Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Reducing participant burden is important in health research and clinical assessment. We examined the psychometric properties of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index, a short version of the 26-item World Health Organisation Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-Bref), in a sample of people receiving joint replacement surgery.
Participants (n = 1008) completed the WHOQOL-Bref at either 6, 12, 24 or 60 months after hip or knee replacement. The factor structure, differential item functioning (DIF) and unidimensionality of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and Rasch analyses. Convergent validity was examined using correlations with the parent measure and other patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). Discriminant validity was assessed between groups reporting high versus low pain and function, and by joint replaced.
The measure demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.86), adequate convergent (r = 0.47–0.82, p < 0.001) and discriminant validity (p < 0.001). Factor and Rasch analyses supported a unidimensional structure. However, there were also indications of multidimensionality, with support for a two-factor model focusing on general health and function, and psychosocial aspects of QOL. There was minimal evidence of DIF, with just one item evaluating energy level showing DIF for age.
The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index demonstrated adequate properties as a unidimensional scale and as a two-factor scale evaluating general health and function, and psychosocial aspects of quality of life. It is low on clinical and participant burden, showed minimal ceiling effects and showed good concurrent and discriminant validity.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Jeffrey, A., Wylde, V., Blom, A., & Horword, J. (2011). “Its there and Im stuck with it”: Patients experiences of chronic pain following total knee replacement. Arthritis Care & Research,63(2), 286–292. CrossRef
Khan, F., Ng, L., Gonzalez, S., Hale, T., & Turner-Stokes, L. (2008). Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes following joint replacement at the hip and knee in chronic arthropathy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(2), Art. No.: CD004957. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004957.pub3.
Ibrahim, M., Twaij, H., Giebaly, D., Nizam, I., & Haddad, F. (2013). Enhanced recovery in total hip replacement: A clinical review. The Bone & Joint Journal,95B, 1587–1594. CrossRef
Ackerman, I., Graves, S., Bennell, K., & Osbourne, R. (2006). Evaluating quality of life in hip and knee replacement: Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization quality of life short version instrument. Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research),55(4), 583–590. CrossRef
The WHOQOL Group. (1998). The World Health Organisation quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine,46(12), 1569–1585. CrossRef
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (2000). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated.
Bellamy, N., Buchanan, W., Goldsmith, C., Campbell, J., & Stitt, L. (1988). Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology,1, 95–108.
Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., & Carr, A. (1996). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. Journal of Bone Joint Surgery,78B, 185–190.
Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Murray, D., & Carr, A. (1998). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. Journal of Bone Joint Surgery,80, 863–869. CrossRef
Sica da Rocha, N., Power, M., Bushnell, D., & Fleck, M. (2012). The EUROHIS-QOL 8-Item index: Comparative psychometric properties to Its parent WHOQOL-Bref. Value in Health,15, 449–457. CrossRef
Gomez-Olive, F., Thorogood, M., Clark, B., Kahn, K., & Tollman, S. (2010). Assessing health and well-being among older people in rural South Africa. Global Health Action,S2, 23–35.
Kyobutungi, C., Egondi, T., & Ezeh, A. (2010). The health and well-being of older people in Nairobi’s slums. Global Health Action,S2, 45–53.
Bellamy, N. (2009). WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index: User guide IX. Brisbane.
Murray, D., Fitzpatrick, R., Rogers, K., Pandit, H., Beard, D., Carr, A., et al. (2007). The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British volume,89(8), 1010–1014. CrossRef
Horn, J. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika,32, 179–185. CrossRef
Wright, B., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press.
Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research),57(8), 1358–1362. CrossRef
Fang, J., Power, M., Lin, Y., Zhang, J., Hao, Y., & Chatterji, S. (2011). Development of short versions for the WHOQOL-OLD module. The Gerontologist,52(1), 6–78. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr085.
New Zealand Orthopaedic Association (2013). New Zealand Joint Registry: Fourteen Year Report (January 1999 to December 2012). In A. Rothwell, T. Hobbs, & C. Frampton (Eds.), New Zealand Joint Registry Reports. www.nzoa.org.nz. Accessed 28 May 2014.
- Evaluating quality of life outcomes following joint replacement: psychometric evaluation of a short form of the WHOQOL-Bref
Deborah L. Snell
Richard J. Siegert
Lois J. Surgenor
Jennifer A. Dunn
Gary J. Hooper
- Springer International Publishing