Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0307-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
We are developing an item bank assessing the impact of diabetic retinopathy (DR) on quality of life (QoL) using a rigorous multi-staged process combining qualitative and quantitative methods. We describe here the first two qualitative phases: content development and item evaluation.
After a comprehensive literature review, items were generated from four sources: (1) 34 previously validated patient-reported outcome measures; (2) five published qualitative articles; (3) eight focus groups and 18 semi-structured interviews with 57 DR patients; and (4) seven semi-structured interviews with diabetes or ophthalmic experts. Items were then evaluated during 3 stages, namely binning (grouping) and winnowing (reduction) based on key criteria and panel consensus; development of item stems and response options; and pre-testing of items via cognitive interviews with patients.
The content development phase yielded 1,165 unique items across 7 QoL domains. After 3 sessions of binning and winnowing, items were reduced to a minimally representative set (n = 312) across 9 domains of QoL: visual symptoms; ocular surface symptoms; activity limitation; mobility; emotional; health concerns; social; convenience; and economic. After 8 cognitive interviews, 42 items were amended resulting in a final set of 314 items.
We have employed a systematic approach to develop items for a DR-specific QoL item bank. The psychometric properties of the nine QoL subscales will be assessed using Rasch analysis. The resulting validated item bank will allow clinicians and researchers to better understand the QoL impact of DR and DR therapies from the patient’s perspective.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Fenwick, E., et al. (2011). Social and emotional impact of diabetic retinopathy: A review. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 40(1), 27–38.
Lamoureux, E., et al. (2007). The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: An assessment of its domain structure using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 48, 1001–1006. CrossRef
Lamoureux, E., et al. (2006). The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: An evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 47, 4732–4741. CrossRef
Brose, L., & Bradley, C. (2009). Psychometric Development of the Individualized Retinopathy-Dependent Quality of Life Questionnaire (RetDQoL). Value Health, 14(6), 740–754.
Vanalphen, A., et al. (1994). Likert or Rasch—Nothing is more applicable than good theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20(1), 196–201. CrossRef
Finger, R. P., Fenwick, E., Pesudovs, K., Marella, M., Lamoureux, E. L., & Holz, F. G. (2012). Rasch analysis reveals problems with multiplicative scoring in the macular disease quality of life questionnaire. Ophthalmology, 119(11), 2351–2357.
Pesudovs, K. (2010). Item banking: A generational change in patient-reported outcome measurement. Optometry and Vision Science, 87(4), 1–9. CrossRef
Gershon, R. C. (2005). Computer adaptive testing. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6(1), 109–127. PubMed
Giesinger, J. M., et al. (2011). Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 19–29.
Bruce, B., et al. (2009). Better assessment of physical function: Item improvement is neglected but essential. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 11(6), R191. CrossRef
WHOQOL Group. (1997). Measuring quality of life (pp. 1–13). Geneva: The World Health Organisation.
Finger, R. P., et al. (2011). The impact of the severity of vision loss on vision-related quality of life in India: An evaluation of the IND-VFQ-33. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 52(9), 6081–6088. CrossRef
Devenney, R., & O’Neil, S. (2010). The experience of diabetic retinopathy: A qualitative study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16(4), 707–721. CrossRef
Oehlergiarratana, J., & Fitzgerald, R. G. (1980). Group-therapy with blind diabetics. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37(4), 463–467. CrossRef
Fenwick, E. K., Pesudovs, K., Khadka, J., Dirani, M., Rees, G., Wong, T. Y., & Lamoureux, E. L. (2012). The impact of diabetic retinopathy on quality of life: Qualitative findings from an item bank development project. Quality of Life Research. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0110-1.
Rice, P., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (Eds.). (1994). Beginning qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Willis, G. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Evaluation of item candidates for a diabetic retinopathy quality of life item bank
Eva K. Fenwick
Tien Y. Wong
Ecosse L. Lamoureux
- Springer Netherlands