Top

Gepubliceerd in:

07-03-2022 | Original Article

Embodiment and repeated exposure do not suffice for abstract concepts acquisition: evidence from tonal music cognition

Auteurs: Gabriel F. López, J. Fernando Anta

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2023

Abstract

Research on abstract concepts (AC) suggests that while some AC are enacted indirectly and occasionally, others are largely grounded in our sensory–motor and affective experience, and the opportunities to enact them are countless, which would allow us to acquire them without supervision. From this, the following question arises: do embodiment and repeated exposure suffice to dispense with supervision in abstract concepts acquisition (ACA)? In the present study, this question was addressed in the context of tonal music cognition, which demands a high level of abstraction, and via musical materials that participants had frequently heard and sung. Specifically, highly trained, moderately trained, and untrained participants (24 each) were given 12 well-known melodic fragments ending on tones instantiating 6 different scale degrees (2 times each) and asked to group (round 1) or pair (round 2) those fragments whose last tone conveyed the same (or a similar enough) level of stability or rest. If embodiment and repeated exposure suffice for ACA, then one would expect a scale degree-based grouping strategy regardless of participants’ training level. Results showed that only highly trained participants systematically grouped stimuli ending on the same scale degree, particularly in round 2; moderately trained participants’ performance was mixed, and tonality’s influence on untrained participants was negligible. Further, moderately trained and untrained participants performed inconsistently, discarding in round 2 almost all of the pairs formed in round 1. These findings are integrated with previous findings on the effect of language, affect, and category type on conceptualization to account for why and when ACA requires supervision.

vorige artikel The contribution of temporal analysis of pupillometry measurements to cognitive research

volgende artikel Happiness feels light and sadness feels heavy: introducing valence-related bodily sensation maps of emotions

A complete description of the Western tonal system is beyond the scope of this article. However, it is worth mentioning that it is based on the idea that pitches or ‘tones’ (e.g., those produced by each key on a piano, and referred to with letters and numbers; e.g., C4) are grouped into a set of 12 pitch classes (C, C♯/Db, D, D♯/Eb, E, F, F♯/Gb, G, G♯/Ab, A, A♯/Bb, and B), which in turn are organized around subsets of 7 pitch classes, called ‘diatonic scales’ (e.g., the C major scale, C, D, E, F, G, A, and B), in which one pitch class, called the ‘tonic’ or ‘1st scale degree’, is taken as reference (e.g., the class C, in the C major scale). In a given piece of music, any subset of tones may be used, but references must be made to a scale, and most importantly to its tonic.

In single sessions (lasting, on average, 90 min), all of the participants worked (in a balanced design) not only with the 12 known fragments described above, but also with 12 novel, ad-hoc created melodies. Novel melodies (composed in accordance with basic principles of melodic structuring, e.g., to keep tones proximate in pitch) were used as control stimuli; they were more homogeneous than know fragments: besides instantiating only major keys, ending only on steps, etc., they had the same scale degree distribution (up to the occurrence of the last/target tone); the same steady rhythm (in which each tone lasted 0.67 s); virtually the same (10 or 11 semitones) range; and always ended on a tone (in a register from D3 to Eb4) closer (in pitch) to the center of their range than to the extremes. The results found with novel stimuli, however, largely mirrored those found with known stimuli. Hence, and given that we were interested in examining the scope of embodiment and exposure in tonal CA, only those aspects of the study related to know stimuli are report here.

With 11 min for working, participants had time enough as to hear each stimulus at least 4 times; we assumed that this would represent a balance between the opportunities needed to grasp their tonal experience at the end of the fragments and the amount of work they were required to do. (Recall—see footnote 2—that all of the participants worked not only with known but also with novel stimuli—that could also be heard at least 4 times each per round). In addition, a timer showing a countdown—in minutes and seconds—was always provided within each round, to help the participants to organize their work. It is worth mentioning that all of the participants finished the tasks within the allocated time, and that none of them reported having had any trouble for completing the study.

Aldwell, E., Schachter, C., & Cadwallader, A. (2017). Harmony & Voice Leading (5th ed.). Cengage.

Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2016). Origins of the brain networks for advanced mathematics in expert mathematicians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 4909–4917. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603205113CrossRef

Andrianopoulou, M. (2020). Aural education: Reconceptualizing ear training in higher music learning. Routledge.

Anta, J. F. (2013). Exploring the influence of pitch proximity on listener’s melodic expectations. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 23(3), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034762

Anta, J. F. (2017). Pitch dispersal and the perception of tonal strength in Schoenberg’s oeuvre. Music Perception, 34(5), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2017.34.5.541CrossRef

Antović, M. (2018). Schemas, grounds, meaning: On the emergence of musical concepts through conceptual blending. Musicae Scientiae, 22(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864917711218CrossRef

Arthur, C. (2018). A perceptual study of scale-degree qualia in context. Music Perception, 35(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2018.35.3.295CrossRef

Ashby, F. G., & O’Brien, J. R. B. (2007). The effects of positive versus negative feedback on information-integration category learning. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 865–878. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193923CrossRef

Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2011). Human category learning 2.0. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05874.x

Barrett, K. C., Ashley, R., Strait, D. L., & Kraus, N. (2013). Art and science: How musical training shapes the brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 713. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00713

Barrett, L. F. (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2CrossRef

Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196968CrossRef

Barsalou, L. W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 1–64). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60120-6

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149CrossRef

Barsalou, L. W., Dutriaux, L., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170144. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0144CrossRef

Barton, M. E., & Komatsu, L. K. (1989). Defining features of natural kinds and artifacts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(5), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067309CrossRef

Besson, M., & Faïta, F. (1995). An event-related potential (ERP) study of musical expectancy: Comparison of musicians with nonmusicians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1278–1296. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1278CrossRef

Bharucha, J. J. (1984). Event hierarchies, tonal hierarchies, and assimilation: A Reply to Deutsch and Dowling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(3), 421–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.3.421CrossRef

Bharucha, J. J. (1987). Music cognition and perceptual facilitation: A connectionist framework. Music Perception, 5(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285384CrossRef

Bigand, E. (1997). Perceiving musical stability: The effect of tonal structure, rhythm, and musical expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 808–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.808CrossRef

Bigand, E., & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2006). Are we ‘“experienced listeners”’? A review of the musical capacities that do not depend on formal musical training. Cognition, 100(1), 100–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.007CrossRef

Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00699-0CrossRef

Borghi, A. M., & Zarcone, E. (2016). Grounding abstractness: Abstract concepts and the activation of the mouth. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01498CrossRef

Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000089CrossRef

Borghi, A. M., Fini, C., & Tummolini, L. (2021). Abstract concepts and metacognition: Searching for meaning in self and others. In M. D. Robinson & L. E. Roberts (Eds.), Embodied Psychology: Thinking, Feeling, and Acting (pp. 197–220). Springer.CrossRef

Brower, C. (2000). A cognitive theory of musical meaning. Journal of Music Theory, 44(2), 323–379. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090681CrossRef

Carey, S. (2011). Précis of The Origin of Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(3), 113–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000919

Carey, S. (2015). Why theories of concepts should not ignore the problem of acquisition. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), The conceptual mind: New directions in the study of concepts (pp. 415–454). MIT Press.

Casasanto, D., & Lupyan, G. (2015). All concepts are ad hoc concepts. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), The conceptual mind: New directions in the study of concepts (pp. 543–566). MIT Press.

Chew, E. (2014). Mathematical and computational modeling of tonality. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9475-1CrossRef

Chrysikou, E. G. (2006). When shoes become hammers: Goal-derived categorization training enhances problem-solving performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 935–942. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.935CrossRef

DeBellis, M. (1995). Music and conceptualization. Cambridge University Press

DeBellis, M. (2005). Conceptual and nonconceptual modes of music perception. Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics, 2(2), 45–61.

Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Vigliocco, G., & Cappa, S. F. (2010). Beyond the abstract–concrete dichotomy: Mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1042–1048. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1042CrossRef

DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489433CrossRef

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750CrossRef

Dove, G. (2018). Language as a disruptive technology: Abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170135. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0135CrossRef

Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013494.ch3

Estes, Z. (2003). Domain differences in the structure of artifactual and natural categories. Memory & Cognition, 31(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194379CrossRef

Evans, V. (2015). What’s in a concept? Analog versus parametric concepts in LCCM theory. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), The conceptual mind: New directions in the study of concepts (pp. 251–290). MIT Press.

Fini, C., Era, V., Da Rold, F., Candidi, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Abstract concepts in interaction: The need of others when guessing abstract concepts smooths dyadic motor interactions. R. Soc. Open Sci., 8, 201205. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201205CrossRef

Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2018). Number concepts: Abstract and embodied. Philosophical Transactional of the Royal Society B, 373, 20170125. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0125CrossRef

Fitch, W. T. (2013). Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: Distinguishing meter and pulse perception. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 68. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00068CrossRef

Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Clarendon Press.

Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108(3), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.007CrossRef

Ghio, M., Vaghi, M. M. S., & Tettamanti, M. (2013). Fine-grained semantic categorization across the abstract and concrete domains. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e67090. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067090CrossRef

Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Isolated and interrelated concepts. Memory & Cognition, 24(5), 608–628. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201087CrossRef

Goldstone, R. L., Kersten, A., & Carvalho, P. F. (2012). Concepts and categorization. In Weiner, I. B, Healey, A. J., & Proctor, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology (2^nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 607–630). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Granito, C., Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2015). Naming a Lego world. The role of language in the acquisition of abstract concepts. PLoS ONE, 10(1), e0114615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114615

Guan, C. Q., Meng, W., Yao, R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2013). The Motor System Contributes to Comprehension of Abstract Language. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e75183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075183CrossRef

Hayes, J. C., & Kraemer, D. J. M. (2017). Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0046-zCrossRef

Huron, D. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6575.001.0001CrossRef

Hyer, B. (2002). Tonality. In T. Christensen (Ed.), The Cambridge history of Western music theory (pp.726–752). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521623711.025

Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(25), 10382–10385. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812142106CrossRef

Johnson, M. L., & Larson, S. (2003). “Something in the way she moves”–Metaphors of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1802_1CrossRef

Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2008). The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science, 320(5875), 454–455. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154659CrossRef

Karpinski, G. S. (2000). Aural skills acquisition: The development of listening, reading, and performing skills in college-level musicians. Oxford University Press.

Kloos, H., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2008). What’s behind different kinds of kinds: Effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.52CrossRef

Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021446CrossRef

Kousta, S., Della Rosa, P. A., Cappa, S. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2007). The effect of mode of acquisition on lexical representation and processing. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Turku, Finland.

Kövecses, Z. (2003). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge University Press.

Kristop, C. A., Moreno, S. J., & Anta, J. F. (2020). What do listeners understand by ‘continuity’ and ‘closure’? Tracking down the links between tonal expectancy, music training, and conceptualization. Psychology of Music, 48(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735618803000CrossRef

Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.

Langland-Hassan, P., Faries, F. R., Gatyas, M., Dietz, A., & Richardson, M. J. (2021). Assessing abstract thought and its relation to language with a new nonverbal paradigm: Evidence from aphasia. Cognition, 211, 104622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104622CrossRef

Leman, M. (2008). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7476.001.0001CrossRef

Leman, M. (2010). An embodied approach to music semantics. Musicæ Scientiæ, 14(1_suppl), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649100140S104

Lerdahl, F. (2001). Tonal pitch space. Oxford University Press.

Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. MIT Press.

Lerdahl, F., & Krumhansl, C. L. (2007). Modeling tonal tension. Music Perception, 24(4), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2007.24.4.329CrossRef

Lytle, S. R., & Kuhl, P. K. (2018). Social interaction and language acquisition: Toward a neurobiological view. In E. M. Fernández & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 615–634). Wiley-Blackwell.

Maes, P., Leman, M., Palmer, C., & Wanderley, M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01008CrossRef

Malt, B. C., & Johnson, E. C. (1992). Do artifact concepts have cores? Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90011-LCrossRef

Mareschal, D. (2003). The acquisition and use of implicit categories in early development. In D. H. Rakison & L. M. Oakes (Eds.), Early category and concept development: Making sense of the blooming, buzzing confusion (pp. 360–383). Oxford University Press.

Mazzuca, C., Majid, A., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. (2020). Gender is a multifaceted concept: Evidence that specific life experiences differentially shape the concept of gender. Language and Cognition, 12(4), 649–678. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2020.15CrossRef

McCaffrey, T. (2012). Innovation relies on the obscure: A key to overcoming the classic problem of functional fixedness. Psychological Science, 23(3), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429580CrossRef

McDevitt, T. M., & Ormrod, J. E. (2020). Child development and education (7th Edition). Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Nuerk, H.-C., Moeller, K., Klein, E., Willmes, K., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Extending the mental number line: A review of multi-digit number processing. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie: Journal of Psychology, 219(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000041CrossRef

Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Acquisition of abstract concepts is influenced by emotional valence. Developmental Science, 21(2), e12549. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12549CrossRef

Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2020). The role of emotional valence in learning novel abstract concepts. Developmental Psychology, 56(10), 1855–1865. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001091CrossRef

Rentfrow, P. J. (2012). The role of music in everyday life: Current directions in the social psychology of music. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(5), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00434.xCrossRef

Rohrmeier, M., & Rebuschat, P. (2012). Implicit learning and acquisition of music. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 525–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01223.xCrossRef

Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018405058216CrossRef

Schwartz, D. L., & Goldstone, R. (2016). Learning as coordination: Cognitive psychology and education. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 61–75). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Sloman, S. A., & Malt, B. C. (2003). Artifacts are not ascribed essences, nor are they treated as belonging to kinds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(5/6), 563–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000035CrossRef

Sloutsky, V. M. (2010). From perceptual categories to concepts: What develops? Cognitive Science, 34(7), 1244–1286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01129.xCrossRef

Sloutsky, V. M., & Deng, W. S., (2019). Categories, concepts, and conceptual development. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1284–1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1391398CrossRef

Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Harvard University Press.CrossRef

Strauss, G. P., & Allen, D. N. (2008). Emotional intensity and categorisation ratings for emotional and nonemotional words. Cognition and Emotion, 22(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701319154CrossRef

Temperley, D. (2007). Music and probability. MIT Press.

Temperley, D., & Marvin, E. W. (2008). Pitch-class distribution and the identification of key. Music Perception, 25(3), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2008.25.3.193CrossRef

Tillmann, B., Bharucha, J. J., & Bigand, E. (2000). Implicit learning of tonality: A self-organizing approach. Psychological Review, 107(4), 885–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.4.885CrossRef

Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S. T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2013). The neural representation of abstract words: The role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 24(7), 1767–1777. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht025CrossRef

Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Sensorimotor and interoceptive dimensions in concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 116(104173), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104173CrossRef

Wang, L., Uhrig, L., Jarraya, B., & Dehaene, S. (2015). Representation of numerical and sequential patterns in macaque and human brains. Current Biology, 25(15), 1966–1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.035CrossRef

Wauters, L. N., Tellings, A. E., Van Bon, W. H., & Van Haaften, A. W. (2003). Mode of acquisition of word meanings: The viability of a theoretical construct. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000201CrossRef

Weinberg, S. (2003). The Discovery of Subatomic Particles. Cambridge University Press.

Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Xu, X. (2005). Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Science, 29(5), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_33CrossRef

Wierzbicka, A. (2009). Language and metalanguage: Key issues in emotion research. Emotion Review, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097175CrossRef

Yee, E. (2019). Abstraction and concepts: When, how, where, what and why? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1660797CrossRef

Yee, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016). Putting concepts into context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0948-7CrossRef

Zbikowski, L. M. (2002). Conceptualizing music: Cognitive structure, theory, and analysis. Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Titel: Embodiment and repeated exposure do not suffice for abstract concepts acquisition: evidence from tonal music cognition
Auteurs: Gabriel F. López
J. Fernando Anta
Publicatiedatum: 07-03-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01662-2

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2023

The molecular genetic basis of creativity: a mini review and perspectives

The experiential basis of compatibility effects in reading-by-rotating paradigms

Effects of working memory training on cognitive and academic abilities in typically developing school-age children

Length is not all that matters: testing the role of number identity and the ratio of fillers in comparisons of multi-digits with different digit length

Dopamine supports idea originality: the role of spontaneous eye blink rate on divergent thinking

Response-code conflict in dual-task interference and its modulation by age