Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

13-11-2018 | Original Article

Explicit knowledge of sensory non-redundancy can reduce the strength of multisensory integration

Auteurs: Nienke B. Debats, Herbert Heuer

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The brain integrates incoming sensory signals to a degree that depends on the signals’ redundancy. Redundancy—which is commonly high when signals originate from a common physical object or event—is estimated by the brain from the signals’ spatial and/or temporal correspondence. Here we tested whether verbally instructed knowledge of non-redundancy can also be used to reduce the strength of the sensory integration. We used a cursor-control task in which cursor motions in the frontoparallel plane were controlled by hand movements in the horizontal plane, yet with a small and randomly varying visuomotor rotation that created spatial discrepancies between hand and cursor positions. Consistent with previous studies, we found mutual biases in the hand and cursor position judgments, indicating partial sensory integration. The integration was reduced in strength, but not eliminated, after participants were verbally informed about the non-redundancy (i.e., the spatial discrepancies) in the hand and cursor positions. Comparisons with model predictions excluded confounding bottom-up effects of the non-redundancy instruction. Our findings thus show that participants have top-down control over the degree to which they integrate sensory information. Additionally, we found that the magnitude of this top-down modulatory capability is a reliable individual trait. A comparison between participants with and without video-gaming experience tentatively suggested a relation between top-down modulation of integration strength and attentional control.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Ernst, M.O. (2006). A Bayesian view on multimodal cue integration. In G. Knoblich, I.M. Thornton, M. Grosjean & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), Human body perception from the inside out (pp. 105–131). New York: Oxford University Press. Ernst, M.O. (2006). A Bayesian view on multimodal cue integration. In G. Knoblich, I.M. Thornton, M. Grosjean & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), Human body perception from the inside out (pp. 105–131). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Ernst, M.O. (2012). Optimal multisensory integration: assumptions and limits. In B.E. Stein (Ed.), The new handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 1084–1124). Cambridge: The MIT Press. Ernst, M.O. (2012). Optimal multisensory integration: assumptions and limits. In B.E. Stein (Ed.), The new handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 1084–1124). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
go back to reference Fourneret, P., & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1133–1140.CrossRef Fourneret, P., & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1133–1140.CrossRef
go back to reference Helbig, H.B., & Ernst, M.O. (2007). Knowledge about a common source can promote visual-haptic integration. Perception, 36, 1523–1533.CrossRef Helbig, H.B., & Ernst, M.O. (2007). Knowledge about a common source can promote visual-haptic integration. Perception, 36, 1523–1533.CrossRef
go back to reference Heuer, H. (2006). Übung. In K. Pawlik (Ed.), Handbuch psychologie (pp. 179–193). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Heuer, H. (2006). Übung. In K. Pawlik (Ed.), Handbuch psychologie (pp. 179–193). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36(1), 14. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36(1), 14.
go back to reference Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin, G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, et al. (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of harold hotelling (pp. 278–292). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin, G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, et al. (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of harold hotelling (pp. 278–292). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
go back to reference van Dam, L.C.J., Parise, C.V., & Ernst, M.O. (2014) Modeling multisensory integration. In: D.J. Bennett, C.S. Hill (Eds.), Sensory integration and the unity of consciousness (pp. 209–229). Cambridge: The MIT Press. van Dam, L.C.J., Parise, C.V., & Ernst, M.O. (2014) Modeling multisensory integration. In: D.J. Bennett, C.S. Hill (Eds.), Sensory integration and the unity of consciousness (pp. 209–229). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
go back to reference Welch, R.B., & Warren, D.H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638–667.CrossRef Welch, R.B., & Warren, D.H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638–667.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Explicit knowledge of sensory non-redundancy can reduce the strength of multisensory integration
Auteurs
Nienke B. Debats
Herbert Heuer
Publicatiedatum
13-11-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1116-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2020

Psychological Research 4/2020 Naar de uitgave