Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

17-10-2021 | Special Section: Non-parametric IRT

Evaluation of the link between the Guttman errors and response shift at the individual level

Auteurs: Yseulys Dubuy, Véronique Sébille, Marie Grall-Bronnec, Gaëlle Challet-Bouju, Myriam Blanchin, Jean-Benoit Hardouin

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 1/2022

Abstract

Purpose

Methods for response shift (RS) detection at the individual level could be of great interest when analyzing changes in patient-reported outcome data. Guttman errors (GEs), which measure discrepancies in respondents’ answers compared to the average sample responses, might be useful for detecting RS at the individual level between two time points, as RS may induce an increase in the number of discrepancies over time. This study aims to establish the link between recalibration RS and the change in the number of GEs over time (denoted index \(I\)) via simulations and explores the discriminating ability of this index.

Methods

We simulated the responses of individuals affected or not affected by recalibration RS (defined as changes in the patients’ standard of measurement) to determine whether simulated individuals with recalibration had a greater change in the number of GEs over time than individuals without recalibration. The effects of factors related to the sample, the questionnaire structure and recalibration were investigated. As an illustrative example, the change in the number of GEs was computed in patients suffering from eating disorders.

Results

Within simulations, simulated individuals affected by recalibration had, on average, a greater change in the number of GEs over time than did individuals without RS. Some of the parameters related to the questionnaire structure and recalibration magnitude appeared to have substantial effects on the values of \(I\). Discriminating abilities appeared, however, globally low.

Conclusion

Some evidence of the link between recalibration and the change in GEs was found in this study. GEs could be a valuable nonparametric tool for RS detection at a more individual level, but further investigation is needed.

vorige artikel The Crit coefficient in Mokken scale analysis: a simulation study and an application in quality-of-life research

volgende artikel Non-parametric measurement for patient-reported outcomes

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

i.e., nonrandom errors in the latent variable estimates.

Basch, E. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes: Harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376(2), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1611252 CrossRefPubMed

Schwartz, C. E., Finkelstein, J. A., & Rapkin, B. D. (2017). Appraisal assessment in patient-reported outcome research: Methods for uncovering the personal context and meaning of quality of life. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 26(3), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1476-2 CrossRef

Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science & Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00045-3 CrossRef

Vanier, A., Falissard, B., Sébille, V., & Hardouin, J. B. (2017). The complexity of interpreting changes observed over time in health-related quality of life: A short overview of 15 years of research on response shift theory. In F. Guillemin, A. Leplege, S. Briancon, E. Spitz, & J. Coste (Eds.), Perceived health and adaptation in chronic disease (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.

Schwartz, C. E., Sprangers, M. A., & Fayers, P. M. (2005). Response shift: You know it’s there, but how do you capture it? Challenges for the next phase of research. In Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Oort, F. J. (2005). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 14(3), 587–598. CrossRef

Schwartz, C. E. (2016). Introduction to special section on response shift at the item level. Quality of Life Research, 25(6), 1323–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1299-1 CrossRefPubMed

Guilleux, A., Blanchin, M., Vanier, A., Guillemin, F., Falissard, B., Schwartz, C. E., Hardouin, J. B., & Sébille, V. (2015). RespOnse Shift ALgorithm in Item response theory (ROSALI) for response shift detection with missing data in longitudinal patient-reported outcome studies. Quality of Life Research, 24(3), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0876-4 CrossRefPubMed

Blanchin, M., Guilleux, A., Hardouin, J.-B., & Sébille, V. (2020). Comparison of structural equation modelling, item response theory and Rasch measurement theory-based methods for response shift detection at item level: A simulation study. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 29(4), 1015–1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280219884574 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Vanier, A., Sébille, V., Blanchin, M., Guilleux, A., & Hardouin, J.-B. (2015). Overall performance of Oort’s procedure for response shift detection at item level: A pilot simulation study. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 24(8), 1799–1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0938-2 CrossRef

11.

Nolte, S., Mierke, A., Fischer, H. F., & Rose, M. (2016). On the validity of measuring change over time in routine clinical assessment: A close examination of item-level response shifts in psychosomatic inpatients. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 25(6), 1339–1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1123-3 CrossRef

12.

Gandhi, P. K., Schwartz, C. E., Reeve, B. B., DeWalt, D. A., Gross, H. E., & Huang, I.-C. (2016). An item-level response shift study on the change of health state with the rating of asthma-specific quality of life: A report from the PROMIS(®) Pediatric Asthma Study. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 25(6), 1349–1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1290-x CrossRef

13.

Verdam, M. G. E., Oort, F. J., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2016). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change in discrete variables: An application to the items of the SF-36. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 25(6), 1361–1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1195-0 CrossRef

14.

Ahmed, S., Sawatzky, R., Levesque, J.-F., Ehrmann-Feldman, D., & Schwartz, C. E. (2014). Minimal evidence of response shift in the absence of a catalyst. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 23(9), 2421–2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0699-3 CrossRef

15.

Blanchin, M., Sébille, V., Guilleux, A., & Hardouin, J.-B. (2016). The Guttman errors as a tool for response shift detection at subgroup and item levels. Quality of Life Research, 25(6), 1385–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1268-8 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Meijer, R. R., Niessen, A. S. M., & Tendeiro, J. N. (2016). A practical guide to check the consistency of item response patterns in clinical research through person-fit statistics: Examples and a computer program. Assessment, 23(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115577800 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (2002). Introduction to nonparametric item response theory. SAGE. CrossRef

18.

Emons, W. H. M. (2008). Nonparametric person-fit analysis of polytomous item scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32(3), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621607302479 CrossRef

19.

Fischer, G. H., & Ponocny, I. (1994). An extension of the partial credit model with an application to the measurement of change. Psychometrika, 59(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295182 CrossRef

20.

American Psychiatric Association, & American Psychiatric Association (eds.). (2009). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR (4. ed., text revision, 13. print.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Assoc.

21.

Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D., Weiller, E., Amorim, P., Bonora, I., Harnett Sheehan, K., & Dunbar, G. (1997). The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: Reliability and validity according to the CIDI. European Psychiatry, 12(5), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83296-8 CrossRef

22.

Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., & Dunbar, G. C. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(Suppl 20), 22–33. PubMed

23.

Garner, D. M. (1991). Eating disorder inventory-2. Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Research.

24.

Archinard, M., Rouget, P., Painot, D., & Liengme, C. (2002). Inventaire des troubles alimentaires 2 [Eating Disorder Inventory 2]. In M. Bouvard & J. Cottraux (Eds.), Protocoles et échelles d’évaluation en psychiatrie et en psychologie [Protocols and evaluation scales in psychiatry and psychology] (3rd ed., pp. 249–251). Masson.

25.

Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., & Svrakic, D. M. (1994). The temperament and character inventory (TCI) a guide to its development and use. Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University.

26.

Pélissolo, A., & Lépine, J.-P. (1997). Traduction française et premières études de validation du questionnaire de personnalité TCI. [Validation study of the French version of the TCI.]. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, 155(8), 497–508.

27.

Chakroun-Vinciguerra, N., Faytout, M., Pélissolo, A., & Swendsen, J. (2005). Validation française de la version courte de l’Inventaire du Tempérament et du Caractère (TCI-125). Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive, 15(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1155-1704(05)81209-1 CrossRef

28.

Cooper, P. J., Taylor, M. J., Cooper, Z., & Fairbum, C. G. (1987). The development and validation of the body shape questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 6(4), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(198707)6:4%3c485::AID-EAT2260060405%3e3.0.CO;2-O CrossRef

29.

Rousseau, A., Knotter, A., Barbe, P., Raich, R., & Chabrol, H. (2005). Validation of the French version of the Body Shape Questionnaire. L’Encephale, 31(2), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82383-8 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483. CrossRef

31.

Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., & de Haes, J. C. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential item functioning. Differential Item Functioning, xv, 453–xv, 453.

33.

Osterlind, S., & Everson, H. (2009). Differential item functioning. SAGE Publications. CrossRef

34.

Marais, I., & Andrich, D. (2008). Formalizing dimension and response violations of local independence in the unidimensional Rasch model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(3), 200–215. PubMed

35.

Christensen, K. B., Kreiner, S., & Mesbah, M. (Eds.). (2013). Rasch models in health. ISTE.

36.

Andrich, D., & Kreiner, S. (2010). Quantifying response dependence between two dichotomous items using the rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621609360202 CrossRef

37.

Andrich, D., Humphry, S. M., & Marais, I. (2012). Quantifying local, response dependence between two polytomous items using the Rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(4), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621612441858 CrossRef

38.

Yen, W. M. (1984). Effects of local item dependence on the fit and equating performance of the three-parameter logistic model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168400800201 CrossRef

39.

Chen, W.-H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22(3), 265. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165285 CrossRef

40.

Hoskens, M., & De Boeck, P. (1997). A parametric model for local dependence among test items. Psychological Methods, 2(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.261 CrossRef

41.

Douglas, J., Kim, H. R., Habing, B., & Gao, F. (1998). Investigating local dependence with conditional covariance functions. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165318 CrossRef

42.

Ip, E. H. (2001). Testing for local dependency in dichotomous and polytomous item response models. Psychometrika, 66(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295736 CrossRef

43.

Ip, E. H. (2002). Locally dependent latent trait model and the dutch identity revisited. Psychometrika, 67(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294990 CrossRef

44.

Edwards, M. C., Houts, C. R., & Cai, L. (2018). A diagnostic procedure to detect departures from local independence in item response theory models. Psychological Methods, 23(1), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000121 CrossRefPubMed

45.

Straat, J. H., van der Ark, L. A., & Sijtsma, K. (2016). Using conditional association to identify locally independent item sets. Methodology, 12(4), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000115 CrossRef

46.

Olsbjerg, M., & Christensen, K. B. (2015). Modeling local dependence in longitudinal IRT models. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1413–1424. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0553-0 CrossRefPubMed

47.

Marais, I. (2009). Response dependence and the measurement of change. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10, 17–29. PubMed

48.

Olsbjerg, M., & Christensen, K. B. (n.d.). LIRT: SAS macros for longitudinal IRT models, 49.

49.

Olsbjerg, M., & Christensen, K. B. (2015). %lrasch_mml : A SAS macro for marginal maximum likelihood estimation in longitudinal polytomous rasch models. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.c02 CrossRef

Titel: Evaluation of the link between the Guttman errors and response shift at the individual level
Auteurs: Yseulys Dubuy
Véronique Sébille
Marie Grall-Bronnec
Gaëlle Challet-Bouju
Myriam Blanchin
Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Publicatiedatum: 17-10-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03015-9

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Tips voor Mijn BSL

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Evaluation of the link between the Guttman errors and response shift at the individual level

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Tips voor Mijn BSL

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2022

Correction to: Patients’ and parents’ perspective on the implementation of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in pediatric clinical practice using the KLIK PROM portal

Assessing forgetfulness and polypharmacy and their impact on health-related quality of life among patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia in Greece during the COVID-19 pandemic

Patients’ and parents’ perspective on the implementation of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in pediatric clinical practice using the KLIK PROM portal

Evidence on the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D: a literature review

Developing and testing a cognitive bolt-on for the EQ-5D-Y (Youth)

Combining EQ-5D-5L items into a level summary score: demonstrating feasibility using non-parametric item response theory using an international dataset