Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 2/2020

07-07-2018 | Original Article

Event segmentation and the temporal compression of experience in episodic memory

Auteurs: Olivier Jeunehomme, Arnaud D’Argembeau

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that episodic memory represents the continuous flow of information that constitutes daily life events in a temporally compressed form, but the nature and determinants of this compression mechanism remain unclear. In the present study, we used wearable camera technology to investigate whether the temporal compression of experience in episodic memory depends on event segmentation. Participants experienced a series of events during a walk on a university campus and were later asked to mentally replay these events. The temporal compression of events in memory and grain size of event segmentation were estimated based on records of participants’ experience taken by the camera. The results showed that the temporal compression of events in memory (i.e., the density of recalled moments of experience per unit of time of the actual event duration) closely corresponded to the grain size of event segmentation. Specifically, grain sizes of event segmentation and temporal compression rates were four to five times lower when remembering events that involved goal-directed actions compared to other kinds of events (e.g., spatial displacements). Furthermore, temporal compression rates in memory were significantly predicted by the grain size of event segmentation and event boundaries were more than five times more likely to be remembered than other parts of events. Together, these results provide new insights into the mechanism of temporal compression of events in episodic memory.
Voetnoten
1
In the present article, we use to terms “event segmentation”, “segmentation points” or “event boundaries” to refer to the events and sub-events identified in this event segmentation task, whereas as noted above the term “experience unit” refers to the moments of past experience that constitute episodic memories.
 
2
During the segmentation task, each picture was presented on the screen for a relatively short duration (i.e., 500 ms) and pilot tests showed that this sometimes led participants to select a picture that was 1 or 2 pictures before or after the actual segmentation point because they pressed the button too early or too late during the sequence. Consequently, we used a 5-picture window (rather than a single picture) to delimit segmentation points in these analyses.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Arnold, A., Iaria, G., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2016). Mental simulation of routes during navigation involves adaptive temporal compression. Cognition, 157, 14–23.CrossRef Arnold, A., Iaria, G., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2016). Mental simulation of routes during navigation involves adaptive temporal compression. Cognition, 157, 14–23.CrossRef
go back to reference Baird, J. A., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Making sense of human behavior: Action parsing and intentional inference. In B. F. Malle & L. J. Moses (Eds.), Intentions an intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 193–206). Cambridge: MIT Press. Baird, J. A., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Making sense of human behavior: Action parsing and intentional inference. In B. F. Malle & L. J. Moses (Eds.), Intentions an intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 193–206). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Bonasia, K., Blommesteyn, J., & Moscovitch, M. (2016). Memory and navigation: Compression of space varies with route length and turns. Hippocampus, 12, 9–12.CrossRef Bonasia, K., Blommesteyn, J., & Moscovitch, M. (2016). Memory and navigation: Compression of space varies with route length and turns. Hippocampus, 12, 9–12.CrossRef
go back to reference Brownstein, A. L., & Read, S. J. (2007). Situation models and memory: The effects of temporal and causal information on recall sequence. Memory, 15(7), 730–745.CrossRef Brownstein, A. L., & Read, S. J. (2007). Situation models and memory: The effects of temporal and causal information on recall sequence. Memory, 15(7), 730–745.CrossRef
go back to reference Brunec, I. K., Moscovitch, M., & Barense, M. D. (2018). Boundaries shape cognitive representations of spaces and events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(7), 637–650.CrossRef Brunec, I. K., Moscovitch, M., & Barense, M. D. (2018). Boundaries shape cognitive representations of spaces and events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(7), 637–650.CrossRef
go back to reference Clewett, D., & Davachi, L. (2017). The ebb and flow of experience determines the temporal structure of memory. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 186–193.CrossRef Clewett, D., & Davachi, L. (2017). The ebb and flow of experience determines the temporal structure of memory. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 186–193.CrossRef
go back to reference Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594–628.CrossRef Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594–628.CrossRef
go back to reference Conway, M. A. (2009). Episodic memories. Neuropsychologia, 47(11), 2305–2313.CrossRef Conway, M. A. (2009). Episodic memories. Neuropsychologia, 47(11), 2305–2313.CrossRef
go back to reference Dubrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2013). The influence of context boundaries on memory for the sequential order of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 693–700. Dubrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2013). The influence of context boundaries on memory for the sequential order of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 693–700.
go back to reference Ezzyat, Y., & Davachi, L. (2011). What constitutes an episode in episodic memory? Psychological Science, 22(2), 243–252.CrossRef Ezzyat, Y., & Davachi, L. (2011). What constitutes an episode in episodic memory? Psychological Science, 22(2), 243–252.CrossRef
go back to reference Faber, M., & Gennari, S. P. (2015a). In search of lost time: Reconstructing the unfolding of events from memory. Cognition, 143, 193–202.CrossRef Faber, M., & Gennari, S. P. (2015a). In search of lost time: Reconstructing the unfolding of events from memory. Cognition, 143, 193–202.CrossRef
go back to reference Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.CrossRef Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Field, A. P., & Wilcox, R. R. (2017). Robust statistical methods: A primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers. Behaviour Research and Therapy (in press). Field, A. P., & Wilcox, R. R. (2017). Robust statistical methods: A primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers. Behaviour Research and Therapy (in press).
go back to reference Flores, S., Bailey, H. R., Eisenberg, M. L., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event segmentation improves event memory up to 1 month later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 43(8), 1183–1202. Flores, S., Bailey, H. R., Eisenberg, M. L., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event segmentation improves event memory up to 1 month later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 43(8), 1183–1202.
go back to reference Goldstein, H. (2011). Multilevel statistical models (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley. Goldstein, H. (2011). Multilevel statistical models (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
go back to reference Hanson, C., & Hirst, W. (1989). On the representation of events: A study of orientation, recall, and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(2), 136–147.CrossRef Hanson, C., & Hirst, W. (1989). On the representation of events: A study of orientation, recall, and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(2), 136–147.CrossRef
go back to reference Hard, B. M., Recchia, G., & Tversky, B. (2011). The shape of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 586–604.CrossRef Hard, B. M., Recchia, G., & Tversky, B. (2011). The shape of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 586–604.CrossRef
go back to reference Horner, A. J., Bisby, J.A., Wang, A., Bogus, K., Burgess, N. (2016). The role of spatial boundaries in shaping long-term event representations. Cognition, 154, 151–164CrossRef Horner, A. J., Bisby, J.A., Wang, A., Bogus, K., Burgess, N. (2016). The role of spatial boundaries in shaping long-term event representations. Cognition, 154, 151–164CrossRef
go back to reference Jeunehomme, O., Folville, A., Stawarczyk, D., Van der Linden, M., & D’Argembeau, A. (2018). Temporal compression in episodic memory for real-life events. Memory, 26(6), 759–770.CrossRef Jeunehomme, O., Folville, A., Stawarczyk, D., Van der Linden, M., & D’Argembeau, A. (2018). Temporal compression in episodic memory for real-life events. Memory, 26(6), 759–770.CrossRef
go back to reference Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 72–79.CrossRef Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 72–79.CrossRef
go back to reference Lassiter, G. D., Stone, J. I., & Rogers, S. L. (1988). Memorial consequences of variation in behavior perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 222–239.CrossRef Lassiter, G. D., Stone, J. I., & Rogers, S. L. (1988). Memorial consequences of variation in behavior perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 222–239.CrossRef
go back to reference Magliano, J. P., Radvansky, G. A., Forsythe, J. C., & Copeland, D. E. (2014). Event segmentation during first-person continuous events. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 649–661.CrossRef Magliano, J. P., Radvansky, G. A., Forsythe, J. C., & Copeland, D. E. (2014). Event segmentation during first-person continuous events. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 649–661.CrossRef
go back to reference Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28–38.CrossRef Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436–450.CrossRef Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436–450.CrossRef
go back to reference Pettijohn, K. A., Thompson, N. A., Tamplin, A. K., Krawietz, S. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (2016). Event boundaries and memory improvement. Cognition, 148, 136–144.CrossRef Pettijohn, K. A., Thompson, N. A., Tamplin, A. K., Krawietz, S. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (2016). Event boundaries and memory improvement. Cognition, 148, 136–144.CrossRef
go back to reference Radvansky, G., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event boundaries in memory and cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 133–140.CrossRef Radvansky, G., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event boundaries in memory and cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 133–140.CrossRef
go back to reference Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2006). Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Situation models and experienced space. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 1150–1156.CrossRef Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2006). Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Situation models and experienced space. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 1150–1156.CrossRef
go back to reference Sargent, J. Q., Zacks, J. M., Hambric, D. Z., Zack, R. T., Kurby, C. A., Bailey, H. R., Eisenber, M. L., & Beck, T. M. (2013). Event segmentation ability uniquely predicts event memory. Cognition, 129, 241–255.CrossRef Sargent, J. Q., Zacks, J. M., Hambric, D. Z., Zack, R. T., Kurby, C. A., Bailey, H. R., Eisenber, M. L., & Beck, T. M. (2013). Event segmentation ability uniquely predicts event memory. Cognition, 129, 241–255.CrossRef
go back to reference Swallow, K. M., Zacks, J. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 236–257.CrossRef Swallow, K. M., Zacks, J. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 236–257.CrossRef
go back to reference Tversky, B., Zacks, J. M., & Lee, P. (2004). Events by hand and feet. Spatial cognition and computation, 4(1), 5–14.CrossRef Tversky, B., Zacks, J. M., & Lee, P. (2004). Events by hand and feet. Spatial cognition and computation, 4(1), 5–14.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilcox, R. R. (2012). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. Waltham: Academic Press. Wilcox, R. R. (2012). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. Waltham: Academic Press.
go back to reference Williams, H. L., Conway, M. A., & Baddeley, A. D. (2008). The boundaries of episodic memories. In T. F. Shipley & J. M. Zacks (Eds.) Understanding events: from perception to action (pp. 589–616). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Williams, H. L., Conway, M. A., & Baddeley, A. D. (2008). The boundaries of episodic memories. In T. F. Shipley & J. M. Zacks (Eds.) Understanding events: from perception to action (pp. 589–616). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(1), 29–58.CrossRef Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(1), 29–58.CrossRef
go back to reference Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind/brain perspective. Psychol Bull, 133(2), 273–293.CrossRef Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind/brain perspective. Psychol Bull, 133(2), 273–293.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Event segmentation and the temporal compression of experience in episodic memory
Auteurs
Olivier Jeunehomme
Arnaud D’Argembeau
Publicatiedatum
07-07-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1047-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2020

Psychological Research 2/2020 Naar de uitgave