Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 4/2013

01-12-2013

Evaluating Self-Report Measures of Narcissistic Entitlement

Auteurs: Robert A. Ackerman, M. Brent Donnellan

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The present work further delineates the psychometric properties of two self-report measures of entitlement: the Psychological Entitlement Scale (PES) and the Entitlement/Exploitativeness subscale from the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI-EE). Past research shows that these measures diverge in their relations with psychological distress and self-esteem. We draw upon conceptual distinctions between normal and pathological narcissism to explain these differences. We also provide additional reliability information for each measure. Study 1 (n = 436) uses self-report data on exploitive entitlement, non-exploitive entitlement, and the traits of the Five-Factor Model (FFM) to evaluate the nomological nets of the PES and NPI-EE. Study 2 (n = 497) uses self-report data on self-esteem and antisocial behaviors to evaluate the criterion-related validity of the PES and NPI-EE; it also replicates the Study 1 FFM profile results. Study 3 (n = 142) investigates the test-retest reliability of the PES and NPI-EE (along with estimates of their internal consistencies) across a 2-week interval. The PES had strong retest reliability and showed a pattern of correlates characteristic of grandiosity (e.g., higher levels of antagonism [immodesty in particular]); the PES also had a strong positive association with non-exploitive entitlement and a modest positive association with self-esteem. The NPI-EE captured some features consistent with vulnerability (e.g., links with higher Neuroticism [anger in particular] and somewhat lower self-esteem) and also had adequate retest reliability in light of its internal consistency. Implications for the assessment of narcissistic entitlement are discussed.
Voetnoten
1
A table with the average correlation between the IPIP facets and the NEO PI-R facets within each domain (as well as the range of these correlations) is available from the second author upon request (see also Johnson 2011). Likewise, complete information regarding the means, standard deviations, and average inter-item correlation coefficients for each of the FFM traits and facets can be obtained from the first author upon request.
 
2
Because the two Lessard et al. scales correlated to some degree, we also regressed the PES on both the Non-Exploitive and Exploitive Entitlement scales to obtain estimates of the unique relations between these entitlement scales and the PES. Consistent with our other findings, both the Non-Exploitive Entitlement scale (b = 0.64, SE = .07, β = .37, p < .001) and the Exploitive Entitlement scale (b = 0.88, SE = .07, β = .47, p < .001) were positive and significant predictors of the PES.
 
3
The one exception to this was the rule-breaking subscale. When rule-breaking was regressed upon the PES and NPI-EE, the NPI-EE was a significant predictor (b = 0.69, SE = .11, β = .30, p < .001) whereas the PES was not (b = 0.00, SE = .02, β = .01, p = .89).
 
4
Because some cells for age (as well as ethnicity) had counts with fewer than 5 cases, Fisher’s exact test was used instead of the Pearson Chi-square test.
 
5
Although the omnibus test was non-significant, z-tests comparing proportions across both groups showed that a significantly higher proportion of 18-year olds were present in the sample subset that completed both waves (p = .08) relative to the sample subset that completed only the first wave (p = .00).
 
6
Additional research (Ackerman et al. 2012) using Item Response Theory analyses has shown that although the Cronbach’s alpha connected with the subscale may be low, the scale is able to discriminate individuals with higher levels of the trait reasonably well.
 
7
Item-level analyses that combined data from Studies 1 and 2 showed that although participants with higher scores on this item reported less Modesty (r = −.39) and Morality (r = −.21), they also reported higher Self-Efficacy (r = .18), Assertiveness (r = .18), and Cheerfulness (r = .18), This and all other item-level analyses are available from the first author upon request.
 
8
Item-level analyses using combined data from Studies 1 and 2 showed that this item was characterized by lower scores on Morality (r = −.39), Cooperation (r = −.32), and Modesty (r = −.39), along with less Dutifulness (r = −.17), less Cautiousness (r = −.17), and more Anger (r = .20); however, it had no connections with Extraversion (r = .05) or any of its facets (r’s ranged from −.06 to .09), or any other facets of Neuroticism besides Anger (r’s ranged from .01 to .08).
 
9
Item-level analyses that combined data from Studies 1 and 2 showed that items 14, 24, and 25 exhibited non-trivial correlations with the broad domain of Neuroticism (rs = .21, .16, and .15, respectively). In addition, although all NPI-EE items were positively correlated with Anger (r’s ranged from .16 to .23), only item 14 exhibited sizeable associations with Anxiety (r = .16), Depression (r = .15), and Vulnerability (r = .19). Thus, future item-level analyses of the NPI-EE may also prove useful.
 
10
We thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Ackerman, R. A., Witt, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., & Kashy, D. A. (2011). What does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory really measure? Assessment, 18, 67–87.PubMedCrossRef Ackerman, R. A., Witt, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., & Kashy, D. A. (2011). What does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory really measure? Assessment, 18, 67–87.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ackerman, R. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R.W. (2012). An item response theory analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 141–155. Ackerman, R. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R.W. (2012). An item response theory analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 141–155.
go back to reference Akhtar, S., & Thomson, J. A. (1982). Overview: Narcissistic Personality disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 12–20.PubMed Akhtar, S., & Thomson, J. A. (1982). Overview: Narcissistic Personality disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 12–20.PubMed
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
go back to reference Bishop, J., & Lane, R. C. (2002). The dynamics and dangers of entitlement. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 19, 739–758.CrossRef Bishop, J., & Lane, R. C. (2002). The dynamics and dangers of entitlement. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 19, 739–758.CrossRef
go back to reference Bosson, J. K., & Weaver, J. R. (2011). “I love me some me”: Examining the links between narcissism and self-esteem. In W. K. Campbell & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 261–271). Hoboken: Wiley. Bosson, J. K., & Weaver, J. R. (2011). “I love me some me”: Examining the links between narcissism and self-esteem. In W. K. Campbell & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 261–271). Hoboken: Wiley.
go back to reference Brown, R. P., & Tamborski, M. (2011). Of tails and their dogs: A critical view of the measurement of trait narcissism in social-personality research. In W. K. Campbell & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 141–145). Hoboken: Wiley. Brown, R. P., & Tamborski, M. (2011). Of tails and their dogs: A critical view of the measurement of trait narcissism in social-personality research. In W. K. Campbell & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 141–145). Hoboken: Wiley.
go back to reference Brown, R. P., Budzek, K., & Tamborski, M. (2009). On the meaning and measure of narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 951–964.PubMedCrossRef Brown, R. P., Budzek, K., & Tamborski, M. (2009). On the meaning and measure of narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 951–964.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Burt, S. A., & Donnellan, M. B. (2009). Development and validation of the sub-types of antisocial behavior questionnaire (STAB). Aggressive Behavior, 35, 376–398.PubMedCrossRef Burt, S. A., & Donnellan, M. B. (2009). Development and validation of the sub-types of antisocial behavior questionnaire (STAB). Aggressive Behavior, 35, 376–398.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Burt, S.A., Donnellan, M.B., & Tackett, J. (2012). Should social aggression be considered “antisocial”? Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34, 153–163. Burt, S.A., Donnellan, M.B., & Tackett, J. (2012). Should social aggression be considered “antisocial”? Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34, 153–163.
go back to reference Cain, N. M., Pincus, A. L., & Ansell, E. B. (2008). Narcissism at the crossroads: phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 638–656.PubMedCrossRef Cain, N. M., Pincus, A. L., & Ansell, E. B. (2008). Narcissism at the crossroads: phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 638–656.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushan, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45.PubMedCrossRef Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushan, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Carpenter, C. J. (2012). Narcissism on facebook: self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 482–486.CrossRef Carpenter, C. J. (2012). Narcissism on facebook: self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 482–486.CrossRef
go back to reference Cater, T. E., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Vonk, J. (2011). Narcissism and recollections of early life experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 935–939.CrossRef Cater, T. E., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Vonk, J. (2011). Narcissism and recollections of early life experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 935–939.CrossRef
go back to reference Coen, S. J. (1986). Superego aspects of entitlement (in rigid characters). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 36, 409–427.CrossRef Coen, S. J. (1986). Superego aspects of entitlement (in rigid characters). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 36, 409–427.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Corbitt, E. M. (2002). Narcissism from the perspective of the Fivc-factor model. In P. T. Costa Jr. & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 293–298). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Corbitt, E. M. (2002). Narcissism from the perspective of the Fivc-factor model. In P. T. Costa Jr. & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 293–298). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
go back to reference Corry, N., Merritt, R. D., Mrug, S., & Pamp, B. (2008). The factor structure of the narcissistic personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(6), 593–600.PubMedCrossRef Corry, N., Merritt, R. D., Mrug, S., & Pamp, B. (2008). The factor structure of the narcissistic personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(6), 593–600.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference del Rosario, P. M., & White, R. M. (2005). The narcissistic personality inventory: test-retest stability and internal consistency. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1075–1081.CrossRef del Rosario, P. M., & White, R. M. (2005). The narcissistic personality inventory: test-retest stability and internal consistency. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1075–1081.CrossRef
go back to reference Dickinson, K. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 188–207.PubMedCrossRef Dickinson, K. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 188–207.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Grey, A. L. (1987). Entitlement: an interactional defense of self-esteem. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 23, 255–263.CrossRef Grey, A. L. (1987). Entitlement: an interactional defense of self-esteem. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 23, 255–263.CrossRef
go back to reference Hill, P. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2012). Narcissism, well-being, and observer-rated personality across the lifespan. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 216–223. Hill, P. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2012). Narcissism, well-being, and observer-rated personality across the lifespan. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 216–223.
go back to reference Johnson, J. A. (2011). Development of a short-form of the IPIP-NEO Personality Inventory, Riverside, California. 2nd Biennial Conference of the Association for Research in Personality. Johnson, J. A. (2011). Development of a short-form of the IPIP-NEO Personality Inventory, Riverside, California. 2nd Biennial Conference of the Association for Research in Personality.
go back to reference Kernberg, O. F. (2007). The almost untreatable narcissistic patient. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 503–539.PubMedCrossRef Kernberg, O. F. (2007). The almost untreatable narcissistic patient. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 503–539.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kris, A. O. (1990). Helping patients by analyzing self-criticism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 38, 605–636.PubMedCrossRef Kris, A. O. (1990). Helping patients by analyzing self-criticism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 38, 605–636.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lessard, J., Greenberger, E., Chen, C., & Farruggia, S. (2011). Are youths’ feelings of entitlement always “bad”?: evidence for a distinction between exploitive and non-exploitive dimensions of entitlement. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 521–529.PubMedCrossRef Lessard, J., Greenberger, E., Chen, C., & Farruggia, S. (2011). Are youths’ feelings of entitlement always “bad”?: evidence for a distinction between exploitive and non-exploitive dimensions of entitlement. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 521–529.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401–412.PubMedCrossRef Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401–412.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Malkin, M. L., Zeigler-Hill, V., Barry, C. T., & Southard, A. C. (2013). The view from the looking glass: how are narcissistic individuals perceived by others? Journal of Personality, 81, 1–15. Malkin, M. L., Zeigler-Hill, V., Barry, C. T., & Southard, A. C. (2013). The view from the looking glass: how are narcissistic individuals perceived by others? Journal of Personality, 81, 1–15.
go back to reference Maxwell, K., Donnellan, M. B., Hopwood, C. J., & Ackerman, R. A. (2011). The two faces of Narcissus? An empirical comparison of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and the pathological narcissism inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 577–582.CrossRef Maxwell, K., Donnellan, M. B., Hopwood, C. J., & Ackerman, R. A. (2011). The two faces of Narcissus? An empirical comparison of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and the pathological narcissism inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 577–582.CrossRef
go back to reference McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 28–50.PubMedCrossRef McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 28–50.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Miller, J. D., Gaughan, E. T., Maples, J., & Price, J. (2011a). A comparison of agreeableness scores from the big five inventory and the NEO PI-R: consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy. Assessment, 18, 335–339.PubMedCrossRef Miller, J. D., Gaughan, E. T., Maples, J., & Price, J. (2011a). A comparison of agreeableness scores from the big five inventory and the NEO PI-R: consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy. Assessment, 18, 335–339.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2011b). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79, 1013–1042.PubMedCrossRef Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2011b). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79, 1013–1042.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Miller, J. D., Price, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2012). Is the narcissistic personality inventory still relevant? a test of independent grandiosity and entitlement scales in the assessment of narcissism. Assessment, 19, 8–13.PubMedCrossRef Miller, J. D., Price, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2012). Is the narcissistic personality inventory still relevant? a test of independent grandiosity and entitlement scales in the assessment of narcissism. Assessment, 19, 8–13.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Millon, T. (2011). Disorders of personality: Introducing a DSM/ICD spectrum from normal to abnormal (3rd ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRef Millon, T. (2011). Disorders of personality: Introducing a DSM/ICD spectrum from normal to abnormal (3rd ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRef
go back to reference Moses, R., & Moses-Hrushovski, R. (1990). Reflections on the sense of entitlement. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 45, 61–78.PubMed Moses, R., & Moses-Hrushovski, R. (1990). Reflections on the sense of entitlement. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 45, 61–78.PubMed
go back to reference Pincus, A. L., & Lukowitsky, M. R. (2010). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 421–446.PubMedCrossRef Pincus, A. L., & Lukowitsky, M. R. (2010). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 421–446.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pincus, A. L., & Roche, M. J. (2011). Narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability. In W. K. Campbell & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 31–40). Hoboken: Wiley. Pincus, A. L., & Roche, M. J. (2011). Narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability. In W. K. Campbell & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 31–40). Hoboken: Wiley.
go back to reference Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Levy, K. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the pathological Narcissism inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21, 365–379.PubMedCrossRef Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Levy, K. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the pathological Narcissism inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21, 365–379.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pryor, L. R., Miller, J. D., & Gaughan, E. T. (2008). A comparison of the psychological entitlement scale and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory’s entitlement scale: relations with general personality traits and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 517–520.PubMedCrossRef Pryor, L. R., Miller, J. D., & Gaughan, E. T. (2008). A comparison of the psychological entitlement scale and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory’s entitlement scale: relations with general personality traits and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 517–520.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Raskin, R. N., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902.PubMedCrossRef Raskin, R. N., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University.
go back to reference Rosenthal, S. A., & Hooley, J. M. (2010). Narcissism assessment in social-personality research: does the association between narcissism and psychological health result from a confound with self-esteem? Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 453–465.CrossRef Rosenthal, S. A., & Hooley, J. M. (2010). Narcissism assessment in social-personality research: does the association between narcissism and psychological health result from a confound with self-esteem? Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 453–465.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosenthal, S. A., Montoya, R. M., Ridings, L. E., Rieck, S. M., & Hooley, J. M. (2011). Further evidence of the narcissistic personality inventory’s validity problems: a meta-analytic investigation—response to Miller, Maples, and Campbell. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 408–416.CrossRef Rosenthal, S. A., Montoya, R. M., Ridings, L. E., Rieck, S. M., & Hooley, J. M. (2011). Further evidence of the narcissistic personality inventory’s validity problems: a meta-analytic investigation—response to Miller, Maples, and Campbell. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 408–416.CrossRef
go back to reference Rothstein, A. (1977). The ego attitude of entitlement. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 4, 409–417. Rothstein, A. (1977). The ego attitude of entitlement. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 4, 409–417.
go back to reference Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2004). Clinicians’ personality descriptions of prototypic personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 286–308.PubMedCrossRef Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2004). Clinicians’ personality descriptions of prototypic personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 286–308.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342.PubMedCrossRef Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Smith, T. W, Marsden, P., Hout, M., & Kim, J. (2011). General social surveys, 1972–2010: cumulative codebook/Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith; Co-Principal Investigator, Peter V. Marsden; Co-Principal Investigator, Michael Hout.–Chicago: National Opinion Research Center. 3,610 pp., 28 cm.–(National Data Program for the Social Sciences Series, no. 21). Smith, T. W, Marsden, P., Hout, M., & Kim, J. (2011). General social surveys, 1972–2010: cumulative codebook/Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith; Co-Principal Investigator, Peter V. Marsden; Co-Principal Investigator, Michael Hout.–Chicago: National Opinion Research Center. 3,610 pp., 28 cm.–(National Data Program for the Social Sciences Series, no. 21).
go back to reference Thomas, K. M., Wright, A. G. C., Lukowitsky, M. R., Donnellan, M. B., & Hopwood, C. J. (2012). Evidence for the criterion validity and clinical utility of the pathological narcissism inventory. Assessment, 19, 135–145.PubMedCrossRef Thomas, K. M., Wright, A. G. C., Lukowitsky, M. R., Donnellan, M. B., & Hopwood, C. J. (2012). Evidence for the criterion validity and clinical utility of the pathological narcissism inventory. Assessment, 19, 135–145.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Trull, T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A five-factor perspective on personality disorder research. In P. T. Costa Jr. & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 45–58). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Trull, T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A five-factor perspective on personality disorder research. In P. T. Costa Jr. & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 45–58). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
go back to reference Vater, A., Schroder-Abe, M., Ritter, K., Renneberg, B., Schulze, L., Bosson, J. K., & Roepke, S. (2012). The narcissistic personality inventory: a useful tool for assessing pathological narcissism? Evidence from patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.732636. Vater, A., Schroder-Abe, M., Ritter, K., Renneberg, B., Schulze, L., Bosson, J. K., & Roepke, S. (2012). The narcissistic personality inventory: a useful tool for assessing pathological narcissism? Evidence from patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment. doi:10.​1080/​00223891.​2012.​732636.
go back to reference Vazire, S., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Impulsivity and the self-defeating behavior of narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 154–165.PubMedCrossRef Vazire, S., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Impulsivity and the self-defeating behavior of narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 154–165.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Watson, D. (2004). Stability versus change, dependability versus error: issues in the assessment of personality over time. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 319–350.CrossRef Watson, D. (2004). Stability versus change, dependability versus error: issues in the assessment of personality over time. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 319–350.CrossRef
go back to reference Wright, A. G. C., Lukowitsky, M. R., Pincus, A. L., & Conroy, D. E. (2010). The higher order factor structure and gender invariance of the pathological narcissism inventory. Assessment, 17, 467–483.PubMedCrossRef Wright, A. G. C., Lukowitsky, M. R., Pincus, A. L., & Conroy, D. E. (2010). The higher order factor structure and gender invariance of the pathological narcissism inventory. Assessment, 17, 467–483.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zeigler-Hill, V., & Wallace, M. T. (2011). Racial differences in narcissistic tendencies. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 456–467.CrossRef Zeigler-Hill, V., & Wallace, M. T. (2011). Racial differences in narcissistic tendencies. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 456–467.CrossRef
go back to reference Zitek, E. M., Jordan, A. H., Monin, B., & Leach, F. R. (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 245–255.PubMedCrossRef Zitek, E. M., Jordan, A. H., Monin, B., & Leach, F. R. (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 245–255.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Evaluating Self-Report Measures of Narcissistic Entitlement
Auteurs
Robert A. Ackerman
M. Brent Donnellan
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9352-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2013

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 4/2013 Naar de uitgave