Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
A recent meta-analysis of 103 studies Burt (Clinical Psychology Review, 29:163–178, 2009a) highlighted the presence of etiological distinctions between aggressive (AGG) and non-aggressive rule-breaking (RB) dimensions of antisocial behavior, such that AGG was more heritable than was RB, whereas RB was more influenced by the shared environment. Unfortunately, behavioral genetic research on antisocial behavior to date (and thus, the research upon which the meta-analysis was based) has relied almost exclusively on the classical twin model. This reliance is problematic, as the strict assumptions that undergird this model (e.g., shared environmental and dominant genetic influences are not present simultaneously; there is no assortative mating) can have significant consequences on heritability estimates when they are violated. The nuclear twin family model, by contrast, allows researchers to relax and statistically evaluate many of the assumptions of the classical twin design by incorporating parental self-report data along with the more standard twin data. The goal of the current study was thus to evaluate whether prior findings of etiological distinctions between AGG and RB persisted when using the nuclear twin family model. We examined a sample of 312 child twin families from the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Results strongly supported prior findings of etiological distinctions between AGG and RB, such that broad genetic influences were observed to be particularly important to AGG whereas shared environmental influences contributed only to RB. Nevertheless, the current findings also implied that additive genetic influences on antisocial behavior may be overestimated when using the classical twin design.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2003). Manual for ASEBA adult forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. CrossRef
Baker, L. A., Barton, M., & Raine, A. (2002). The Southern California Twin Register at the University of Southern California. Twin Research, 5, 456–459. PubMed
Burt, S. A. (2012). How do we optimally conceptualize the heterogeneity within antisocial behavior? An argument for aggressive versus non-aggressive behavioral dimensions. Clinical Psychology Review, doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.006.
Burt, S. A., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Evidence that the sub-types of antisocial behavior questionnaire (STAB) predicts momentary reports of acting-out behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 917–920. CrossRef
Hay, D. A., McStephen, M., Levy, F., & Pearsall-Jones, J. (2002). Recruitment and attrition in twin register studies of childhood behavior: The example of the Austrailian Twin ADHD Project. Twin Research, 5, 324–328. PubMed
Hudziak, J. J., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Bartels, M., Rietveld, M. J. H., Rettew, D. C., Derks, E. M. & Boomsma, D. I. (2003). Individual differences in aggression: Genetic analyses by age, gender, and informant in 3-, 7-, and 10-year-old Dutch twins. Behavior Genetics, 33, 575–589.
Keller, M. C., & Medland, S. E. (2008). Evaluation of the cascade model - a new extended twin family model. Paper presented at the Behavioral Genetics Association, Louisville, KY.
Moffitt, T. E. (2003). Life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial behavior: A research review and a research agenda. In B. Lahey, T. E. Moffitt, & A. Caspi (Eds.), The causes of conduct disorder and serious juvenile delinquency (pp. 49–75). New York: Guilford.
Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical Modeling. VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry, 6th Edition.
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGruffin, P. (2008). Behavioral genetics (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. CrossRef
Sclove, L. S. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 53(3), 333–343. CrossRef
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 64(4), 583–639. CrossRef
van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Bartels, M., Hudziak, J. J., & Boomsma, D. I. (2003). Causes of stability of aggression from early childhood to adolescence: A longitudinal genetic analysis in Dutch twins. Behavioral Genetics, 33, 591–605. CrossRef
Visser, J. H., Van der Ende, J., Koot, H. M., & Verhulst, F. C. (2000). Predictors of psychopathology in young adults referred to mental health services in childhood or adolescence. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 59–65. CrossRef
- Etiological Distinctions between Aggressive and Non-aggressive Antisocial Behavior: Results from a Nuclear Twin Family Model
S. Alexandra Burt
Kelly L. Klump
- Springer US