Top

Gepubliceerd in:

23-12-2022 | Original Paper

Examining Parental Monitoring, Neighborhood Peer Anti-social Behavior, and Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Control as a Pathway to Adolescent Substance Use

Auteurs: Jaime M. Booth, Daniel S. Shaw

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 2/2023

Abstract

Adolescence is a critical developmental period in which substance use can have long-term adverse effects. Structural ecosystem theory (SET) argues that community contexts may support or undermine the family’s ability to protect youth from substance use. Specific parenting attributes (e.g., providing structure, monitoring) have consistently been linked to youth substance use. However, less is known about how community factors may be influencing substance use through family and peer dynamics during adolescence. To address this gap, the current study uses five waves (ages 10–17) of data, collected as part of the Pitt Mother and Child Project (N = 228 low-income boys and their parents). This data are used to test a path model that investigates the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage (at age 10) and adolescent boys substance use (at age 17) through parental perceptions of neighborhood process (age 11), parents’ perceptions of monitoring (age 12) and affiliation with anti-social neighborhood peers/best friends (age 15). This study finds support for the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage in late childhood and substance use at age 17 through parental perceptions of neighborhood cohesion, parental monitoring at age 12, and the youths’ association with neighborhood best friends and marijuana use, but limited support for the indirect effect. The findings of this study partially support the assertion that neighborhood factors influence adolescent boys marijuana use by affecting other relationships within their ecological systems, suggesting that more research is needed in this area.

vorige artikel Felons Need Not Apply: The Tough-on-crime Era’s Felony Welfare Benefits Ban and its Impact on Families with a Formerly Incarcerated Parent

Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.

Augenstein, T. M., Thomas, S. A., Ehrlich, K. B., Daruwala, S., Reyes, S. M., Chrabaszcz, J. S., & De Los Reyes, A. (2016). Comparing multi-informant assessment measures of parental monitoring and their links with adolescent delinquent behavior. Parenting, 16(3), 164–186.CrossRefPubMed

Barr, P. B. (2018). Neighborhood conditions and trajectories of alcohol use and misuse across the early life course. Health & Place, 51, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.02.007.CrossRef

Bengtson, V. L., & Allen, K. R. (2009). The life course perspective applied to families over time. In Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 469–504). Springer, Boston, MA.

Bernburg, J. G., Thorlindsson, T., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2009). The neighborhood effects of disrupted family processes on adolescent substance use. Social Science & Medicine, 69(1), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.025.CrossRef

Booth, J. M., & Shaw, D. S. (2020). Relations among Perceptions of Neighborhood Cohesion and Control and Parental Monitoring across Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01045-8.CrossRefPubMed

Branstetter, S. A., & Furman, W. (2013). Buffering Effect of Parental Monitoring Knowledge and Parent-Adolescent Relationships on Consequences of Adolescent Substance Use. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(2), 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9568-2.CrossRefPubMed

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard university press.

Byrnes, H. F., Miller, B. A., Chamratrithirong, A., Rhucharoenpornpanich, O., Cupp, P. K., Atwood, K. A., & Chookhare, W. (2013). The roles of perceived neighborhood disorganization, social cohesion, and social control in urban thai adolescents’ substance use and delinquency. Youth & Society, 45(3), 404–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X11421940.CrossRef

Cambron, C., Kosterman, R., Rhew, I. C., Catalano, R. F., Guttmannova, K., & Hawkins, J. D. (2020). Neighborhood structural factors and proximal risk for youth substance use. Prevention Science, 21(4), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01072-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). A theory of antisocial behavior. Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories, 1996, 149.

Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., Pitts, S. C., & Sherman, S. J. (2000). The natural history of cigarette smoking from adolescence to adulthood in a midwestern community sample: multiple trajectories and their psychosocial correlates. Health Psychology, 19(3), 223–231.CrossRefPubMed

Chuang, Y. C., Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., & Foshee, V. A. (2005). Neighborhood influences on adolescent cigarette and alcohol use: Mediating effects through parent and peer behaviors. Journal of health and social behavior, 46(2), 187–204.

Cleveland, M. J., Feinberg, M. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2010). Protective families in high-and low-risk environments: Implications for adolescent substance use. Journal of youth and adolescence, 39(2), 114–126.

Crum, R. M., Lillie-Blanton, M., & Anthony, J. C. (1996). Neighborhood environment and opportunity to use cocaine and other drugs in late childhood and early adolescence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 43(3), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-8716(96)01298-7.CrossRefPubMed

Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. L. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental psychology, 27(1), 172.

Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., & Strycker, L. A. (2002). A multilevel analysis of neighborhood context and youth alcohol and drug problems. Prevention Science, 3(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015483317310.CrossRefPubMed

Elliott, D. S., Ageton, S. S., & Huizinga, D. (1982). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Behavioral Research Inst. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Erickson, P. G., Harrison, L., Cook, S., Cousineau, M.-M., & Adlaf, E. M. (2012). A comparative study of the influence of collective efficacy on substance use among adolescent students in Philadelphia, Toronto, and Montreal. Addiction Research & Theory, 20(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2010.530710.CrossRef

Fagan, A. A., Wright, E. M., & Pinchevsky, G. M. (2014). The protective effects of neighborhood collective efficacy on adolescent substance use and violence following exposure to violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1498–1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0049-8.CrossRefPubMed

Fagan, A. A., Wright, E. M., & Pinchevsky, G. M. (2015). A multi-level analysis of the impact of neighborhood structural and social factors on adolescent substance use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 153, 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.022.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fauth, R. C., Leventhal, T., & Brooks‐Gunn, J. (2007). Welcome to the neighborhood? Long‐term impacts of moving to low‐poverty neighborhoods on poor children’s and adolescents’ outcomes. Journal of research on adolescence, 17(2), 249–284.

Furstenberg, F. F., Cook, T. D., Eccles, J., Elder, G. H., & Sameroff, A. (1999). Managing to make it: Urban families in high-risk neighborhoods. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Gibson, C. L., Morris, S. Z., & Beaver, K. M. (2009). Secondary exposure to violence during childhood and adolescence: does neighborhood context matter. Justice Quarterly, 26(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820802119968.CrossRef

Gil, A. G., Wagner, E. F., & Tubman, J. G. (2004). Associations between early-adolescent substance use and subsequent young-adult substance use disorders and psychiatric disorders among a multiethnic male sample in South Florida. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9), 1603–1609. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.9.1603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Griffin, A. (2017). Adolescent Neurological Development and Implications for Health and Well-Being. Healthcare (Basel), 5(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare5040062.

Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.64.CrossRefPubMed

Hipp, J. R. (2016). Collective efficacy: How is it conceptualized, how is it measured, and does it really matter for understanding perceived neighborhood crime and disorder. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four Factor Index of Social Status. New Haven, CT; Hollingshead.

Ingoldsby, E. M., Shaw, D. S., Winslow, E., Schonberg, M., Gilliom, M., & Criss, M. M. (2006). Neighborhood disadvantage, parent–child conflict, neighborhood peer relationships, and early antisocial behavior problem trajectories. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 34(3), 293–309.

Jackson, N., Denny, S., & Ameratunga, S. (2014). Social and socio-demographic neighborhood effects on adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of multi-level studies. Social Science & Medicine, 115, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.004.CrossRef

Jackson, N., Denny, S., Sheridan, J., Zhao, J., & Ameratunga, S. (2016). The role of neighborhood disadvantage, physical disorder, and collective efficacy in adolescent alcohol use: a multilevel path analysis. Health & Place, 41, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.07.005.CrossRef

Jang, S. J., & Smith, C. A. (1997). A test of reciprocal causal relationships among parental supervision, affective ties, and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 307–336.

Karriker-Jaffe, K. J. (2011). Areas of disadvantage: a systematic review of effects of area-level socioeconomic status on substance use outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00191.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Keogh-Clark, F., Whaley, R. C., Leventhal, A. M., & Krueger, E. A. (2021). Sex differences in the association between parental monitoring and substance use initiation among adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 122, 107024–107024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kline, R. B. (1998). Structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

Korbin, J., & Coulton, C. J. (1997). Understanding the neighborhood context for children and families: Combining epidemiological and ethnographic approaches. Neighborhood Poverty, 2, 65–79.

Lac, A., & Crano, W. D. (2009). Monitoring matters: Meta-analytic review reveals the reliable linkage of parental monitoring with adolescent marijuana use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(6), 578–586.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology; an Interdisciplinary Journal, 31(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01132.x.CrossRef

Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.309.CrossRefPubMed

Leventhal, Tama, & Dupéré, V. (2019). Neighborhood effects on children’s development in experimental and nonexperimental research. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-085221.CrossRef

Maimon, D., & Browning, C. R. (2012). Underage drinking, alcohol sales and collective efficacy: Informal control and opportunity in the study of alcohol use. Social Science Research, 41(4), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.01.009.CrossRefPubMed

Marschall-Lévesque, S., Castellanos-Ryan, N., Vitaro, F., & Séguin, J. R. (2014). Moderators of the association between peer and target adolescent substance use. Addictive Behaviors, 39(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.025.CrossRefPubMed

Merline, A. C., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (2004). Substance use among adults 35 years of age: prevalence, adulthood predictors, and impact of adolescent substance use. American Journal of Public Health, 94(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.1.96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Moilanen, K. L., Shaw, D. S., Criss, M. M., & Dishion, T. J. (2009). Growth and predictors of parental knowledge of youth behavior during early adolescence. The Journal of early adolescence, 29(6), 800–825.

Musick, K., Seltzer, J. A., & Schwartz, C. R. (2008). Neighborhood norms and substance use among teens. Social Science Research, 37(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.02.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Preacher, K. J., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org/.

Racz, S. J., & McMahon, R. J. (2011). The relationship between parental knowledge and monitoring and child and adolescent conduct problems: a 10-year update. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14(4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-011-0099-y.CrossRefPubMed

Rusby, J. C., Light, J. M., Crowley, R., & Westling, E. (2018). Influence of parent-youth relationship, parental monitoring, and parent substance use on adolescent substance use onset. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(3), 310–320.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ryan, J., Roman, N. V., & Okwany, A. (2015). The Effects of Parental Monitoring and Communication on Adolescent Substance Use and Risky Sexual Activity: A Systematic Review. Open Family Studies Journal, 7(1), 12–27.CrossRef

Sameroff, A. (2010). A unified theory of development: A dialectic integration of nature and nurture. Child development, 81(1), 6–22.

Sampson, R. J. (1997). Collective regulation of adolescent misbehavior: Validation results from eighty Chicago neighborhoods. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743554897122005.CrossRef

Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American sociological review, 633–660.

Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1943). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Harvard Law Review, 56(4), 681 https://doi.org/10.2307/1334446.CrossRef

Shaw, D. S., Gilliom, M., Ingoldsby, E. M., & Nagin, D. (2003).Trajectories leading to school-age conduct problems. Developmental Psychology, 39, 189–200.

Shedler, J., & Block, J. (1990). Adolescent drug use and psychological health. A longitudinal inquiry. The American Psychologist, 45(5), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.5.612.CrossRefPubMed

Sitnick, S. L., Shaw, D. S., & Hyde, L. W. (2014). Precursors of adolescent substance use from early childhood and early adolescence: Testing a developmental cascade model. Development and psychopathology, 26(1), 125–140.

Snedker, K. A., Herting, J. R., & Walton, E. (2009). Contextual effects and adolescent substance use: exploring the role of neighborhoods. Social Science Quarterly, 90(5), 1272–1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00677.x.CrossRef

Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71(4), 1072–1085.CrossRefPubMed

Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. New York, NY.

Stritzel, H. (2022). Peer and Community Influences on Adolescent Substance Use in the Context of Adverse Childhood Experiences. Sociological Perspectives, 65(2), 413–432.

Su, J., & Supple, A. J. (2014). Parental, peer, school, and neighborhood influences on adolescent substance use: direct and indirect effects and ethnic variations. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 13(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2013.847393.CrossRefPubMed

Szapocznik, J., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1999). An ecodevelopmental framework for organizing the influences on drug abuse: A developmental model of risk and protection. In M. D. Glantz & C. R. Hartel (eds.), Drug abuse: Origins & interventions. (pp. 331–366). Washington: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10341-014.

Trucco, E. M., Colder, C. R., Wieczorek, W. F., Lengua, L. J., & Hawk, L. W. (2014). Early adolescent alcohol use in context: how neighborhoods, parents, and peers impact youth. Development and Psychopathology, 26(2), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000042.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Villarreal, D. L., & Nelson, J. A. (2018). Parental monitoring and adolescent risk behaviors: the moderating role of adolescent internalizing symptoms and gender. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(11), 3627–3637.CrossRef

Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2019). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. John Wiley & Sons.

Wen, M. (2017). Social capital and adolescent substance use: the role of family, school, and neighborhood contexts. Journal of Research on Adolescence: the Official Journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 27(2), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12299.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Examining Parental Monitoring, Neighborhood Peer Anti-social Behavior, and Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Control as a Pathway to Adolescent Substance Use
Auteurs: Jaime M. Booth
Daniel S. Shaw
Publicatiedatum: 23-12-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02514-8

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2023

Feasibility and Preliminary Impact of a Community-Based Intervention for Maternal PTSD and Parenting: Parenting-STAIR Pilot

Mental Health Trajectories of Latinx Female Caregivers and Young Children During COVID-19: A Longitudinal Analysis

What Works in Preventing Emerging Social Anxiety: Exposure, Cognitive Restructuring, or a Combination?

Targeting Parental Accommodation in Anxiety: An Open Trial of the Coping Cat Accommodation Reduction Intervention

Felons Need Not Apply: The Tough-on-crime Era’s Felony Welfare Benefits Ban and its Impact on Families with a Formerly Incarcerated Parent

A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study of Midwestern Latino Parents Participation and Preferences for Parenting Education Programs