Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The incapacity of individuals to experience empathy has long been linked to heightened risks of antisocial acts being perpetrated without remorse. Psychologists frequently consider deficits in empathy in the context of risk assessments and other clinical appraisals, such as the amenability to treatment. When evaluated, offenders—especially those with substantial psychopathic traits—may be motivated to mask their empathic deficits to avoid being characterized as callous and cold-blooded toward the victims of their crimes. The current study is the first known investigation with an offender population to simulate empathy via positive impression management (PIM). Using a mixed between- and within-subjects design, 81 male detainees were categorized into a Low, Moderate, or High Psychopathy group, based on the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). For the within-subjects component, all offenders answered empathy questionnaires under genuine and PIM conditions. In the genuine condition, results indicate that offenders—irrespective of psychopathy—possessed cognitive empathy, but not affective empathy. In the PIM condition, offenders easily simulated high levels of empathy. Potential approaches to the assessment of simulated empathy in offender populations are explored, including a possible indicator for simulated affective empathy.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Blair, J., Mitchell, D., & Blair, K. (2005). The psychopath: Emotion and the brain. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Blasingame, G. D. (1998). Suggested clinical uses of polygraphy in community-based sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 37–45. doi: 10.1177/107906329801000105.
Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity. Louis: St Mosby.
Hare, R. D. (1991). The hare psychopathy checklist—revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
Hare, R. D. (2003). The hare psychopathy checklist—revised (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
Hemmerdinger, J. M., Stoddart, S. D., & Lilford, R. J. (2007). A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Medical Education, 7(24), 1–8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-24.
Jensen, S. H., & Jewell, C. A. (1988). The sex offender experts . Prosecutor. Fall: 13–20.
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychopathic personality inventory—revised: professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Lykken, D. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Lyon, D. R., Hart, S. D., & Webster, C. D. (2001). Violence and risk assessment. In R. A. Schuller & J. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Introduction to psychology and law: Canadian perspectives (pp. 314–350). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., & Serran, G. A. (2009). Empathy and offending behavior. In M. McMurran & R. Howard (Eds.), Personality, personality disorder and violence: An evidence based approach (pp. 229–244). Blackwell: Wiley.
Mullins-Nelson, J. L., Salekin, R. T., & Leistico, A. R. (2006). Psychopathy, empathy, and perspective-taking ability in a community sample: implications for the successful psychopathy concept. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5(2), 133–149. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2006.10471238. CrossRef
Paulhus, D. (1998). Paulhus deception scales (PDS): The balanced inventory of desirable responding—7: User’s manual. North Tanawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
Rogers, R. (Ed.). (2008). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Viaglione, G. D. & Barnett, M. A. (1999, June). Measuring a new dimension of empathy: The empathic anger scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Denver, CO.
- Empathy Faking in Psychopathic Offenders: The Vulnerability of Empathy Measures
Emily V. Robinson
- Springer US
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505