuur
Bahnmueller, J., Huber, S., Nuerk, H. -C., Göbel, S. M., Moeller, K. (2016). Processing multi-digit numbers: A translingual eye tracking study. Psychological Research, (online first version).
Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1525), 1831–1840.CrossRef
Bulf, H., de Hevia, M. D., & Macchi Cassia, V. (2015). Small on the left, large on the right: Numbers orient visual attention onto space in preverbal infants. Developmental Science,. doi:10.​1111/​desc.​12315. (online first version).PubMed
Coello, Y., & Fischer, M. H. (2016). Foundations of embodied cognition: Volume 1. Perceptual and emotional embodiment. London: Taylor & Francis.
Cohen, Y. E., & Andersen, R. A. (2002). A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(7), 553–562.CrossRefPubMed
de Hevia, M. D., Girelli, L., Addabbo, M., & Cassia, V. M. (2014a). Human infants’ preference for left-to-right oriented increasing numerical sequences. PLoS One, 9(5), e96412.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
de Hevia, M. D., Izard, V., Coubart, A., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2014b). Representations of space, time, and number in neonates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(13), 4809–4813.CrossRef
Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396.CrossRef
Desmurget, M., Pélisson, D., Rossetti, Y., & Prablanc, C. (1998). From eye to hand: Planning goal-directed movements. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 22(6), 761–788.CrossRefPubMed
Duncker, K. (1935/1963). Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens [The psychology of productive thinking]. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43(9), 1035–1045.CrossRefPubMed
Fischer, M. H. (2012). A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied, and situated numerical cognition. Cognitive Processing, 13(1), 161–164.CrossRef
Fischer, M. H., & Coello, Y. (2016). Foundations of embodied cognition: Volume 2. Conceptual and interactive embodiment. London: Taylor & Francis.
Ganor-Stern, D., & Weiss, N. (2016). Tracking practice effects in computation estimation. Psychological Research, (online first version).
Gao, X., Yan, H., & Sun, H. (2015). Modulation of microsaccade rate by task difficulty revealed through between- and within-trial comparisons. Journal of Vision, 15(3), 1–15.CrossRef
Göbel, S. M. (2015). Up or down? Reading direction influences vertical counting direction in the horizontal plane: A cross-cultural comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 6 228.PubMedPubMedCentral
Göbel, S. M., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). The cultural number line: A review of cultural and linguistic influences on the development of number processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(4), 543–565.CrossRef
Grant, E. R., & Spivey, M. J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14(5), 462–466.CrossRefPubMed
Hartmann, M., Gashaj, V., Stahnke, A., & Mast, F. (2014). There is more than “more is up”: Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1401–1414. doi:10.​1037/​a0036686.PubMed
Hartmann, M., Grabherr, L., & Mast, F. W. (2012). Moving along the mental number line: Interactions between whole-body motion and numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1416–1427. doi:10.​1037/​a0026706.PubMed
Hartmann, M., Laubrock, J., & Fischer, M. H. (in preparation). The visual number world: A new approach to study the mathematical mind.
Hayhoe, M., & Ballard, D. (2005). Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 188–194.CrossRef
Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1964). Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science, 143(3611), 1190–1192.CrossRefPubMed
Hintz, F., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Prediction and production of simple mathematical equations: Evidence from visual world eye-tracking. PLoS One, 10(7), e0130766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hubbard, T. L. (2014). Forms of momentum across space: Representational, operational, and attentional. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1371–1403.CrossRef
Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96(1), B23–B32.CrossRefPubMed
Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica (Amst), 137(2), 151–171.CrossRef
Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(25), 10382–10385.CrossRef
Johansson, R., Holsanova, J., Dewhurst, R., & Holmqvist, K. (2012). Eye movements during scene recollection have a functional role, but they are not reinstatements of those produced during encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1289.PubMed
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329.CrossRefPubMed
Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 154, 3.CrossRef
Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 12.CrossRef
Laeng, B., & Teodorescu, D.-S. (2002). Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 207–231.CrossRef
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–486.CrossRef
Macchi Cassia, V., McCrink, K., de Hevia, M. D., Gariboldi, V., & Bulf, H. (2016). Operational momentum and size ordering in preverbal infants. Psychological Research, (online first version).
Martarelli, C. S., & Mast, F. W. (2013). Eye movements during long-term pictorial recall. Psychological Research, 77(3), 303–309.CrossRefPubMed
Masson, N., & Pesenti, M. (2015). Interference of lateralized distractors on arithmetic problem solving: A functional role for attention shifts in mental calculation. Psychological Research (online first version).
McCrink, K., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2007). Moving along the number line: Operational momentum in nonsymbolic arithmetic. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(8), 1324–1333.CrossRefPubMed
Meyerhoff, H. S., Moeller, K., Debus, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2012). Multi-digit number processing beyond the two-digit number range: A combination of sequential and parallel processes. Acta Psychologica (Amst), 140(1), 81–90.CrossRef
Micic, D., Ehrlichman, H., & Chen, R. (2010). Why do we move our eyes while trying to remember? The relationship between non-visual gaze patterns and memory. Brain and Cognition, 74(3), 210–224.CrossRefPubMed
Mock, J., Huber, S., Klein, E., & Moeller, K. (2016). Insights into numerical cognition: Considering eye-fixations in number processing and arithmetic. Psychological Research, (online first version).
Moeller, K., Fischer, M. H., Nuerk, H. C., & Willmes, K. (2009). Sequential or parallel decomposed processing of two-digit numbers? Evidence from eye-tracking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 62(2), 323–334. doi:10.​1080/​1747021080194674​0.CrossRef
Moeller, K., Shaki, S., Göbel, S. M., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2015). Language influences number processing: A quadrilingual study. Cognition, 136, 150–155.CrossRefPubMed
Myachykov, A., Ellis, R., Cangelosi, A., & Fischer, M. H. (2016). Ocular drift along the mental number line. Psychological Research, (online first version).
Nuerk, H.-C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. (2002). A unit-decade compatibility effect in German number words. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain & Cognition, 7, 19–38.
Nyffeler, T., Hartmann, M., Hess, C. W., & Müri, R. M. (2008). Visual vector inversion during memory antisaccades: A TMS study. Progress in Brain Research, 171, 429–432.CrossRefPubMed
Ranzini, M., Lisi, M., & Zorzi, M. (2016). Voluntary eye movements direct attention on the mental number space. Psychological Research, (online first version).
Rau, A. K., Moll, K., Snowling, M. J., & Landerl, K. (2015). Effects of orthographic consistency on eye movement behavior: German and English children and adults process the same words differently. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 92–105.CrossRefPubMed
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372.CrossRefPubMed
Rayner, K., & Reingold, E. M. (2015). Evidence for direct cognitive control of fixation durations during reading. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 1, 107–112.CrossRef
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125.CrossRefPubMed
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Priftis, K., & Regolin, L. (2015). Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line. Science, 347(6221), 534–536.CrossRefPubMed
Schneider, M., Heine, A., Thaler, V., Torbeyns, J., De Smedt, B., Verschaffel, L., & Stern, E. (2008). A validation of eye movements as a measure of elementary school children’s developing number sense. Cognitive Development, 23(3), 409–422.CrossRef
Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. M. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 66(4), 651–664.CrossRefPubMed
Schwarz, W., & Müller, D. (2006). Spatial associations in number-related tasks: A comparison of manual and pedal responses. Experimental Psychology, 53(1), 4–15.CrossRefPubMed
Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). Newborn chicks need no number tricks. Commentary: Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 451.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Siegenthaler, E., Costela, F. M., McCamy, M. B., Di Stasi, L. L., Otero-Millan, J., Sonderegger, A., & Martinez-Conde, S. (2014). Task difficulty in mental arithmetic affects microsaccadic rates and magnitudes. European Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 287–294.CrossRefPubMed
Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14(3), 237–250.CrossRefPubMed
Spivey, M. J., & Geng, J. J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research, 65(4), 235–241.CrossRefPubMed
Starr, M. S., & Rayner, K. (2001). Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5(4), 156–163.CrossRef
Sullivan, J. L., Juhasz, B. J., Slattery, T. J., & Barth, H. C. (2011). Adults’ number-line estimation strategies: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(3), 557–563. doi:10.​3758/​s13423-011-0081-1.CrossRef
Susac, A. N. A., Bubic, A., Kaponja, J., Planinic, M., & Palmovic, M. (2014). Eye movements reveal students’ strategies in simple equation solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 555–577.CrossRef
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634.CrossRefPubMed
Thomas, L. E., & Lleras, A. (2007). Moving eyes and moving thought: On the spatial compatibility between eye movements and cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 663–668.CrossRef
van’t Noordende, J. E., van Hoogmoed, A. H., Schot, W. D., Kroesbergen, E. H. (2016). Number line estimation strategies in children with mathematical learning difficulties measured by eye tracking. Psychological Research, (online first version).
Wade, N., & Tatler, B. W. (2005). The moving tablet of the eye: The origins of modern eye movement research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(11), 483–488.CrossRef
Walsh, V. (2015). A theory of magnitude: The parts that sum to number. In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition (pp. 552–565 ). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Winter, B., Matlock, T., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). Mental number space in three dimensions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 57, 209–219.CrossRefPubMed
Yu, X., Liu, J., Li, D., Liu, H., Cui, J., & Zhou, X. (2016). Dynamic mental number line in simple arithmetic. Psychological Research, (online first version).
Metagegevens
Titel
Exploring the numerical mind by eye-tracking: a special issue
Auteurs
Matthias Hartmann
Martin H. Fischer
Publicatiedatum
29-02-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0759-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2016

Number line estimation strategies in children with mathematical learning difficulties measured by eye tracking

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Insights into numerical cognition: considering eye-fixations in number processing and arithmetic

  • Review

Tracking practice effects in computation estimation

  • Original Article

Ocular drift along the mental number line

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Dynamic mental number line in simple arithmetic

  • Original Article

Counting is a spatial process: evidence from eye movements

  • Original Article