Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 4/2015

15-02-2015

Empathy Faking in Psychopathic Offenders: The Vulnerability of Empathy Measures

Auteurs: Emily V. Robinson, Richard Rogers

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The incapacity of individuals to experience empathy has long been linked to heightened risks of antisocial acts being perpetrated without remorse. Psychologists frequently consider deficits in empathy in the context of risk assessments and other clinical appraisals, such as the amenability to treatment. When evaluated, offenders—especially those with substantial psychopathic traits—may be motivated to mask their empathic deficits to avoid being characterized as callous and cold-blooded toward the victims of their crimes. The current study is the first known investigation with an offender population to simulate empathy via positive impression management (PIM). Using a mixed between- and within-subjects design, 81 male detainees were categorized into a Low, Moderate, or High Psychopathy group, based on the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). For the within-subjects component, all offenders answered empathy questionnaires under genuine and PIM conditions. In the genuine condition, results indicate that offenders—irrespective of psychopathy—possessed cognitive empathy, but not affective empathy. In the PIM condition, offenders easily simulated high levels of empathy. Potential approaches to the assessment of simulated empathy in offender populations are explored, including a possible indicator for simulated affective empathy.
Voetnoten
1
As subsequently noted, the IM scale of the PDS was used as a partial manipulation check for PIM response pattern in the genuine condition.
 
2
The researchers were clinical doctoral students who had received at minimum 10 hours of specialized PCL-R administration and scoring training.
 
3
At times, the researcher administering the PCL-R was not the same researcher administering the other measures to a single participant. However, there were no differences based on PCL-R administrator and reliability among the three PCL-R administrators was high (ICC = 0.89).
 
4
The Moderate group is identical to Hare’s (2003). Low combines his Low and Very Low groups; High combines his High and Very High groups.
 
5
It is interesting to note that QCAE retains four IRI PT items; however, all appear on the QCAE OS and none on the QCAE PT scales.
 
6
Specific d’s for each of the cognitive and affective subscales are available from the authors upon request.
 
7
The PIM base rates for simulated empathy are not known. However, studies (see Ballenger et al. 2001) of defensiveness have suggested varying levels of PIM, and therefore, the cut score has been evaluated at 20 and 25 % base rates; the actual base rate (50 %) was also included (see Table 3).
 
8
It is very concerning, for example, that all self-report measures of psychopathy—with the sole exception of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (Lilienfeld & Widows, 2005)—make not effort whatsoever to evaluate PIM.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Blair, J., Mitchell, D., & Blair, K. (2005). The psychopath: Emotion and the brain. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. Blair, J., Mitchell, D., & Blair, K. (2005). The psychopath: Emotion and the brain. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
go back to reference Blasingame, G. D. (1998). Suggested clinical uses of polygraphy in community-based sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 37–45. doi:10.1177/107906329801000105. Blasingame, G. D. (1998). Suggested clinical uses of polygraphy in community-based sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 37–45. doi:10.​1177/​1079063298010001​05.
go back to reference Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity. Louis: St Mosby. Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity. Louis: St Mosby.
go back to reference Hare, R. D. (1991). The hare psychopathy checklist—revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems. Hare, R. D. (1991). The hare psychopathy checklist—revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
go back to reference Hare, R. D. (2003). The hare psychopathy checklist—revised (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems. Hare, R. D. (2003). The hare psychopathy checklist—revised (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
go back to reference Hemmerdinger, J. M., Stoddart, S. D., & Lilford, R. J. (2007). A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Medical Education, 7(24), 1–8. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-7-24. Hemmerdinger, J. M., Stoddart, S. D., & Lilford, R. J. (2007). A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Medical Education, 7(24), 1–8. doi:10.​1186/​1472-6920-7-24.
go back to reference Jensen, S. H., & Jewell, C. A. (1988). The sex offender experts. Prosecutor. Fall: 13–20. Jensen, S. H., & Jewell, C. A. (1988). The sex offender experts. Prosecutor. Fall: 13–20.
go back to reference Lanyon, R. I., & Carle, A. C. (2007). Internal and external validity of scores on the balanced inventory of desirable responding and the paulhus deception scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 859–876. doi:10.1177/0013164406299104.CrossRef Lanyon, R. I., & Carle, A. C. (2007). Internal and external validity of scores on the balanced inventory of desirable responding and the paulhus deception scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 859–876. doi:10.​1177/​0013164406299104​.CrossRef
go back to reference Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychopathic personality inventory—revised: professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources. Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychopathic personality inventory—revised: professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.
go back to reference Lykken, D. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Lykken, D. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
go back to reference Lyon, D. R., Hart, S. D., & Webster, C. D. (2001). Violence and risk assessment. In R. A. Schuller & J. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Introduction to psychology and law: Canadian perspectives (pp. 314–350). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Lyon, D. R., Hart, S. D., & Webster, C. D. (2001). Violence and risk assessment. In R. A. Schuller & J. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Introduction to psychology and law: Canadian perspectives (pp. 314–350). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
go back to reference Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., & Serran, G. A. (2009). Empathy and offending behavior. In M. McMurran & R. Howard (Eds.), Personality, personality disorder and violence: An evidence based approach (pp. 229–244). Blackwell: Wiley. Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., & Serran, G. A. (2009). Empathy and offending behavior. In M. McMurran & R. Howard (Eds.), Personality, personality disorder and violence: An evidence based approach (pp. 229–244). Blackwell: Wiley.
go back to reference Mullins-Nelson, J. L., Salekin, R. T., & Leistico, A. R. (2006). Psychopathy, empathy, and perspective-taking ability in a community sample: implications for the successful psychopathy concept. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5(2), 133–149. doi:10.1080/14999013.2006.10471238.CrossRef Mullins-Nelson, J. L., Salekin, R. T., & Leistico, A. R. (2006). Psychopathy, empathy, and perspective-taking ability in a community sample: implications for the successful psychopathy concept. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5(2), 133–149. doi:10.​1080/​14999013.​2006.​10471238.CrossRef
go back to reference Paulhus, D. (1998). Paulhus deception scales (PDS): The balanced inventory of desirable responding—7: User’s manual. North Tanawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems. Paulhus, D. (1998). Paulhus deception scales (PDS): The balanced inventory of desirable responding—7: User’s manual. North Tanawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
go back to reference Rogers, R. (Ed.). (2008). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford. Rogers, R. (Ed.). (2008). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Viaglione, G. D. & Barnett, M. A. (1999, June). Measuring a new dimension of empathy: The empathic anger scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Denver, CO. Viaglione, G. D. & Barnett, M. A. (1999, June). Measuring a new dimension of empathy: The empathic anger scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Denver, CO.
Metagegevens
Titel
Empathy Faking in Psychopathic Offenders: The Vulnerability of Empathy Measures
Auteurs
Emily V. Robinson
Richard Rogers
Publicatiedatum
15-02-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9479-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2015

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 4/2015 Naar de uitgave