Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Members of the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group include Karen L. Bierman (Pennsylvania State University), Kenneth A. Dodge (Duke University), Mark T. Greenberg (Pennsylvania State University), John E. Lochman (University of Alabama), Robert J. McMahon (Simon Fraser University and Child & Family Research Institute), and Ellen E. Pinderhughes (Tufts University)
Strong associations between conduct disorder (CD), antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and substance use disorders (SUD) seem to reflect a general vulnerability to externalizing behaviors. Recent studies have characterized this vulnerability on a continuous scale, rather than as distinct categories, suggesting that the revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) take into account the underlying continuum of externalizing behaviors. However, most of this research has not included measures of disorders that appear in childhood [e.g., attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or oppositional defiant disorder (ODD)], nor has it considered the full range of possibilities for the latent structure of externalizing behaviors, particularly factor mixture models, which allow for a latent factor to have both continuous and categorical dimensions. Finally, the majority of prior studies have not tested multidimensional models. Using lifetime diagnoses of externalizing disorders from participants in the Fast Track Project (n = 715), we analyzed a series of latent variable models ranging from fully continuous factor models to fully categorical mixture models. Continuous models provided the best fit to the observed data and also suggested that a two-factor model of externalizing behavior, defined as (1) ODD+ADHD+CD and (2) SUD with adult antisocial behavior sharing common variance with both factors, was necessary to explain the covariation in externalizing disorders. The two-factor model of externalizing behavior was then replicated using a nationally representative sample drawn from the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication data (n = 5,692). These results have important implications for the conceptualization of externalizing disorders in DSM-5.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Achenbach, T. M. (1966). The classification of children’s psychiatric symptoms: A factor-analytic study. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–37. PubMed
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (2010). Cross-cutting dimensional assessment in DSM-5. In DSM-5 development. Retrieved from http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/CrossCuttingDimensionalAssessmentinDSM-5.aspx.
Beauchaine, T. P., Hinshaw, S. P., & Pang, K. L. (2010). Comorbidity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and early-onset conduct disorder: Biological, environmental, and developmental mechanisms. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17, 327–336. CrossRef
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1992). A developmental and clinical model for the prevention of conduct disorders: The FAST Track program. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 509–527. CrossRef
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 631–647. CrossRef
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2000). Merging universal and indicated prevention programs: The Fast Track model. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 913–927. CrossRef
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. CrossRef
Kendler, K. S., Aggen, S. H., Knudsen, G. P., Roysmb, E., Neale, M. C., & Reichborn-Kjennerud, T. (2011). The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for syndromal and subsyndromal common DSM-IV axis I and all axis II disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 29–39. PubMedCrossRef
King, K. M., Luk, J. W., Wu, J., Witkiewitz, K., Racz, S. J., McMahon, R. J., the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2012). The co-occurrence of externalizing behaviors during childhood: Factor structure and invariance over time. Manuscript in preparation.
Krueger, R. F., & Bezdjian, S. (2009). Enhancing research and treatment of mental disorders with dimensional concepts: Toward DSM-V and ICD-11. World Psychiatry, 8, 3–6. PubMed
Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. CrossRef
Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, covariate effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 26–47.
Lubke, G. H., & Neale, M. C. (2006). Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: Resolution by maximum likelihood? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 499–532. CrossRef
Lubke, G. H., & Spies, J. (2008). Choosing a ‘correct’ factor mixture model: Power, limitations, and graphical data exploration. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 343–362). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
MacLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley. CrossRef
Masyn, K., Henderson, C. E., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2010). Exploring the latent structures of psychological constructs in social development using the dimensional-categorical spectrum. Social Development, 19, 470–493. CrossRef
Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569. CrossRef
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. CrossRef
Shaffer, D., & Fisher, P. (1997). NIMH-diagnostic interview schedule for children: Child informant. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Shaffer, D., Fisher, P., Lucas, C., Dulcan, M., & Schwab-Stone, M. (2000). NIMH diagnostic interview schedule for children version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): Description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 28–38. PubMedCrossRef
Shaffer, D., Fisher, P., Lucas, C., & Comer, J. (2003). Scoring manual: Diagnostic interview schedule for children (DISC-IV). New York, NY: Columbia University.
Tackett, J. L. (2010). Toward an externalizing spectrum in DSM-V: Incorporating developmental concerns. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 161–167. CrossRef
Todd, R. D., Rasmussen, E. R., Neuman, R. J., Reich, W., Hudziak, J. J., Bucholz, K. K., et al. (2001). Familiarity and heritability of subtypes of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a population sample of adolescent female twins. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1891–1898. PubMedCrossRef
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. CrossRef
World Health Organization. (1992). International statistical classification of disease and related health problems, tenth revision (ICD-10). Geneva: Author.
- Evidence for a Multi-Dimensional Latent Structural Model of Externalizing Disorders
Robert J. McMahon
Karen L. Bierman
John D. Coie
Kenneth A. Dodge
Mark T. Greenberg
John E. Lochman
Ellen E. Pinderhughes
the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group
- Springer US