Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Prior research suggests that youths’ engagement in out-of-school time programs may be a crucial factor linking program participation to positive outcomes during adolescence. Guided by the theoretical concept of flow and by stage-environment fit theory, the present study explored correlates of engagement in youth programs. Engagement was conceptualized as the extent to which youth found the program activities enjoyable, interesting, and challenging. The current study examined how program content, monetary incentives, and youth demographic characteristics were linked to youth engagement among a sample of primarily low-income middle and high school youth attending 30 out-of-school programs (n = 435, 51 % female). Results from multilevel models suggested that program content and staff quality were strongly associated with youth engagement. Youth who reported learning new skills, learning about college, and learning about jobs through activities in the program were more engaged, as were youth who found the staff caring and competent. Results demonstrated that the link between learning content for the future and engagement was stronger for older youth than younger youth. In addition, there was a trend suggesting that providing a monetary incentive was associated negatively with youth engagement. Taken as a whole, these findings have important implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers interested in understanding the characteristics of out-of-school time programs that engage older youth.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Akiva, T., Sugar, S., Smith, C., & Brummet, Q. (2011). Staff instructional practices, youth engagement, and belonging in out-of-school time programs. Paper presented at the 2011 American educational research association annual meeting.
Anderson-Butcher, D. (2005). Recruitment and retention in youth development programming. The Prevention Researcher, 12, 3–6. CrossRef
Bohnert, A., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. (2010). Capturing unique dimensions of youth organized activity involvement: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research, 80, 576–610. CrossRef
Broh, B. A. (2002). Linking extracurricular programming to academic achievement: Who benefits and why? Sociology of Education, 75, 69–95. CrossRef
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human Development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). New York: Wiley.
Busseri, M. A., & Rose-Krasner, L. (2010). Addressing three common issues in research on youth activities: An integrative approach for operationalizing and analyzing involvement. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 583–615. CrossRef
Clifford, M. (1990). Students need challenge, not easy success. Educational Leadership, 48, 22–26.
Collins, A., Bronte-Tinkew, J., & Burkhauser, M. (2008). Using incentives to increase participation in out-of-school time programs. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.). (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27. CrossRef
Denault, A. S., & Poulin, F. (2009). Predictors of adolescent participation in organized activities: A five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 287–311. CrossRef
Deschenes, S., Arbreton, A., Little, P. M., Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Weiss, H. B., et al. (2010). Engaging older youth: Program and city-level strategies to support sustained participation in out-of-school time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Participation in extracurricular activities in the middle school years: Are there developmental benefits for African American and European American Youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1029–1043. CrossRef
Fuligni, A. J. (1997). The academic achievement of adolescents from immigrant families: The roles of family background, attitudes, and behavior. Child Development, 68, 351–363. PubMed
Gambone, M. A., & Arbreton, A. J. A. (1997). Safe havens: The contributions of youth organizations to healthy adolescent development. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Gneezy, U., Meier, S., & Rey-Biel, P. (2011). When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 1–21. CrossRef
Gottfredson, D., Cross, A. B., Wilson, D., Rorle, M., & Connell, N. (2010). Effects of participation in after-school programs for middle school students: A randomized trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 282–313. CrossRef
Hartung, P. J., Porfeli, E. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2005). Child vocational development: A review and reconsideration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 385–419. CrossRef
Hernandez, D. J., Denton, N. A., & Macartney, S. E. (2008). Children in immigrant families: Looking to America’s future. Society for Research in Child Development Social Policy Report, 22, 3–22.
Hirsch, B. J., Hedges, L. V., Stawicki, J., & Mekinda, M. A. (2011). After-school programs for high school students: An evaluation of after school matters. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/after-school/evaluations/Pages/After-School-Programs-for-High-School-Students-An-Evaluation-of-After-School-Matters.aspx.
Hooker, S., & Brand, B. (2009). Success at every step: How 23 programs support youth on the path to college and beyond. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.
Hynes, K., Greene, K. M., & Constance, N. (in press). Helping youth prepare for careers: Career-programming in out-of-school time. Afterschool Matters.
Hynes, K., Miller, A., & Cohen, B. (2010). The Pennsylvania older youth out- of- school time study: A practitioner’s guide to promising practices for recruiting and retaining older youth. Retrieved from http://www.psaydn.org/Documents/2010PractitionerGuideforOlderYouthRetention.pdf.
James-Burdumy, S., Dynarski, M., Moore, M., Deke, J., Mansfield, W., Pistorino, C., & Warner, E. (2005). When schools stay open late: The national evaluation of the 21st century community learning centers program final report. Retrieved from http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/pdfs/21stfinal.pdf.
Jerald, C. (2009). Defining a 21st century education. Alexandria, VA: Center for Public Education.
Jones, J. N., & Deutsch, N. L. (2011). Relational strategies in after-school settings: How staff-youth relationships support positive development. Youth and Society, 43, 1381–1406. CrossRef
Kao, G., & Tienda, M. (1995). Optimism and achievement: The educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 76, 1–19.
Larson, R., & Kleiber, D. (1993). Daily experience of adolescents. In P. Tolan & B. Cohler (Eds.), Handbook of clinical research and practice with adolescents (pp. 125–145). New York: Wiley.
Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Green, M. (2006). Out-of school time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk students. Review of Educational Research, 76, 275–313. CrossRef
Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., & Eccles, J. S. (Eds.). (2005a). Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
Mannell, R., Zuzanek, J., & Larson, R. (1988). Leisure states and “flow” experiences: Testing perceived freedom and intrinsic motivation hypotheses. Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 289–304.
McNeal, R. B. (1998). High school extracurricular activities: Closed structures and stratifying patterns of participation. The Journal of Educational Research, 9, 183–191. CrossRef
Pearce, N. J., & Larson, R. W. (2006). How teens become engaged in youth development programs: The process of motivational change in a civic activism organization. Applied Developmental Science, 10, 121–131. CrossRef
Pearson, L., Russell, C., & Reisner, E. (2007). Evaluation of OST programs for youth: Patterns of youth retention in OST programs, 2005- 06 to 2006- 07. Retrieved from http://www.policystudies.com/studies/youth/Year%202%20Report.pdf.
Pedersen, S. (2005). Urban adolescents’ out-of-school activity profiles: Associations with youth, family, and school transition characteristics. Applied Developmental Science, 9, 107–124. CrossRef
Peguero, A. A. (2011). Immigrant youth involvement in school-based extracurricular activities. The Journal of Educational Research, 104, 19–27. CrossRef
Perkins, D. F., Borden, L. M., Villarruel, F. A., Carlton-Hug, A., Stone, M. R., & Keith, J. G. (2007). Participation in structured youth programs: Why ethnic minority urban youth choose to participate—or not to participate. Youth and Society, 38, 420–422. CrossRef
Pittman, K. (2009). Thinking outside of the box: Creating catalytic partnerships to change the odds for children and youth. The Forum for Youth Investment.
Porfeli, E. J., Hartung, P. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2008). Children’s vocational development: A research rationale. Career Development Quarterly, 57, 25–37. CrossRef
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. CrossRef
Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2006). The developing person: An experiential perspective. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed.): Vol 1, Theoretical models of human development (pp. 465–515). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Reardon-Anderson, J., Capps, R., & Fix, M. (2002). The health and well-being of children in immigrant families. Series B, No. B-52. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Russell, C. A., Mielke, M. B., & Reisner, E. R. (2009). Evidence of program quality and youth outcomes in the DYCD out-of-school time initiative: Report on the initiative’s first three years. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc.
Schochet, P. Z., Burghardt, J., & McConnell, S. (2008). Does job corps work? Impact findings from the National Job Corps Study. American Economic Review, 98, 1864–1886. CrossRef
Seftor, N., Mamun, A., & Schirm, A. (2009). The impacts of regular Upward Bound on postsecondary outcomes 7–9 years after scheduled high school graduation: Final report. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176. CrossRef
Shernoff, D. J., & Vandell, D. L. (2007). Engagement in after-school program activities: Quality of experience from the perspective of participants. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 891–903. CrossRef
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Methods for studying change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, C., Akiva, T., Sugar, S. A., Lo, Y. J., Frank, K. A., Peck, S. C., et al. (2012). Continuous quality improvement in afterschool settings: Impact findings from the Youth Program Quality Intervention study. Washington, DC: Forum for Youth Investment.
Suárez-Orozco, C., & Suárez-Orozco, M. (2001). Children of immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Theokas, C., & Bloch, M. (2006). Out-of-school time is critical for children: Who participates in programs? Research-to-results fact sheet (Vol. 20). Washington, DC: Child Trends.
Time, Learning and Afterschool Task Force. (2007). A new day for learning: A report from the Time, Learning and Afterschool Task Force. Flint, MI: Collaborative Communications Group, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation.
Vandell, D. L., Reisner, E. R., Brown, B. B., Pierce, K. M., Dadisman, K., & Pechman, E. M. (2004). The study of promising afterschool programs: Descriptive report of promising programs. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.
Wimer, C., Bouffard, S., Caronongan, P., Dearing, E., Simpkins, S., Little, P., et al. (2006). What are kids getting into these days? Demographic differences in youth out-of-school time participation. Cambridge: Harvard Family Research Project.
- Examining Youth and Program Predictors of Engagement in Out-of-School Time Programs
Kaylin M. Greene
- Springer US