Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Recent studies suggest that episodic memory represents the continuous flow of information that constitutes daily life events in a temporally compressed form, but the nature and determinants of this compression mechanism remain unclear. In the present study, we used wearable camera technology to investigate whether the temporal compression of experience in episodic memory depends on event segmentation. Participants experienced a series of events during a walk on a university campus and were later asked to mentally replay these events. The temporal compression of events in memory and grain size of event segmentation were estimated based on records of participants’ experience taken by the camera. The results showed that the temporal compression of events in memory (i.e., the density of recalled moments of experience per unit of time of the actual event duration) closely corresponded to the grain size of event segmentation. Specifically, grain sizes of event segmentation and temporal compression rates were four to five times lower when remembering events that involved goal-directed actions compared to other kinds of events (e.g., spatial displacements). Furthermore, temporal compression rates in memory were significantly predicted by the grain size of event segmentation and event boundaries were more than five times more likely to be remembered than other parts of events. Together, these results provide new insights into the mechanism of temporal compression of events in episodic memory.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Baird, J. A., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Making sense of human behavior: Action parsing and intentional inference. In B. F. Malle & L. J. Moses (Eds.), Intentions an intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 193–206). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bonasia, K., Blommesteyn, J., & Moscovitch, M. (2016). Memory and navigation: Compression of space varies with route length and turns. Hippocampus, 12, 9–12. CrossRef
Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594–628. CrossRef
Dubrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2013). The influence of context boundaries on memory for the sequential order of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 693–700.
Field, A. P., & Wilcox, R. R. (2017). Robust statistical methods: A primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers. Behaviour Research and Therapy ( in press).
Flores, S., Bailey, H. R., Eisenberg, M. L., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event segmentation improves event memory up to 1 month later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 43(8), 1183–1202.
Goldstein, H. (2011). Multilevel statistical models (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
Hanson, C., & Hirst, W. (1989). On the representation of events: A study of orientation, recall, and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(2), 136–147. CrossRef
Hard, B. M., Recchia, G., & Tversky, B. (2011). The shape of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 586–604. CrossRef
Jeunehomme, O. & D’Argembeau, A. (2018). The time to remember: temporal compression and duration judgments in memory for real-life events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818773082 ( in press)
Lassiter, G. D., Stone, J. I., & Rogers, S. L. (1988). Memorial consequences of variation in behavior perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 222–239. CrossRef
Magliano, J. P., Radvansky, G. A., Forsythe, J. C., & Copeland, D. E. (2014). Event segmentation during first-person continuous events. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 649–661. CrossRef
Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28–38. CrossRef
Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436–450. CrossRef
Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2006). Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Situation models and experienced space. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 1150–1156. CrossRef
Swallow, K. M., Zacks, J. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 236–257. CrossRef
Tversky, B., Zacks, J. M., & Lee, P. (2004). Events by hand and feet. Spatial cognition and computation, 4(1), 5–14. CrossRef
Wilcox, R. R. (2012). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. Waltham: Academic Press.
Williams, H. L., Conway, M. A., & Baddeley, A. D. (2008). The boundaries of episodic memories. In T. F. Shipley & J. M. Zacks (Eds.) Understanding events: from perception to action (pp. 589–616). New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(1), 29–58. CrossRef
- Event segmentation and the temporal compression of experience in episodic memory
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772