Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 7/2007

01-09-2007 | Brief Communication

Emergency physicians’ pain judgments: cluster analyses on scenarios of acute abdominal pain

Auteurs: Laetitia Marquié, Paul C. Sorum, Etienne Mullet

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Physicians have been found to give lower ratings of patients’ pain than do the patients themselves. We hypothesized that the physicians’ rating depends not only on the patient’s pain rating but also on other cues. We also hypothesized that these cues influence physicians’ pain treatment and urgency level. We gave to 52 emergency room physicians in Toulouse, France, 45 scenarios describing patients with acute abdominal pain, representing all combinations of 5 levels of patient’s pain rating, 3 levels of behavioral manifestations of pain, and three signs of the severity of the abdominal pathology (namely, the likelihood of appendicitis). The participants rated the patient’s pain, selected the intensity of pain treatment, and judged the degree of urgency of calling in a surgeon. In rating pain, physicians took into account the patient’s rating, behavioral manifestations of pain, and the signs of abdominal pathology. Clusters analyses showed two sets of individual differences. When rating pain and choosing pain treatment, physicians gave either a low or high weight to behavioral pain cues. In urgency judgments, physicians could be separated into those who gave considerable weight to the different levels of severity and those who did not.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver S. (1986). The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of methods. Pain, 27, 17–26.CrossRef Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver S. (1986). The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of methods. Pain, 27, 17–26.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Price, D. D., McGrath, P. A., Rafii, A., & Buckingham, B. (1983). The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain, 17, 45–56.PubMedCrossRef Price, D. D., McGrath, P. A., Rafii, A., & Buckingham, B. (1983). The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain, 17, 45–56.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kaasalainen, S., Middleton, J., Knezacek, S., Hartley, T., Stewart, N., Ife C., & Robinson, L. (1998). Pain and cognitive status in the institutionalized elderly. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 24, 24–31.PubMed Kaasalainen, S., Middleton, J., Knezacek, S., Hartley, T., Stewart, N., Ife C., & Robinson, L. (1998). Pain and cognitive status in the institutionalized elderly. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 24, 24–31.PubMed
4.
go back to reference McCaffery, M., & Gerrell, B. R. (1997). Nurses’ knowledge of pain assessment and management: How much progress have we made? Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 14, 175–188.PubMedCrossRef McCaffery, M., & Gerrell, B. R. (1997). Nurses’ knowledge of pain assessment and management: How much progress have we made? Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 14, 175–188.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tait, R. C., & Chibnall, J. T. (2002). Pain in older subacute care patients: associations with clinical status and treatment. Pain Medicine, 3, 231–239.PubMedCrossRef Tait, R. C., & Chibnall, J. T. (2002). Pain in older subacute care patients: associations with clinical status and treatment. Pain Medicine, 3, 231–239.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Herr, K., Titler, M. G., Schilling, M. L., Marsh, J. L, Xie, X., Ardery, G., Clarke, W. R., & Everett, L. Q. (2004). Evidence-based assessment of acute pain in older adults: current nursing practices and perceived barriers. Clinical Journal of Pain, 20, 331–340.PubMedCrossRef Herr, K., Titler, M. G., Schilling, M. L., Marsh, J. L, Xie, X., Ardery, G., Clarke, W. R., & Everett, L. Q. (2004). Evidence-based assessment of acute pain in older adults: current nursing practices and perceived barriers. Clinical Journal of Pain, 20, 331–340.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Visentin, M., Zanolin, E., Trentin, L., Sartori, S., & De Marco, R. (2005). Prevalence and treatment of pain in adults admitted to Italian hospitals. European Journal of Pain, 9, 61–67.PubMedCrossRef Visentin, M., Zanolin, E., Trentin, L., Sartori, S., & De Marco, R. (2005). Prevalence and treatment of pain in adults admitted to Italian hospitals. European Journal of Pain, 9, 61–67.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Blettery, B., Ebrahm, L., Honnart, D., & Aube, H. (1996). Les échelles de mesure de la douleur dans un service d’accueil des urgences. Reanimation Urgences, 5, 691–697.CrossRef Blettery, B., Ebrahm, L., Honnart, D., & Aube, H. (1996). Les échelles de mesure de la douleur dans un service d’accueil des urgences. Reanimation Urgences, 5, 691–697.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Marquié, L., Raufaste, E., Lauque, D., Marine, C., Ecoiffier, M., & Sorum, P. C. (2003). Pain rating by patients and physicians: Evidence of systematic pain miscalibration. Pain, 102/103, 289–296.CrossRef Marquié, L., Raufaste, E., Lauque, D., Marine, C., Ecoiffier, M., & Sorum, P. C. (2003). Pain rating by patients and physicians: Evidence of systematic pain miscalibration. Pain, 102/103, 289–296.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Marquié, L., Raufaste, E., Lauque, D., Marine, C., Ecoiffier, M., & Sorum, P. C. (2004). Further results about pain rating by patients and physicians: Reply to Chibnall and Tait. Pain, 107, 194–195.CrossRef Marquié, L., Raufaste, E., Lauque, D., Marine, C., Ecoiffier, M., & Sorum, P. C. (2004). Further results about pain rating by patients and physicians: Reply to Chibnall and Tait. Pain, 107, 194–195.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bartfield, J. M., Salluzzo, R. F., Raccio-Robak, N., Funk, D. L., & Verdile, V. P. (1997). Physician and patient factors influencing the treatment of low back pain. Pain, 73, 209–211.PubMedCrossRef Bartfield, J. M., Salluzzo, R. F., Raccio-Robak, N., Funk, D. L., & Verdile, V. P. (1997). Physician and patient factors influencing the treatment of low back pain. Pain, 73, 209–211.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Thomas, S. H., Borczuk, P., Shackelford, J., Ostrander, J., Silver, D., Evans, M., & Stein, J. (1999). Patient and physician agreement on abdominal pain severity and need for opioid analgesia. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17, 586–590.PubMedCrossRef Thomas, S. H., Borczuk, P., Shackelford, J., Ostrander, J., Silver, D., Evans, M., & Stein, J. (1999). Patient and physician agreement on abdominal pain severity and need for opioid analgesia. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17, 586–590.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chibnall, J. T., Tait, R. C., & Ross, L. R. (1997). The effects of medical evidence and pain intensity on medical student judgments of chronic pain patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 257–271.PubMedCrossRef Chibnall, J. T., Tait, R. C., & Ross, L. R. (1997). The effects of medical evidence and pain intensity on medical student judgments of chronic pain patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 257–271.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In A. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under undercertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 341–366). Cambridge University Press. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In A. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under undercertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 341–366). Cambridge University Press.
15.
go back to reference Froberg, D. G., & Kane, R. L. (1989). Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—I: measurement strategies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 345–354.PubMedCrossRef Froberg, D. G., & Kane, R. L. (1989). Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—I: measurement strategies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 345–354.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Anderson, N. H. (1996). A Functional Theory of Cognition. Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates. Anderson, N. H. (1996). A Functional Theory of Cognition. Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
go back to reference Sorum, P. C., Stewart, T. R., Mullet, E., González-Vallejo, C., Shim, J., Chasseigne, G., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., & Grenier, B. (2002). Does choosing a treatment depend on making a diagnosis? U.S. and French physicians’ decision making about acute otitis media. Medical Decision Making, 22, 394–402.PubMedCrossRef Sorum, P. C., Stewart, T. R., Mullet, E., González-Vallejo, C., Shim, J., Chasseigne, G., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., & Grenier, B. (2002). Does choosing a treatment depend on making a diagnosis? U.S. and French physicians’ decision making about acute otitis media. Medical Decision Making, 22, 394–402.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Anderson, N. H. (Ed.) (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press. Anderson, N. H. (Ed.) (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
19.
go back to reference Anderson, N. H. (Ed.) (2001). Empirical directions in design and analyses. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Anderson, N. H. (Ed.) (2001). Empirical directions in design and analyses. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
go back to reference Jones, T. V., Gerrity, M. S., & Earp, J. (1990). Written case simulations: do they predict physicians’ behavior? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 805–815.PubMedCrossRef Jones, T. V., Gerrity, M. S., & Earp, J. (1990). Written case simulations: do they predict physicians’ behavior? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 805–815.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Peabody, J. W., Luck, J., Glassman, P., Dresselhaus, T. R., & Lee, M. (2000). Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1715–1722.CrossRef Peabody, J. W., Luck, J., Glassman, P., Dresselhaus, T. R., & Lee, M. (2000). Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1715–1722.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Emergency physicians’ pain judgments: cluster analyses on scenarios of acute abdominal pain
Auteurs
Laetitia Marquié
Paul C. Sorum
Etienne Mullet
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9228-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2007

Quality of Life Research 7/2007 Naar de uitgave