Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00426-016-0786-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Recent corpus studies of eye-movements in reading revealed a substantial increase in saccade amplitudes and fixation durations as the eyes move over the first words of a sentence. This start-up effect suggests a global oculomotor program, which operates on the level of an entire line, in addition to the well-established local programs operating within the visual span. The present study investigates the nature of this global program experimentally and examines whether the start-up effect is predicated on generic visual or specific linguistic characteristics and whether it is mainly reflected in saccade amplitudes, fixation durations or both measures. Eye movements were recorded while 38 participants read (a) normal sentences, (b) sequences of randomly shuffled words and (c) sequences of z-strings. The stimuli were, therefore, similar in their visual features, but varied in the amount of syntactic and lexical information. Further, the stimuli were composed of words or strings that either varied naturally in length (Nonequal condition) or were all restricted to a specific length within a sentence (Equal). The latter condition constrained the variability of saccades and served to dissociate effects of word position in line on saccade amplitudes and fixation durations. A robust start-up effect emerged in saccade amplitudes in all Nonequal stimuli, and—in an attenuated form—in Equal sentences. A start-up effect in single fixation durations was observed in Nonequal and Equal normal sentences, but not in z-strings. These findings support the notion of a global oculomotor program in reading particularly for the spatial characteristics of motor planning, which rely on visual rather than linguistic information.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 53 kb)426_2016_786_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Balogh, J., Zurif, E., Prather, P., Swinney, D., & Finkel, L. (1998). Gap-filling and end-of-sentence effects in real-time language processing: implications for modeling sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 182(61), 169–182. CrossRef
Corbic, D., Glover, L., & Radach, R. (2007). The Landoldt-C string scanning task as a proxy for visuomotor processing in reading: A pilot study. In Poster session presented at the 14th European Conference on Eye Movements.
Enomoto, Y., Kadono, H., Suzuki, Y., Chiba, T., & Koyama, K. (2008). Biomechanical analysis of the medalists in the 10,000 metres at the 2007 World Championships in Athletics. New Studies in Athletics, 3, 61–66.
Hill, R. L., & Murray, W. S. (2000). Commas and spaces: effects of punctuation on eye movements and sentence parsing. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a Perceptual Process (pp. 565–589). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-008043642-5/50027-9.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=lmerTest.
Lackner, J. R., & Dizio, P. (1994). Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. Journal of Neurophysiology, 72(1), 299–313. PubMed
Lackner, J. R., & Dizio, P. (1998). Gravitoinertial Force Background Level Affects Adaptation to Coriolis Force Perturbations of Reaching Movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 546–553. PubMed
Mann, R., Kotmel, J., Herman, J., Johnson, B., & Schultz, C. (1984). Kinematic trends in elite sprinters. Proceedings of the International Symposium of Biomechanics in Sports (pp. 17–33). Del Mar, California: Academic Publishers.
Muggeo, V. M. R. (2008). Segmented: An R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News, 8, 20–25.
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/353867.
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., & Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3–4), SI21–SI49. doi: 10.1080/01690968908406362.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. (2013). Motor Learning and performance, 5E with web study guide: From principles to application. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Shadmehr, R., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1994). Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 14(5 Pt 2), 3208–3224. PubMed
Wotschack, C. (2009). Eye movements in reading strategies: How reading strategies modulate effects of distributed processing and oculomotor control. Universität Potsdam.
- Evidence for a global oculomotor program in reading
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg