Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Event-related potentials were measured to investigate the role of visual spatial attention mechanisms in conflict processing. We suggested that a more difficult target selection leads to stronger attentional top-down control, thereby reducing the effects of arising conflicts. This hypothesis was tested by varying the selection difficulty in a location negative priming (NP) paradigm. The difficult task resulted in prolonged responses as compared to the easy task. A behavioral NP effect was only evident in the easy task. Psychophysiologically the easy task was associated with reduced parietal N1, enhanced frontocentral N2 and N2pc components and a prolonged P3 latency for the conflict as compared to the control condition. The N2pc effect was also obvious in the difficult task. Additionally frontocentral N2 amplitudes increased and latencies of N2pc and P3 were delayed compared to the easy task. The differences at frontocentral and parietal electrodes are consistent with previous studies ascribing activity in the prefrontal and parietal cortex as the source of top-down attentional control. Thus, we propose that stronger cognitive control is involved in the difficult task, resulting in a reduced behavioral NP conflict.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 11, 179–181. CrossRef
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon. CrossRef
Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., Chasteen, A. L., & Scialfa, C. T. (2005). Examining task difficulty and the time course of inhibition of return: detecting perceptually degraded targets. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 90–98. PubMed
Christie, J., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Negative priming for spatial location? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 24–38. PubMed
Frings, C., & Wühr, P. (2007). Prime-display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks. Memory & Cognition, 35, 504–513.
Gibbons, H. (2006). An event-related potential investigation of varieties of negative priming. Journal of Psychophysiology, 20, 170–185. CrossRef
Gibbons, H., Rammsayer, T. H., & Stahl, J. (2006). Multiple sources of positive- and negative-priming effects: An event-related potential study. Memory & Cognition, 34, 172–186.
Hillyard, S. A., & Munte, T. F. (1984). Selective attention to color and location: an analysis with event-related brain potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 185–198.
Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego: Academic Press.
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W, 3rd, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 13, 1023–1026. CrossRef
Mayr, S., Niedeggen, M., Buchner, A., & Pietrowsky, R. (2003). ERP correlates of auditory negative priming. Cognition, 90, 11–21. CrossRef
Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupiáñez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1280–1296.
Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 565–576. CrossRef
Paus, T., Koski, L., Caramanos, Z., & Westbury, C. (1998). Regional differences in the effects of task difficulty and motor output on blood flow response in the human anterior cingulate cortex: a review of 107 PET activation studies. Neuroreport, 9, 37–47. CrossRef
Posner, M.I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting, In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X, London: Erlbaum, 25, 229–242.
Posner, M. I., & DiGirolamo, G. J. (1998). Executive attention: Conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The Attentive Brain: MIT Press.
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (1998). Attention, self regulation and consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 353, 1915–1927. CrossRef
Ruge, H., & Naumann, E. (2006). Brain-Electrical Correlates of Negative Location Priming Under Sustained and Transient Attentional Context Conditions. Journal of Psychophysiology, 20, 160–169. CrossRef
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A, 37, 571–590.
Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflic-ting views. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A, 54, 321–343. CrossRef
Weissman, D. H., Warner, L. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2004). The neural mechanisms for minimizing cross-modal distraction. Journal of Neuroscience, 1, 10941–10949. CrossRef
Wright, C. I., Keuthen, N. J., Savage, C. R., Martis, B., Williams, D., Wedig, M., et al. (2006). Brain correlates of negative and positive visuospatial priming in adults. NeuroImage, 15, 983–991. CrossRef
- Electrophysiological evidence for cognitive control during conflict processing in visual spatial attention
Stefan P. Koch
Stephan A. Brandt