Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2010

01-07-2010 | Original Article

Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation

Auteurs: Beatriz Calvo-Merino, Shantel Ehrenberg, Delia Leung, Patrick Haggard

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Biological motion perception is influenced by observers’ familiarity with the observed action. Here, we used classical dance as a means to investigate how visual and motor experience modulates perceptual mechanism for configural processing of actions. Although some ballet moves are performed by only one gender, male and female dancers train together and acquire visual knowledge of all ballet moves. Twenty-four expert ballet dancers (12 female) and matched non-expert participants viewed pairs of upright and inverted point light female and common dance movements. Visual discrimination between different exemplars of the same movement presented upright was significantly better in experts than controls, whilst no differences were found when the same stimuli were presented upside down. These results suggest expertise influences configural action processing. Within the expert group, effects were stronger for female participants than for males, whilst no differences were found between movement types. This observer gender effect could suggest an additional role for motor familiarity in action perception, over and above the visual experience. Our results are consistent with a specific motor contribution to configural processing of action.
Literatuur
go back to reference Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 47–74.CrossRefPubMed Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 47–74.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Buccino, G., Lui, F., Canessa, N., Patteri, I., Lagravinese, G., & Benuzzi, F., et al. (2004). Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by non-conspecifics: an fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 114–126.CrossRefPubMed Buccino, G., Lui, F., Canessa, N., Patteri, I., Lagravinese, G., & Benuzzi, F., et al. (2004). Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by non-conspecifics: an fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 114–126.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bukach, C.M, Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M.J. (2006). Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4), 159–166.CrossRefPubMed Bukach, C.M, Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M.J. (2006). Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4), 159–166.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243–1249.CrossRefPubMed Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243–1249.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16, 1905–1910.CrossRefPubMed Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16, 1905–1910.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16, 69–74.CrossRefPubMed Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16, 69–74.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F. D. C., & Grafton, S. T. (2006). Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. Neuroimage, 31, 1257–1267.CrossRefPubMed Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F. D. C., & Grafton, S. T. (2006). Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. Neuroimage, 31, 1257–1267.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1977). Recognizing friends by their walk—gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 353–356. Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1977). Recognizing friends by their walk—gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 353–356.
go back to reference Cutting, J. E., Moore, C., & Morrison, R. (1988). Masking the motions of human gait. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 339–347. Cutting, J. E., Moore, C., & Morrison, R. (1988). Masking the motions of human gait. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 339–347.
go back to reference Dittrich, W. H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S. E. G., & Morgan, D. (1996). Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception, 25, 727–738.CrossRefPubMed Dittrich, W. H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S. E. G., & Morgan, D. (1996). Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception, 25, 727–738.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Farah, M. J., Rabinowitz, C., Quinn, G. E., & Liu, G. T. (2000) Early commitment of neural substrates for face recognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(1–3), 117–123(7). Farah, M. J., Rabinowitz, C., Quinn, G. E., & Liu, G. T. (2000) Early commitment of neural substrates for face recognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(1–3), 117–123(7).
go back to reference Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191–197.CrossRefPubMed Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191–197.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hecht, H., Vogt, S., & Prinz, W. (2001). Motor Learning enhances perceptual judgement: a case for action perception transfer. Psychological Research, 65, 3–14.CrossRefPubMed Hecht, H., Vogt, S., & Prinz, W. (2001). Motor Learning enhances perceptual judgement: a case for action perception transfer. Psychological Research, 65, 3–14.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Heyes, C. (2003). Four routes of cognitive evolution. Psychological Review, 4, 713–727.CrossRef Heyes, C. (2003). Four routes of cognitive evolution. Psychological Review, 4, 713–727.CrossRef
go back to reference Hiris, E. (2007). Detection of biological and nonbiological motion. Journal of Vision, 7 (12):4, 1–16. Hiris, E. (2007). Detection of biological and nonbiological motion. Journal of Vision, 7 (12):4, 1–16.
go back to reference Hiris, E., Krebeck, A., Edmonds, J., & Stout, A. (2005). What learning to see arbitrary motion tells us about biological motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1096–1106.CrossRefPubMed Hiris, E., Krebeck, A., Edmonds, J., & Stout, A. (2005). What learning to see arbitrary motion tells us about biological motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1096–1106.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral Brain Science, 24, 849–937. Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral Brain Science, 24, 849–937.
go back to reference Jastorff, J., Kourtzi, Z., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Learning to discriminate complex movements: biological versus artificial trajectories. Journal of Vision, 6, 791–804.CrossRefPubMed Jastorff, J., Kourtzi, Z., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Learning to discriminate complex movements: biological versus artificial trajectories. Journal of Vision, 6, 791–804.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford: Blackwell. Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford: Blackwell.
go back to reference Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 202–211. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 202–211.
go back to reference Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 2, 467–472.CrossRef Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 2, 467–472.CrossRef
go back to reference Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 210–220.CrossRefPubMed Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 210–220.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 255–260.CrossRef Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 255–260.CrossRef
go back to reference Pavlova, M., & Sokolov, A. (2000). Orientation specificity in biological motion perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 889–899. Pavlova, M., & Sokolov, A. (2000). Orientation specificity in biological motion perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 889–899.
go back to reference Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.CrossRef Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.CrossRef
go back to reference Pyles, J. A., Garcia, J. O., Hoffman, D. D., & Grossman, E. D. (2007). Visual perception and neural correlates of novel ‘biological motion’. Vision Research, 47, 2786–2797.CrossRefPubMed Pyles, J. A., Garcia, J. O., Hoffman, D. D., & Grossman, E. D. (2007). Visual perception and neural correlates of novel ‘biological motion’. Vision Research, 47, 2786–2797.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Bozova, S., & Tanaka, J. (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14, 302–308.CrossRefPubMed Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Bozova, S., & Tanaka, J. (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14, 302–308.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shiffrar, M., & Pinto, J. (2002). The visual analysis of bodily motion. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Eds.) Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance (Vol. XIX, pp. 381–399). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shiffrar, M., & Pinto, J. (2002). The visual analysis of bodily motion. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Eds.) Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance (Vol. XIX, pp. 381–399). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Simion, F., Regolin, L., & Bulf, H. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 105(2), 809–813.CrossRef Simion, F., Regolin, L., & Bulf, H. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 105(2), 809–813.CrossRef
go back to reference Sumi, S. (1984). Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception, 13, 283–286.CrossRefPubMed Sumi, S. (1984). Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception, 13, 283–286.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces—a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471–491.PubMed Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces—a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471–491.PubMed
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145.CrossRef Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation
Auteurs
Beatriz Calvo-Merino
Shantel Ehrenberg
Delia Leung
Patrick Haggard
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2010
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0262-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2010

Psychological Research 4/2010 Naar de uitgave