Top

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Gepubliceerd in:

09-02-2016 | Original Paper

Experiences of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Policing in England and Wales: Surveying Police and the Autism Community

Auteurs: Laura Crane, Katie L. Maras, Tamsyn Hawken, Sue Mulcahy, Amina Memon

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 6/2016

Abstract

An online survey gathered the experiences and views of 394 police officers (from England and Wales) regarding autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Just 42 % of officers were satisfied with how they had worked with individuals with ASD and reasons for this varied. Although officers acknowledged the need for adjustments, organisational/time constraints were cited as barriers. Whilst 37 % of officers had received training on ASD, a need for training tailored to policing roles (e.g., frontline officers, detectives) was identified. Police responses are discussed with respect to the experiences of the ASD community (31 adults with ASD, 49 parents), who were largely dissatisfied with their experience of the police and echoed the need for police training on ASD.

vorige artikel An Evaluation of a Parent Implemented In Situ Pedestrian Safety Skills Intervention for Individuals with Autism

volgende artikel Stress in Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Exploration of Demands and Resources

The UK government comprises England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland; however, for this study, only England and Wales are considered as they share the relevant legal framework.

Note: The ASD community surveys asked about experiences of the CJS (from initial encounters with police through to experiences during a court case, if appropriate). All respondents completed the section about their views and experiences of the police (reported in this paper), but those respondents whose cases progressed to court were asked to complete further questions about these experiences. The latter data is not reported in this paper, but is available by contacting the authors. Note that scores regarding ‘overall satisfaction with the CJS’ (on page 14) may or may not include the respondents’ views on the court process.

We use the term “ASD community” to refer collectively to adults with autism (Adults) and parents/carers of children and adults with autism (Parent/carer).

Note that these data are presented to provide an insight into the experiences (in terms of types of crime and whether the individual was a victim, witness or suspect) of the police officers who took part in this survey; it is not intended to provide prevalence data regarding ASD and engagement with the police.

The discrepancy in the reported provision rates of AAs between police and ASD community responses may be due to unclear phrasing of the question and a lack of awareness by the ASD community that AAs are only provided for suspects and not victims/witnesses and that there is a distinction between ‘Supporter’, ‘Appropriate Adult’ and ‘Intermediary’ roles. Thus encounters as a victim/witness may have been included in responses, lowering provision rates. Due to the structuring of the questionnaire it is not possible to disentangle this issue further.

Note that the survey did not specifically ask whether people with autism not identify themselves if they were asked directly (as the police may do with those they believe may be ‘vulnerable’) or would they not volunteer this information.

Adebowale V. (2013). The independent commission on mental health and policing report. London.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Autism West Midlands (2015). Autism and the criminal justice system: Advice and guidance for professionals. Retrieved from: http://www.autismwestmidlands.org.uk/upload/pdf_files/1406643451_InformationSheets_CJS_Web.pdf.

Beadle-Brown, J., Richardson, L., Guest, C., Malovic, A., Bradshaw, J., & Himmerich, J. (2014). Living in fear: Better outcomes for people with learning disabilities and autism. Main research report. Canterbury: Tizard Centre, University of Kent.

Bradley, K. (2009). The bradley report. London: COI for the Department of Health.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRef

Brosnan, M., & Mills, E. (2015). The effect of diagnostic labels on the affective responses of college students towards peers with “Asperger’s Syndrome” and “Autism Spectrum Disorder”. Autism. doi:10.1177/1362361315586721.

Cascardi, M., Poythress, N. G., & Hall, A. (2000). Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: An analogue study. Behavioral Science and the Law, 18, 731–740. doi:10.1002/bsl.421.CrossRef

Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2001). National evaluation of the PEACE investigative interviewing course. London: Home Office.

Cummins, I. (2011). ‘The Other Side of Silence’: The role of the appropriate adult post-bradley. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5(3), 306–312. doi:10.1080/17496535.2011.597163.CrossRef

Dando, C., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2008). The cognitive interview: Inexperienced police officers’ perceptions of their witness/victim interviewing practices. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(1), 59–70. doi:10.1348/135532506X162498.CrossRef

Department of Health. (2010). Fulfilling and rewarding lives: The strategy for adults with autism in England. London: Department of Health.

Department of Health. (2014). Think autism: Fulfilling and rewarding lives, the strategy for adults with autism in England: an update. London: Department of Health.

H.M. Government. (2009). Autism act. London: HMSO.

H.M. Government. (2010). Equality act. London: Office for Disability Issues.

Huws, J. C., & Jones, R. S. P. (2011). Missing voices: Representations of autism in British newspapers, 1999–2008. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 98–104. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2010.00624.x.CrossRef

King, C., & Murphy, G. H. (2014). A systematic review of people with autism spectrum disorder and the criminal justice system. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(11), 2717–2733. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2046-5.CrossRefPubMed

Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef

Lindblad, F., & Lainpelto, K. (2011). Sexual abuse allegations by children with neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 20(2), 182–195. doi:10.1080/10538712.2011.554339.CrossRefPubMed

Livingston, J. D., Desmarais, S. L., Verdun-Jones, S., Parent, R., Michalak, E., & Brink, J. (2014). Perceptions and experiences of people with mental illness regarding their interactions with police. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37, 334–340. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.003.CrossRefPubMed

Maras, K. L., & Bowler, D. M. (2010). The cognitive interview for eyewitnesses with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(11), 1350–1360. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-0997-8.CrossRefPubMed

Maras, K. L., & Bowler, D. M. (2014). Eyewitness testimony in autism spectrum disorder: A review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(11), 2682–2697. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1502-3.CrossRefPubMed

Mattison, M. A., Dando, C., & Ormerod, T. (2015). Sketching to remember: Episodic free recall task support for child witnesses and victims with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(6), 1751–1765. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2335-z.CrossRefPubMed

Mayes, T. A. (2003). Persons with autism and criminal justice: Core concepts and leading cases. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5(2), 92–100. doi:10.1177/10983007030050020401.CrossRef

Medford, S., Gudjonsson, G. H., & Pearse, J. (2003). The efficacy of the appropriate adult safeguard during police interviewing. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8(2), 253–266. doi:10.1348/135532503322363022.CrossRef

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2002). Back to basics: A componential analysis of the original cognitive interview mnemonics with three age groups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(7), 746–753. doi:10.1002/acp.825.CrossRef

Milton, D. (2014). Autistic expertise: A critical reflection on the production of knowledge in autism studies. Autism, 18(7), 794–802. doi:10.1177/1362361314525281.CrossRefPubMed

Ministry of Justice. (2011). Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, and guidance on using special measures. London: Ministry of Justice.

Ministry of Justice. (2012). The registered intermediary procedural guidance manual. London: Ministry of Justice.

National Autistic Society (2011). Autism: A guide for criminal justice professionals. Retrieved from: http://www.autism.org.uk/working-with/criminal-justice/a-guide.aspx.

Office, Home. (1999). Youth justice and criminal evidence act. London: HMSO.

Office, Home. (2011). National appropriate adult network: Guide for appropriate adults. London: HMSO.

Pellicano, E., Dinsmore, A., & Charman, T. (2014). What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the UK. Autism, 18, 756–770. doi:10.1177/1362361314529627.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Plotnikoff, J., & Woolfson, R. (2015). Intermediaries in the criminal justice system: Improving communication for vulnerable witnesses and defendants. Bristol: Policy Press.

Watson, A. C., & Angell, B. (2007). Applying procedural justice theory to understanding police interactions with persons who have mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 58, 787–793.CrossRefPubMed

Woodbury-Smith, M., & Dein, K. (2014). Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and unlawful behaviour: Where do we go from here? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(11), 2734–2741. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2216-5.CrossRefPubMed

ZH v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (2012). EWHC 604 (QB).

Titel: Experiences of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Policing in England and Wales: Surveying Police and the Autism Community
Auteurs: Laura Crane
Katie L. Maras
Tamsyn Hawken
Sue Mulcahy
Amina Memon
Publicatiedatum: 09-02-2016
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2729-1

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2016

Susceptibility to Optical Illusions Varies as a Function of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient but not in Ways Predicted by Local–Global Biases

Sleep and Behavioral Problems in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Factors Mediating Dysphoric Moods and Help Seeking Behaviour Among Australian Parents of Children with Autism

Infant Development in Fragile X Syndrome: Cross-Syndrome Comparisons

Do Adults with High Functioning Autism or Asperger Syndrome Differ in Empathy and Emotion Recognition?

Differences in Social Motivation in Children with Smith–Magenis Syndrome and Down Syndrome