Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 5/2010

01-06-2010

Estimating importance weights for the IWQOL-Lite using conjoint analysis

Auteurs: A. Brett Hauber, Ateesha F. Mohamed, F. Reed Johnson, Olatoye Oyelowo, Bradley H. Curtis, Cheryl Coon

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Our objective was to estimate preference-based weights for the IWQOL-Lite that reflect the relative importance overweight and obese people place on the domains included in the instrument.

Methods

US residents, 18 years of age or older, who are overweight (BMI = 25.0–29.9) or obese (BMI ≥ 30) completed an online survey instrument consisting of 12 choice questions. The survey included eight attributes: problems doing usual daily activities, physical symptoms, worry about health, low self-esteem, sexual problems, problems moving around or sitting in public places, teasing or discrimination, and problems at work. Ordered probit was used to estimate importance weights for the attributes and levels.

Results

Five hundred and two subjects completed the survey. Sexual problem was the most important attribute. The remaining attributes can be ranked on the order of importance as follows: low self-esteem, physical symptoms, daily activities, teasing or discrimination, moving around or sitting, problems at work, and worry about health.

Conclusions

Our results confirm previous findings that weighting the individual items in the IWQOL-Lite by the importance of outcomes to overweight and obese subjects may provide a more meaningful evaluation of the effect of changes in weight on patient well-being than a nonpreference-based measure of HRQOL.
Literatuur
2.
go back to reference Kolotkin, R. L., Crosby, R. D., Williams, G. R., Hartley, G. G., & Nicol, S. (2001). The relationship between health-related quality of life and weight loss. Obesity Research, 9(9), 564–571.CrossRefPubMed Kolotkin, R. L., Crosby, R. D., Williams, G. R., Hartley, G. G., & Nicol, S. (2001). The relationship between health-related quality of life and weight loss. Obesity Research, 9(9), 564–571.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kolotkin, R. L., Crosby, R. D., Kosloski, K. D., & Williams, G. R. (2001). Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obesity Research, 9(2), 102–111.CrossRefPubMed Kolotkin, R. L., Crosby, R. D., Kosloski, K. D., & Williams, G. R. (2001). Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obesity Research, 9(2), 102–111.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kolotkin, R. L., & Crosby, R. D. (2002). Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite) in a community sample. Quality of Life Research, 11, 157–171.CrossRefPubMed Kolotkin, R. L., & Crosby, R. D. (2002). Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite) in a community sample. Quality of Life Research, 11, 157–171.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kolotkin, R. L., Corey-Lisle, P. K., Crosby, R. D., Kan, H. J., & McQuade, R. D. (2008). Changes in weight and weight-related quality of life in a multicentre, randomized trial of aripiprazole versus standard of care. European Psychiatry, 26, 561–566.CrossRef Kolotkin, R. L., Corey-Lisle, P. K., Crosby, R. D., Kan, H. J., & McQuade, R. D. (2008). Changes in weight and weight-related quality of life in a multicentre, randomized trial of aripiprazole versus standard of care. European Psychiatry, 26, 561–566.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kolotkin, R. L., Corey-Lisle, P. K., Crosby, R. D., Swanson, J. M., Tuomari, A. V., L’Italien, G. J., et al. (2008). Impact of obesity on health-related quality of life in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Obesity, 16(4), 749–754.CrossRefPubMed Kolotkin, R. L., Corey-Lisle, P. K., Crosby, R. D., Swanson, J. M., Tuomari, A. V., L’Italien, G. J., et al. (2008). Impact of obesity on health-related quality of life in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Obesity, 16(4), 749–754.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rieger, E., Wilfley, D. E., Stein, R. I., Marino, V., & Crow, S. J. (2005). A comparison of quality of life in obese individuals with and without binge eating disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37(3), 234–240.CrossRefPubMed Rieger, E., Wilfley, D. E., Stein, R. I., Marino, V., & Crow, S. J. (2005). A comparison of quality of life in obese individuals with and without binge eating disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37(3), 234–240.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Boan, J., Kolotkin, R. L., Westman, E. C., McMahon, R. L., & Grant, J. P. (2004). Binge eating, quality of life and physical activity improve after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obesity Surgery, 14(3), 341–348.CrossRefPubMed Boan, J., Kolotkin, R. L., Westman, E. C., McMahon, R. L., & Grant, J. P. (2004). Binge eating, quality of life and physical activity improve after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obesity Surgery, 14(3), 341–348.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Van Nunen, A. M., Wouters, E. J., Vingerhoets, A. J., Hox, J. J., & Geenen, R. (2007). The health-related quality of life of obese persons seeking or not seeking surgical or non-surgical treatment: A meta-analysis. Obesity Surgery, 17(10), 1357–1366.CrossRefPubMed Van Nunen, A. M., Wouters, E. J., Vingerhoets, A. J., Hox, J. J., & Geenen, R. (2007). The health-related quality of life of obese persons seeking or not seeking surgical or non-surgical treatment: A meta-analysis. Obesity Surgery, 17(10), 1357–1366.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chancellor, J. V. M., Coyle, D., & Drummond, M. F. (1997). Constructing health state preference values from descriptive quality of life outcomes: Mission impossible? Quality of Life Research, 6, 159–168.CrossRefPubMed Chancellor, J. V. M., Coyle, D., & Drummond, M. F. (1997). Constructing health state preference values from descriptive quality of life outcomes: Mission impossible? Quality of Life Research, 6, 159–168.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bult, J. R., Bosch, J. L., & Hunink, M. G. M. (1996). Heterogeneity in the relationship between the standard-gamble utility measure and health-status dimensions. Medical Decision Making, 16, 226–233.CrossRefPubMed Bult, J. R., Bosch, J. L., & Hunink, M. G. M. (1996). Heterogeneity in the relationship between the standard-gamble utility measure and health-status dimensions. Medical Decision Making, 16, 226–233.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Brazier, J. E., Kolotkin, R. L., Crosby, R. D., & Williams, G. R. (2004). Estimating a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) instrument from the SF-6D. Value in Health, 7(4), 490–498.CrossRefPubMed Brazier, J. E., Kolotkin, R. L., Crosby, R. D., & Williams, G. R. (2004). Estimating a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) instrument from the SF-6D. Value in Health, 7(4), 490–498.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Byrne, H. A., Hailey, B. J., & Johnson, J. T. (1996). The use of weighted scores with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scales. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 13, 57–77.CrossRef Byrne, H. A., Hailey, B. J., & Johnson, J. T. (1996). The use of weighted scores with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scales. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 13, 57–77.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schwartz, C. E., Mathias, S. D., Pasta, D. J., Colwell, H. H., Rapkin, B. D., Genderson, M. W., et al. (1999). A comparison of two approached for assessing patient importance weights to conduct and extended Q-TWiST analysis. Quality of Life Research, 8, 197–207.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz, C. E., Mathias, S. D., Pasta, D. J., Colwell, H. H., Rapkin, B. D., Genderson, M. W., et al. (1999). A comparison of two approached for assessing patient importance weights to conduct and extended Q-TWiST analysis. Quality of Life Research, 8, 197–207.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jansen, S. J. T., Stiggelbout, A. M., Nooij, M. A., & Kievit, J. (2000). The effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment. Quality of Life Research, 9, 541–557.CrossRefPubMed Jansen, S. J. T., Stiggelbout, A. M., Nooij, M. A., & Kievit, J. (2000). The effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment. Quality of Life Research, 9, 541–557.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Johnson, F. R., Hauber, A. B., Osoba, D., Hsu, M., Coombs, J., & Copley-Merriman, C. (2006). Are chemotherapy patients’ HRQoL importance weights consistent with linear scoring rules? A stated-choice approach. Quality of Life Research, 15, 285–298.CrossRefPubMed Johnson, F. R., Hauber, A. B., Osoba, D., Hsu, M., Coombs, J., & Copley-Merriman, C. (2006). Are chemotherapy patients’ HRQoL importance weights consistent with linear scoring rules? A stated-choice approach. Quality of Life Research, 15, 285–298.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Osoba, D., Hsu, A., Copley-Merriman, C., Coombs, J., Johnson, F. R., Hauber, A. B., et al. (2006). Stated preferences of patients with cancer for health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) domains during treatment. Quality of Life Research, 15, 273–283.CrossRefPubMed Osoba, D., Hsu, A., Copley-Merriman, C., Coombs, J., Johnson, F. R., Hauber, A. B., et al. (2006). Stated preferences of patients with cancer for health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) domains during treatment. Quality of Life Research, 15, 273–283.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ryan, M., McIntosh, E., & Shackley, P. (1998). Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care. Health Economics, 7, 373–378.CrossRefPubMed Ryan, M., McIntosh, E., & Shackley, P. (1998). Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care. Health Economics, 7, 373–378.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bryan, S., Martin, B., Robert, S., & Alison, G. (1998). Magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of knee injuries: An investigation of preferences. Health Economics, 7, 595–603.CrossRefPubMed Bryan, S., Martin, B., Robert, S., & Alison, G. (1998). Magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of knee injuries: An investigation of preferences. Health Economics, 7, 595–603.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Johnson, F. R., Banzhaf, M., & Desvousges, W. (2000). Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: A multiple-format stated-preference approach. Health Economics, 9, 295–317.CrossRefPubMed Johnson, F. R., Banzhaf, M., & Desvousges, W. (2000). Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: A multiple-format stated-preference approach. Health Economics, 9, 295–317.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gan, T. J., Lubarsky, D. A., Flood, E. M., Thanh, T., Mauskopf, J., Mayne, T., et al. (2004). Subject preferences for acute pain treatment. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 92(5), 681–688.CrossRefPubMed Gan, T. J., Lubarsky, D. A., Flood, E. M., Thanh, T., Mauskopf, J., Mayne, T., et al. (2004). Subject preferences for acute pain treatment. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 92(5), 681–688.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Huber, J., & Zwerina, K. (1996). The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 307–317.CrossRef Huber, J., & Zwerina, K. (1996). The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 307–317.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zwerina, K., Huber, J., & Kuhfeld, W. (1996). A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. Durham: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. Zwerina, K., Huber, J., & Kuhfeld, W. (1996). A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. Durham: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.
24.
go back to reference Kanninen, B. (2002). Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 214–227.CrossRef Kanninen, B. (2002). Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 214–227.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Train, K. (1986). Qualitative choice analysis: Theory and applications to predict automobile demand. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Train, K. (1986). Qualitative choice analysis: Theory and applications to predict automobile demand. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Metagegevens
Titel
Estimating importance weights for the IWQOL-Lite using conjoint analysis
Auteurs
A. Brett Hauber
Ateesha F. Mohamed
F. Reed Johnson
Olatoye Oyelowo
Bradley H. Curtis
Cheryl Coon
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2010
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9621-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2010

Quality of Life Research 5/2010 Naar de uitgave