Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Active patient engagement is increasingly viewed as essential to ensuring that patient-driven perspectives are considered throughout the research process. However, guidance for patient engagement (PE) in HRQoL research does not exist, the evidence-base for practice is limited, and we know relatively little about underpinning values that can impact on PE practice. This is the first study to explore the values that should underpin PE in contemporary HRQoL research to help inform future good practice guidance.
A modified ‘World Café’ was hosted as a collaborative activity between patient partners, clinicians and researchers: self-nominated conference delegates participated in group discussions to explore values associated with the conduct and consequences of PE. Values were captured via post-it notes and by nominated note-takers. Data were thematically analysed: emergent themes were coded and agreement checked. Association between emergent themes, values and the Public Involvement Impact Assessment Framework were explored.
Eighty participants, including 12 patient partners, participated in the 90-min event. Three core values were defined: (1) building relationships; (2) improving research quality and impact; and (3) developing best practice. Participants valued the importance of building genuine, collaborative and deliberative relationships—underpinned by honesty, respect, co-learning and equity—and the impact of effective PE on research quality and relevance.
An explicit statement of values seeks to align all stakeholders on the purpose, practice and credibility of PE activities. An innovative, flexible and transparent research environment was valued as essential to developing a trustworthy evidence-base with which to underpin future guidance for good PE practice.
NIHR. (2015). Going the Extra Mile: improving the nation’s health and wellbeing through public involvement in research. http://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/about-NIHR/NIHR-Publications/Extra%20Mile2.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2016.
de Wit, M., Abma, T., Koelewijn-Van Loon, M., Collins, S., & Kirwan, J. (2013). Facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients at outcome conferences—Lessons learnt from a decade of collaboration in OMERACT: a qualitative study. BMJ Open., 3(8), e003311. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Haywood, K., Brett, J., Salek, S., Marlett, N., Penman, C., Shklarov, S., et al. (2015). Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: What is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium. Quality of Life Research, 24(5), 1069–1076. CrossRefPubMed
Popay, J., & Collins, M. (Eds) (2014). PiiAF: The Public Involvement Impact Assessment Framework Guidance. http://piiaf.org.uk/documents/piiaf-guidance-jan14.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2016.
Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) Patient and Citizen Involvement Group (PCIG): Values and Quality Standards for Patient Involvement in HTA (2014). http://www.htai.org/fileadmin/HTAi_Files/ISG/PatientInvolvement/v2_files/Info/PCISG-Info-ValuesandStandards-30-Jun14.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2016.
Snape, D., Kirkham, J., Britten, N., Froggatt, K., Gradinger, F., Lobban, F., et al. (2014). Exploring perceived barriers, drivers, impacts and the need for evaluation of public involvement in health and social care research: A modified Delphi study. BMJ Open, 4(6), e004943. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Brown, J. I. D. (2005). The World Cafe. Shaping our futures through conversations that matter (p. 765). Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
Chapter 8 Patient Partners and OMERACT. In: M. Boers, J. R. Kirwan, & P. Tugwell et al. The OMERACT Handbook. Published by OMERACT Updated May 2016. http://www.omeract.org/pdf/OMERACT_Handbook.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2016.
Wilkinson, J. E., Rycroft-Malone, J., Davies, H. T., & McCormack, B. (2012). A creative approach to the development of an agenda for knowledge utilization: outputs from the 11th international knowledge utilization colloquium (KU 11). Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing, 9(4), 195–199. CrossRefPubMed
Howitt, D. C. D. (2008). Introduction to research methods in psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education Ltd.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., O’Connor, W., Morrell, G., & Ormston, R. (2014). Chapter 11: Analysis in practice. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton-Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
Caeyer, N., & de Wit, M. (2013). Patient Involvement in Research: A way to success. EULAR—The reference cards explained. http://www.eular.org/myUploadData/files/Reference_cards_explained_Booklet_pages_23-08-13_1.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2016.
Cheung, P. P., deWit, M., Bingham, C. O., 3rd, Kirwan, J. R., Leong, A., March, L. M., et al. (2016). Recommendations for the Involvement of Patient Research Partners (PRP) in OMERACT Working Groups. A Report from the OMERACT 2014 Working Group on PRP. Journal of Rheumatology, 43(1), 187–193. CrossRefPubMed
Winder, E. (2013). In collaboration with the Value+ Steering Group. The Value+ Toolkit for patient organisations on meaningful patient involvement patients adding value to policy, projects and services. http://www.eu-patient.eu/globalassets/projects/valueplus/value-toolkit.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2016.
ReseArch with Patient and Pulich involvement: A RealisT evaluation—The RAPPORT study. Health Services and Delivery Research, Vol 3, Issue 38. September 2015. ISSN 2050-4349. http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/152298/FullReport-hsdr03380.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2016.
Wilson, P., Mathie, E., Keenan, J., McNeilly, E., Goodman, C., Howe, A., et al. (2015). ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: A RealisT evaluation—The RAPPORT study. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library.
- Establishing the values for patient engagement (PE) in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) research: an international, multiple-stakeholder perspective
Samantha J. Brace-McDonnell
- Springer International Publishing