Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

22. Evaluatie van het proces van implementatie

Auteurs : Prof. dr. Marlies Hulscher, Prof. dr. Michel Wensing

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

Naast uitkomsten van implementatiestrategieën zijn ook processen onderwerp van evaluatie. Procesevaluatie omvat allereerst een gedetailleerde beschrijving van de feitelijk gerealiseerde activiteiten en de blootstelling van de doelgroep aan deze activiteiten. Deze worden vergeleken met de de geplande implementatiestrategieën, die ten behoeve hiervan goed in kaart moeten worden gebracht. Daarnaast kunnen diverse thema’s aan bod komen in procesevaluatie, zoals contextfactoren, niet-verwachte uitkomsten, en ervaringen van deelnemers. De gegevensverzameling in procesevaluatie is vaak gebaseerd op vragenlijsten en interviews. De analyse is beschrijvend en soms (aanvullend) ook theoriegestuurd.

vorige hoofdstuk Effecten van implementatie: het observationele studiedesign

volgende hoofdstuk Economische evaluatie van implementatiestrategieën

Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behaviour change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH behaviour change consortium. Health Psych. 2004;23:443–51.CrossRef

Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, et al. Realist randomized controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:2299–306.CrossRef

Bryman A. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. J Mixed Methods Res. 1998;1(1):8–22.CrossRef

Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, et al. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. BMC Implement Sci. 2007;2:40–8.CrossRef

Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:979–83.

Crocker-Buque T, Edelstein M, Mounier-Jack S. A process evaluation of how the routine vaccination programme is implemented at GP practices in England. Implem Sci. 2018;13:132.CrossRef

Dane A, Schneider B. Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control. Clin Psychol Rev. 1998;18:23–45.CrossRef

De la Perrelle L, Cations M, Barbery G, Radisic G, Kaambwa B, Crotty M, Fitzgerald JA, Kurrle S, Cameron I, Whitehead C, Thompson J, Laver K. How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation. BMJ Open Qual. 2021;10(2): e001147.CrossRef

Dixon-Woods M, Leslie M, Tarrant C, Bion J. Explaining matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program. Implem Sci. 2013;8:70.CrossRef

Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen WB. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:237–56.CrossRef

Glidewell L, Hunter C, Ward V, McEachan RRC, Lawton R, Willis TA, Hartley S, Collinson M, Holland M, Farrin AJ, Foy R; ASPIRE programme team. Explaining variable effects of an adaptable implementation package to promote evidence-based practice in primary care: a longitudinal process evaluation. Implement Sci. 2022 27;17(1):9.

Gotlib Conn L, McKenzie M, Pearsall EA, McLeod RS. Successful implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for elective colorectal surgery: a process evaluation of champions’ experiences. Implement Sci. 2015;10:99.CrossRef

Grant E, Treweek S, Dreischulte T, Foy R, Guthrie B. Process evaluations for cluster randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting. Trials. 2013;14:15.CrossRef

Hulscher ME, Laurant MG, Grol RP. Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:40–6.CrossRef

Jäger C, Steinhäuser J, Freund T, Baker R, Agaral S, Godycki-Cwirko M, Kowalczyk A, Aakhus E, Granlund I, Van Lieshout J, Szecsenyi J, Wensing M. Process evaluation of five tailored programs to improve the implementation of evidence-based recommendations for chronic conditions in primary care. Implem Sci. 2016;11:123.CrossRef

Klaic M, Kapp S, Hudson P, Chapman W, Denehy L, Story D, Francis JJ. Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):10.CrossRef

May CR, Cummings A, Girling M, Bracher M, Mair FS, May CM, Murray E, Myall M, Rapley T, Finch T. Using normalization process theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):80.CrossRef

May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, Murray E, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Gunn J, Montori VM. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization Process Theory. Implem Sci. 2009;4:29.CrossRef

McIntyre SA, Francis JJ, Gould NJ, Lorencatto F. The use of theory in process evaluations conducted alongside randomized trials of implementation interventions: a systematic review. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(1):168–78.

Miller CJ, Barnett ML, Baumann AA, Gutner CA, Wiltsey-Stirman S. The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1):36.CrossRef

Montgomery P, Underhill K, Gardner F, Operario D, Mayo-Wilson E. The Oxford Implementation Index: a new tool for incorporating implementation data into systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(8):874–82.CrossRef

Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird D. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350: h1258.CrossRef

Musuuza JS, Barker A, Ngam C, Vellardita L, Safdar N. Assessment of fidelity in interventions to improve hand hygiene of healthcare workers: a systematic review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37:567–75.CrossRef

O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):92–8.CrossRef

Odendaal W, Atkins S, Lewin S. Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: is more better? Reflections from a South African study. BMC Med Res Method. 2016;16:173.CrossRef

Pérez D, Van der Stuyft P, Zabala MC, Castro M, Lefèvre P. A modified theoretical framework to assess implementation fidelity of adaptive public health interventions. Implem Sci. 2016;11:91.CrossRef

Schalkwijk AA, Nijpels G, Bot SD, Chin A Paw MJ, Renders CM, Elders PJ. Lessen geleerd van de implementatie van Zorgstandaard Obesitas voor kinderen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2016;160:D525.

Slaughter SE, Hill JN, Snelgrove-Clarke E. What is the extent and quality of documentation and reporting of fidelity to implementation strategies: a scoping review. Implem Sci. 2015;10:129.CrossRef

Spoorenberg V, Hulscher ME, Geskus RB, De Reijke TM, Opmeer BC, Prins JM, Geerlings SE. A cluster-randomized trial of two strategies to improve antibiotic use for patients with a complicated urinary tract infection. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0142672.CrossRef

Squires JE, Graham I, Bashir K, Nadalin-Penno L, Lavis J, Francis J, Curran J, Grimshaw JM, Brehaut J, Ivers N, Michie S, Hillmer M, Noseworthy T, Vine J, Demery Varin M, Aloisio LD, Coughlin M, Hutchinson AM. Understanding context: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(12):3448–70.CrossRef

Swanborn PG. Evalueren. Het ontwerpen, begeleiden en evalueren van interventies: een methodische basis voor evaluatie-onderzoek. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Boom; 1999.

Tashakkori A, Creswell JW. The newe era of mixed methods (editorial). J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1:3–7.CrossRef

Vindrola-Padros C, Pape T, Utley M, Fulop NJ. The role of embedded research in quality improvement: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:70–80.CrossRef

Wiltsey Stirman S, Baumann AA, Miller CJ. The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):58.CrossRef

Wiltsey Stirman SW, Miller CJ, Toder K, Calloway A. Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2013;8:65.CrossRef

Wolfenden L, Yoong SL, Williams CM, et al. Embedding researchers in health service organizations improves research translation and health service performance: the Australian Hunter New England Population Health example. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;85:3–11.CrossRef

Titel: Evaluatie van het proces van implementatie
Auteurs: Prof. dr. Marlies Hulscher
Prof. dr. Michel Wensing
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Implementatie
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2908-3

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2909-0

Copyright: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2909-0_22

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen