Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Direct contact with patients for medical education is essential in healthcare professional training. Patients who were recruited for a medical education home visit program in Malaysia did so on a voluntary basis without remuneration. This paper aims to explore their reasons for participation in this program.
An exploratory qualitative study was conducted on patients who had been visited during the 2012/2013 academic session. Purposive sampling was done to select adult participants from varying ethnicities and ages from the list of patients. In-depth interviews were conducted at the participants’ homes and were audio recorded. The transcripts of these interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.
A total of nine in-depth interviews were conducted. Four main themes were identified from thematic analysis: 1) Perceived meaning of the visit; 2) Perceived benefits and risks; 3) Past healthcare experiences; 4) Availability for visits. The home visits meant different things to different participants, including a teaching-learning encounter, a social visit, a charitable deed or a healthcare check-up. The benefits and risks of accepting unknown students to their homes and sharing their health issues with them had been weighed prior to participation. Prior experience with healthcare services such as gratitude to healthcare providers or having a relative in the healthcare profession increased their receptivity for involvement. Lastly, enabling factors such as availability of time would determine their acceptance for home visits.
Patients agree to participate in medical education activities on a voluntary basis for various reasons. Providing good healthcare service and sufficient preparation are crucial to increase patient receptivity for such activities.
Henley LD. A home visit programme to teach medical students about children with special needs. Med Educ. 1999;33:749–52. CrossRef
Neale AV, Hodgkins BJ, Demers RY. The home visit in resident education: program description and evaluation. Fam Med. 1992;24:36–40.
Patel S, Bachhuber M, O’Brien B. An interprofessional home visit curriculum for high-risk patients. Med Educ. 2013;47:1138–9. CrossRef
Medina-Walpole A, Heppard B, Clark NS, Markakis K, Tripler S, Quill T. Mi Casa o Su Casa? Assessing function and values in the home. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:336–42. CrossRef
Young R, Freiber E, Stringham P. The home visit in the multidisciplinary teaching of primary care physicians. Med Care. 1981;56:341–6.
Doucet S, Lauckner H, Wells S. Patients’ messages as educators in an interprofessional health education program. J Res Interprof Pract Educ. 2013;3:92–102.
Mckinlay E, Mcbain L, Gray B. Teaching and learning about chronic conditions management for undergraduate medical students: utilizing the patient-as-teacher approach. Chronic Illn. 2009;5:209–18. CrossRef
Strano-Paul L, Lane S, Lu WH, Chandran L. Impact of a home hospice visit program on third-year medical students: a qualitative analysis of student reflections. J Palliat Care. 2015;31:5–12.
Vaughn LM, Cross B, Bossaer L, Flores EK, Moore J, Click I. Analysis of an interprofessional home visit assignment : student perceptions of team-based care, home visits, and medication-related problems. Fam Med. 2014;46:522–6.
Tan C, Jaffar A, Tong SF, Hamzah MS, Mohamad N. Comprehensive healthcare module: medical and pharmacy students’ shared learning experiences. Med Educ Online. 2014;19:25605. CrossRef
Lauckner H, Doucet S, Wells S. Patients as educators: the challenges and benefits of sharing experiences with students. Med Educ. 2012;46:992–1000. CrossRef
Coleman K, Murray E. Patients’ views and feelings on the community-based teaching of undergraduate medical students: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2002;19:183–8. CrossRef
Lucas B, Pearson D. Patient perceptions of their role in undergraduate medical education within a primary care teaching practice. Educ Prim Care. 2012;23:277–85. CrossRef
Hudson JN, Knight PJ, Weston KM. Patient perceptions of innovative longitudinal integrated clerkships based in regional, rural and remote primary care: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:72. CrossRef
Jackson A, Blaxter L, Lewando-Hundt G. Participating in medical education: views of patients and carers living in deprived communities. Med Educ. 2003;37:532–8. CrossRef
Stacy R, Spencer J. Patients as teachers: a qualitative study of patients’ views on their role in a community-based undergraduate project. Med Educ. 1999;33:688–94. CrossRef
Chipp E, Stoneley S, Cooper K. Clinical placements for medical students: factors affecting patients’ involvement in medical education. Med Teach. 2004;26:114–9. CrossRef
McLachlan E, King N, Wenger E, Dornan T. Phenomenological analysis of patient experiences of medical student teaching encounters. Med Educ. 2012;46:963–73. CrossRef
Muhammad P, Muhammad P, Muhammad P. Treating guests the islamic way [Internet]. Islamreligion.com, p. 1–3 2014. http://www.islamreligion.com/pdf/en/treating_guests_the_islamic_way_10662_en.pdf. Accessed 31. Mar 2016.
McNeil JK. Effects of nonprofessional home visit programs for subclinically unhappy and unhealthy older adults. J Appl Gerontol. 1995;14:333–42. CrossRef
Walters K, Buszewicz M, Russell J, Humphrey C. Teaching as therapy : cross sectional and qualitative psychiatry teaching in the community. Br Med J. 2003;326:1–6. CrossRef
Mavis B, Vasilenko P, Schnuth R, Marshall J, Jeffs MC. Medical students’ involvement in outpatient clinical encounters : a survey of patients and their obstetricians – gynecologists. Acad Med. 2006;81:290–6. CrossRef
Suikkala A, Leino-Kilpi H. Nursing student-patient relationship: experiences of students and patients. Nurse Edu Today. 2005;25:344–54. CrossRef
- Exploring patients’ reasons for participation in a medical education home visit program: a qualitative study in Malaysia
Syahnaz Mohd Hashim
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum